Effect of fruit pulp supplementation on rapid and enhanced ethanol production in very high gravity (VHG) fermentation

Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka, Hwa-Won Ryu, Young-Jung Wee

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 22.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing All Journals
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 22. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-014-0022-8
Short Report

Effect of fruit pulp supplementation on rapid and enhanced ethanol production in very high gravity (VHG) fermentation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Background

The energy crisis and climate change necessitate studying and discovering of new processes involved in the production of alternative and renewable energy sources. Very high gravity (VHG) fermentation is one such process improvement aimed at increasing both the rate of fermentation and ethanol concentration. The technology involves preparation and fermentation of media containing 300 g or more of dissolved solids per liter to get a high amount of ethanol.

Findings

Saccharomyces cerevisiae was inoculated to the very high gravity medium containing 30% to 40% w/v glucose with and without supplementation of three selected fruit pulps (mango, banana, and sapota). The fermentation experiments were carried out in batch mode. The effect of supplementation of 4% fruit pulp/puree on the metabolic behavior and viability of yeast was studied. Significant increase in ethanol yields up to 83.1% and dramatic decrease in glycerol up to 35% and trehalose production up to 100% were observed in the presence of fruit pulp. The fermentation rate was increased, and time to produce maximum ethanol was decreased from 5 to 3 days with increased viable cell count. The physical and chemical factors of fruit pulps may aid in reducing the osmotic stress of high gravity fermentation as well as enhanced ethanol yield.

Conclusions

It was found that fruit pulp supplementation not only reduced fermentation time but also enhanced ethanol production by better utilization of sugar. Production of high ethanol concentration by the supplementation of cheap materials in VHG sugar fermentation will eliminate the expensive steps in the conventional process and save time.

Keywords

High gravity fermentation / Osmotic stress / Ethanol / Fruit pulp supplementation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka, Hwa-Won Ryu, Young-Jung Wee. Effect of fruit pulp supplementation on rapid and enhanced ethanol production in very high gravity (VHG) fermentation. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2014, 1(1): 22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-014-0022-8

References

[1.]
Cardona C, Sa´nchez O. Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol, 2007, 98: 2415-2457.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Reddy LVA. Gupta V. K., Tuohy M. G.. Potential bioresources as future sources of biofuels production:an overview. Biofuel technologies, 2013, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
[3.]
Pereira FB, Guimarães PMR, Teixeira JA, Domingues L. Optimization of low-cost medium for very high gravity ethanol fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using statistical experimental designs. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 7856-7863.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Jones AM, Ingledew WM. Production of fuel alcohol from wheat by VHG technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 1993, 43: 211-226.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Reeve P. Sweat your fermentation assets. Brewer, 1998, 12: 212-215.
[6.]
Bafrncova P, Smogrovicova D, Salvikova I, Patkova J, Domeny Z. Improvement of very high gravity ethanol fermentation by media supplementation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett, 1999, 21: 337-341.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Casey GP, Magnus CA, Ingledew WM. High-gravity brewing: effects of nutrition on yeast composition, fermentative ability, and alcohol production. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1984, 48: 639-646.
[8.]
Alfenore S, Molina-Jouve C, Guillouet SE, Uribelarrea JL, Goma G, Benbadis L. Improving ethanol production and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by vitamin feeding strategy during fed batch process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2002, 60: 67-72.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
Damoano D, Wang SS. Improvements in ethanol concentration and fermentor ethanol productivity in yeast fermentations using whole soy flour in batch and continuous recycle systems. Biotechnol Lett, 1985, 71: 35-140.
[10.]
Deepak S, Visvanathan L. Effects of oils and fatty acids on the tolerance of distillers yeast to alcohol and temperature. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1984, 6: 78-80.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Patil SG, Patil BG. Chitin supplement speeds up the ethanol production in cane molasses fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1989, 11: 38-43.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Patil SG, Patil BG, Gokhale VD, Bastawde KB, Puntambekar S, Ranjekar PK (2000) Process for the production of alcohol. US Patent no: 6016699.
[13.]
Reddy LVA, Reddy OVS. Improvement of ethanol production in very high gravity fermentation by horse gram (Dolichos biflorus) flour supplementation. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2005, 41: 440-445.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Reddy LVA, Reddy OVS. Rapid and enhanced production of ethanol in very high gravity (VHG) sugar fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of finger millet (Eleusinae coracana L.) flour. Process Biochem, 2006, 41: 726-729.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Shaffer PA, Somogyi M. Copper iodometric reagents for sugar determination. J Biol Chem, 1933, 100: 695-713.
[16.]
Antony JC. Malt beverages and malt brewing materials: gas chromatographic determination of ethanol in beer. J Assoc Off Annal Chem, 1984, 67: 192-193.
[17.]
Aranda JS, Salgado E, Taillandier P. Trehalose accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells: experimental data and structured modeling. Biochem Eng J, 2004, 17: 129-140.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Postgate JP. Norris JR, Ribbons DW. Viable counts and viability. Methods in microbiology, vol. 1, 1967, New York: Academic Press.
[19.]
Ferguson LR. Role of plant polyphenols in genomic stability. Mutat Res, 2001, 475: 89-111.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
Li LL, Ye YR, Pan L, Zhu Y, Zheng S, Lin Y. The induction of trehalose and glycerol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to various stresses. BBRC, 2009, 387: 778-783.
[21.]
Klipp E, Nordlander B, Krüger R, Gennemark P, Hohmann S. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol, 2005, 23: 975-982.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Da Costa M, Da Silva C, Mariani D, Fernandes P, Pereira M, Panek A, Eleutherio E. The role of trehalose and its transporter in protection against reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Acta, 2008, 1780: 1408-1411.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Siderius M, Van Wuytswinkel O, Reijenga K, Kelders M, Mager W. The control of intracellular glycerol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae influences osmotic stress response and resistance to increased temperature. Mol Microbiol, 2000, 36: 1381-1390.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Uesono Y, Tohe A. Transient inhibition of translation initiation by osmotic stress. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 13848-13855.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Lin YH, Chien WS, Duan KJ, Chang PR. Effect of aeration timing and interval during very-high-gravity ethanol fermentation. Process Biochem, 2011, 46: 1025-1028.
CrossRef Google scholar

18

Accesses

5

Citations

3

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/