Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities

Yamuna KALUARACHCHI

PDF(1936 KB)
PDF(1936 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 98-108. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-020-0136-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Cities are incorporating smart and green infrastructure components in their urban design policies, adapting existing and new infrastructure systems to integrate technological advances to mitigate extreme weather due to climate change. Research has illustrated that smart green infrastructure (SGI) provides not only climate change resilience but also many health and wellbeing benefits that improve the quality of life of citizens. With the growing demand for smart technology, a series of problems and challenges, including governance, privacy, and security, must be addressed. This paper explores the potential to transition from grey, green, or smart silos to work with nature-based solutions and smart technology to help change cities to achieve considerable environmental and socio-economic benefits. The concepts of grey, green, and smart infrastructure are presented, and the needs, benefits, and applications are investigated. Moreover, the advantages of using integrated smart, green nature-based solutions are discussed. A comprehensive literature review is undertaken with keyword searches, including journal papers, stakeholder and case study reports, and local authority action plans. The methodology adopts multimethod qualitative information review, including literature, case studies, expert interviews, and documentary analysis. Published data and information are analysed to capture the key concepts in implementing SGI systems, such as storm-water control, flood and coastal defense, urban waste management, transportation, recreation, and asset management. The paper investigates the elimination of silo approaches and the alleviation of the destructions caused by extreme weather events using these interdependent SGI systems supported by novel data-driven platforms to provide nature-based solutions to boost the health and wellbeing of the residents.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

grey infrastructure / green infrastructure / smart infrastructure / smart and green combined infrastructure / smart cities / future cities

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yamuna KALUARACHCHI. Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 98‒108 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0136-y

References

[1]
Albert S (2019). Smart cities: The promises and failures of utopian technological planning.
[2]
Alberta Water Portal Society (2019). Introduction to green infrastructure and grey infrastructure.
[3]
Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico R M (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1): 3–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Anwar S H (2018). Use cases of Internet of Things: Smart urban waste management.
[5]
Bande S, Shete V V (2017). Smart flood disaster prediction system using IoT & neural networks. In: International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation (SmartTechCon). Bangalore: IEEE, 189–194
[6]
Beadenkopf E (2019). Taking BIM to the infrastructure level.
[7]
Benedict M A, McMahon E T (2002). Green infrastructure: Smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Resources Journal, 20(3): 12–17
[8]
Browder G, Ozment S, Bescos I R, Gartner T, Lange G M (2019). Integrating green and gray: Creating next generation infrastructure. Washington, DC: World Bank and World Resources Institute
[9]
Brown R D, Vanos J K, Kenny N A, Lenzholzer S (2015). Designing urban parks that ameliorate the effects of climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138: 118–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Carter T (2013). Smart cities: The future of urban infrastructure. BBC Future.
[11]
Chapman L (2014). A climate change report card for infrastructure. Research & Innovation for our Dynamic Environment (RIDE) Forum Working Technical Paper
[12]
Chepesiuk R (2009). Missing the dark: Health effects of light pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(1): A20–A27
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Committee on Climate Change (2017a). UK Climate Change Risk Assessment. Synthesis report: Priorities for the next five years.
[14]
Committee on Climate Change (2017b). UK Climate Change Risk Assessment. Evidence report.
[15]
Crncevic T, Tubic L, Bakic O (2017). Green infrastructure planning for climate smart and “green” cities. Spatium, 3(38): 35–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (2012). UK climate change risk assessment: Government report.
[17]
Department for International Trade (2018). The UK—a natural home for green asset management, wealth and investment management.
[18]
DfT (2004). The changing climate: Impact on the Department for Transport. London: Department for Transport (DfT)
[19]
DfT (2014). Transport resilience review—a review of the resilience of the transport network to extreme weather events. London: Department for Transport (DfT)
[20]
Environment Agency (2016). Managing flood and coastal erosion risks in England: 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. Corporate Report
[21]
Fang K (2015). “Smart Mobility”: Is it the time to re-think urban mobility? The World Bank Group.
[22]
Foster J, Lowe A, Winkelman S (2011). The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. Washington, DC: Center for Clean Air Policy
[23]
Foster L, Heller B, Williams A, Dunn M, Curtis D, Goodwill S (2016). Development of smart inner-city recreational facilities to encourage active living. In: Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 458–468
[24]
Godfrey N, Savage R (2012). Future proofing cities: Risks and opportunities for inclusive urban growth in developing countries. Epsom: Atkins
[25]
Goldenberg S (2016). Masdar’s zero-carbon dream could become world’s first green ghost town.
[26]
Gray L (2011). World’s forests absorb almost 40 percent of man-made CO2.
[27]
Habitat UN (2011). Hot cities: Battle-ground for climate change. Global Report on Human Settlement
[28]
Hammersen F, Niemann H, Hoebel J (2016). Environmental noise annoyance and mental health in adults: Findings from the cross-sectional German health update (GEDA) study 2012. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10): 954
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2014). Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions. Technical Report. ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities (FG-SSC)
[30]
Jessup K (2018). The smart cities toolkit for SMART Urban Parks.
[31]
Kaluarachchi Y (2019a). Smart and green infrastructure for future cities. In: International Conference on Innovation, Technology, Enterprise and Entrepreneurship
[32]
Kaluarachchi Y (2019b). Improving urban city resilience by incorporating smart green infrastructure components. In: CIB World Building Congress. Hong Kong
[33]
Lennon M (2015). Green infrastructure and planning policy: A critical assessment. Local Environment, 20(8): 957–980
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Leviäkangas P, Tuominen A, Molarius R, Kojo H, Schabel J, Toivonen S, Keränen J, Ludvigsen J, Vajda A, Tuomenvirta H, Juga I, Nurmi P, Rauhala J, Rehm F, Gerz T, Mühlhausen T, Schweighofer J, Michaelides S, Papadakis M, Dotzek N (2011). Extreme weather impacts on transport systems. EWENT Project Deliverable D1. VTT Working Papers 168
[35]
Liquete C, Kleeschulte S, Dige G, Maes J, Grizzetti B, Olah B, Zulian G (2015). Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study. Environmental Science & Policy, 54: 268–280
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Liu C (2018). Oil-rich Abu Dhabi’s Masdar City: Green oasis or green ghost town?
[37]
Mair R (2015). How will city infrastructure and sensors be made smart? Cambridge Centre for Smart Infrastructure and Construction
[38]
Martinez E, Hernandez J, Rodriguez-Nikl T, Mazari M (2018). Resilience of underground transportation infrastructure in coastal regions: A case study. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development: Planning, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Systems. Pittsburgh, 223–230
[39]
Mell I C (2013). Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the “green” of green infrastructure development. Local Environment, 18(2): 152–166
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Moudon A V (2009). Real noise from the urban environment: How ambient community noise affects health and what can be done about it. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(2): 167–171
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Natural Economy Northwest (NENW) (2008). The economic value of green infrastructure.
[42]
NGICP and IGICP (2018). National green infrastructure certification program glossary.
[43]
Natural England (2015). Natural England’s green infrastructure guidance.
[44]
Office for National Statistics (2018). UK environmental accounts, atmospheric emissions datasets.
[45]
Onuoha M (2017). A 5-mile island built to save Lagos’s economy has a worrying design flaw.
[46]
Papayanis N, Wakeman R (2019). The urban infrastructure.
[47]
Poon L (2018). Sleepy in Songdo, Korea’s smartest city.
[48]
Quant (2019). Smart networks.
[49]
SAS (2018). Big Data—What it is and why it matters .
[50]
Science for Environment Policy (2012). The multifunctionality of green infrastructure. European Commission
[51]
Smart Cities World (2018). Smart cities report forecasts trillions in economic growth.
[52]
Talberth J, Gray E, Yonavjak L, Gartner T (2013). Green versus gray: Nature’s solutions to infrastructure demands. Solutions, 4(1): 40–47
[53]
Talberth J, Hanson C (2012). Green vs. gray infrastructure: When nature is better than concrete. World Resources Institute
[54]
The World Bank (2019). Putting nature to work: Integrating green and gray infrastructure for water security and climate resilience.
[55]
Titus J (2002). Does sea level rise matter to transportation along the Atlantic coast? In: The Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Transportation. Federal Research Partnership Workshop, Summary and Discussion Papers. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation Center for Climate Change and Environmental Forecasting
[56]
Tobergte D, Curtis S (2013). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9): 1689–1699
[57]
UK Green Building Council (2015). Green building council demystifying green infrastructure. London
[58]
United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) (2017). Smart cities study 2017. Bilbao: The Committee of Digital and Knowledge-Based Cities of UCLG
[59]
United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) (2019). Smart cities study 2019. Bilbao: The Committee of Digital and Knowledge-Based Cities of UCLG
[60]
United Nations (UN) (2018). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs
[61]
Urban Resilience (2019). What is urban resilience? Rock efeller Foundation.
[62]
Victoria Business Improvement District (2013). Green Infrastructure audit—best practice guide.
[63]
Wang J, Banzhaf E (2018). Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review. Ecological Indicators, 85: 758–772
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Wentworth J (2013). Urban green infrastructure. POSTnote POST-PN-448. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology of the UK Parliament (POST)
[65]
Woetzel J, Remes J, Boland B, Lv K, Sinha S, Strube G, Means J, Law J, Cadena A, von der Tann V (2018). Smart cities: Digital solutions for a more livable future. McKinsey Global Institute
[66]
Wray S (2017). Why smart city infrastructure is going green? Special Reports. Smart Cities World
[67]
Wright J, Marchese D (2017). Briefing: Continuous monitoring and adaptive control: The “smart” storm water management solution. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 170(4): 86–89

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1936 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/