Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision in low-lying rectal cancer
Po-Jung Chen , Ching-Wen Huang , Hsiang-Lin Tsai , Yung-Sung Yeh , Wei-Chih Su , Tsung-Kun Chang , Ming-Yii Huang , Chun-Ming Huang , Jaw-Yuan Wang
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2018, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 43
Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision in low-lying rectal cancer
Aim: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with low-lying rectal cancer (≤ 5 cm from anal verge).
Methods: We enrolled 60 patients with stages I-III low-lying rectal cancer who underwent robotic-assisted TME at a single institution between July 2013 and April 2017.
Results: Of the 60 patients enrolled, 49 (81.6%) underwent preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, among these 49 patients, 18 (36.7%) achieved a pathologic complete response. R0 resection was performed in 57 (95%) patients. Circumferential and distal resection margins were positive in 3 (5%) and 1 (1.6%) patients, respectively. The sphincter preservation rate was 93.3% (56/60). The overall complication rate was 21.7% (13/60), with an anastomotic leakage rate of 3.3% (2/60); most of these instances were mild and the patient recovered uneventfully.
Conclusion: The results demonstrate that robotic-assisted TME is safe and feasible for patients with low-lying rectal cancer.
Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision / low-lying rectal cancer / R0 resection / circumferential resection margin
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |