Effect of restoration technique on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals
Sary S Borzangy, Samah M Saker, Walid A Al-Zordk
Effect of restoration technique on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals
This study was designed to compare the impact of post and core systems on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals and to assess their fracture pattern. Sixty central incisors were cut horizontally 2 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). After root canal therapy, teeth were assigned into 6 groups (n=10 each) based on a post system and used as follows: Group C, non-flared root received size #1 glass fiber posts (Control); Group AP, flared root restored with anatomical post; Group RC, flared root restored with size #1 fiber post and cemented with thick layer of resin cement; Group CR, flared root restored with size #1 and reinforced with composite resin; Group CM, cast post-core; Group CP, CAD̸/CAM polymer-infiltrated ceramic post and core. Following post cementation, core build-up and crown insertion, the specimens were thermo-cycled up to 10,000 cycles (5C/55C; 30 seconds dwell time, 6 seconds transition time) and then statically loaded at 1 mm/minute crosshead speed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test (α=0.05) were used for data analysis. Group C recorded significantly higher resistance to fracture values [(826.9±39.1) N] followed by group CP [(793.8±55.6) N] while group RC yielded the lowest fracture resistance values [(586.7±51.4) N]. The resistance to fracture of wide root canals can be enhanced by using one-piece CAM/CAM post and core as an alternative to the use of either glass fiber post, relined with composite resin increasing the thickness of luting cement or the use of cast post and core system. However, this was an in vitro investigation and further in vivo studies are necessary.
anatomical post / customized post / endodontically treated teeth / flared root canal
[1] |
Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S,
Pubmed
|
[2] |
Giovani AR, Vansan LP, de Sousa Neto MD,
Pubmed
|
[3] |
Mangold JT, Kern M. Influence of glass-fiber posts on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with varying substance loss: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2011, 105(6): 387–393
Pubmed
|
[4] |
Silva GR, Santos-Filho PC, Simamoto-Júnior PC,
Pubmed
|
[5] |
Li Q, Xu B, Wang Y,
Pubmed
|
[6] |
McLean A. Criteria for the predictably restorable endodontically treated tooth[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 1998, 64(9): 652–656
Pubmed
|
[7] |
Eckerbom M, Magnusson T. Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2001, 14(3): 245–249
Pubmed
|
[8] |
Valdivia AD, Raposo LH, Simamoto-Júnior PC,
Pubmed
|
[9] |
Clavijo VG, Reis JM, Kabbach W,
Pubmed
|
[10] |
Mezzomo LA, Corso L, Marczak RJ,
Pubmed
|
[11] |
Xiong Y, Huang SH, Shinno Y,
Pubmed
|
[12] |
Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?[J]. J Endod, 1992, 18(7): 332–335
Pubmed
|
[13] |
Teixeira CS, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD. Bond strength of fiber posts to weakened roots after resin restoration with different light-curing times[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(7): 1034–1039
Pubmed
|
[14] |
Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM,
Pubmed
|
[15] |
Mancebo JC, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Cañadas D. Effect of tooth type and ferrule on the survival of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts: a 3-year clinical study[J]. Am J Dent, 2010, 23(6): 351–356
Pubmed
|
[16] |
Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1979, 42(1): 39–44
Pubmed
|
[17] |
Zogheib LV, Pereira JR, do Valle AL,
Pubmed
|
[18] |
Faria-e-Silva AL, Pedrosa-Filho Cde F, Menezes Mde S,
Pubmed
|
[19] |
Liang BM, Chen YM, Wu X,
Pubmed
|
[20] |
Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2003, 5(3): 243–247
Pubmed
|
[21] |
Amin RA, Mandour MH, Abd El-Ghany OS. Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system[J]. J Prosthodont, 2014, 23(6): 484–494
Pubmed
|
[22] |
Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Martins LR. Effect of cement type, relining procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(9): 1543–1546
Pubmed
|
[23] |
Conde DM, Rodrigues VP, Carvalho Souza Sde F,
Pubmed
|
[24] |
Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Gomes JC,
Pubmed
|
[25] |
Gomes GM, Rezende EC, Gomes OM,
Pubmed
|
[26] |
Gomes GM, Monte-Alto RV, Santos GO,
|
[27] |
Rahman H, Singh S, Chandra A,
Pubmed
|
[28] |
Farina AP, Weber AL, Severo Bde P,
Pubmed
|
[29] |
Farina AP, Chiela H, Carlini-Junior B,
Pubmed
|
[30] |
Chen Z, Li Y, Deng X,
Pubmed
|
[31] |
Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material[J]. Open Dent J, 2013, 7: 118–122
Pubmed
|
[32] |
Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I,
Pubmed
|
[33] |
Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials[J]. Dent Mater, 2013, 29(4): 419–426
Pubmed
|
/
〈 | 〉 |