Chromosome-level genome assembly and population genomics unveil strigolactone-regulated growth adaptation in the mycoheterotrophic orchid Gastrodia elata
Zhong-yi Hua , Lihong Li , Yuchao Chen , Yiying Cao , Wei Liu , Xiying Teng , Junhui Zhou , Yuyang Zhao , Yuan Yuan
Horticulture Research ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (7) : 99
Mycoheterotrophic plants rely entirely on fungal symbionts for nutrients, yet the role of intraspecific genomic variation in shaping symbiotic adaptation remains unclear. Gastrodia elata is a mycoheterotrophic orchid with multiple cultivated varieties. Here, we generated a chromosome-level genome of G. elata Bl. f. glauca. Comparative genomic analyses with published G. elata assemblies revealed extensive intraspecific variation, characterized by transposon-mediated inversions occurring in 26% of syntenic regions. Notably, these regions frequently harbored orphan genes. Population genomic analysis of 150 individuals identified three genetically distinct clades: two cultivated (Clades E and G) and one hybrid (Clade I). Transcriptomic profiling uncovered clade-specific expression patterns in symbiosis-related genes, particularly within strigolactone signaling pathways. Molecular dynamics simulations and protein interaction assays demonstrated that polymorphisms in the M domain of the suppressor protein DWARF53 (GeD53) modulate strigolactone signaling by altering the stability of its interaction with the receptor (GeD14). Specifically, a Clade G-specific haplotype enhanced signaling through stabilized protein interactions, thereby influencing tuber development genes, whereas GeD14 variants had minimal functional impact. Further co-expression networks identified LOL5 , RNP1 , and MTHD as downstream effectors correlating with clade-specific tuber phenotypes and carbohydrate allocation. These findings demonstrate how intraspecific variation in strigolactone signaling components drives functional divergence in G. elata , providing both mechanistic insights into mycoheterotrophic adaptation and genomic resources for future research.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Vogel A, Schwacke R, Denton AK. et al. Footprints of parasitism in the genome of the parasitic flowering plant Cuscuta campestris. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2515 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |