Production of a biodiesel-like biofuel without glycerol generation, by using Novozym 435, an immobilized Candida antarctica lipase

Abstract

Background

Novozym 435, a commercial lipase from Candida antarctica, recombinant, expressed in Aspergillus niger, immobilized on macroporous acrylic resin, has been already described in the obtention of biodiesel. It is here evaluated in the production of a new biofuel that integrates the glycerol as monoglyceride (MG) together with two fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) molecules by the application of 1,3-selective lipases in the ethanolysis reaction of sunflower oil.

Results

Response surface methodology (RSM) is employed to estimate the effects of main reaction. Optimum conditions for the viscosity, selectivity, and conversion were determined using a multifactorial design of experiments with three factors run by the software Stat Graphics version XV.I. The selected experimental parameters were reaction temperature, oil/ethanol ratio and alkaline environment. On the basis of RSM analysis, the optimum conditions for synthesis were 1/6 oil/EtOH molar ratio, 30°C, and 12.5 μl of NaOH 10 N aqueous solutions, higher stirring than 300 rpm, for 2 h and 0.5 g of biocatalyst.

Conclusions

These obtained results have proven a very good efficiency of the biocatalyst in the studied selective process. Furthermore, it was allowed sixteen times the successive reuse of the biocatalyst with good performance.

Keywords

Biodiesel / Enzyme biocatalysis / Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) / N435 / Response surface methodology / Transesterification

References

[1.] Demirbas A. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review. Appl Energy, 2009, 86: 108-117.

[2.] Luque R, Herrero-Davila L, Campelo JM, Clark JH, Hidalgo JM, Luna D, Marinas JM, Romero AA. Biofuels: a technological perspective. Energy Environ Sci, 2008, 1: 542-564.

[3.] Oh PP, Lau HLN, Chen JH, Chong MF, Choo YM. A review on conventional technologies and emerging process intensification (PI) methods for biodiesel production. Renew Sust Energy Rev, 2012, 16: 5131-5145.

[4.] Saleh J, Dube MA, Tremblay AY. Separation of glycerol from FAME using ceramic membranes. Fuel Process Technol, 2011, 92: 1305-1310.

[5.] Calero J, Luna D, Sancho ED, Luna C, Posadillo A, Bautista FM, Romero AA, Berbel J, Verdugo C. Technological challenges for the production of biodiesel in arid lands. J Arid Environ, 2014, 102: 127-138.

[6.] Ganesan D, Rajendran A, Thangavelu V. An overview on the recent advances in the transesterification of vegetable oils for biodiesel production using chemical and biocatalysts. Rev Environ Sci Biotech, 2009, 8: 367-394.

[7.] Ilham Z, Saka S. Two-step supercritical dimethyl carbonate method for biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas oil. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 2735-2740.

[8.] Kim SJ, Jung SM, Park YC, Park K. Lipase catalyzed transesterification of soybean oil using ethyl acetate, an alternative acyl acceptor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 2007, 12: 441-445.

[9.] Tan KT, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. A glycerol-free process to produce biodiesel by supercritical methyl acetate technology: an optimization study via response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102: 3990-3991.

[10.] Casas A, Ruiz JR, Ramos MJ, Perez A. Effects of triacetin on biodiesel quality. Energy Fuels, 2010, 24: 4481-4489.

[11.] Verdugo C, Luque R, Luna D, Hidalgo JM, Posadillo A, Sancho ED, Rodriguez S, Ferreira-Dias S, Bautista F, Romero AA. A comprehensive study of reaction parameters in the enzymatic production of novel biofuels integrating glycerol into their composition. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 6657-6662.

[12.] Caballero V, Bautista FM, Campelo JM, Luna D, Marinas JM, Romero AA, Hidalgo JM, Luque R, Macario A, Giordano G. Sustainable preparation of a novel glycerol-free biofuel by using pig pancreatic lipase: partial 1,3-regiospecific alcoholysis of sunflower oil. Process Biochem, 2009, 44: 334-342.

[13.] Luna D, Posadillo A, Caballero V, Verdugo C, Bautista FM, Romero AA, Sancho ED, Luna C, Calero J. New biofuel integrating glycerol into its composition through the use of covalent immobilized pig pancreatic lipase. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13: 10091-10112.

[14.] Luna C, Sancho E, Luna D, Caballero V, Calero J, Posadillo A, Verdugo C, Bautista FM, Romero AA. Biofuel that keeps glycerol as monoglyceride by 1,3-selective ethanolysis with pig pancreatic lipase covalently immobilized on AlPO₄ support. Energies, 2013, 6: 3879-3900.

[15.] Verdugo C, Luna D, Posadillo A, Sancho ED, Rodriguez S, Bautista F, Luque R, Marinas JM, Romero AA. Production of a new second generation biodiesel with a low cost lipase derived from Thermomyces lanuginosus: optimization by response surface methodology. Catal Today, 2011, 167: 107-112.

[16.] Xu YF, Wang QJ, Hu XG, Li C, Zhu XF. Characterization of the lubricity of bio-oil/diesel fuel blends by high frequency reciprocating test rig. Energy, 2010, 35: 283-287.

[17.] Haseeb A, Sia SY, Fazal MA, Masjuki HH. Effect of temperature on tribological properties of palm biodiesel. Energy, 2010, 35: 1460-1464.

[18.] Wadumesthrige K, Ara M, Salley SO, Ng KYS. Investigation of lubricity characteristics of biodiesel in petroleum and synthetic fuel. Energy Fuels, 2009, 23: 2229-2234.

[19.] Çelikten I. The effect of biodiesel, ethanol and diesel fuel blends on the performance and exhaust emissions in a diesel engine. GU J Sci, 2011, 24: 341-346.

[20.] Cheenkachorn K, Fungtammasan B. Biodiesel as an additive for diesohol. Int J Green Energy, 2009, 6: 57-72.

[21.] Jaganjac M, Prah IO, Cipak A, Cindric M, Mrakovcic L, Tatzber F, Ilincic P, Rukavina V, Spehar B, Vukovic JP, Telen S, Uchida K, Lulic Z, Zarkovic N. Effects of bioreactive acrolein from automotive exhaust gases on human cells in vitro. Environ Toxicol, 2012, 27: 644-652.

[22.] Pang XB, Mu YJ, Yuan J, He H. Carbonyls emission from ethanol-blended gasoline and biodiesel-ethanol-diesel used in engines. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 1349-1358.

[23.] Szczesna-Antczak M, Kubiak A, Antczak T, Bielecki S. Enzymatic biodiesel synthesis - key factors affecting efficiency of the process. Renew Energy, 2009, 34: 1185-1194.

[24.] Moayedallaie S, Mirzaei M, Paterson J. Bread improvers: comparison of a range of lipases with a traditional emulsifier. Food Chem, 2010, 122: 495-499.

[25.] Xu Y, Nordblad M, Woodley JM. A two-stage enzymatic ethanol-based biodiesel production in a packed bed reactor. J Biotechnol, 2012, 162: 407-414.

[26.] Yara-Varon E, Joli JE, Torres M, Sala N, Villorbina G, Mendez JJ, Canela-Garayoa R. Solvent-free biocatalytic interesterification of acrylate derivatives. Catal Today, 2012, 196: 86-90.

[27.] Chang C, Chen JH, Chang CMJ, Wu TT, Shieh CJ. Optimization of lipase-catalyzed biodiesel by isopropanolysis in a continuous packed-bed reactor using response surface methodology. N Biotechnol, 2009, 26: 187-192.

[28.] Min JY, Lee EY. Lipase-catalyzed simultaneous biosynthesis of biodiesel and glycerol carbonate from corn oil in dimethyl carbonate. Biotechnol Lett, 2011, 33: 1789-1796.