Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 648-665
Orginal Article |
Is Pain Representation?
School of Marxism, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
Download: PDF(334 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

The argument given by strong representationalists about phenomenal consciousness usually has two steps. The first is to identify all phenomenal consciousness with representation. The second is to identify all phenomenal aspects of phenomenal consciousness with certain representational content. Pain is often thought to be a counterexample torepresentationalism. However, current objections from this perspective mostly focus on the second step and try to show that pains have some special qualities that representational content cannot explain. This paper objects to representationalism with regard to pain (that pain is not representation) by way of a focus on the first step. First, it shows that by borrowing the notion of “representation” from the causal co-variation theory of representation, representationalists are not able to demonstrate that pain is representation. Second, by laying out some well-accepted criteria for what counts as representation, it argues that pains do not satisfy them. Thus, pain is not representation.

Keywords representationalism      pain      representation      veridicality conditions      causal co-variation     
Issue Date: 11 January 2018
 Cite this article:   
JIANG Wei. Is Pain Representation?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(4): 648-665.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Saulius Geniusas. Max Scheler’s Phenomenology of Pain[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 358-376.
[2] LIU Chuang. Invariance and Scientific Representation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 647-667.
[3] John Sallis. Effacements of Form[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 641-654.
[4] James O. Young. Music and the Representation of Emotion[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(2): 332-348.
[5] LI Ruohui. On Laozi’s Dao—An Attempt to Make Philosophy Speak Chinese[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 1-19.
[6] WANG Bo , . The Flexibility of Gua and Yao—Based on an Interpretation of Yizhuan[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 68-93.
[7] YANG Dachun. Representationalism and the linguistic question in early modern philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 595-606.
[8] LI Hengwei, HUANG Huaxin. Representation and development of cognition[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 583-600.
Full text