Water surface profile prediction in non-prismatic compound channel using support vector machine (SVM)
Vijay Kaushik, Munendra Kumar
AI in Civil Engineering ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 6.
Water surface profile prediction in non-prismatic compound channel using support vector machine (SVM)
The process of estimating the level of water surface in two-stage waterways is a crucial aspect in the design of flood control and diversion structures. Human activities carried out along the course of rivers, such as agricultural and construction operation, have the potential to modify the geometry of floodplains, leading to the formation of compound channels with non-prismatic floodplains, thus possibly exhibiting convergent, divergent, or skewed characteristics. In the current investigation, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique is employed to approximate the water surface profile of compound channels featuring narrowing floodplains. Some models are constructed by utilizing significant experimental data obtained from both contemporary and previous investigations. Water surface profiles in these channels can be estimated through the utilization of non-dimensional geometric and flow parameters, including: converging angle, width ratio, relative depth, aspect ratio, relative distance, and bed slope. The results of this study indicate that the SVM-generated water surface profile exhibits a high degree of concordance with both the empirical data and the findings from previous research, as evidenced by its R 2 value of 0.99, RMSE value of 0.0199, and MAPE value of 1.263. The findings of this study based on statistical analysis demonstrate that the SVM model developed is dependable and suitable for applications in this particular domain, exhibiting superior performance in forecasting water surface profiles.
Non-prismatic compound channel / Non-dimensional parameter / Support vector machine (SVM) / Water surface profile
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
Bousmar, D., & Zech, Y. (2002). Periodical turbulent structures in compound channels. In River Flow International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, pp. 177–185.
|
[6] |
Chlebek, J., Bousmar, D., Knight, D.W., & Sterling, M.A. (2010). Comparison of overbank flow conditions in skewed and converging/diverging channels. In: River Flows International Conference, pp. 503–511.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
Das, B.S., Devi, K., Proust, S., & Khatua, K.K. (2018). Flow distribution in diverging compound channels using improved independent subsection method. In River Flow 2018: 9th International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, vol. 40, no. 05068.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
James, M., & Brown, R.J. (1977). Geometric parameters that influence floodplain flow. In U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, June, Vicksburg Miss. Research report H-77.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
MATLAB, R. (2019). [Computer Software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
Rezaei, B. (2006). Overbank Flow in Compound Channels with Prismatic and non-Prismatic Floodplains. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |