Chemical screening in Fabaceae identified GPM1 as a novel compound enhancing early graft adhesion

Abstract

Plant grafting is a horticultural technique used to join different plants with desirable traits. However, graft incompatibility limits its application, especially in agriculturally important Fabaceae species. To enhance grafting efficiency, we conducted chemical screening utilizing an in vitro grafting (IVG) system in Fabaceae. In this study, we screened 3000 artificial chemical compounds and identified a compound, designated graft-promoting molecule 1 (GPM1), which enhanced graft adhesion in Fabaceae species-including Phaseolus coccineus, Vigna unguiculata, Vigna angularis, and Glycine max-as well as in V. unguiculata/ G. max hetero-IVGs at 5 days after grafting (DAG). Notably, GPM1 also increased adhesive force in Nicotiana benthamiana IVGs and improved survival rates in Arabidopsis thaliana micrografting, indicating that its activity is not restricted to Fabaceae. Transcriptome analysis of P. coccineus IVGs at 1 DAG revealed that application of GPM1 induced the upregulation of cell wall modification genes, including PvEXPA5, PvEXPA22, and PvEXPA25. In contrast, treatment with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) induced a broader transcriptional response, predominantly upregulating genes related to cell division. In G. max stem grafting, GPM1 enhanced scion growth and promoted the formation of larger callus cells at the graft junction. Moreover, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that GPM1 significantly upregulated Glyma.07G229000, a homolog of PvEXPA5. The upregulation of cell wall-associated genes by GPM1 is consistent with a role in early graft union formation, potentially by facilitating tissue adhesion at the graft interface. Collectively, this study identifies GPM1 as a chemical regulator that enhances graft adhesion and provides insight into molecular processes associated with early graft adhesion.

References

[1] Mehdi-Tounsi H, Chelli-Chaabouni A, Mahjoub-Boujnah D, et al. Long-term field response of pistachio to irrigation water salinity. Agric Water Manag. 2017; 185: 1-12

[2] Ramírez-Gil JG, Ramelli EG, Osorio JGM . Economic impact of the avocado (cv. Hass) wilt disease complex in Antioquia, Colombia, crops under different technological management levels. Crop Prot. 2017; 101: 103-15

[3] Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, et al. A history of grafting. Hortic Rev. 2009; 35: 437-93

[4] Shrestha S, Mattupalli C, Miles C . Effect of grafting compatibility on fruit yield and quality of cantaloupe in a Mediterranean-type climate. Horticulturae. 2022; 8: 888

[5] Kawaguchi M, Taji A, Backhouse D, et al. Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2008; 83: 581-8

[6] Rasool A, Mansoor S, Bhat KM, et al. Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 1-19

[7] Venema JH, Giuffrida F, Paponov I, et al. Rootstock-scion signalling: key factors mediating scion performance. In: Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices . (Colla G, Pérez-Alfocea F, Schwarz D, eds). CABI: UK, 2017, 94-131

[8] Albornoz F, Pérez-Donoso AG, Leigh Urbina J, et al. Nitrate transport rate in the xylem of tomato plants grafted onto a vigorous rootstock. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 182

[9] Huang C, Kurotani K, Tabata R, et al. Nicotiana benthamiana XYLEM CYSTEINE PROTEASE genes facilitate tracheary element formation in interfamily grafting . Hortic Res. 2023; 10: uhad072

[10] Rouphael Y, Venema JH, Edelstein M, et al. Grafting as a tool for tolerance of abiotic stress. In: Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices . (Colla G, Pérez-Alfocea F, Schwarz D, eds). CABI: UK, 2017, 171-215

[11] Belmonte-Ureña LJ, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Camacho-Ferre F . Analysis of world research on grafting in horticultural plants. HortScience. 2020; 55: 112-20

[12] Vougeleka V, Savvas D, Ntatsi G, et al. Impact of the rootstock genotype on the performance of grafted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars . Sci Hortic. 2023; 311: 111821

[13] Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B . Legumes of the World . Kew, UK: Royal Botanical Gardens; 2005:

[14] Christenhusz MJM, Byng J . The number of known plant species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa. 2016; 261: 201-17

[15] Govaerts R, Nic Lughadha E, Black N, et al. The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci Data. 2021; 8: 215

[16] Savvas D, Ntatsi G, Vlachou M, et al. Impact of different rhizobial strains and reduced nitrogen supply on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in cowpea grown hydroponically. In: International Symposium on New Technologies for Environment Control, Energy-Saving and Crop Production in Greenhouse and Plant, Vol. 1227. (Yang Q, Luo W, Jiang W, eds). 2017; 417-24. International Society for Horticultural Science, Belgium

[17] Pacheco RS, Boddey RM, Alves BJR, et al. Differences in contribution of biological nitrogen fixation to yield performance of common bean cultivars as assessed by the 15N natural abundance technique. Plant Soil. 2020; 454: 327-41

[18] Graham PH, Vance CP . Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol. 2003; 131: 872-7

[19] Nishimura R, Ohmori M, Fujita H, et al. A lotus basic leucine zipper protein with a RING-finger motif negatively regulates the developmental program of nodulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 15206-10

[20] Varma Penmetsa R, Uribe P, Anderson J, et al. The Medicago truncatula ortholog of Arabidopsis EIN2, sickle, is a negative regulator of symbiotic and pathogenic microbial associations. Plant J. 2008; 55: 580-95

[21] Du Y, Zhao Q, Li S, et al. Shoot/root interactions affect soybean photosynthetic traits and yield formation: a case study of grafting with record-yield cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 445

[22] Gurusamy V, Bett KE, Vandenberg A . Grafting as a tool in common bean breeding. Can J Plant Sci. 2010; 90: 299-304

[23] Koren A, Klein E, Dieleman JA, et al. Practical applications and specialty crops. In: Pérez-Alfocea F, Colla G, Schwarz D, eds. Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices.FAO Plant Prod Prot Pap. Vol. 218. CABI: UK, 2017, 245-69

[24] Wulf KE, Reid JB, Foo E . What drives interspecies graft union success? Exploring the role of phylogenetic relatedness and stem anatomy. Physiol Plant. 2020; 170: 132-47

[25] Notaguchi M, Kurotani K, Sato Y, et al. Cell-cell adhesion in plant grafting is facilitated by β-1,4-glucanases. Science. 2020; 369: 698-702

[26] Melnyk CW, Schuster C, Leyser O, et al. A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana . Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 1306-18

[27] Xie L, Tian J, Peng L, et al. Conserved regulatory pathways for stock-scion healing revealed by comparative analysis of Arabidopsis and tomato grafting transcriptomes. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 12: 810465

[28] Cosgrove DJ . Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature. 2000; 407: 321-6

[29] Cookson SJ, Clemente Moreno MJ, Hevin C, et al. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 2997-3008

[30] Yin H, Yan B, Sun J, et al. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 4219-32

[31] Matsuoka K, Sugawara E, Aoki R, et al. Differential cellular control by cotyledon-derived phytohormones involved in graft reunion of Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57: 2620-31

[32] Kawakatsu Y, Sawai Y, Kurotani K, et al. An in vitro grafting method to quantify mechanical forces of adhering tissues. Plant Biotechnol. 2020; 37: 451-8

[33] Nemhauser JL, Torii KU . Plant synthetic biology for molecular engineering of signalling and development. Nat Plants. 2016; 2: 1-7

[34] Hagihara S, Yamada R, Itami K, et al. Dissecting plant hormone signaling with synthetic molecules: perspective from the chemists. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019; 47: 32-7

[35] Halder V, Russinova E . Understanding the language of drugged plants. Nat Chem Biol. 2019; 15: 1025-8

[36] Hicks GR, Raikhel NV . Small molecules present large opportunities in plant biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012; 63: 261-82

[37] Tsuchiya Y, Yoshimura M, Sato Y, et al. Probing strigolactone receptors in Striga hermonthica with fluorescence. Science. 2015; 349: 864-8

[38] Hirakawa Y, Shinohara H, Welke K, et al. Cryptic bioactivity capacitated by synthetic hybrid plant peptides. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14318

[39] Uchida N, Takahashi K, Iwasaki R, et al. Chemical hijacking of auxin signaling with an engineered auxin-TIR1 pair. Nat Chem Biol. 2018; 14: 299-305

[40] Yoshimura M, Sato A, Kuwata K, et al. Discovery of shoot branching regulator targeting strigolactone receptor DWARF14. ACS Central Science. 2018; 4: 230-4

[41] Dobránszky J, Magyar-Tábori K, Jámbor-Benczúr E, et al. New in vitro micrografting method for apple by sticking. Int J Hortic Sci. 2000; 6: 79-83

[42] Murashige T, Bitters WP, Rangan TS, et al. A technique of shoot apex grafting and its utilization towards recovering virus-free citrus clones. HortScience. 1972; 7: 118-9

[43] Errea P, Felipe A, Herrero M . Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. J Exp Bot. 1994; 45: 393-401

[44] Pina A, Errea P, Martens HJ . Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. Sci Hortic. 2012; 143: 144-50

[45] Tedesco S, Irisarri Sarto P, Teixeira-Santos M, et al. In vitro early detection of grapevine virus-induced graft incompatibility in Syrah/R110: the involvement of GRSPaV. In: 20th Congress of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-like diseases of the Grapevine.(Maliogka VI, Katis NI, eds). ICVG, USA, 2023

[46] Lal N, Ramteke V, Diwan G, et al. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses during grafting in horticultural crops. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2025; 43: 1790-811

[47] Cosgrove DJ . Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 6: 850-61

[48] Nishitani K, Masuda Y . Auxin-induced changes in the cell wall structure: changes in the sugar compositions, intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight distributions of matrix polysaccharides of the epicotyl cell wall of Vigna angularis . Physiol Plant. 1981; 52: 482-94

[49] Song Y . Insight into the mode of action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) as an herbicide. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014; 56: 106-13

[50] Nissen SJ, Sutter EG . Stability of indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid in nutrient medium to several tissue culture procedures. HortScience. 1990; 25: 800-2