Distributed governance of Solar Radiation Management geoengineering: A possible solution to SRM’s “free driver” problem?

Abstract

Geoengineering (deliberate climate modification) is a possible way to limit Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) (Shepherd, 2009; National Research Council, 2015). Solar Radiation Management geoengineering (SRM) offers relatively inexpensive, rapid temperature control. However, this low cost leads to a risk of controversial unilateral intervention—the “free-driver” problem (Weitzman, 2015). Consequently, this creates a risk of counter-geoengineering (deliberate warming) (Parker et al., 2018), resulting in governance challenges (Svoboda, 2017) akin to an arms race. Free-driver deployment scenarios previously considered include the rogue state, Greenfinger (Bodansky, 2013), or power blocs (Ricke et al., 2013), implying disagreement and conflict. We propose a novel distributed governance model of consensually-constrained unilateralism: Countries’ authority is limited to each state’s fraction of the maximum realistic intervention (e.g., pre-industrial temperature). We suggest a division of authority based on historical emissions (Rocha et al., 2015)—noting alternatives (e.g., population). To aid understanding, we offer an analogue: An over-heated train carriage, with passenger-controlled windows. We subsequently discuss the likely complexities, notably Coasian side-payments. Finally, we suggest further research: Algebraic, bot and human modeling; and observational studies.

Keywords

geoengineering / Solar Radiation Management / governance / decentralised

References

[1] Appell D (2013). Strange bedfellows? Climate change denial and support for geoengineering. Yale Forum on Climate Change & the Media, October 30.

[2] Bodansky D (2013). The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance. Climatic Change, 121(3): 539–551

[3] Brasseur G P, Granier C (2013). Mitigation, adaptation or climate engineering? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14(1): 1–20

[4] Brown M A (2010). Policy update: The multiple policy dimensions of carbon management: Mitigation, adaptation and geoengineering. Carbon Management, 1(1): 27–33

[5] Chhetri N, Chong D, Conca K, Falk R, Gillespie A, Gupta A, Jinnsh S, Kashwan P, Lahsen M, Light A, McKinnon C, Thiele L P, Valdivia W, Wapner P, Morrow D, Turkaly C, Nicholson S (2018). Governing Solar Radiation Management. Washington DC: Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment, American University

[6] Coase R H (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3: 1–44

[7] Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) (2014). Report of the conference of the parties on its twentieth session, held in Lima from 1 to 14 December 2014. FCCC, United Nations.

[8] Gordijn B, Ten Have H (2012). Ethics of mitigation, adaptation and geoengineering. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15(1): 1–2

[9] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–30

[10] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press

[11] Levitt S D, Dubner S J (2005). Freakonomics. New York: William Morrow

[12] Lewis S (2015). The dirty secret of the Paris climate deal . Foreign Policy.

[13] Lockley A (2016a). Geoengineering: A war on climate change? Journal of Evolution and Technology, 26(1): 26–49

[14] Lockley A (2016b). Licence to chill: Building a legitimate authorisation process for commercial SRM operations. Environmental Law Review, 18(1): 25–40

[15] Lockley A, Coffman D (2016). Distinguishing morale hazard from moral hazard in geoengineering. Environmental Law Review, 18(3): 194–204

[16] Lomax G, Workman M, Lenton T, Shah N (2015). Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies. Energy Policy, 78: 125–136

[17] National Research Council (2015). Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. Washington DC: The National Academies Press

[18] Parker A, Horton J B, Keith D W (2018). Stopping solar geoengineering through technical means: A preliminary assessment of counter-geoengineering. Earth’s Future, 6(8): 1058–1065

[19] Randall T (2015). Fossil fuels just lost the race against renewables.

[20] Ricke K L, Moreno-Cruz J B, Caldeira K (2013). Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1): 014021

[21] Rocha M, Krapp M, Guetschow J, Jeffery L, Hare B, Schaeffer M (2015). Historical responsibility for climate change—from countries emissions to contribution to temperature increase. Potsdam, Germany: Climate Analytics and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

[22] Shepherd J G (2009). Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: The Royal Society

[23] Stern N H (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. London: Cambridge University Press

[24] Svoboda T (2017). The Ethics of Climate Engineering: Solar Radiation Management and Non-Ideal Justice. New York: Routledge

[25] Weitzman M L (2015). A voting architecture for the governance of free-driver externalities, with application to geoengineering. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1049–1068

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. ƒThe images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. ƒTo view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn