Functional data analysis-based yield modeling in year-round crop cultivation

Hidetoshi Matsui , Keiichi Mochida

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) : 144

PDF (1084KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) :144 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae144
Article
research-article
Functional data analysis-based yield modeling in year-round crop cultivation
Author information +
History +
PDF (1084KB)

Abstract

Crop yield prediction is essential for effective agricultural management. We introduce a methodology for modeling the relationship between environmental parameters and crop yield in longitudinal crop cultivation, exemplified by strawberry and tomato production based on year-round cultivation. Employing functional data analysis (FDA), we developed a model to assess the impact of these factors on crop yield, particularly in the face of environmental fluctuation. Specifically, we demonstrated that a varying-coefficient functional regression model (VCFRM) is utilized to analyze time-series data, enabling to visualize seasonal shifts and the dynamic interplay between environmental conditions such as solar radiation and temperature and crop yield. The interpretability of our FDA-based model yields insights for optimizing growth parameters, thereby augmenting resource efficiency and sustainability. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of VCFRM-based yield modeling, offering strategies for stable, efficient crop production, pivotal in addressing the challenges of climate adaptability in plant factory-based horticulture.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hidetoshi Matsui, Keiichi Mochida. Functional data analysis-based yield modeling in year-round crop cultivation. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (7) : 144 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae144

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Heiwado farm for providing us with the data for cultivation of strawberries and Higashibaba farm for providing us with those of tomatoes. This work was supported by PRESTO (grant no. JPMJPR16O6 to H.M.) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency and KAKENHI (grant no. 19 K11858 to H.M.) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This work was also partially supported by CREST (grant no. JPMJCR16O4 to K.M.) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency and by Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Moonshot Research and Development Program for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, No. JPJ009237 to K.M.).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the trade secret.

References

[1]

Iaksch J, Fernandes E, Borsato M. Digitalization and big data in smart farming - a review. J Manag Anal. 2021; 8 :333-49

[2]

Telagam N, Kandasamy N, Arun Kumar M. Review on smart farming and smart agriculture for society:post-pandemic era. In: Chakraborty C,ed. Green technological innovation for sustainable smart societies. Springer: Cham, 2021,

[3]

Hao S, Ryu D, Western A. et al. Performance of a wheat yield prediction model and factors influencing the performance: a review and meta-analysis. Agric Syst. 2021; 194 :103278

[4]

Ray D, Gerber J, MacDonald G. et al. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nat Commun. 2015; 6 :5989

[5]

van Klompenburg T, Kassahun A, Catal C. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Comput Electron Agric. 2020; 177 :105709

[6]

Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D. et al. Machine learning in agriculture: a review. Sensors. 2018; 18 :2674

[7]

Kang Y, Ozdogan M, Zhu X. et al. Comparative assessment of environmental variables and machine learning algorithms for maize yield prediction in the US Midwest. Environ Res Lett. 2020; 15 :064005

[8]

Kang Y, Khan S, Ma X. Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security - a review. Prog Nat Sci. 2009; 19 :1665-74

[9]

Lobell DB, Burke MB. On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agric For Meteorol. 2010; 150 :1443-52

[10]

Saito T, Kawasaki Y, Ahn D-H. et al. Prediction and improvement of yield and dry matter production based on modeling and non-destructive measurement in year-round greenhouse tomatoes. Hort J. 2020; 89 :425-31

[11]

Kim S, Jo JS, Luk V. et al. Estimating the impact of environmental management on strawberry yield using publicly available agricultural data in south Korea. PeerJ. 2023, 2023; 11 :e15390

[12]

Chen Y, Lee WS, Gan H. et al. Strawberry yield prediction based on a deep neural network using high-resolution aerial Orthoimages. Remote Sens. 2019; 11 :1584

[13]

Yoon S, Jo JS, Kim SB. et al. Prediction of strawberry yield based on receptacle detection and Bayesian inference. Heliyon. 2023; 9 :e14546

[14]

Kokoszka P, Reimherr M. Introduction to functional data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017:

[15]

Ramsay J, Silverman B. Functional data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005:

[16]

Boschi T, Di Iorio J, Testa L. et al. Functional data analysis characterizes the shapes of the first COVID-19 epidemic wave in Italy. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 :17054

[17]

Kayano M, Matsui H, Yamaguchi R. et al. Gene set differential analysis of time course expression profiles via sparse estimation in functional logistic model with application to time-dependent biomarker detection. Biostatistics. 2016; 17 :235-48

[18]

Padilla-Segarra A, González-Villacorte M, Amaro IR. et al. Brief review of functional data analysis:a case study on regional demographic and economic data. In: Information and Communication Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, 163-76

[19]

Ullah S, Finch CF. Applications of functional data analysis: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13 :43

[20]

Wong RW, Li Y, Zhu Z. Partially linear functional additive models for multivariate functional data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2019; 114 :406-18

[21]

Wu Y, Fan J, Müller HG. Varying-coefficient functional linear regression. Bernoulli. 2010; 16 :730-58

[22]

Konishi S, Kitagawa G. Information criteria and statistical modeling. New York: Springer; 2008:

[23]

Quy VK, Hau NV, Anh DV. et al. IoT-enabled smart agriculture: architecture, applications, and challenges. Appl Sci. 2022; 12 :3396

[24]

Rayhana R, Xiao G, Liu Z. Internet of things empowered smart greenhouse farming. IEEE J Radio Freq Identif. 2020; 4 :195-211

[25]

Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C. et al. Big data in smart farming - a review. Agric Syst. 2017; 153 :69-80

[26]

Mochida K, Lipka AE, Hirayama T. Exploration of life-course factors influencing phenotypic outcomes in crops. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020a; 61 :1381-3

[27]

Mochida K, Nishii R, Hirayama T. Decoding plant-environment interactions that influence crop agronomic traits. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020b; 61 :1408-18

PDF (1084KB)

100

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/