Setting kinetics and mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials

Ensanya Ali Abou Neel, Anne M. Young

PDF(456 KB)
PDF(456 KB)
Journal of Biomedical Research ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3) : 264-272. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20150023
Original Article
Original Article

Setting kinetics and mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Regardless of the excellent properties of glass ionomer cements, their poor mechanical properties limit their applications to non-load bearing areas. This study aimed to investigate the effect of incorporated short, chopped and randomly distributed flax fibers (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 25 wt%) on setting reaction kinetics, and mechanical and morphological properties of glass ionomer cements. Addition of flax fibers did not significantly affect the setting reaction extent. According to their content, flax fibers increased the compressive (from 148 to 250 MPa) and flexure strength (from 20 to 42 MPa). They also changed the brittle behavior of glass ionomer cements to a plastic one. They significantly reduced the compressive (from 3 to 1.3 GPa) and flexure modulus (from 19 to 14 GPa). Accordingly, flax fiber-modified glass ionomer cements could be potentially used in high-stress bearing areas.

Keywords

setting kinetics / flax fibre / glass ionomer cements

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ensanya Ali Abou Neel, Anne M. Young. Setting kinetics and mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials. Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(3): 264‒272 https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.31.20150023

References

[1]
HamoudaIM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials[J].J Esthet Restor Dent, 2011, 23(5): 315–322.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
ElsakaSE, Hamouda IM, SwainMV . Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties[J].J Dent, 2011, 39(9): 589–598.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
CrispS, Pringuer MA, WardleworthD , Reactions in glass ionomer cements: II. An infrared spectroscopic study[J].J Dent Res, 1974, 53(6): 1414–1419.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
MendonçaAAM, Oliveira CF, HeblingJ , Influence of thicknesses of smear layer on the transdentinal cytotoxicity and bond strength of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement[J].Braz Dent J, 2012, 23(4): 379–386.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Selimović-DragašM , HuseinbegovićA, Kobašlija S, A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements[J].Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 2012, 12(4): 273–278
Pubmed
[6]
GeurtsenW, SpahlW, LeyhausenG. Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers[J].J Dent Res, 1998, 77(12): 2012–2019.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
HattabFN, AminWM. Fluoride release from glass ionomer restorative materials and the effects of surface coating[J].Biomaterials, 2001, 22(12): 1449–1458.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
BertoliniMJ, Palma-Dibb RG, ZagheteMA , Evaluation of glass ionomer cements properties obtained from niobium silicate glasses prepared by chemical process[J].J Non-Cryst Solids, 2005, 351(6-7): 466–471.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
BertoliniMJ, Zaghete MA, GimenesR , Determination of the properties of an experimental glass polyalkenoate cement prepared from niobium silicate powder containing fluoride[J].Dent Mater, 2008, 24(1): 124–128.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
BertoliniMJ, Zaghete MA, GimenesR , Preparation of new glass systems by the polymeric precursor method for dental applications[J].J Non-Cryst Solids, 2004, 344(3): 170–175.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Boaventura JM, Bertolini MJ, Padovani GC, et al.Tissue response to experimental dental cements prepared from a modified power glass composition[J].Dent Mater J, 2012, 31(4): 583–592.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
El-NegolySAEFA, El-Fallal AA, El-SherbinyIM . A new modification for improving shear bond strength and other mechanical properties of conventional glass-ionomer restorative materials[J].J Adhes Dent, 2014, 16(1): 41–47
Pubmed
[13]
StamboulisA, Baillie CA, GarkhailSK , Environmental durability of flax fibres and their composites based on polypropylene matrix[J].Appl Compos Mater, 2000, 7(5/6): 273–294.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
KromerKH. Physical properties of flax fibre for non-textile-use[J].Res Agr Eng, 2009, 55(2): 52–61.
[15]
CzemplikM, KulmaA, BazelaK, The biomedical potential of genetically modified flax seeds overexpressing the glucosyltransferase gene[J].BMC Complement Altern Med, 2012, 12(1): 251
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
HuC, YuanYV, KittsDD. Antioxidant activities of the flaxseed lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside, its aglycone secoisolariciresinol and the mammalian lignans enterodiol and enterolactone in vitro[J].Food Chem Toxicol, 2007, 45(11): 2219–2227.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
AdamyanAA.Current approaches to the development and clinical use of effective dressings, sutures, and polymer implants[J]. Proceedings of the International Conference2006([in Russian], Institut Khirugii im. A. V. Vishevskogo, RAMN, Moscow):19–20.
[18]
MoryganovAP, Galashina VN, DymnikovaNS , Modification of flax fibres: from research to realization[J].Fibre Chem, 2008, 40(3): 234–240.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
ShehataMM, MonaHAD, El-HaririDM . Compressive strength, solubility and micro-leakage of flax fibers reinforced zinc oxide eugenol dental cement material[J]. Flax and other bast plants Symp,September,30 and October 1, INF Poznan Poland1997.
[20]
Abou NeelEA, SalihV, RevellPA, Brushite and Self-Healing Flexible Polymer-Modified Brushite Bone Adhesives for Fibular Osteotomy Repair[J]. Adv Eng Mater, 2014, 16(2): 218–230.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
YoungAM, Rafeeka SA, HowlettJA . FTIR investigation of monomer polymerisation and polyacid neutralisation kinetics and mechanisms in various aesthetic dental restorative materials[J].Biomaterials, 2004, 25(5): 823–833.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Wróbel-KwiatkowskaM , CzemplikM, KulmaA, New biocomposites based on bioplastic flax fibers and biodegradable polymers[J].Biotechnol Prog, 2012, 28(5): 1336–1346.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Wróbel-KwiatkowskaM , ZukM, SzopaJ, Poly-3-hydroxy butyric acid interaction with the transgenic flax fibers: FT-IR and Raman spectra of the composite extracted from a GM flax[J].Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 2009, 73(2): 286–294.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
YoungAM. FTIR investigation of polymerisation and polyacid neutralisation kinetics in resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements[J].Biomaterials, 2002, 23(15): 3289–3295.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
SidhuSK, Pilecki P, SherriffM , Crack closure on rehydration of glass-ionomer materials[J].Eur J Oral Sci, 2004, 112(5): 465–469.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
NicholsonJW, Brookman PJ, LacyOM , Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the role of tartaric acid in glass-ionomer dental cements[J].J Dent Res, 1988, 67(12): 1451–1454.
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Lima PRL, Toledo Filho RD, Melo Filho JA. Compressive stress-strain behaviour of cement mortar-composites reinforced with short sisal fibre[J].Mater Res, 2014, 17(1): 38–46.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
MolinaGF, CabralRJ, MazzolaI, Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)[J].J Appl Oral Sci, 2013, 21(3): 243–249
Pubmed

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 2017 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved
PDF(456 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/