A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Decision Tree + Partitioned Survival Model
Shang Yumeng , Zhang Fang , Dong Li
Asian Journal of Social Pharmacy ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2) : 184 -194.
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Decision Tree + Partitioned Survival Model
Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the perspective of China’s healthcare system. Methods A decision tree + partitioned survival model was constructed for early diagnosis of HCC based on literature data. Taking quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as the main health outcome measure for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) analysis, the sensitivity analysis by Monte Carlo simulation was constructed to generate corresponding tornado diagram, incremental cost-effectiveness scatter plot, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Results and Conclusion The basic analysis results showed that the ICER value of Gd-BOPTA diagnostic scheme compared with Gd-DTPA diagnostic scheme was 17 302.46 yuan/QALY, which is less than 1 times of China’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the cost of delayed treatment and timely treatment had a significant impact on the results. When the willingness to pay (WTP) was 1 time of GDP per capita, the probability of cost-effectiveness advantage of Gd-BOPTA diagnostic scheme was 65.30%. When the WTP value is set at 1 times of GDP per capita, Gd-BOPTA MRI has cost-effectiveness advantages for the early diagnosis of HCC.
early HCC / Gd-DTPA / Gd-BOPTA / cost-effectiveness analysis / sensitivity analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
National Health Commission. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary hepatic carcinoma (2022 edition)[J]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Cancer Management (Electronic Version), 2022, 8 (2): 16-53. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |