TiRobot-Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Elderly Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) is increasing in the elderly population, and FFPs that require fixation are a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The insertion of implants is not risk free due to the complex anatomical and osteoporotic bones and requires a steep learning curve. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of TiRobot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of elderly FFP patients.

Method: The clinical data of 46 elderly FFP patients who had been treated with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation from May 2020 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-four patients were treated with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation assisted by the TiRobot (TiRobot-assisted group) and 22 patients were treated with conventional freehand surgery (freehand group). Postoperative outcomes, including Matta value, excellent and good rate (EGR) of fracture reduction, and accuracy of screw placement (ASP), were compared. Changes in the Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and the Majeed score were recorded and compared between groups before and after surgery and during the 24-week follow-up. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and effect sizes were used as analysis methods.

Results: A total of 90 screws were implanted, 51 screws in the TiRobot-assisted group and 39 screws in the freehand group. The operation time of the two groups was 34.1 ± 2.67 min versus 64.5 ± 4.19 min (p < 0.001). There were no screw-related complications or revision surgeries in any group. The Matta value of the TiRobot-assisted group was 5.13 ± 3.52, which was significantly lower than that of the freehand group (9.00 ± 3.68, p < 0.001), while the EGR was 91.67% versus 72.73%, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The ASP was 100% in the TiRobot-assisted group, better than that in the freehand group, where it was 85.7% (p = 0.043). At each timepoint in the early postoperative period, the VAS score of the TiRobot-assisted group was significantly lower than that of the freehand group and was close to consistent by the last follow-up; the Majeed score of the former was significantly higher than that of the latter at each timepoint of follow-up, with statistical significance (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: TiRobot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of elderly FFP patients is advantageous over conventional freehand surgery, with less invasion, more accurate screw placement, better fracture reduction, early pain relief, and rapid recovery, suggesting that Freehand method to stabilize FFP in the elderly population.

Keywords

elderly patients / fragility fracture of the pelvis / percutaneous cannulated screw fixation / TiRobot-assisted surgery / treatment

References

[1] Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Focus on fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(1):1–2.

[2] Schmerwitz IU, Jungebluth P, Lehmann W, Hockertz TJ. Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(1):37–45.

[3] Orsini LS, Rousculp MD, Long SR, Wang S. Health care utilization and expenditures in the United States: a study of osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(4):359–371.

[4] Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, Sievänen H. Low-trauma pelvic fractures in elderly Finns in 1970-2013. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97(6):577–580.

[5] Höch A, Schneider I, Todd J, Josten C, Böhme J. Lateral compression type B 2-1 pelvic ring fractures in young patients do not require surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(2):171–177.

[6] Eastman JG, Chip Routt ML. Intramedullary fixation techniques for the anterior pelvic ring. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 6):S4–s13.

[7] Rommens PM, Graafen M, Arand C, Mehling I, Hofmann A, Wagner D. Minimal-invasive stabilization of anterior pelvic ring fractures with retrograde transpubic screws. Injury. 2020;51(2):340–346.

[8] Vioreanu MH, Mulhall KJ. Intra-operative imaging technique to aid safe placement of screws in percutaneous fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77(3):398–401.

[9] Zhou KH, Luo CF, Chen N, Hu CF, Pan FG. Minimally invasive surgery under fluoro-navigation for anterior pelvic ring fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(3):250–255.

[10] Eckardt H, Egger A, Hasler RM, Zech CJ, Vach W, Suhm N, et al. Good functional outcome in patients suffering fragility fractures of the pelvis treated with percutaneous screw stabilisation: assessment of complications and factors influencing failure. Injury. 2017;48(12):2717–2723.

[11] Noser J, Dietrich M, Tiziani S, Werner CML, Pape HC, Osterhoff G. Mid-term follow-up after surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Injury. 2018;49(11):2032–2035.

[12] Xu D, Lou W, Li M, Xiao J, Wu H, Chen J. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in the clinical application of trauma orthopedics in China: a systematic review. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(6):e930.

[13] Long T, Li KN, Gao JH, Liu TH, Mu JS, Wang XJ, et al. Comparative study of percutaneous sacroiliac screw with or without TiRobot assistance for treating pelvic posterior ring fractures. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(3):386–396.

[14] Liu ZJ, Gu Y, Jia J. Comparative retrospective study of triangular osteosynthesis with and without robotic assistance for unilateral unstable sacral fractures combined with lumbosacral junction injuries. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):430.

[15] Liu ZJ, Gu Y, Jia J. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with robot-aided percutaneous anterior column screw fixation for transverse-oriented acetabular fractures: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):345.

[16] Wang J, Han W, Su Y, Wang J, Jiang X. Comparison of robot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screws versus open reduction and internal fixation in calcaneal fractures. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(3):724–730.

[17] Lin S, Wang F, Hu J, Tang LY. Comparison of the accuracy and safety of TiRobot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(11):2955–2963.

[18] Vaidya R, Woodbury D, Nasr K. Anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixation/INFIX: a systemic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 6):S24–s30.

[19] Yin Y, Zhang R, Li S, Su K, Hou Z, Zhang Y. Complications following internal fixator in the treatment of pelvic fracture. Orthopedics. 2019;42(1):e7–e13.

[20] Comstock CP, van der Meulen MC, Goodman SB. Biomechanical comparison of posterior internal fixation techniques for unstable pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(8):517–522.

[21] Zhang J, Zhang L, Li C, Chai W, Zhang L, Chen H, et al. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(9):2195–2212.

[22] Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44(12):1733–1744.

[23] Matta JM, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:129–140.

[24] Gras F, Marintschev I, Wilharm A, Klos K, Mückley T, Hofmann GO. 2D-fluoroscopic navigated percutaneous screw fixation of pelvic ring injuries: a case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:153.

[25] Huang SM, Lan SH, Xing HL, Wang C, Xie PP, Chu XF, et al. Effect analysis of trajectory screw technique in fragility fracture of pelvic ring. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022;35(4):309–316.

[26] Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(2):304–306.

[27] Wu XB, Wang JQ, Sun X, Zhao CP. Guidance for treatment of pelvic acetabular injuries with precise minimally invasive internal fixation based on the orthopaedic surgery robot positioning system. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(3):341–347.

[28] Liu HS, Duan SJ, Xin FZ, Zhang Z, Wang XG, Liu SD. Robot-assisted minimally-invasive internal fixation of pelvic ring injuries: a single-center experience. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(1):42–51.

[29] Al-Naseem A, Sallam A, Gonnah A, Masoud O, Abd-El-Barr MM, Aleem IS. Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(1):9–20.

[30] Wang JQ, Wang Y, Feng Y, Han W, Su YG, Liu WY, et al. Percutaneous sacroiliac screw placement: a prospective randomized comparison of robot-assisted navigation procedures with a conventional technique. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(21):2527–2534.

[31] Li N, Zhu Z, Xiao C, Wei D, Wang F, Zhang W, et al. The efficacy of "TiRobot"orthopaedic robot-assisted VS conventional fluoroscopic percutaneous screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. Int Orthop. 2023;47(2):351–358.

[32] Yang C, Liu G, Tang J, Li G, Qin X, Hu J. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury with sacral variations. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;36(8):940–945.

[33] Ge S, Zhang L, Zhou Z, Jia S, Zheng L. TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;36(8):934–939.

[34] Liu Z, Gu Y, Jin X, Tian W, Qi H, Sun Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes following TiRobot-assisted sacroiliac screw fixation with bone grafting and traditional screw fixation without bone grafting for unstable osteoporotic sacral fracture: a single-center retrospective study of 33 patients. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e932724.

[35] Han W, Zhang T, Su YG, Zhao CP, Zhou L, Wu XB, et al. Percutaneous robot-assisted versus freehand S(2) Iliosacral screw fixation in unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(2):221–228.

[36] Hopf JC, Krieglstein CF, Müller LP, Koslowsky TC. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after osteoporotic posterior ring fractures of the pelvis reduces pain significantly in elderly patients. Injury. 2015;46(8):1631–1636.

[37] Balling H. Additional sacroplasty does not improve clinical outcome in minimally invasive navigation-assisted screw fixation procedures for nondisplaced insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(8):534–542.

[38] Sanders D, Fox J, Starr A, Sathy A, Chao J. Transsacral-transiliac screw stabilization: effective for recalcitrant pain due to sacral insufficiency fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(9):469–473.

[39] Wong JSY, Lau JCK, Chui KH, Tiu KL, Lee KB, Li W. Three-dimensional-guided navigation percutaneous screw fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27(1):2309499019833897.

[40] König MA, Hediger S, Schmitt JW, Jentzsch T, Sprengel K, Werner CML. In-screw cement augmentation for iliosacral screw fixation in posterior ring pathologies with insufficient bone stock. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(2):203–210.

[41] Höch A, Pieroh P, Henkelmann R, Josten C, Böhme J. In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):132.

[42] Suero EM, Greiner A, Becker CA, Cavalcanti Kußmaul A, Weidert S, Pfeufer D, et al. Biomechanical stability of sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis with and without cement augmentation. Injury. 2021;52(10):2707–2711.

[43] Rommens PM, Hofmann A, Kraemer S, Kisilak M, Boudissa M, Wagner D. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):2881–2896.

[44] Wilson DGG, Kelly J, Rickman M. Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):717.

[45] Reilly MC, Bono CM, Litkouhi B, Sirkin M, Behrens FF. The effect of sacral fracture malreduction on the safe placement of iliosacral screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(1 Suppl):S37–S43.

[46] Stübig T, Windhagen H, Krettek C, Ettinger M. Computer-assisted orthopedic and trauma surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(47):793–800.

[47] Ariffin MHM, Ibrahim K, Baharudin A, Tamil AM. Early experience, setup, learning curve, benefits, and complications associated with exoscope and three-dimensional 4K hybrid digital visualizations in minimally invasive spine surgery. Asian Spine J. 2020;14(1):59–65.

[48] Weil YA, Khoury A, Mosheiff R, Kaplan L, Liebergall M, Schroeder JE. Robotic assisted fixation of sacral fractures: a pilot study. OTA Int. 2019;2(4):e046.

[49] Guo X, Wang D, Li J, Zhang H. Global research status and trends in orthopaedic surgical robotics: a bibliometric and visualisation analysis study. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(4):1743–1756.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.