Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy - how I do it: tips, tricks and pitfalls to standardize the technique to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality

Long R. Jiao , Rajendran Vellaisamy , Tamara Gall

Artificial Intelligence Surgery ›› 2023, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 98 -110.

PDF
Artificial Intelligence Surgery ›› 2023, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) :98 -110. DOI: 10.20517/ais.2023.03
Technical Note
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy - how I do it: tips, tricks and pitfalls to standardize the technique to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is increasingly performed laparoscopically (LPD) and robotically (RPD) with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with conventional open PD (OPD). When LPD and RPD are compared, RPD offers better precision with 3D vision and advanced instrumentation. Although the learning curve for RPD is long with a longer operating time compared with OPD, this can be reduced to a duration similar to that for OPD through standardization of techniques and case numbers. Perioperative outcomes such as length of stay, blood loss, and transfusion requirement are significantly improved compared to OPD and fewer cases require conversion to open than LPD. In this article, we describe our approach to RPD through standardizing PD techniques along with tips and tricks for the benefit of surgeons interested in learning robotic pancreatic surgery.

Keywords

Whipple’s / PD-pancreatoduodenectomy / Robotic Whipple’s / OPD-open pancreatoduodenectomy / LPD-laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy / RPD-robotic pancreatoduodenectomy / pancreatic resection / pancreatic cancer

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Long R. Jiao, Rajendran Vellaisamy, Tamara Gall. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy - how I do it: tips, tricks and pitfalls to standardize the technique to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Artificial Intelligence Surgery, 2023, 3(2): 98-110 DOI:10.20517/ais.2023.03

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

de Rooij T,Bosscha K.Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials2018;19:1-10

[2]

Yates DR,Roupret M.From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology.BJU Int2011;108:1708-13; discussion 14

[3]

Yu HY,Lipsitz SR,Hu JC.Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery.J Urol2012;187:1392-8

[4]

Midura EF,Hoehn RS.The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.Surgery2015;158:453-9

[5]

Cheng CL.The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.BMJ2018;360:j5304

[6]

Chitwood WR Jr.Robotic cardiac surgery by 2031.Tex Heart Inst J2011;38:691-3 PMCID:PMC3233340

[7]

Diodato MD Jr.Robotic cardiac surgery: overview.Surg Clin North Am2003;83:1351-67

[8]

Giulianotti PC,Bianco FM.Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.Surg Endosc2010;24:1646-57

[9]

Hanly EJ.Robotic abdominal surgery.Am J Surg2004;188:19s-26s

[10]

Boggi U,De Lio N.Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.Br J Surg2013;100:917-25

[11]

Gall TMH,Soomro N,Jiao LR.Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves.BJS Open2020;4:1100-8

[12]

Liu R,Zhao ZM.The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center.Surg Endosc2017;31:2380-6

[13]

Klompmaker S,Wellner UF.Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European propensity score matched study.Ann Surg2020;271:356-63

[14]

Inoue Y,Kato T.Reproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique.Surg Endosc2022;36:8684-9

[15]

Jiao LR. Robotic Whipple procedure-pancreaticogastrostomy for normal pancreas with a non -visible pancreatic duct. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHiXJvb9R4I [Last accessed on 6 May 2023]

[16]

Peng L,Li Y.Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy.Surg Endosc2017;31:3085-97

[17]

Gall TMH,Cunningham D,Jiao LR.Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic center - early experience of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.HPB2020;22:1637-164

[18]

Prete A,Al-Tarrah K.The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Endocrinol2018;89:554-67

[19]

Pedziwiatr M,Pisarska M.Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg2017;402:841-51

[20]

Shin SH,Song KB.Totally laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy versus open surgery for periampullary neoplasms: separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Surg Endosc2017;31:3459-74

[21]

Ducreux M,Caramella C.Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann Oncol2015;26 Suppl 5:v56-68

[22]

Gumbs AA,Spolverato G.Artificial intelligence surgery: how do we get to autonomous actions in surgery?.Sensors2021;21:5526

[23]

Gumbs AA,Karcz K.White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery.Art Int Surg2022;2:93-100

[24]

Bassi C,Molinari E.Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.Ann Surg2005;242:767-71, discussion 771 PMCID:PMC1409871

[25]

Gumbs AA,Tsai TJ,Chouillard E.Keeping surgeons in the loop: are handheld robotics the best path towards more autonomous actions?.Art Int Surg2021;1:38-51

PDF

257

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/