A Novel Multiple Screw Distraction Reducer System in the Treatment of Scoliosis with a Severe Rib Hump

Abstract

Objectives:: The treatment of scoliosis with a severe rib hump remains a major challenge. Traditional vertebral rotation techniques are not satisfactory, and thoracoplasty has many pulmonary complications that limit its application. A novel surgical device, the multiple screw distraction reducer (MSDR) system, provides longitudinal distraction during the corrective operation while at the same time providing lateral translation and axial derotation, which may facilitate the correction of a rib hump. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the MSDR system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a severe rib hump.

Methods:: This was a case-matched study of patients with retrospectively collected data from our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Sixty-eight patients who underwent one-stage posterior pedicle screw-instrumented spinal fusion were matched by the Cobb angle of the main curve and rib hump. All patients underwent a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: the MSDR group (using the MSDR system, n = 34) and the DVR group (using direct vertebral derotation, n = 34). The patients were evaluated for the height of the rib hump, deformity correction, complications, and SRS-30 scores. The unpaired Student's t-test and Pearson's χ²-test were used to compare the outcome measures between the two groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the variables that affected the correction of a rib hump.

Results:: The rib hump was 30.21 ± 6.21 mm versus 29.35 ± 6.52 mm (p = 0.583) preoperatively and 9.18 ± 4.06 mm versus 13.82 ± 5.54 mm (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up in the MSDR and DVR groups, respectively. The correction rates were 70.83% and 53.56%, respectively (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, the main thoracic curve was 58.43° ± 7.97° and 57.84° ± 6.32° (p = 0.736) and was corrected to 10.92° ± 5.47° and 19.14° ± 5.32° (p < 0.001) at last follow-up in the MSDR and DVR group, respectively. Thoracic kyphosis was restored from 18.24° ± 5.19° and 17.98° ± 5.28° (p = 0.836) in the MSDR and DVR group to 24.59° ± 4.41° and 19.32° ± 4.96° (p < 0.001), respectively. Correction of apical vertebra rotation and translation in the main thoracic curve were significantly better in the MSDR group than in the DVR group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Lenke type, implant density, estimated blood loss, or follow-up duration between the two groups, whereas the operation time in the DVR group was significantly less than that in the MSDR group. There were only two minor pulmonary complications in the MSDR group. At the last follow-up, the MSDR group scored higher in terms of appearance and satisfaction (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:: The MSDR system, enabling better coronal alignment, thoracic kyphosis, and axial derotation, could be a safe and effective technique for severe rib hump correction in AIS.

Keywords

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis / Direct Vertebral Derotation / MSDR System / Rib Hump

References

[1] Samdani AF, Hwang SW, Miyanji F, Lonner B, Marks MC, Sponseller PD, et al. Direct vertebral body derotation, thoracoplasty, or both: which is better with respect to inclinometer and scoliosis research society-22 scores? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):E849–E853.

[2] Yang JH, Bhandarkar AW, Kasat NS, Suh SW, Hong JY, Modi HN, et al. Isolated percutaneous thoracoplasty procedure for skeletally mature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients, with rib deformity as their only concern: short-term outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;38(1):37–43.

[3] Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:343–349.

[4] Chang MS, Lenke LG. Vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Oper Tech Orthop. 2009;19:19–23.

[5] Vallespir GP, Flores JB, Trigueros IS, Sierra EH, Fernández PD, Olaverri JCR, et al. Vertebral coplanar alignment: a standardized technique for three dimensional correction in scoliosis surgery: technical description and preliminary results in Lenke type 1 curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(14):1588–1597.

[6] Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Lonner B, Miyanji F, Stanton P, Marks MC, et al. Impact of direct vertebral body derotation on rib prominence: are preoperative factors predictive of changes in rib prominence? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(2):E86–E89.

[7] McMaster MJ, McMaster ME. Does an internal thoracoplasty correct and prevent a reassertion of the rib cage deformity after spine surgery for an adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis greater than 70 degrees. Spine Deform. 2016;4(1):40–47.

[8] Suk SI, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee JJ, Han YT. Thoracoplasty in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2008;33:1061–1067.

[9] Yang JH, Bhandarkar AW, Modi HN, Park SY, Cha JM, Hong JY, et al. Short apical rib resections thoracoplasty compared to conventional thoracoplasty in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(12):2680–2688.

[10] Kumar V, Vatkar AJ, Baburaj V, Najjar E, Bansal P. Pulmonary function after thoracoplasty for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:2972–2986.

[11] Feng G, Huang Y, Huang L, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhou C, et al. A novel posterior multiple screws distraction reducer system versus anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and subsequent spinal fusion for severe scoliosis. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2021;22:144.

[12] Ho EK, Upadhyay SS, Chan FL, Hsu LC, Leong JC. New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:1173–1177.

[13] Mukaiyama K, Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, Ogihara N, Kuraishi S, Shimizu M, et al. Factors influencing the residual rib hump after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 curves. J Orthop sci. 2013;18(10):687–692.

[14] Pankowski R, Roclawski M, Ceynowa M, Mikulicz M, Mazurek T, Kloc W. Direct vertebral rotation versus single concave rod rotation: low-dose intraoperative computed tomography evaluation of spine Derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2016;41:864–871.

[15] Lykissas MG, Sharma V, Jain VV, Crawford AH. Assessment of rib hump deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with or without costoplasty using the double rib contour sign. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:134–139.

[16] Easwar TR, Hong JY, Yang JH, Suh SW, Modi HN. Does lateral vertebral translation correspond to cobb angle and relate in the same way to axial vertebral rotation and rib hump index? A radiographic analysis on idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1095–1105.

[17] Simon AL, Angelliaume A, Happiette A, Huneidi M, Julien-Marsollier F, Ilharreborde B. Halo-gravity traction followed by definitive fusion in severe early onset scoliosis: results of a trunk analysis based on biplanar 3D reconstructions. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:3540–3549.

[18] Kong QJ, Sun XF, Wang Y, Sun JC, Chen ZQ, Yang Y, et al. Evaluating the rotation correction of the Main thoracic curve in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: bending and traction vs. Fulcrum – a preliminary report. Med Sci Monitor. 2017;23:4981–4988.

[19] Kulkarni AG, Shah SP. Intraoperative skull-femoral (skeletal) traction in surgical correction of severe scoliosis (>80 degrees) in adult neglected scoliosis. Spine. 2013;38:659–664.

[20] Jhaveri SN, Zeller R, Miller S, Lewis SJ. The effect of intra-operative skeletal (skull femoral) traction on apical vertebral rotation. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:352–356.

[21] Schlager B, Krump F, Boettinger J, Jonas R, Liebsch C, Ruf M, et al. Morphological patterns of the rib cage and lung in the healthy and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Anat. 2022;240:120–130.

[22] Wan SH, Wong DL, To SC, Meng N, Zhang T, Cheung JP. Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(6):1927–1946.

[23] Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ. The impact of segmental and en bloc derotation maneuvers on scoliosis correction and rib prominence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J]. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(4):345–350.

[24] Mattila M, Jalanko T, Helenius I. En bloc vertebral column derotation provides spinal derotation but no additional effect on thoracic rib hump correction as compared with no derotation in adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis with total pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine. 2013;38:1576–1583.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.