Leveraging on non-causal reasoning techniques for enhancing the cognitive management of highly automated vehicles

Ilias Panagiotopoulos, George Dimitrakopoulos

Autonomous Intelligent Systems ›› 2022, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 17. DOI: 10.1007/s43684-022-00035-1
Original Article

Leveraging on non-causal reasoning techniques for enhancing the cognitive management of highly automated vehicles

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) are expected to improve the performance of terrestrial transportations by providing safe and efficient travel experience to drivers and passengers. As HAVs will be equipped with different driving automation levels, they should be capable to dynamically adapt their Level of Autonomy (LoA), in order to tackle sudden and recurrent changes in their environment (i.e., inclement weather, complex terrain, unexpected on-road obstacles, etc.). In this respect, HAVs should be able to respond not only on causal reasoning effects, which depend on present and past inputs from the external driving environment, but also on non-causal reasoning situations depending on future states associated with the external driving scene. On the other hand, driver’s personal preferences and profile characteristics should be assessed and managed properly, in order to enhance travel experience. In the light of the above, the present paper aims to tackle these challenges on how cognitive computing enables HAVs to operate each time in the best available LoA by responding quickly to changing environment situations and driver’s preferences. On this basis, an in-vehicle cognitive functionality is introduced, which collects data from various sources (sensor and driver layers), intelligently processing it to the decision-making layer, and finally, selecting the optimal LoA by integrating previous knowledge and experience. The overall approach includes the identification and utilization of a hybrid (data-driven and event-driven) algorithmic process towards reaching intelligent and proactive decisions. An indicative discrete event simulation analysis showcases the efficiency of the developed approach in proactively adapting the vehicle’s LoA.

Keywords

Cognitive computing / Highly automated vehicles / Hybrid intelligence / Level of autonomy prediction / Non-causal reasoning / Optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ilias Panagiotopoulos, George Dimitrakopoulos. Leveraging on non-causal reasoning techniques for enhancing the cognitive management of highly automated vehicles. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 2022, 2(1): 17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43684-022-00035-1

References

[1]
MilakisD., van AremB., van WeeB.. Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 21(4):324-348
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Van BrummelenJ., O’BrienM., GruyerD., NajjaranaH.. Autonomous vehicle perception: the technology of today and tomorrow. Transp. Res., Part C, Emerg. Technol., 2018, 89: 384-406
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
DimitrakopoulosG., DemestichasP.. Intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., 2010, 5(1):77-84
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
OhS.I., KangH.B.. Object detection and classification by decision-level fusion for intelligent vehicle systems. Sensors, 2017, 17(1):454-463
[5]
LiJ., ChengH., GuoH., QluS.. Survey on artificial intelligence for vehicles. Automot. Innov., 2018, 1: 2-14
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
DesaiS., DesaiS.. Smart vehicle automation. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., 2017, 6(9):46-50
[7]
KalaR., WarwickK.. Intelligent transportation system with diverse semi-autonomous vehicles. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 2015, 8(5):886-899
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
FelembanE., SheikhA.. A review on mobile and sensor networks innovations in intelligent transportation systems. J. Transp. Technol., 2014, 4(3):196-204
[9]
ChenX., ZhouL., LiL.. Bayesian network for red-light-running prediction at signalized intersections. J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2019, 23(2):120-132
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
LanaI., Del SerJ., VelezM., VlahogianniE.I.. Road traffic forecasting: recent advances and new challenges. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., 2018, 10(2):93-109
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
ZhangJ., WangF.-Y., WangK., LinW.-H., XuX., ChenC.. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: a survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2011, 12(4):1624-1638
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
PiaoJ., McDonaldM., HounsellN., et al.. Public views towards implementation of automated vehicles in urban areas. Transp. Res. Proc., 2016, 14(8):2168-2177
[13]
FagnantD.J., KockelmanK.. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res., Part A, 2015, 77: 167-181
[14]
InternationalS.A.E.. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for on-Road Motor Vehicles, 2016 Washington SAE International
[15]
PendletonS., AndersenH., DuX., ShenX., MeghjaniM., EngY., RusD., MarceloJ.. Perception, planning, control, and coordination for autonomous vehicles. Mach. J., 2017, 5
[16]
PanagiotopoulosI.E., DimitrakopoulosG.J.. Diffie–Hellman process and its use in secure and authenticated VC networks. IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2018, 12(9):1082-1087
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
LimK., ManivannanD.. An efficient protocol for authenticated and secure message delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. Veh. Commun., 2016, 4: 30-37
[18]
ShenX., ChengX., YangL., et al.. Data dissemination in vanets: a scheduling approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 15(5):2213-2223
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
KaurR., MalhotraJ.. Survey on security requirements in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. and Emerg. Eng. Res., 2015, 3(7):87-90
[20]
ChenS.T., JianZ.Q., HuangY.H., et al.. Autonomous driving: cognitive construction and situation understanding. Sci. China Inf. Sci., 2019, 62(8
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
SumaleeA., Wai HoH.. Smarter and more connected: future intelligent transportation system. IATSS Res., 2018, 42: 67-71
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
LiL., WenD., ZhengN.-N., ShenL.-C.. Cognitive cars: a new frontier for ADAS research. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. J., 2012, 13 1):395-407
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
WuY., TanH., QinL., RanB., JiangZ.. A hybrid deep learning based traffic flow prediction method and its understanding. Transp. Res., Part C, Emerg. Technol., 2018, 90: 166-180
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
LiY., MoonJ.. Reduced-complexity soft MIMO detection based on causal and noncausal decision feedback. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2008, 56(3):1178-1187
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
ZhengN., LiuZ., RenP., et al.. Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2017, 18(2):153-179
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
DimitrakopoulosG., KavakliE., ZographosT., LoucopoulosP., AnagnostopoulosD.. A capability-oriented modelling and simulation approach for autonomous vehicle management. Elsevier Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory J., 2019, 91: 28-47
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
DimitrakopoulosG., BravosG., NikolaidouM., AnagnostopoulosD.. A proactive, knowledge-based intelligent transportation system based on vehicular sensor networks. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. J., 2013, 7(4):454-463
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
DimitrakopoulosG., DemestichasP., KoutraV.. Intelligent management functionality for improving transportation efficiency by means of the car pooling concept. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2012, 7(4):424-436
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
RussellS.J., NorvigP.. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2002 New Jersey Prentice-Hall
[30]
NeapolitanR.E.. Learning Bayesian Drivers, 2002 New Jersey Prentice-Hall
[31]
DomingosP., PazzaniM.. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach. Learn., 1997, 29(2/3):103-130
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/