Analysis of alkali ultrasonication pretreatment in bioethanol production from cotton gin trash using FT-IR spectroscopy and principal component analysis

Jersson Plácido, Sergio Capareda

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 23.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing All Journals
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 23. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-014-0023-7
Research

Analysis of alkali ultrasonication pretreatment in bioethanol production from cotton gin trash using FT-IR spectroscopy and principal component analysis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Background

Cotton gin trash (CGT) is a lignocellulosic residue that can be used in the production of cellulosic ethanol. In a previous research, the sequential use of ultrasonication, liquid hot water, and ligninolytic enzymes was selected as pretreatment for the production of ethanol from CGT. However, an increment in the ethanol production is necessary. To accomplish that, this research evaluated the effect of pretreating CGT using alkaline ultrasonication before a liquid hot water and ligninolytic enzymes pretreatments for ethanol production. Three NaOH concentrations (5%, 10%, and 15%) were employed for the alkaline ultrasonication. Additionally, this work is one of the first applications of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum and principal component analysis (PCA) as fast methodology to identify the differences in the biomass after different types of pretreatments.

Results

The three concentrations employed for the alkaline ultrasonication pretreatment produced ethanol yields and cellulose conversions higher than the experiment without NaOH. Furthermore, 15% NaOH concentration achieved twofold increment yield versus the treatment without NaOH. The FT-IR spectrum confirmed modifications in the CGT structure in the different pretreatments. PCA was helpful to determine differences between the pretreated and un-pretreated biomass and to evaluate how the CGT structure changed after each treatment.

Conclusions

The combination of alkali ultrasonication hydrolysis, liquid hot water, and ligninolytic enzymes using 15% of NaOH improved 35% the ethanol yield compared with the original treatment. Additionally, we demonstrated the use of PCA to identify the modifications in the biomass structure after different types of pretreatments and conditions.

Keywords

Alkali-hydrolysis / Cotton gin trash / Ethanol production / FT-IR / Ligninolytic enzymes / Principal components analysis / Ultrasonication

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jersson Plácido, Sergio Capareda. Analysis of alkali ultrasonication pretreatment in bioethanol production from cotton gin trash using FT-IR spectroscopy and principal component analysis. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2014, 1(1): 23 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-014-0023-7

References

[1.]
Sharma-Shivappa RR, Chen Y. Conversion of cotton wastes to bioenergy and value-added products. T ASABE, 2008, 51: 2239-2246.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Rogers GM, Poore MH, Paschal JC. Feeding cotton products to cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 2002, 18: 267-294.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Jeoh T, Agblevor FA. Characterization and fermentation of steam exploded cotton gin waste. Biomass Bioenergy, 2001, 21: 109-120.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Sissine F. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: a summary of major provisions 2011, 2007
[5.]
Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew Energy, 2012, 37: 19-27.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J. A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour Technol, 2007, 98: 3000-3011.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Shen J, Agblevor FA. Optimization of enzyme loading and hydrolytic time in the hydrolysis of mixtures of cotton gin waste and recycled paper sludge for the maximum profit rate. Biochem Eng J, 2008, 41: 241-250.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Plácido J, Imam T, Capareda S. Evaluation of ligninolytic enzymes, ultrasonication and liquid hot water as pretreatments for bioethanol production from cotton gin trash. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 139: 203-208.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Chaudhary G, Singh LK, Ghosh S. Alkaline pretreatment methods followed by acid hydrolysis of Saccharum spontaneum for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 124: 111-118.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Goshadrou A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ. Bioethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse by Mucor hiemalis. Ind Crop Prod, 2011, 34: 1219-1225.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Technical report National Renewable Energy Laboratory/TP-510-42618:2011:15, 2011
[12.]
Popescu M-C, Simionescu BC. Multivariate statistical analysis of mid-infrared spectra for a G1 allyl-terminated carbosilane dendrimer. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 2012, 92: 398-405.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
Shi J, Chinn MS, Sharma-Shivappa RR. Microbial pretreatment of cotton stalks by solid state cultivation of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Bioresour Technol, 2008, 99: 6556-6564.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Jeihanipour A, Taherzadeh MJ. Ethanol production from cotton-based waste textiles. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 1007-1010.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Kaur U, Oberoi HS, Bhargav VK, Sharma-Shivappa R, Dhaliwal SS. Ethanol production from alkali- and ozone-treated cotton stalks using thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii HOP-1. Ind Crop Prod, 2012, 37: 219-226.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Chen M, Zhao J, Xia L. Comparison of four different chemical pretreatments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility. Biomass Bioenergy, 2009, 33: 1381-1385.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K. Sono-assisted enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Biochem Eng J, 2012, 63: 1-9.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Kim I, Han J-I. Optimization of alkaline pretreatment conditions for enhancing glucose yield of rice straw by response surface methodology. Biomass Bioenergy, 2012, 46: 210-217.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Agblevor F, Batz S, Trumbo J. Composition and ethanol production potential of cotton gin residues. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2003, 105: 219-230.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Duque A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Saez F, Ballesteros M. Study of process configuration and catalyst concentration in integrated alkaline extrusion of barley straw for bioethanol production. Fuel, 2014, 134: 448-454.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Monti F, Dell’Anna R, Sanson A, Fasoli M, Pezzotti M, Zenoni S. A multivariate statistical analysis approach to highlight molecular processes in plant cell walls through ATR FT-IR microspectroscopy: the role of the α-expansion PhEXPA1 in Petunia hybrida. Vib Spectrosc, 2013, 65: 36-43.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Krasznai DJ, Champagne P, Cunningham MF. Quantitative characterization of lignocellulosic biomass using surrogate mixtures and multivariate techniques. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 110: 652-661.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Ferreira D, Barros A, Coimbra MA, Delgadillo I. Use of FT-IR spectroscopy to follow the effect of processing in cell wall polysaccharide extracts of a sun-dried pear. Carbohydr Polym, 2001, 45: 175-182.
CrossRef Google scholar

12

Accesses

27

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/