Enhancement of the enzymatic hydrolysis of fines from recycled paper mill waste rejects

Abstract

Background

A significant fraction of short fibers commonly called “reject fines” is produced while recycling wastepaper at paper mills producing linerboard. These fines are usually rejected into the solid waste stream that further requires land filling and poses environmental problems. The major component of these rejects is cellulose that can be a potential source of fermentable sugars for biofuels, bioplastics or other products. Therefore, a feasible process for converting these reject fines into sugars can profit the paper mills by producing value for their waste products while simultaneously mitigating their adverse environmental impact by avoided solid waste. Additionally, the sugar feedstocks can be used to reduce fossil carbon contributing to the sustainability of the industry.

Results

Enzymatic conversion of rejects fines from paper mills was achieved using commercial cellulases from Trichoderma reesei. The presence of mineral particles along with the cellulosic fines was found to have potent inhibitory effects on enzyme hydrolysis. The mineral particles are kaolin and calcium carbonate and originate from the fillers used in the wastepaper. The adsorption of the cellulase onto these mineral components was measured and quantified by the slope of the adsorption isotherm. The application of a nonionic surfactant Tween-80, decreased the adsorption of cellulase and this improved the hydrolysis yield of sugars.

Conclusions

Enzymatic hydrolysis of rejects from recycled paper mills is feasible and provides a source of sugars for biofuels and bioplastics. However, the presence of mineral particles can be detrimental to this bioconversion. Calcium carbonate which occurs as a filler in waste paper shows high adsorption affinity to the cellulase enzymes and thus reduces the available enzyme for cellulolysis. This can be remedied by the application of surfactants which preferentially occlude to the mineral surfaces and thus increase enzyme availability in solution. The non-ionic surfactant, Tween-80, shows the best hydrolysis enhancement at a dosage of 3 % based on the dry weight of the biomass.

Keywords

Enzymatic hydrolysis / Calcium carbonate / Recycled paper / Surfactants / Rejects / Fillers / Cellulase adsorption

References

Alves EF, Bose SK, Francis RC, Colodette JL, Iakovlev M, Van Heiningen A. Carbohydrate composition of eucalyptus, bagasse and bamboo by a combination of methods. Carbohydr Polym, 2010, 82(4): 1097-1101.

Arora R, Behera S, Sharma NK, Kumar S. Bioprospecting thermostable cellulosomes for efficient biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2015, 2(1): 1-12.

Bhuwal AK, Singh G, Aggarwal NK, Goyal V, Yadav A. Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate production and management of cardboard industry effluent by new Bacillus sp. NA10. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2014, 1(1): 1-11.

Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72(1): 248-254.

Cao B, Tschirner U, Ramaswamy S. A study of changes in wet-fiber flexibility and surface condition of recycled fibers. Pap Puu, 1999, 81(2): 117-122.

Chen H, Venditti RA, Jameel H, Park S. Enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered office printing paper with low enzyme dosages to produce fermentable sugars. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2012, 166(5): 1121-1136.

Galbe M, Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2002, 59(6): 618-628.

Graf A, Koehler T (2000) Oregon cellulose-ethanol study. An evaluation of the potential for eth-anol production in Oregon using cellulose-based feedstocks report prepared by the Oregon of-fce of Energy Portland, Oregon, USA

He J, Lange CR, Dougherty M. Laboratory study using paper mill lime mud for agronomic benefit. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2009, 87(6): 401-405.

Kádár Z, Szengyel Z, Réczey K. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of industrial wastes for the production of ethanol. Ind Crops Prod, 2004, 20(1): 103-110.

Kale G, Kijchavengkul T, Auras R, Rubino M, Selke SE, Singh SP. Compostability of bioplastic packaging materials: an overview. Macromol Biosci, 2007, 7(3): 255-277.

Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW. The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2012, 109(4): 1083-1087.

Lark N, Xia Y, Qin C-G, Gong C, Tsao G. Production of ethanol from recycled paper sludge using cellulase and yeast, Kluveromyces marxianus. Biomass Bioenergy, 1997, 12(2): 135-143.

Laurijssen J, Marsidi M, Westenbroek A, Worrell E, Faaij A. Paper and biomass for energy?: The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO₂ emissions. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2010, 54(12): 1208-1218.

Lavrykov SA, Ramarao B. Thermal properties of copy paper sheets. Drying Technol, 2012, 30(3): 297-311.

Likon M, Saarela J (2012) The conversion of paper mill sludge into absorbent for oil spill sanitation—The life cycle assessment. In: Macromolecular Symposia. Wiley Online Library, pp 50–56

Monte M, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag, 2009, 29(1): 293-308.

Roche CM, Dibble CJ, Knutsen JS, Stickel JJ, Liberatore MW. Particle concentration and yield stress of biomass slurries during enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2009, 104(2): 290-300.

Scott GM, Smith A (1995) Sludge characteristics and disposal alternatives for the pulp and paper industry. In: TAPPI International Environmental Conference. TAPPI Press, pp 269–269

Singh S, Mohanty AK, Sugie T, Takai Y, Hamada H. Renewable resource based biocomposites from natural fiber and polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV) bioplastic. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 2008, 39(5): 875-886.

Singh R, Lavrykov S, Ramarao BV. Permeability of pulp fiber mats with filler particles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, 2009, 333(1): 96-107.

Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol, 2002, 83(1): 1-11.

Villanueva A, Wenzel H. Paper waste–recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments. Waste Manag, 2007, 27(8): S29-S46.

Wang L, Sharifzadeh M, Templer R, Murphy RJ. Bioethanol production from various waste papers: economic feasibility and sensitivity analysis. Appl Energy, 2012, 111: 1172-1182.

Yasarla LR, Ramarao BV. Dynamics of flocculation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates by polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2012, 51(19): 6847-6861.

Zhang Y-HP. Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 2008, 35(5): 367-375.

Funding

New Yok State Energy Research and Development Authority(25922)