Characterization of integrons and novel cassette arrays in bacteria from clinical isloates in China, 2000-2014

Wenying Xia, Ting Xu, Tingting Qin, Pengpeng Li, Yun Liu, Haiquan Kang, Bing Gu, Ping Ma

Journal of Biomedical Research ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 292-303.

PDF(666 KB)
PDF(666 KB)
Journal of Biomedical Research ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 292-303. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150153

Characterization of integrons and novel cassette arrays in bacteria from clinical isloates in China, 2000-2014

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Rapid dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes among bacterial isolates is an increasing problem in China. Integron, a conserved DNA sequence, which is carried on episomal genetic structures, plays a very important role in development of antibiotic resistance. This systematic analysis was based on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. We summarized the distribution and proportion of different types of gene cassette arrays of integrons (including class 1, 2, 3 and atypical class 1 integron) from clinical bacteria isolates in China. Fifty-six literatures were included in this study. Most of the strains were Gram-negative bacteria (94.1%, 7,364/7,822) while only 5.9% strains were Gram-positive bacteria. Class 1 integrons were detected in 54.2% (3,956/7,295) Gram-negative strains. aadA2 was the most popular gene cassette array detected from 60 Gram-positive bacteria while dfrA17-aadA5 were detected in 426 Gram-negative bacteria. This study identified 12 novel gene cassette arrays which have not been previously found in any species. All the novel gene cassette arrays were detected from Gram-negative bacteria. A regional characteristic of distribution of integrons was presented in this study. The results highlight a need for continuous surveillance of integrons and provide a guide for future research on integron-mediated bacteria resistance.

Keywords

integron / novel cassette arrays / clinical bacteria / China

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenying Xia, Ting Xu, Tingting Qin, Pengpeng Li, Yun Liu, Haiquan Kang, Bing Gu, Ping Ma. Characterization of integrons and novel cassette arrays in bacteria from clinical isloates in China, 2000-2014. Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(4): 292‒303 https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.30.20150153

1 Introduction

Dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer has led to the rapid emergence of antibiotic resistance among bacteria, thus complicating the treatment of infections. Many studies have shown that integrons play an important role in the development of antibiotic resistance. Integrons are gene capture and expression systems characterised by the presence of an intI gene encoding an integrase, a recombination site (attI) and a promoter, situated in the bacterial plasmid, chromosome or transposon, which has the capability of site-specific recombination. They can also selectively capture or remove various specific drug resistance box genes, and transfer their drug resistance genes to different strains or different bacterial genera through functions, such as transformation, transduction and conjugation, a mechanism which accelerates the spread and dissemination of bacterial drug resistanceŽ[ 13]. China has the largest population in the world, and the ratio of unreasonable antibiotics usage in China is higher, so resistance to various antibiotics is common in clinical isolates, often more so than in Western countriesŽ[ 4]. This meta-analysis first reviewed all the researches on integrons and drug resistance in clinical isolates in China.
Till Dec 31, 2014, a total of 56 articles studied on integron and drug resistance of bacteria isolates from patients in China were included. The positive rates of integron were investigated in different species, and the gene cassettes were also measured in some studies. This study mainly review all the literatures, analyzed the data of types (class 1, 2, 3 and atypical integron), positive rates and gene cassette of integrons detected from patients in China.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Search strategy

Two independent reviewers (WX and BG) performed a systematic literature review of potentially relevant studies on integrons and drug resistance. Studies were identified using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (for articles published till Dec 31, 2014) as well as bibliographies of identified papers. The search strategy used the following terms and connectors: "integron" AND "China". The search was not restricted by language. We also attempted to identify potentially relevant articles by checking the references of the germane articles and through personal communications with colleagues.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies obtained from the literature search were checked by title and citation. If an article appeared relevant, the abstract was reviewed. Relevant abstracts were examined in full text. The criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies were established by the investigators before the literature was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: original article, short communication, correspondence or letter that provided sufficient original data; all strains isolated from patients in China. Exclusion criteria were as follows: review and case report; animal, plants, water experiments; strains isolated from healthy people; studies on selected isolates, with certain drug resistance genes, that were already resistant to some antimicrobial agents. Before any studies were excluded, authors of such studies were contacted in an effort to obtain missing data. Differences between reviewers regarding appropriateness for inclusion or exclusion were resolved by consensus.

2.3 Validity assessment

Studies were assessed for quality, with only high-quality studies included for analysis. Characteristics of high quality studies were: prospective cohort, retrospective consecutive cohort; provided basic data including study period and area, total tested numbers and resistant numbers; susceptibility test was performed in accordance with guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). When studies overlapped, the more recent and larger study was included in the analysis. If the smaller study provided data not reported in the larger study, results were included for that specific variable.

2.4 Data extraction

Data extraction was performed by two reviewers using a standardised extraction form. When there was disagreement, the relevant paper was reviewed and differences were resolved by consensus. In this review, microsoft Excel v.1 2.0 was used for data entry and analysis.

3 Results

3.1 Literature search

A total of 519 articles were identified from the initial electronic database search finally, and 56 literatures were finally included (Fig. 1[ 358].
Fig.1 Systematic literature search flowchart

Full size|PPT slide

3.2 Strains and positive rates of integron

Integron distribution was examined in 7,822 clinical isolates in 56 studies. Most strains (94.1%, 7,364/7,822) were Gram-negative bacteria while only 5.9% strains were Gram-positive bacteria (Table 1).
Tab.1 Strains and positive rates of integrons from clinical bacterial isolates in China
Class 1 integron Class 2 integron Class 3 integron Atypical class 1 integron
Gram-positive bacteria
ƒƒStaphylococcus 44.4% (199/448) 6.1% (11/180) 0 (0/180) ND
ƒƒEnterococcus 80.0% (8/10) 20% (2/10) ND ND
Gram-negative bacteria
ƒƒEscherichia coli 65.4% (1,356/2,072) 4.8% (53/1,096) 0.8%(6/709) ND
ƒƒKlebsiella pneumoniae 53.0% (444/838) 0 (0/90) 7.8% (7/90) ND
ƒƒKlebsiella oxytoca 50.5% (12/24) ND ND ND
ƒƒMarcescens 72.2% (13/18) ND ND ND
ƒƒSalmonella 17.1% (155/909) 0 (0/842) 0 (0/842) ND
ƒƒShigella 75.3% (918/1,219) 79.9% (933/1,168) 0 (0/1,112) 77.5% (213/275)
ƒƒEnterobacter 39.5% (79/200) 13.3% (2/15) 0 (0/15) ND
ƒƒCitrobacter 36.4% (4/11) ND ND ND
ƒƒProteus 55.6% (109/196) 66.0% (101/153) 0 (0/153) ND
ƒƒPseudomonas aeruginosa 37.5% (296/789) 1.4% (1/71) 0 (0/71) ND
ƒƒAcinetobacter 61.1% (674/1,103) 0.9% (2/229) 0 (0/158) ND
ƒƒStenotrophomonas maltophilia 5.5% (6/109) ND ND ND
ƒƒBurkholderia cepacia 27.0% (20/74) ND ND ND
ƒƒPseudomonas putida 66.7% (8/12) ND ND ND
Other Gram-negative bacteria 71.4% (5/8) ND ND ND

ND: no data.

(1) Gram-positive bacteria
In all of the studies collected, a total of 458 Gram-positive bacteria were detected of which 448 strains were Staphylococcus. Among these Gram-positive bacteria, class 1 integron was detected in 207 strains while class 2 integron in 13 strains. No class 3 integron and atypical class 1 integron was detected.
(2) Gram-negative bacteria:
Among 56 included studies, 47 studies focused  on Gram-negative bacteria. A total of 7,295 Gram-negative strains were detected in these studies. Based on data, class 1 integron positive were detected in 3,956 strains, 1,037 strains positive in class 2 integron, and 13 strains positive in class 3 integron. It is worth noting that atypical class 1 integrons were detected in 213 Gram-negative strains.
A total of 5,201 Enterobacteriaceae were detected in these 41 studies, class 1 integrons were detected in 2,947 strains, and class 2 integron in 1,034 strains. the Class 3 integron (13 strains) and atypical class 1 integron (213 strains) were detected from Enterobacteriaceae. A total of 2,087 non-fermenting bacteria strains were detected of which 1,004 strains were positive in class 1 integron while only 3 strains positive in class 2 integron.

3.3 Gene cassettes of integrons in China

Based on the 56 including studies, we summarized the distribution of gene cassettes of integrons detected from isolates. Table 2 and Table 3 show the proportions of class 1 integrons and classs 2 integrons from clinical strains. aadA2 was the most popular gene cassette array detected from 60 Gram-positive bacteria while 426 Gram-negative bacteria were detected dfrA17-aadA5. Only 1 study detected class 3 integron in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and the gene cassette array of all the 6 isolates were the same as those comprising blaGES-1-blaOXA-10-aac(6’)-Ib.
Tab.2 Table 2(a) Gene cassette arrays of class 1 integrons in Gram-positive bacteria
Strain Gene cassette array Detection rate*
Staphylococcus aureus aadA2 59.2% (58/98)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 48.7% (37/76)
aacA4-cmlA1 2.6% (2/76)
dfrA17-aadA5 1.3% (1/76)
Staphylococcus epidermidis dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 75.0% (12/16)
aacA4-cmlA1 12.5% (2/16)
aadA2 6.2% (1/16)
dfrA17-aadA5 6.2% (1/16)
Staphylococcus hominis dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 75.0% (6/8)
aacA4-cmlA1 12.5% (1/8)
dfrA17-aadA5 12.5% (1/8)
Staphylococcus haemolyticus dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 100% (5/5)
Staphylococcus warneri dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 100% (1/1)
Enterococcus dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 75.0% (6/8)
dfrA17-aadA5 25.0% (2/8)
aadA2 12.5% (1/8)

*: The denominator is the number of the detected integrons in the study.

Tab.3 Table 2(b) Gene cassette arrays of class 1 integrons in Enterobactericeae
Strain Gene cassette array Detection rate*
Escherichia coli aacA4-catB8-aadA1 60.7% (17/28)
dfrA17-aadA5 41.9% (284/678)
orfD-aacA4-catB8 25.0% (7/28)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 16.9% (89/526)
aac(6’)-1b-cmlA1 11.1% (11/99)
aadA1-dfrA12 11.0% (12/109)
dfrA1-aadA1 9.1% (9/99)
dfrA12-aadA2 9.0% (16/178)
dfr2d 8.1% (14/172)
aadA23b 7.3% (8/109)
dfrA17 5.1% (5/99)
aadA1 4.4% (13/298)
aac(6’)-1b-catB8-aadA1 4.0% (4/99)
dfrA7 3.8% (1/26)
arr3-aacA4 3.8% (3/79)
aacA4-cmlA1 3.8% (14/373)
dfrA1 3.4% (6/178)
aadA2 2.0% (2/99)
dfrA5 2.0% (2/99)
aac(6’)-1b-cr-arr3-dfrA27-aadA16 2.0% (2/99)
dfrA12 2.0% (2/99)
dfrA1-orfC 1.2% (2/165)
dfrv 1.2% (2/26)
aadB-aadA2 1.1% (3/264)
aadB-orf1-cmlA1 1.0% (1/99)
aacA4-catB3-dfrA1 1.0% (1/99)
aac(6’)-1b-catB3-dfrA1 1.0% (1/99)
aadB-cmlA1 1.0% (1/99)
aacC4-cm1A1 1.0% (1/73)
aacC-cmlA1 0.6% (1/165)
aadA22 0.6% (1/165)
aadB-aadA-cmlA6 0.6% (1/165)
arr3-dfrA27 0.6% (1/165)
dfrA5 0.6% (1/165)
dfrA27 0.6% (1/165)
Klebsiella pneumoniae orfD-aacA4 71.4% (10/14)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 32.7% (55/168)
aadA5-dfrA17 28.6% (4/14)
dfrA17-aadA5 22.0% (37/168)
dfrA1-orfC 19.5% (30/154)
dfrA27-aac(6’)-Ib-cr 14.1% (10/71)
arr2-ereC-aadA1-cmlA7 7.1% (1/14)
aadB-catB8-blaOXA-10-aadA1 7.1% (1/14)
aacC1/aacA1-orfP-orfQ-aadA1 7.1% (1/14)
aadA2 5.6% (4/71)
dfrA1-aadA1 5.6% (4/71)
aacA4-catB8-aadA1 4.8% (4/83)
aac(6’)-Ib-cr-aar-3 4.2% (3/71)
dfrA25 3.5% (3/85)
accC4-cmlA 2.4% (2/83)
aadA1 1.4% (1/71)
ORF for hypothetical protein-mfs-1 1.4% (1/71)
aacA4-blaOXA-4-aadA2 1.2% (1/83)
dfrA12-orfF 1.2% (1/83)
dfrA5 1.2% (1/83)
Klebsiella oxytoca dfrA17-aadA5 42.9% (3/7)
aac(6')-Ib-cr-aar3-dfrA27-aadA16 28.5% (2/7)
ddfrA1-aadA5 28.5% (2/7)
Marcescens dfrA12-hypothesis protein-aadA2 100.0% (10/10)
Salmonella dhfrXII-orfF-aadA2 86.5% (32/37)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 50.5% (51/101)
aadA5-dfrA11 4.7% (5/106)
dfrA1 17.8% (18/101)
aadA2 15.1% (16/106)
blaOXA-30-aadA1 13.5% (5/37)
blaP1 5.0% (5/101)
dfrA1-aadA1 5.0% (5/101)
aadA22 4.0% (4/101)
aadA1 1.0% (1/101)
dfrA12-unknown-aadA1 1.0% (1/101)
Shigella dfrA17- aadA5 17.5% (73/417)
aar-3-aacA4 0.8% (2/249)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 0.5% (2/417)
Enterobacter dfrA17-aadA5 61.5% (8/13)
dfrA12-hypothesis protein-aadA2 23.1% (3/13)
dfrA12–orfF–aadA2–orfII–orfIII 20.0% (3/15)
ant(3’ )-Ih–aac(6’)-Iid–catB8 16.7% (1/6)
aacA4–catB8–aadA1 9.5% (2/21)
dfrA12–orfF–aadA2 9.5% (2/21)
dfrA15 13.3% (2/15)
aac(6')-Ib-cr-aar3-dfrA27-aadA16 7.7% (1/13)
drfA7 7.7% (1/13)
dfrA15-aadA2 6.7% (1/15)
Citrobacter aadA2 66.7% (2/3)
dfrA12-hypothesis protein-aadA2 33.3% (1/3)
Proteus aadB-aadA2 28.0% (37/132)
dfrA17-aadA5 15.8% (22/139)
dfrA12-hypothesis protein-aadA2 14.3% (1/7)
dfrA1–orfF 14.3% (1/7)
aadB-catB8-blaOXA-10-aadA1 14.3% (1/7)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 7.9% (11/139)
aadA2 2.2% (3/139)
dfrA1-orfC 1.5% (2/132)
aacA4-cmlA1 0.8% (1/132)
aadB 0.8% (1/132)
dfrA1-sat2 0.8% (1/132)

*: The denominator is the number of the detected integrons in the study.

Tab.4 Table 2 (c) Gene cassette arrays of class 1 integrons in non-fermentative bacteria and other Gram-negative bacteria
Strain Gene cassette array Detection rate*
Pseudomonas aeruginosa aac(6’)-II-aadA13-cmlA8-oxa-10 100.0% (29/29)
dfr17-aadA5 81.5% (22/27)
aacA4-catB8a-blaOXA-10 50.0% (1/2)
aacA4-blaIMP-9-aacA4 50.0% (1/2)
aadA6-orfD 45.5% (15/33)
blaIMP-9-aacA4-blaOXA-10-aadA2 44.4% (16/36)
aadA2 24.2% (8/33)
dfrA17-aadA5 22.2% (2/9)
aadB-aacA4 22.2% (2/9)
aadB-aadA1 22.2% (2/9)
aadB-aac(6’)-IIa-blaCARB-8 18.2% (6/33)
aac(6’)-II–aadA13–cmlA8–blaOXA-10 16.7% (6/36)
aadB-blaPSE-1 16.7% (6/36)
aadB-blaPSE-1-aacA4 11.1% (1/9)
dsul3-Dorf5 11.1% (1/9)
aadB 11.1% (1/9)
aacA4-blaIMP-25-blaOXA-30-catB3 8.4% (3/36)
dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 5.6% (2/36)
dfrXII-orfF-aadA2 9.1% (3/33)
aadB-blaP1 3.0% (1/33)
dfrA15 2.8% (1/36)
aadB-aadA2 2.8% (1/36)
aacA4-aadA2 2.8% (1/36)
Acinetobacter aacA4-catB8-aadA1 71.2% (255/358)
aac(6’)-IId-catB8-aadA1 69.6% (16/23)
aacC1-orfP-orfQ-aadA1 27.9% (17/61)
aacC1-orfX-orfX-orfX'-aadA1 16.2% (16/99)
orfI-aadA1 12.8% (12/94)
arr3-aacA4 10.9% (30/276)
dfrXII-orfF-aadA2 10.7% (6/56)
aadB-catB-like-blaOXA-10/aadA1 10.7% (6/56)
aacC1-orfP-orfP-orfQ-aadA1 4.3% (2/46)
aacA4 3.8% (1/26)
aadB-blaPSE-1-aacA4 3.8% (1/26)
drfA7 3.8% (1/26)
dfr17-aadA5 3.6% (2/56)
aacC1-orfA-orfB-aadA1 1.4% (2/139)
dfrA15 1.4% (2/139)
aadB-aadA2 1.4% (2/139)
aadA2 1.3% (2/155)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia dfrA15 33.3% (1/3)
aadB–aadA2 33.3% (1/3)
aadB–aadA4 14.3% (3/21)
Burkholderia cepacia aadB-aac(6’)-II-blaPSE-1 77.8% (7/9)
aacA4-catB8–aadA1 22.2% (2/9)
Pseudomonas putida aadB-aac(6 )-II-blaPSE-1 60.0% (3/5)
aadA1 20.0% (1/5)
Other Gram-negative bacteria drfA7 14.3% (1/7)
blaPSE-1-aadA2 14.3% (1/7)
aadB-catB3 14.3% (1/7)
aadB-catB8-blaOXA-10-aadA1 14.3% (1/7)
aadA2 14.3% (1/7)

*: The denominator is the number of the detected integrons in the study.

Tab.5 Gene cassette arrays of class 2 integrons in China
Strain Gene cassette array Detection rate*
Enterococcus dfrA1-sat1–aadA1 100.0% (2/2)
Escherichia coli dfrA1-sat2-aadA1 100.0% (3/3)
dfrA1-sat1-aadA1 2.8% (3/109)
Shigella dfrA1-sat1-aadA1 40.0% (167/417)
Proteus dfrA1-sat2-aadA1 45.5% (60/132)

*: The denominator is the number of the detected integrons in the study.

Besides the proportion of gene cassette arrays in isolates, we also analyzed the different types of the gene cassette arrays of integrons. We found that a total of 19 kinds of arrays composed by only one gene cassette were detected in China. The array aadA2 was the most common among the 19 kinds of arrays, which was detected from 95 strains, mainly from Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus and other Gram-negative bacteria. aacC and dfr2d took the second place among the one gene cassette arrays, which were all detected from 17 Escherichia coli strains. There were 33 kinds of arrays composed by 2 gene cassettes in which dfrA17-aadA5 was the most array from 431 strains including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Shigella, while aadB-aadA2 was detected from 43 clinical isolates mainly from Proteus and 35 clinical strains, mainly from Acinetobacter, detected arr-3-aacA4. The type of arrays composed by 3 gene cassettes were detected in 22 different kinds in China. aacA4-catB8-aadA1 followed by dfrA12-orfF-aadA2 and dfrA1-sat1-aadA1 occupied the top 3 which were detected from 280, 227, and 172 strains mainly from Acinetobacter, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and Shigella, respectively.
The resistance gene cassettes of aad, dfr, aac, cat, sat, bla, cml and aar of integrons were detected in China. Figure. 2 shows the proportion of those resistance gene cassettes detected in China.
Fig.2 The proportions of the resistance genes of integrons in China

Full size|PPT slide

3.4 Atypical class 1 integron

All atypical class 1 integrons were detected from Shigella in 3 studiesŽ[ 15, 35, 42]. The gene cassette array blaoxa-30-aadA1, blaOXA-1-aadA1 and dfrA1-sat1-aadA1 were detected in these studies.

3.5 Novel gene cassette array

Six studies claimed they found the novel gene cassette array which was not found in any species previouslyŽ[ 4, 78, 20, 33, 54]. All the novel gene cassette arrays were detected from Gram-negative bacteria. After excluding the unknown gene cassette arrays, the 12 novel gene cassette arrays are listed as follows: aadA6-orfD, aadB-blaP1, aadB-aac(6’)-IIa-blaCARB-8, orfI-aadA1, aadB-catB-like-blaoxa-10/aadA1, dfrA1-aadA5, orfF-HAD-like-aac(6’)-II, orfF-∆MFS-1, catB3-qnrVC-like-aacA4, gcuD1-aacA4'-17-gcu38B-catB8::IS10, aacA3c-aadA13-blaOXA-25, and dfrA1-gcu37-aadA5.

3.6 Regional distribution of class 1 integron in China

Based on 56 studies, 16 provinces and municipalities had data on distribution of class 1 integron. Beijing, Guangzhou and Henan province had data on not only Gram-positive bacteria but also Gram-negative bacteria, while only Gram-negative bacteria were detected in other areas including Anhui, Gansu, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Shandong, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Sichuan, Tianjin, Zhejiang, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. Among Gram-negative bacteria, the highest rate is 91.5% (65/71) in Tianjin; on the contrast, the lowest rate is 12.6% (105/834) in Hong Kong (Fig. 3).
Fig.3 Distribution of class 1 integron in China

Full size|PPT slide

4 Discussion

Integrons play an important role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance through horizontal transmission. Their contribution to the prevalence of multi-drug resistance Gram-negative bacteria has been demonstrated. This study comprehensively analyzed integron distribution in China based on published articles.
From the data of integron distribution, we can easily conclude that integrons in both Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria can be detected, but integrons were widely distributed among clinically isolated Gram-negative bacteria while only seldom integrons can be detected in Gram-positive bacteria (mostly in Staphylococcus).We also found that only 5 studies were about integron in Staphylococ-cusŽ[ 3, 12, 27, 3031], and wherein 4 were by the same author, so we have reason to suspect that the detection results are representative. Among Gram-negative bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae had a higher positive rate of integron than non-fermenting bacteria. From the results, it is evident that class 1 integron positive rate is the highest, much higher than class 2 integron, class 3 integron and atypical class 1 integron. The three highest positive rates of class 1integron occurred in Shigella, Escherichia coli and Marcescens. Class 2 integrons were detected most frequently in Shigella, and the rest were detected in Proteus, Staphylococcus, and Escherichia coli, etc. Class 3 integrons were detected in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Atypical class 1 integrons were only detected in Shigella. In our previous study, we detected integron distribution in different kinds of Gram-negative bacteria, including Shigella, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and AcinetobacterŽ[ 4, 33, 44]. Our results showed that the positive rates of class 1,2 and atypical class 1 integron in Shigella were 68.5% (660/964), 85.2% (821/964) and 73.0% (704/964), respectively, the positive rates of class 1 and 2 integron in Enterobacteriaceae were 58.5% (83/142), 14.1% (20/142), respectively, and 40.8% (40/98) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 52.8% (56/106) Acinetobacter were detected class 1 integron. These results are similar to the review results. Furthermore, in our previous studies, we also found 5 novel gene cassette arrays in the same bacteria. These phenomena give us important information about, the characteristics of integron distribution that may provide a basis for future study.
According to our review results, many types of gene cassettes were observed in the same species/genus of isolates, while the same gene cassette array was found in different species/genus of isolates, which might contribute to genes capture capacity and dissemination capacity of integrons. Most isolates carrying class 1 integron contained gene cassettes. However, a few isolates among class 1 integron positive strains did not contain gene cassettes. The main reasons may be: defects or mutations at the 3’CS; gene cassette array in novel, complex or unusual class 1 integrons or the variable region was too long to be amplified.
In this study, we also found that the class 1 integron positive rate in mainland China was higher than Taiwan and Hong Kong. We speculate that whether the different antibiotic policies lead to different situations of bacteria resistance. But because the inclusion criteria, the number and type of isolates are different, the results are for reference only.
Among 56 studies, many studies also showed that the presence of integrons is positively correlated with multi-drug resistance phenotype. One integron may carry several box genes. The production of bacterial multidrug resistance is closely related to the integrons. The gene cassettes included those encoding resistance to trimethoprim (dfrA1, dfrA5, dfrA7, dfrA12, dfrA15, dfrA17 and dfrA27), aminoglycosides (aadA, aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, aadA12, aadA13, aadA16, aadA22, aadB, aac(6’)-II, aac(6’)-Iid, aac(6’)-1b, aacA4, aacC, aacC1, aacC4 and ant(3’)-Ih), the β-lactamase (blaPSE-1, blaOXA-4, blaOXA-10, blaOXA-30, blaCARB-8,blaIMP-9 and blaIMP-25), chloramphenicol (cmlA1, cmlA6, cmlA7, cmlA8, catB3 and catB8), quinolones (qnrVC-like) and rifampicin (arr2, arr3). Horizontal gene transfer was clearly evident among the Gram-negative bacteria in some studies, as gene arrays, including aacA4-catB8-aadA1, dfrA12-orfF-aadA2, dfrA15 and aadB-aadA2 were found in different species of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria. Horizontal gene transfer was further suggested by the discovery of arrays (dfrA5, dfrA1-orfC and dfrA1-aadA5) in different Enterobacteriaceae species. The research on class 1 integrons and related gene cassettes may provide evidence and information to understand the evolutionary changes of class 1 integrons and gene cassettes. It is urgent to conduct consecutive surveillance of class 1 integron related antimicrobial resistance in China. Meanwhile, some isolates show more kinds of resistant phenotypes than gene cassette array, which might be due to other resistance mechanisms such as resistance plasmids, transposons, biomembrane, ISCRs, and natural resistant mechanisms.
It is worth noting that 12 novel gene cassette arrays were discovered in several studies. It indicated that integrons can efficiently capture and integrate genes. For example, the qnrVC-like gene, which was included in the catB3-qnrVC-like-aacA4 array, showed 98% identity with the functional qnrVC genes, which differed by 14 and 15 nucleotides compared with qnrVC1 and qnrVC3, respectively. The presence of novel integron structures in clinical isolates suggests that hospital environments may favor the formation of novel combination of gene cassettes. Moreover, the high prevalence of integrons in multi-drug resistant isolates highlights the urgent need to employ effective means to avoid dissemination of drug-resistant bacteria.
Overall, this study is a statistical study on the integron types (including class 1 integron, class 2 integron, class 3 integron and atypical class 1 integron) , the positive rates and the gene cassettes detected from clinical isolates in China. This study may provide a reference for future study on integron-mediated bacteria resisteance.

References

[1]
Jones ME, Peters E, Weersink AM, Widespread occurrence of integrons causing multiple antibiotic resistance in bacteria[J]. Lancet, 1997, 349(9067): 1742–1743
Pubmed
[2]
White PA, McIver CJ, Rawlinson WD. Integrons and gene cassettes in the enterobacteriaceae[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2001, 45(9): 2658–2661
Pubmed
[3]
Ren C, Zhao Y, Shen Y. Analysis of the effect of integrons on drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by multiplex PCR detection[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2013, 7(3): 719–724
Pubmed
[4]
Gu B, Pan S, Wang T, Novel cassette arrays of integrons in clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae in China[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2008, 32(6): 529–533
Pubmed
[5]
Sun J, Zheng F, Wang F, Class 1 integrons in urinary isolates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Southern China during the past five years[J]. Microb Drug Resist, 2013, 19(4): 289–294
Pubmed
[6]
Shen Y, Qian H, Gong J, High prevalence of antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of integrons among Shigella isolates in Eastern China[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2013, 57(3): 1549–1551
Pubmed
[7]
Mao P, Fu W, Ye D, Characterized of class I integron in Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from upper respiratory tract[J]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao (in Chinese), 2012, 52(6): 791–796
Pubmed
[8]
Wu K, Wang F, Sun J, Class 1 integron gene cassettes in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in southern China[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2012, 40(3): 264–267
Pubmed
[9]
Han D, Huang J, Shang Z, Co-existence of resistance genes and their association with the genetic marker of integrons among multi-resistant Escherichia coli isolates[J]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao (in Chinese), 2011, 51(4): 458–467
Pubmed
[10]
Hu Q, Hu Z, Li J, Detection of OXA-type carbapenemases and integrons among carbapenem-resistant Acinetobactor baumannii in a teaching hospital in China[J]. J Basic Microbiol, 2011, 51(5): 467–472
Pubmed
[11]
Chang-Tai Z, Yang L, Zhong-Yi H, High frequency of integrons related to drug-resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2011, 29(2): 118–123
Pubmed
[12]
Xu Z, Li L, Shirtliff ME, Resistance class 1 integron in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in southern China, 2001-2006[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011, 17(5): 714–718
Pubmed
[13]
Zhu J, Duan G, Yang H, Multi-drug resistance and characteristic of integrons in Shigella spp. isolated from China[J]. Biomed Environ Sci, 2011, 24(1): 56–61
Pubmed
[14]
Hu LF, Chang X, Ye Y, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole mediated by acquisition of sul and dfrA genes in a plasmid-mediated class 1 integron[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2011, 37(3): 230–234
Pubmed
[15]
Zhu JY, Duan GC, Yang HY, Atypical class 1 integron coexists with class 1 and class 2 integrons in multi-drug resistant Shigella flexneri isolates from China[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2011, 62(3): 802–806
Pubmed
[16]
Xu Z, Li L, Shirtliff ME, First report of class 2 integron in clinical Enterococcus faecalis and class 1 integron in Enterococcus faecium in South China[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2010, 68(3): 315–317
Pubmed
[17]
Jin Y, Ling JM. Prevalence of integrons in antibiotic-resistant Salmonella spp. in Hong Kong[J]. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2009, 62(6): 432–439
Pubmed
[18]
Hu XH, Xu XM, Mi ZH, Relationship between drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds and its mobile genetic elements [J]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi, 2009, 25(2): 103–105 [In Chinese]
Pubmed
[19]
Yang CM, Lin MF, Lin CH, Characterization of antimicrobial resistance patterns and integrons in human fecal Escherichia coli in Taiwan[J]. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2009, 62(3): 177–181
Pubmed
[20]
Xu H, Su Z, Wang S, Four novel resistance integron gene-cassette occurrences in bacterial isolates from zhenjiang, China[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2009, 59(2): 113–117
Pubmed
[21]
Liu R, Yang LL, Luo BR, Detecting int I 1 gene expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with fluorescent quantitative PCR assay[J]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban (in Chinese), 2009, 40(1): 33–36
Pubmed
[22]
Chen J, Su Z, Liu Y, Identification and characterization of class 1 integrons among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in Zhenjiang, China[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2009, 13(6): 717–721
Pubmed
[23]
Jiang LY, Xue XD, Wei LH, Detection of integron, homology and genotype of carbapenemases in multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii isolated from burn wound [J]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi (in Chinese), 2008, 24(6): 432–436
Pubmed
[24]
Wu Y, Li H, Li J, Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa carried a new array of gene cassettes within class 1 integron isolated from a teaching hospital in Nanjing, China[J]. J Microbiol, 2008, 46(6): 687–691
Pubmed
[25]
Li L, Xia ZD, Hu ZH, Expression of Class I integrase gene in Acinetobacter baumannii and drug-resistance[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban (in Chinese), 2008, 33(10): 952–957
Pubmed
[26]
Xu X, Kong F, Cheng X, Integron gene cassettes in Acinetobacter spp. strains from South China[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2008, 32(5): 441–445
Pubmed
[27]
Xu Z, Li L, Alam MJ, First confirmation of integron-bearing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2008, 57(3): 264–268
Pubmed
[28]
Cheng X, Wang P, Wang Y, Identification and distribution of the clinical isolates of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying metallo-beta-lactamase and/or class 1 integron genes[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2008, 28(3): 235–238
Pubmed
[29]
Cui S, Li J, Sun Z, Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium, China[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2008, 14(3): 493–495
Pubmed
[30]
Xu Z, Shi L, Alam MJ, Integron-bearing methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in South China, 2001-2004[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2008, 278(2): 223–230
Pubmed
[31]
Xu Z, Shi L, Zhang C, Nosocomial infection caused by class 1 integron-carrying Staphylococcus aureus in a hospital in South China[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2007, 13: 980–984
Pubmed
[32]
Yu H, Wang XH, Ye YZ, Detection of class I integron and its relation to antimicrobial resistance of Shigella flexneri in children[J]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi, 2006, 44(9): 680–683 [In Chinese]
Pubmed
[33]
Gu B, Tong M, Zhao W, Prevalence and characterization of class I integrons among Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from patients in Nanjing, China[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2007, 45(1): 241–243
Pubmed
[34]
Yu YS, Qu TT, Zhou JY, Integrons containing the VIM-2 metallo-beta-lactamase gene among imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from different Chinese hospitals[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(11): 4242–4245
Pubmed
[35]
Pan JC, Ye R, Meng DM, Molecular characteristics of class 1 and class 2 integrons and their relationships to antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2006, 58(2): 288–296
Pubmed
[36]
Su J, Shi L, Yang L, Analysis of integrons in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli in China during the last six years[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2006, 254(1): 75–80
Pubmed
[37]
Chang CY, Chang LL, Chang YH, Two new gene cassettes, dfr17 (for trimethoprim resistance) and aadA4 (for spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance), inserted in an Escherichia coli class 1 integron[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2000, 46(1): 87–89
Pubmed
[38]
Houang ET, Chu YW, Lo WS, Epidemiology of rifampin ADP-ribosyltransferase (arr-2) and metallo-beta-lactamase (blaIMP-4) gene cassettes in class 1 integrons in Acinetobacter strains isolated from blood cultures in 1997 to 2000[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2003, 47(4): 1382–1390
Pubmed
[39]
Cao X, Xu X, Zhang Z, Molecular characterization of clinical multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2014, 13: 16
Pubmed
[40]
Zhu Y, Yi Y, Liu F, Distribution and molecular profiling of class 1 integrons in MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and whole genome-based analysis of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in a representative strain[J]. Microbiol Res, 2014, 169(11): 811–816
Pubmed
[41]
Cao X, Zhang Z, Shen H, Genotypic characteristics of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates associated with urinary tract infections[J]. APMIS, 2014, 122(11): 1088–1095
Pubmed
[42]
Yang H, Pan Y, Hu L, Antimicrobial resistance patterns and characterization of integrons in clinical isolates of Shigella from China[J]. Can J Microbiol, 2014, 60(4): 237–242
Pubmed
[43]
Li LM, Wang MY, Yuan XY, Characterization of integrons among Escherichia coli in a region at high incidence of ESBL-EC[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2014, 30(1): 177–180
Pubmed
[44]
Shen D, Xu Y, Pan S, Prevalence and characterization of class 1 integrons in multi-drug resistant Salmonella sp. from China in 2010[J]. J Chemother, 2015, 27(1): 57–60
Pubmed
[45]
Chen X, Li GX, Zhang H, Characterization of class 1 integron gene cassettes among clinical bacteria isolated from one large hospital in northern China[J]. Biomed Environ Sci, 2013, 26(12): 1003–1007
Pubmed
[46]
Zhu Y, Yi Y, Yang X, Discovery of new structure of class 1 integron in MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its association with drug-resistance[J]. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao (in Chinese), 2013, 53(9): 927–932
Pubmed
[47]
Wei Q, Hu Q, Li S, A novel functional class 2 integron in clinical Proteus mirabilis isolates[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2014, 69(4): 973–976
Pubmed
[48]
Li B, Hu Y, Wang Q, Structural diversity of class 1 integrons and their associated gene cassettes in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from a hospital in China[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(9): e75805
Pubmed
[49]
Chen T, Feng Y, Yuan JL, Class 1 integrons contributes to antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2013, 31(4): 385–389
Pubmed
[50]
Liu LT, Wan LH, Song XH, Relevance of class 1 integrons and extended-spectrum β-lactamases in drug-resistant Escherichia coli[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2013, 8(4): 1251–1255
Pubmed
[51]
Wei Q, Jiang X, Li M, Diversity of gene cassette promoter variants of class 1 integrons in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. [J]. Curr Microbiol, 2013, 67(5): 543–549
Pubmed
[52]
Xiong J, Alexander DC, Ma JH, Complete sequence of pOZ176, a 500-kilobase IncP-2 plasmid encoding IMP-9-mediated carbapenem resistance, from outbreak isolate Pseudomonas aeruginosa 96[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2013, 57(8): 3775–3782
Pubmed
[53]
Chen Z, Fang H, Wang L, IMP-1 encoded by a novel Tn402-like class 1 integron in clinical Achromobacter xylosoxidans, China[J]. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 7212
Pubmed
[54]
Sun G, Yi M, Shao C, Novel Class 1 Integrons in Multi-drug Resistant Isolates from Eastern China[J]. Indian J Microbiol, 2014, 54(2): 227–231
Pubmed
[55]
Wang J, Liang F, Wu XM, Transfer patterns of integron-associated and antibiotic resistance genes in S. flexneri during different time intervals in Tianjin, China[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2014, 32(3): 256–260
Pubmed
[56]
Yuejin Z, Qingli C, Qian W, Structure and function of class 1 integron in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Yi Chuan, 2014, 36(6): 603–610 [In Chinese]
Pubmed
[57]
Zhu Y, Yi Y, Liu F, Distribution and molecular profiling of class 1 integrons in MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and whole genome-based analysis of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in a representative strain[J]. Microbiol Res, 2014, 169(11): 811–816
Pubmed
[58]
Cao X, Zhang Z, Shen H, Genotypic characteristics of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates associated with urinary tract infections[J]. APMIS, 2014, 122(11): 1088–1095
Pubmed

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000754 and No. 81471994) and received a grant from the Key Laboratory for Laboratory Medicine of Jiangsu Province of China (No. XK201114).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 2016 by the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved.
PDF(666 KB)

609

Accesses

3

Citations

1

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/