Chronic training status affects muscle excitation of the vastus lateralis during repeated contractions

Sunggun Jeon , Stephanie A. Sontag , Trent J. Herda , Michael A. Trevino

Sports Medicine and Health Science ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 42 -49.

PDF
Sports Medicine and Health Science ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :42 -49. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.12.005
Original article

Chronic training status affects muscle excitation of the vastus lateralis during repeated contractions

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study examined electromyographic amplitude (EMGRMS)-force relationships during repeated submaximal knee extensor muscle actions among chronic aerobically-(AT), resistance-trained (RT), and sedentary (SED) individuals. Fifteen adults (5/group) attempted 20 isometric trapezoidal muscle actions at 50% of maximal strength. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from vastus lateralis (VL) during the muscle actions. For the first and last successfully completed contractions, linear regression models were fit to the log-transformed EMGRMS-force relationships during the linearly increasing and decreasing segments, and the b terms (slope) and a terms (antilog of y-intercept) were calculated. EMGRMS was averaged during steady force. Only the AT completed all 20 muscle actions. During the first contraction, the b terms for RT (1.301 ​± ​0.197) were greater than AT (0.910 ​± ​0.123; p ​= ​0.008) and SED (0.912 ​± ​0.162; p ​= ​0.008) during the linearly increasing segment, and in comparison to the linearly decreasing segment (1.018 ​± ​0.139; p ​= ​0.014), respectively. For the last contraction, the b terms for RT were greater than AT during the linearly increasing (RT ​= ​1.373 ​± ​0.353; AT ​= ​0.883 ​± ​0.129; p ​= ​0.018) and decreasing (RT ​= ​1.526 ​± ​0.328; AT ​= ​0.970 ​± ​0.223; p ​= ​0.010) segments. In addition, the b terms for SED increased from the linearly increasing (0.968 ​± ​0.144) to decreasing segment (1.268 ​± ​0.126; p ​= ​0.015). There were no training, segment, or contraction differences for the a terms. EMGRMS during steady force increased from the first- ([64.08 ​± ​51.68] ​μV) to last-contraction ([86.73 ​± ​49.55] ​μV; p ​= ​0.001) collapsed across training statuses. The b terms differentiated the rate of change for EMGRMS with increments in force among training groups, indicating greater muscle excitation to the motoneuron pool was necessary for the RT than AT during the linearly increasing and decreasing segments of a repetitive task.

Keywords

Electromyography / Fatigue / Isometric trapezoidal muscle action / Motor unit control properties / Natural log-transformed model / Vastus lateralis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sunggun Jeon, Stephanie A. Sontag, Trent J. Herda, Michael A. Trevino. Chronic training status affects muscle excitation of the vastus lateralis during repeated contractions. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2023, 5(1): 42-49 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2022.12.005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by SJ, SAS, TJH, and MAT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SJ and MAT, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethical approval statement
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University of Kansas (10-30-2012/HSCL #20495). Written informed consents were collected from participants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

CJ. De Luca. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech, 13 (2) ( 1997), pp. 135-163, DOI: 10.1123/jab.13.2.135

[2]

D Farina, R Merletti, RM. Enoka. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol, 96 (4) ( 2004), pp. 1486-1495, DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003

[3]

JA. Hawley. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to prolonged, intense endurance training. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 29 (3) ( 2002), pp. 218-222, DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03623.x

[4]

I Jukic, B Van Hooren, AG Ramos, et al.. The effects of set structure manipulation on chronic adaptations to resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med, 51 (5) ( 2021), pp. 1061-1086, DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01423-4

[5]

CJ De Luca, RS LeFever, MP McCue, AP. Xenakis. Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol, 329 (1) ( 1982), pp. 113-128, DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014293

[6]

C Vila-Chã, D Falla, D Farina. Motor unit behavior during submaximal contractions following six weeks of either endurance or strength training. J Appl Physiol, 109 (5) ( 2010), pp. 1455-1466, DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01213.2009

[7]

HL Dimmick, JD Miller, AJ Sterczala,MA Trevino, TJ. Herda. Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women. Eur J Appl Physiol, 118 (9) ( 2018), pp. 1789-1800, DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3909-9

[8]

MA Trevino, HL Dimmick, ME Parra, et al.. Effects of continuous cycling training on motor unit firing rates, input excitation, and myosin heavy chain of the vastus lateralis in sedentary females. Exp Brain Res, 240 (3) ( 2022), pp. 825-839, DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06278-3

[9]

HS Milner-Brown R. Lee. Synchronization of human motor units: possible roles of exercise and supraspinal reflexes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 38 (3) ( 1975), pp. 245-254, DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90245-x

[10]

J Semmler, M Nordstrom. Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill-and strength-trained individuals. Exp Brain Res, 119 (1) ( 1998), pp. 27-38, DOI: 10.1007/s002210050316

[11]

M Van Cutsem, J Duchateau, K. Hainaut. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol, 513 (1) ( 1998), pp. 295-305, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.295by.x

[12]

A Del Vecchio, A Casolo, F Negro, et al.. The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding. J Physiol, 597 (7) ( 2019), pp. 1873-1887, DOI: 10.1113/JP277250

[13]

C Perot, F Goubel, I. Mora. Quantification of T-and H-responses before and after a period of endurance training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 63 (5) ( 1991), pp. 368-375, DOI: 10.1007/BF00364464

[14]

C Latella, WP Teo, D Harris, B Major, D VanderWesthuizen, AM. Hendy. Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses. Eur J Appl Physiol, 117 (11) ( 2017), pp. 2211-2224, DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3709-7

[15]

C Vila-Chã, D Falla, MV Correia, D. Farina. Changes in H reflex and V wave following short-term endurance and strength training. J Appl Physiol, 112 (1) ( 2012), pp. 54-63, DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00802.2011

[16]

TJ Herda, TJ Housh, AC Fry, et al.. A noninvasive, log-transform method for fiber type discrimination using mechanomyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 20 (5) ( 2010), pp. 787-794, DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.01.004

[17]

MA Trevino TJ. Herda. The effects of training status and muscle action on muscle activation of the vastus lateralis. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 17 (4) ( 2015), pp. 107-114

[18]

J McKendry, S Joanisse, S Baig, et al.. Superior aerobic capacity and indices of skeletal muscle morphology in chronically trained master endurance athletes compared with untrained older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci, 75 (6) ( 2020), pp. 1079-1088, DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glz142

[19]

GE Campos, TJ Luecke, HK Wendeln, et al.. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol, 88 (1) ( 2002), pp. 50-60, DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6

[20]

TC Shoepe, JE Stelzer, DP Garner, JJ. Widrick. Functional adaptability of muscle fibers to long-term resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 35 (6) ( 2003), pp. 944-951, DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069756.17841.9E

[21]

B. Shenkman. From slow to fast: hypogravity-induced remodeling of muscle fiber myosin phenotype. Acta naturae, 8 (4) ( 2016), pp. 47-59, DOI: 10.32607/20758251-2016-8-4-47-59

[22]

RA Garnett, MJ O’Donovan, JA Stephens, A Taylor. Motor unit organization of human medial gastrocnemius. J Physiol, 287 (1) ( 1979), pp. 33-43, DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012643

[23]

MS Stock, TW Beck, JM. Defreitas. Effects of fatigue on motor unit firing rate versus recruitment threshold relationships. Muscle Nerve, 45 (1) ( 2012), pp. 100-109, DOI: 10.1002/mus.22266

[24]

P Contessa, CJ De Luca, JC. Kline. The compensatory interaction between motor unit firing behavior and muscle force during fatigue. J Neurophysiol, 116 (4) ( 2016), pp. 1579-1585, DOI: 10.1152/jn.00347.2016

[25]

TW Beck, T Housh, A Fry, et al.. The influence of muscle fiber type composition on the patterns of responses for electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during a fatiguing submaximal isometric muscle action. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 47 (4-5) ( 2007), pp. 221-232

[26]

AA Olmos, TJ Herda, SA Sontag, MA. Trevino. The influence of chronic training status on the mechanical behavior of the vastus lateralis during repetitive trapezoidal contractions. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 22 (2) ( 2022), pp. 161-171

[27]

S Perry, T Housh, G Johnson, et al.. Mechanomyography, electromyography, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion during incremental cycle ergometry. J Sports Med Phys Fit, 41 (2) ( 2001), p. 183

[28]

JM Zuniga MH. Malek. Electromyographic responses of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles during incremental treadmill running. Muscle Nerve, 48 (6) ( 2013), pp. 938-944, DOI: 10.1002/mus.23842

[29]

ED Ryan, TW Beck, TJ Herda, et al.. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions. J Neurosci Methods, 168 (2) ( 2008), pp. 293-305, DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.10.010

[30]

C Orizio, R Perini, A. Veicsteinas. Muscular sound and force relationship during isometric contraction in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 58 (5) ( 1989), pp. 528-533, DOI: 10.1007/BF02330708

[31]

MJ Zwarts M. Keidel. Relationship between electrical and vibratory output of muscle during voluntary contraction and fatigue. Muscle Nerve, 14 (8) ( 1991), pp. 756-761, DOI: 10.1002/mus.880140810

[32]

TJ Herda, JP Weir, ED Ryan, et al.. Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude. J Neurosci Methods, 179 (2) ( 2009), pp. 240-246, DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.028

[33]

MP Davis D. Walsh. Mechanisms of fatigue. J Support Oncol, 8 (4) ( 2010), pp. 164-174

[34]

AC Fry, TJ Housh, JB Cramer, et al.. Noninvasive assessment of skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain expression in trained and untrained men. J Strength Condit Res, 31 (9) ( 2017), pp. 2355-2362, DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001645

[35]

AS Jackson ML. Pollock. Practical assessment of body composition. Physician Sportsmed, 13 (5) ( 1985), pp. 76-90, DOI: 10.1080/00913847.1985.11708790

[36]

P Bartuzi, T Tokarski, D. Roman-Liu. The effect of the fatty tissue on EMG signal in young women. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 12 (2) ( 2010), pp. 87-92

[37]

MA Cooper, TJ Herda, JP Vardiman, PM Gallagher, AC. Fry. Relationships between skinfold thickness and electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitude recorded during voluntary and non-voluntary muscle actions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 24 (2) ( 2014), pp. 207-213, DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.12.005

[38]

TJ Herda MA. Cooper. Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography frequency-force relationships are model dependent. Med Biol Eng Comput, 53 (8) ( 2015), pp. 689-697, DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1261-3

[39]

E Martinez-Valdes, F Negro, D Falla, AM De Nunzio, D. Farina. Surface electromyographic amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles. J Appl Physiol, 124 (4) ( 2018), pp. 1071-1079, DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2017

[40]

DL Mayhew, JS Kim, JM Cross, AA Ferrando, MM. Bamman. Translational signaling responses preceding resistance training-mediated myofiber hypertrophy in young and old humans. J Appl Physiol, 107 (5) ( 2009), pp. 1655-1662, DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91234.2008

[41]

AJ Sterczala, JD Miller, HL Dimmick, ME Wray, MA Trevino, TJ. Herda. Eight weeks of resistance training increases strength, muscle cross-sectional area and motor unit size, but does not alter firing rates in the vastus lateralis. Eur J Appl Physiol, 120 (1) ( 2020), pp. 281-294, DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04273-9

[42]

CH. Hakansson. Conduction velocity and amplitude of the action potential as related to circumference in the isolated fibre of frog muscle. Acta Physiol Scand, 37 (1) ( 1956), pp. 14-34, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1956.tb01338.x

[43]

M Trevino, A Sterczala, J Miller, et al.. Sex-related differences in muscle size explained by amplitudes of higher-threshold motor unit action potentials and muscle fibre typing. Acta Physiol, 225 (4) ( 2019), p. e13151, DOI: 10.1111/apha.13151

[44]

TJ Herda, JA Siedlik, MA Trevino, MA Cooper, JP. Weir. Motor unit control strategies of endurance-versus resistance-trained individuals. Muscle Nerve, 52 (5) ( 2015), pp. 832-843, DOI: 10.1002/mus.24597

[45]

CJ De Luca EC. Hostage. Relationship between firing rate and recruitment threshold of motoneurons in voluntary isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol, 104 (2) ( 2010), pp. 1034-1046, DOI: 10.1152/jn.01018.2009

[46]

JA Mettler L. Griffin. Muscular endurance training and motor unit firing patterns during fatigue. Exp Brain Res, 234 (1) ( 2016), pp. 267-276, DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4455-x

[47]

H Klitgaard, M Mantoni, S Schiaffino, et al.. Function, morphology and protein expression of ageing skeletal muscle: a cross-sectional study of elderly men with different training backgrounds. Acta Physiol Scand, 140 (1) ( 1990), pp. 41-54, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1990.tb08974.x

[48]

JM Wilson, JP Loenneke, E Jo, GJ Wilson, MC Zourdos, JS. Kim. The effects of endurance, strength, and power training on muscle fiber type shifting. J Strength Condit Res, 26 (6) ( 2012), pp. 1724-1729, DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234eb6f

[49]

SC. Gandevia. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev, 81 (4) ( 2001), pp. 1725-1789, DOI: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

344

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/