Use of combined UV and chemical mutagenesis treatment of Aspergillus terreus D34 for hyper-production of cellulose-degrading enzymes and enzymatic hydrolysis of mild-alkali pretreated rice straw

Abstract

Background

Microbial production of cellulose-degrading enzymes could be significantly improved using traditional mutagenesis treatment. Development of high-titre cellulase producing mutants drastically reduces the costs involved in cellulase production and downstream processing in commercial-scale enzyme production. Here, we have evaluated the efficacy of different Aspergillus terreus D34 mutants for hyper-production of improved cellulase enzymes utilizing locally available lignocellulosic biomass residues as growth substrates in solid state fermentation conditions. Further, enzymatic hydrolysis of mild-alkali pre-treated rice straw was performed using the improved cellulases.

Results

A 4.9-fold higher β-glucosidase activity was obtained from ethyl methyl sulphonate (EMS) treated mutant strain (EMS2) when grown on mixed rice straw/sugarcane bagasse (RSBG) biomass growth substrate. Similarly with the EMS2 mutant and BG-grown culture extract a 1.1-fold higher xylanase activity was observed. Irrespective of the growth substrates and the mutant strains, the maximum cellulase (FPase, carboxymethyl cellulase, avicelase, β-glucosidase) and xylanase activities (U mL⁻¹) were 2.34, 39.8, 2.46, 19.9 and 655, respectively. Further, external supplementation of 20% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 3% tween 80 and 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 to the crude enzyme extract increased the FPase activity nearly 4.0-, 2.8- and 2.2-fold. Addition of 0.05% sodium benzoate marginally increased the stability of cellulase enzyme and retained more than 60% of the initial activity after 96 h incubation at 37°C. While at 4°C, no loss in enzyme activity was observed even after prolonged incubation period (up to 90 days). Further, maximum reducing sugars of 0.842 g g⁻¹ at a rate of 0.25 mM g⁻¹ h⁻¹ at 10% biomass loading of mild-alkali pretreated rice straw was produced using the BG-grown culture extract of EMS2 mutant strain.

Conclusion

The extracellular protein production and corresponding cellulase activities of A. terreus D34 were significantly enhanced after combined UV and chemical mutagenesis treatments. In the present study, besides accelerating the rate of cellulase production, we have also demonstrated production of high reducing sugars by enzymatic saccharification of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass using hyper-produced cellulase enzymes. Due to high enzyme activity of the cellulase enzymes produced from the mutant strains, the volume of enzyme loadings in enzymatic hydrolysis could be reduced up to 7-fold. These studies clearly show the potential of the developed hyper-cellulase producing mutants in decreasing the overall process economics of cellulosic ethanol technology.

Keywords

A. terreus / Cellulases / Mutagenesis / Lignocellulosic biomass / Enzymatic hydrolysis

References

[1] AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 1990, 15, Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.

[2] Bajaj BK, Sharma M, Rao RS. Agricultural residues for production of cellulase from Sporotrichum thermophile LAR5 and its application for saccharification of rice straw. J Mater Environ Sci, 2014, 5: 1454-1460.

[3] Bajpai P. Applications of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry. Biotechnol Prog, 1999, 15: 147-157.

[4] Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72: 248-254.

[5] Chand P, Aruna A, Maqsood AM, Rao LV. Novel mutation method for increased cellulase production. J Appl Microbiol, 2005, 98: 318-323.

[6] Dashtban M, Maki M, Leung KT, Mao C, Qin W. Cellulase activities in biomass conversion: measurement methods and comparison. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2010, 30: 302-309.

[7] Dhawan S, Lal R, Kuhad RC. Ethidium bromide stimulated hyper laccase production from bird’s nest fungus Cyathus bulleri. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2003, 36: 64-67.

[8] El-Ghonemy DHE, Ali TH, El-Bondkly AM, Moharam MES, Talkhan FN. Improvement of Aspergillus oryzae NRRL 3484 by mutagenesis and optimization of culture conditions in solid-state fermentation for the hyper-production of extracellular cellulase. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2014, 106: 853-864.

[9] Ghose T (1994) Measurement of cellulase activities. In: Commission on Biotechnology. IUPAC, New York, pp 1–12

[10] Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural handbook, no. 379. U.S. Agricultural Research Service

[11] Gusakov AV. Alternatives to Trichoderma reesei in biofuel production. Cell, 2011, 29: 419-425.

[12] Gusakov AV. Alternatives to Trichoderma reesi in biofuel production. Trends Biotechnol, 2011, 29: 419-425.

[13] Harman GE, Kubicek CP. Trichoderma and Gliocladium: enzymes, biological control and commercial applications, 1998, London: Taylor and Francis Ltd., 393.

[14] Ikehata H, Ono T. The mechanisms of UV mutagenesis. J Radiat Res, 2011, 52: 115-125.

[15] Irfan M, Javed J, Syed Q. UV mutagenesis of Aspergillus niger for enzyme production in submerged fermentation. Pak J Biochem Mol Biol, 2011, 44: 137-140.

[16] Kawamori M, Morikawa Y, Takasawa S. Induction and production of cellulases by l-sorbose in Trichoderma reesi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1986, 24: 449-453.

[17] Kim W, Gamo Y, Sani YM, Wusiman Y, Ogawa S, Karita S, . Effect of tween 80 on hydrolytic activity and substrate accessibility of carbohyrolase (CBH I) from Trichoderma viride. Asian Aust J Anim Sci, 2006, 19: 684-689.

[18] Kim IJ, Lee HJ, Choi IG, Kim KH. Synergetic proteins for the enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2014, 98: 8469-8480.

[19] Kosalkova K, Garcia-Estrada C, Barreiro C, Florez MG, Jami MS, Paniagua MA, . Casein phosphopeptides drastically increase the secretion of extacellular proteins in Aspergillus awamori. Proteomic studies reveal changes in the secretory pathway. Microb Cell Fact, 2012, 11: 5.

[20] Kubicek CP. Beta-glucosidase excretion by Trichoderma pseudokoningii: correlation with cell wall bound beta-1,3-glucanase activities. Arch Microbiol, 1982, 132: 349-354.

[21] Kumar AK, Parikh BS. Cellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus terreus D34 and enzymatic saccharification of mild-alkali and dilute-acid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass residues. Biores Bioprocess, 2015, 2: 7.

[22] Laser M, Jin H, Jayawardhana K, Dale BE, Lynd LR. Projected mature technology scenarios for conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol with co-production of thermochemical fuels, power, and/or animal feed protein. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin, 2009, 3: 231-246.

[23] Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulase utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2002, 66: 506-577.

[24] Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, . How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 26: 169-172.

[25] Narra M, Dixit G, Divecha J, Madambar D, Shah AR. Production of cellulases by solid state fermentation with Aspergillus terreus and enzymatic hydrolysis of mild alkali-treated rice straw. Biores Technol, 2012, 121: 355-361.

[26] Palaniyandi SA, Yang SH, Suh JW. Cellulase production and saccharification of rice straw by the mutant strain Hypocrea koningii RSC1. J Basic Microbiol, 2014, 54: 56-65.

[27] Pandey A, Selvakumar P, Soccol CR, Nigam P. Solid state fermentation for the production of industrial enzymes. Curr Sci, 1999, 77: 149-162.

[28] Parekh S, Vinci VA, Strobel RJ. Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2000, 54: 287-301.

[29] Reith JH, den Uil H, van Veen H, de Laat WTAM, Niessen JJ, de Jong E et al (2002) Co-production of bio-ethanol, electricity and heat from biomass residues. In: proceedings of the 12th European conference on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection, 17–21 June 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1118–1123

[30] Rocha VAL, Maeda RN, Anna LMMS, Pereira N. Sugarcane bagasse as feedstock for cellulase production by Trichoderma harzianum in optimized culture medium. Electron J Biotechnol, 2013

[31] Shafique S, Rukhsana B, Sobiya S. Strain improvement in Trichoderma viride through mutation for over-expression of cellulase and characterization of mutants using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Afr J Biotechnol, 2011, 10: 19590-19597.

[32] Uhlig H. Industrial enzymes and their applications, 1998, New York: Wiley, 435.

[33] Van Dyk JS, Pletchke BI. A review of lignocelluloses bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes-factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol Adv, 2012, 30: 1458-1480.

[34] Wang H, Mochidzuki K, Kobayashi S, Hiraide H, Wang X, Cui Z. Effect of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2013, 170: 541-551.

[35] Zong Z, Ma L, Yu L, Zhang D, Yang Z, Chen S. Characterization of the interactions between polyethylene glycol and cellulase during the hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Bioenergy Res, 2015, 8: 270-278.

Funding

ICAR/ACRIP-RES(VVN/RES/DRET-LBT/2014/4)