
Risk factors for clinical treatment failure and death in patients with ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A single-centre retrospective analysis
Tingting Liu, Gang Li, Huijie Yue, Xuejiao Liu
Intelligent Pharmacy ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2) : 183-189.
Risk factors for clinical treatment failure and death in patients with ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A single-centre retrospective analysis
Objective: In recent years, the number of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) isolated from clinic has been increasing. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy in patients with CZA-resistant GNB infections, and analyze the risk factors for clinical treatment failure and death.
Methods: Clinical data of patients with CZA-resistant GNB infections were collected retrospectively, and the influencing factors were analyzed by binary logistic regression.
Results: A total of 75 patients with CZA-resistant GNB infections were enrolled in the study, and the clinical effective rate was 56% (42/75). Multivariate analysis showed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during anti-infection treatment was an independent risk factor for clinical treatment failure (OR 0.177, 95% CI 0.05–0.63, p=0.008). The 28-day mortality rate in 75 patients was 18.7% (14/75). Multivariate analysis showed that the regimen of colistin E 750,000 U q12h (OR 0.020, 95% CI 0.00–0.56, p=0.021), co-administration of tigecycline (OR 8.851, 95% CI 2.38–1316.87, p=0.012) and CRRT during anti-infection treatment (OR 79.610, 95% CI 4.87–1300.26, p=0.002) were independent affecting factors for 28-day mortality in patients with CZA-resistant GNB infections.
Conclusions: Patients with CZA-resistant GNB infections had a higher possibility of clinical treatment failure and death. The results of the study based on small sample size from a single center showed that clinical treatment failure and death were more likely to happen in patients on CRRT, and the regimen of colistin E 750,000 U q12h or co-administration of tigecycline may reduce or increase mortality, respectively. Further validation in rigorously designed multicenter clinical studies with larger sample sizes is needed.
Ceftazidime-avibactam resistant / Gram-negative bacteria / Clinical efficacy / Mortality / Risk factors
[1] |
DietlB, Martínez LM, CalboE, et al. Update on the role of ceftazidime-avibactam in the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. Future Microbiol. 2020;15:473–484.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
WangY, WangJ, WangR, et al. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and underlying mechanisms. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:18–27.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
ChenYB, JiJR, LiuZY, et al. BRICS report of 2021: the distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of clinical bacterial isolates from blood stream infections in China. Chin J Clin Infect Dis. 2023;16(1):33–47. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2023.01.005.
|
[4] |
TammaPD, AitkenSL, BonomoRA, et al. Infectious diseases society of America 2023 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial resistant gram-negative infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;18:ciad428.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
DingL, ShenS, HanR, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with imipenem as salvage therapy for ST11 KPC-33-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotics. 2022;11(5):604.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
ShiQ, YinD, HanR, et al. Emergence and recovery of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in blaKPC-33-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 11 isolates in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
ZhangY, ZhaoJ, HanJ, et al. Synergistic activity of imipenem in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam or avibactam against non-MBL-producing extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(2):e0274021.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing M100. 32nd ed.; 2022. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/]. Accessed September 22, 2023. The last visit was on.
|
[9] |
HaoM, YangY, GuoY, et al. Combination regimens with colistin sulfate versus colistin sulfate monotherapy in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenemresistant gram-negative bacilli. Antibiotics. 2022;11(10):1440.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
ShieldsRK, NguyenMH, ChenL, et al. Pneumonia and renal replacement therapy are risk factors for ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failures and resistance among patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(5):e02497-17.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
ShieldsRK, Potoski BA, HaidarG, et al. Clinical outcomes, drug toxicity, and emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance among patients treated for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(12):1615–1618.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Bacterial resistance surveillance results in the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) for January-June 2023. [Available from: http://www.chinets.com/Document/Index?pageIndex=0]. The last visit was on 22 September 2023.
|
[13] |
GaibaniP, ReMC, CampoliC, et al. Bloodstream infection caused by KPC producing Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam: epidemiology and genomic characterization China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) Study Group. Dissemination of Carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(4). 516e1-e4.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
LiX, ZhangJ, YangC, et al. Increased expression and amplification of blaKPC-2 contributes to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in a sequence type 11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4): e0095522.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
HuF, GuoY, YangY, et al. Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:2275–2281.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
BassettiM, EcholsR, MatsunagaY, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenemresistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, openlabel, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(2):226–240.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
YuW, LuoQ, ShenP, et al. New options for bloodstream infections caused by colistin-or ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;58(6):106458.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Papp-WallaceKM, ZeiserET, BeckaSA, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with fosfomycin: a novel therapeutic strategy against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(4):666–676.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
MonteroMM, Domene Ochoa S, López-Causapé C, et al. Time-kill evaluation of antibiotic combinations containing ceftazidime-avibactam against extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their potential role against ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(1):e0058521.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
FengK, JiaN, ZhuP, et al. Aztreonam/avibactam effect on pharmacodynamic indices for mutant selection of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring serine-and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(11):2875–2883.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
WangL, ShenW, ZhangR, et al. Identification of a novel ceftazidime-avibactamresistant KPC-2 variant, KPC-123, in Citrobacter koseri following ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:930777.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
KumarA, SinghNP. Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19(2):99–108.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
JamalJA, Mueller BA, ChoiGY, et al. How can we ensure effective antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving different types of renal replacement therapy? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;82(1):92–103.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
FioreM, PelusoL, TacconeFS, et al. The impact of continuous renal replacement therapy on antibiotic pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. Expet Opin Drug Metabol Toxicol. 2021;17(5):543–554.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
FeretzakisG, Loupelis E, SakagianniA, et al. A 2-year single-centre audit on antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from an intensive care unit and other wards in a general public hospital in Greece. Antibiotics. 2019;8(2):2.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
RobertsJA, De Waele JJ, DimopoulosG, et al. DALI: defining Antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: a multi-centre point of prevalence study to determine whether contemporary antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients is therapeutic. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;6(12):152.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
De WaeleJJ, Carrette S, CarlierM, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimisation of piperacillin and meropenem: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(3):380–387.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
MatusikE, Lemtiri J, WabontG, et al. Beta-lactam dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy: a survey of practices in French intensive care units. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):48.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
YuXB, ZhangXS, WangYX, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of colistin sulfate in critically ill patients: exposure and clinical efficacy. Front Pharmacol. 2022;16(13):915958.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
XieYL, JinX, YanSS, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous colistin sulfate and dosage optimization in critically ill patients. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:967412.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
XiaoT, ZhuY, ZhangS, et al. A retrospective analysis of risk factors and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in nontransplant patients. J Infect Dis. 2020;221(
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |