Application of the New Irrigation Protocol to Reduce Recurrence Rate in the Management Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Abstract

Objective: Irrigation is a conventional treatment for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, there has been no unified standard for irrigation during surgery for PJI in the past, and the efficacy is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to create a new irrigation protocol to enhance the infection control rate and reduce the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review with a total of 56 patients who underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasties due to PJI from January 2011 to January 2022. Conventional irrigation (CI) was used in 32 cases, and standard operating procedure of irrigation (SOPI) was used in 24. The CI protocol carries out an empirical irrigation after debridement, which is quite random. Our SOPI protocol clearly stipulates the soaking concentration and time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine. The irrigation is carried out three times, and tissue samples are taken from multiple parts before and after irrigation, which are sent for microbial culture. The important statistical indicators were the rate of positive microbiological culture and postoperative recurrence rate with an average follow-up of 24 average months.

Results: The drainage volume was lower in the SOPI group than in the CI group on postoperative day 3 (p < 0.01) and 7 (p = 0.016). In addition, the percentage of positive microbiological cultures after the third irrigation was less than that before (p < 0.01) and after (p < 0.01) the first irrigation. The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus, which was detected in 25.0% and 12.5% of the SOPI and CI groups, respectively. The failure rate at the final follow-up was 8.3% and 31.3% (p = 0.039) for the SOPI and CI groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared with the traditional CI method, SOPI standardized the soaking time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine, increased the frequency of and irrigation, and proved that microorganisms were almost completely removed through the microbial culture of multiple tissues. SOPI has the potential to become a standardized irrigation process worthy of promotion, effectively reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

Keywords

Irrigation protocol / Periprosthetic joint infection / Recurrence / Revision / Staphylococcus aureus

References

[1] Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:302–345.

[2] Blanco JF, Díaz A, Melchor FR, da Casa C, Pescador D. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140:239–245.

[3] Ahmed SS, Begum F, Kayani B, Haddad FS. Risk factors, diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:1063–1070.

[4] Buchalter DB, Kirby DJ, Teo GM, Iorio R, Aggarwal VK, Long WJ. Topical vancomycin powder and dilute povidone-iodine irrigation reduce the rate of early periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:286–290.e1.

[5] Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(1):e1–e25.

[6] Yilmaz MK, Abbaszadeh A, Tarabichi S, Azboy I, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic joint infection: the utility of biomarkers in 2023. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(6):1054.

[7] Taha M, Abdelbary H, Ross FP, Carli AV. New innovations in the treatment of PJI and biofilms-clinical and preclinical topics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(3):380–388.

[8] Warren SI, Charville GW, Manasherob R, Amanatullah DF. Immune checkpoint upregulation in periprosthetic joint infection. J Orthop Res. 2022;40(11):2663–2669.

[9] Hwang BH, Lee SC, Ong A, Ahn HS, Moon SH. Mycobacterial periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021;45(12):3055–3062.

[10] Peng KT, Hsieh CC, Huang TY, Chen PC, Shih HN, Lee MS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm elicits the expansion, activation and polarization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in vivo and in vitro. PloS One. 2017;12(8):e0183271.

[11] Pellegrini A, Legnani C, Meani E. A new perspective on current prosthetic joint infection classifications: introducing topography as a key factor affecting treatment strategy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(3):317–322.

[12] Tözün IR, Ozden VE, Dikmen G, Karaytuğ K. Trends in the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(10):672–683.

[13] Rudelli BA, Giglio PN, de Carvalho VC, Pécora JR, Gurgel HMC, Gobbi RG, et al. Bacteria drug resistance profile affects knee and hip periprosthetic joint infection outcome with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):574.

[14] Pellegrini A, Meani E, Macchi V, Legnani C. One-stage revision surgery provides infection eradication and satisfying outcomes for infected knee arthroplasty in selected patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021;19(7):945–948.

[15] Pangaud C, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(8):495–502.

[16] Sabah SA, Alvand A, Price AJ. Revision knee replacement for prosthetic joint infection: epidemiology, clinical outcomes and health-economic considerations. Knee. 2021;28:417–421.

[17] Vahedi H, Aali-Rezaie A, Shahi A, Conway JD. Irrigation, debridement, and implant retention for recurrence of periprosthetic joint infection following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1772–1775.

[18] Kuiper JW, Vos SJ, Saouti R, Vergroesen DA, Graat HCA, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, et al. Prosthetic joint-associated infections treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention): analysis of risk factors and local antibiotic carriers in 91 patients. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:380–386.

[19] Ruder JA, Springer BD. Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection using antimicrobials: dilute povidone-iodine lavage. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017;2:10–14.

[20] Kavolus JJ, Schwarzkopf R, Rajaee SS, Chen AF. Irrigation fluids used for the prevention and treatment of orthopaedic infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:76–84.

[21] Blom A, Cho J, Fleischman A, Goswami K, Ketonis C, Kunutsor SK, et al. General assembly, prevention, antiseptic irrigation solution: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:S131–S138.

[22] Siddiqi A, Abdo ZE, Rossman SR, Kelly MA, Piuzzi NS, Higuera CA, et al. What is the optimal irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3570–3583.

[23] Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S. Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:8–14.

[24] Siddiqi A, Abdo ZE, Springer BD, Chen AF. Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections. J Bone Jt Infect. 2021;6:189–198.

[25] Workgroup Convened by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1136–1138.

[26] Duque AF, Post ZD, Lutz RW, Orozco FR, Pulido SH, Ong AC. Is there still a role for irrigation and debridement with liner exchange in acute periprosthetic total knee infection? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1280–1284.

[27] van Meurs SJ, Gawlitta D, Heemstra KA, Poolman RW, Vogely HC, Kruyt MC. Selection of an optimal antiseptic solution for intraoperative irrigation: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:285–291.

[28] Kobayashi N, Kamono E, Maeda K, Misumi T, Yukizawa Y, Inaba Y. Effectiveness of diluted povidone-iodine lavage for preventing periprosthetic joint infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:569.

[29] Zubko EI, Zubko MK. Co-operative inhibitory effects of hydrogen peroxide and iodine against bacterial and yeast species. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:272.

[30] Lu M, Hansen EN. Hydrogen peroxide wound irrigation in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Infect. 2017;2:3–9.

[31] Glynn AA, O'Donnell ST, Molony DC, Sheehan E, McCormack DJ, O'Gara JP. Hydrogen peroxide induced repression of icaADBC transcription and biofilm development in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:627–630.

[32] Henley N, Carlson DWA, Kaehr DM, Clements B. Air embolism associated with irrigation of external fixator pin sites with hydrogen peroxide. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:821–822.

[33] Barnes S, Spencer M, Graham D, Johnson HB. Surgical wound irrigation: a call for evidence-based standardization of practice. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42:525–529.

[34] Anglen JO, Apostoles S, Christensen G, Gainor B. The efficacy of various irrigation solutions in removing slime-producing staphylococcus. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:390–396.

[35] Poilvache H, Ruiz-Sorribas A, Sakoulas G, Rodriguez-Villalobos H, Cornu O, Van Bambeke F. Synergistic effects of pulsed lavage and antimicrobial therapy against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an in-vitro model. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:527.

[36] Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA, Fritz J, Bhave A, Mont MA. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet. 2016;387(10016):386–394.

[37] Fehring TK, Odum SM, Berend KR, Jiranek WA, Parvizi J, Bozic KJ, et al. Failure of irrigation and débridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):250–257.

[38] Royo A, Bertrand ML, Ramos L, Fernandez-Gordillo FF, Guerado E. Is there still a place for continuous closed irrigation in the management of periprosthetic total knee infection? Open Orthop J. 2013;7:205–210.

[39] Riesgo AM, Park BK, Herrero CP, Yu S, Schwarzkopf R, Iorio R. Vancomycin povidone-iodine protocol improves survivorship of periprosthetic joint infection treated with irrigation and debridement. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:847–850.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.