Assessment of atrial electromechanical interval using echocardiography after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract

We sought to investigate variation of atrial electromechanical interval after catheter ablation procedure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using pulse Doppler (PW) and pulse tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI). A total of 25 consecutive in-patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, who restored sinus rhythm after ablation procedure, were recruited in our cardiac center. Echocardiography was performed on each patient at 2 hours, 1 day, 5 days, 1 month and 3 months after the ablation therapy, and atrial electromechanical delay was measured simultaneously by PW and PW-TDI. There was no significant difference between PW and TDI in measuring atrial electromechanical delay. However, at postoperative 2 hours, peak A detection rates were mathematically but nonsignificantly greater by PW-TDI than by PW. Second, there was a significant decreasing trend in atrial electromechanical interval from postoperative 2 hours to 3 months, but only postoperative 2-hour atrial electromechanical interval was significantly greater than atrial electromechanical interval at other time. Lastly, patients without postoperative 2-hour atrial electromechanical interval had a significantly longer duration of atrial fibrillation as compared to those with postoperative 2-hour atrial electromechanical interval, by the PW or by PW-TDI, respectively. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, atrial electromechanical interval may decrease significantly within the first 24 hours after ablation but remain consistent later, and was significantly related to patients' duration of atrial fibrillation. Atrial electromechanical interval, as a potential predicted factor, is recommended to be measured by either PW or TDI after 24 hours, when patients had recovered sinus rhythm by radiofrequency ablation.

Keywords

atrial fibrillation / echocardiography / tissue Doppler imaging / atrial electromechanical interval

References

[1] Jones DG, Haldar SK, Hussain W, A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(18): 1894–1903

[2] Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Radiofrequency catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy: a prospective, randomized, 4-year follow-up trial: the APAF study[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2011, 4(6): 808–814

[3] Miyazaki S, Kuwahara T, Takahashi A, Effect of left atrial ablation on the quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Circ J, 2008, 72(4): 582–587

[4] Hunter RJ, Berriman TJ, Diab I, A randomized controlled trial of catheter ablation versus medical treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure (the CAMTAF trial)[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2014, 7(1): 31–38

[5] Wijffels MC. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: what is the role of atrial remodeling and what can we learn from the atrial defibrillator[J]? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 1999, 10(9): 1210–1213

[6] Berruezo A, Tamborero D, Mont L, Pre-procedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2007, 28(7): 836–841

[7] Lo LW, Tai CT, Lin YJ, Predicting factors for atrial fibrillation acute termination during catheter ablation procedures: implications for catheter ablation strategy and long-term outcome[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2009, 6(3): 311–318

[8] Chang SL, Tai CT, Lin YJ, Biatrial substrate properties in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2007, 18(11): 1134–1139

[9] Chao TF, Sung SH, Wang KL, Associations between the atrial electromechanical interval, atrial remodelling and outcome of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Heart, 2011, 97(3): 225–230

[10] Fuenmayor AJ, Ramírez L, Fuenmayor AM. Validation of inter-atrial conduction time measurement by means of echo-Doppler[J]. Arch Cardiol Mex, 2002, 72(2): 125–128

[11] Merckx KL, De Vos CB, Palmans A, Atrial activation time determined by transthoracic Doppler tissue imaging can be used as an estimate of the total duration of atrial electrical activation[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2005, 18(9): 940–944

[12] den Uijl DW, Gawrysiak M, Tops LF, Prognostic value of total atrial conduction time estimated with tissue Doppler imaging to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation[J]. Europace, 2011, 13(11): 1533–1540

[13] Antoni ML, Bertini M, Atary JZ, Predictive value of total atrial conduction time estimated with tissue Doppler imaging for the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2010, 106(2): 198–203

[14] De Vos CB, Weijs B, Crijns HJ, Atrial tissue Doppler imaging for prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation[J]. Heart, 2009, 95(10): 835–840

[15] Omi W, Nagai H, Takamura M, Doppler tissue analysis of atrial electromechanical coupling in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2005, 18(1): 39–44

[16] Hoshi Y, Nozawa Y, Ogasawara M, Atrial electromechanical interval may predict cardioembolic stroke in apparently low risk elderly patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Echocardiography, 2014, 31(2): 140–148

[17] Park SM, Kim YH, Choi JI, Left atrial electromechanical conduction time can predict six-month maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation by Doppler tissue echocardiography[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2010, 23(3): 309–314

[18] Jones DG, Haldar SK, Hussain W, A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(18): 1894–1903

[19] Dogan A, Gedikli O, Ozaydin M, Mitral annular velocity by Doppler tissue imaging for the evaluation of atrial stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 25(2): 113–120

[20] Zapolski T, Wysokiński A. Stunning of the left atrium after pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2005, 63(3): 254–262., discussion 263–264.

[21] Grimm RA, Stewart WJ, Maloney JD, Impact of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and spontaneous echo contrast: characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993, 22(5): 1359–1366

[22] Susam I, Sacar M, Dereli M, Mitral annular velocity in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation[J]. J Surg Res, 2012, 178(1): 92–95

[23] Eren M, Oz D. The mitral late diastolic flow acceleration slope after the restoration of sinus rhythm in acute atrial fibrillation: relationship to atrial function and change over time[J]. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg, 2010, 10(6): 488–494

[24] Logan WF, Rowlands DJ, Howitt G, Left atrial activity following cardioversion[J]. Lancet, 1965, 2(7410): 471–473

[25] Dell’Era G, Rondano E, Franchi E, , and the Novara Atrial Fibrillation (NAIF) Study Group. Atrial asynchrony and function before and after electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2010, 11(7): 577–583

[26] Akyürek O, Diker E, Dinçer I, The relation between transmitral early filling wave deceleration time and the recovery of atrial contractility after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2001, 79(2-3): 151–157

[27] Manning WJ, Leeman DE, Gotch PJ, Pulsed Doppler evaluation of atrial mechanical function after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989, 13(3): 617–623

[28] Manning WJ, Silverman DI, Katz SE, Impaired left atrial mechanical function after cardioversion: relation to the duration of atrial fibrillation[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994, 23(7): 1535–1540

[29] Daoud EG, Marcovitz P, Knight BP, Short-term effect of atrial fibrillation on atrial contractile function in humans[J]. Circulation, 1999, 99(23): 3024–3027

[30] Leistad E, Aksnes G, Verburg E, Atrial contractile dysfunction after short-term atrial fibrillation is reduced by verapamil but increased by BAY K8644[J]. Circulation, 1996, 93(9): 1747–1754

[31] Dispersyn GD, Ausma J, Thoné F, Cardiomyocyte remodelling during myocardial hibernation and atrial fibrillation: prelude to apoptosis[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 1999, 43(4): 947–957

[32] Ausma J, Wijffels M, van Eys G, Dedifferentiation of atrial cardiomyocytes as a result of chronic atrial fibrillation[J]. Am J Pathol, 1997, 151(4): 985–997

[33] Müller P, Schiedat F, Bialek A, Total atrial conduction time assessed by tissue doppler imaging (PA-TDI Interval) to predict early recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2014, 25(2): 161–167

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 2016 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved