Genetic and epigenetic signatures for improved breeding of cultivated blueberry

Zejia Wang , Wanchen Zhang , Yangyan Zhou , Qiyan Zhang , Krishnanand P. Kulkarni , Kalpalatha Melmaiee , Youwen Tian , Mei Dong , Zhaoxu Gao , Yanning Su , Hong Yu , Guohui Xu , Yadong Li , Hang He , Qikun Liu , Haiyue Sun

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) : 138

PDF (3809KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) :138 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae138
Article
research-article
Genetic and epigenetic signatures for improved breeding of cultivated blueberry
Author information +
History +
PDF (3809KB)

Abstract

Blueberry belongs to the Vaccinium genus and is a highly popular fruit crop with significant economic importance. It was not until the early twentieth century that they began to be domesticated through extensive interspecific hybridization. Here, we collected 220 Vaccinium accessions from various geographical locations, including 154 from the United States, 14 from China, eight from Australia, and 29 from Europe and other countries, comprising 164 Vaccinium corymbosum, 15 Vaccinium ashei, 10 lowbush blueberries, seven half-high blueberries, and others. We present the whole-genome variation map of 220 accessions and reconstructed the hundred-year molecular history of interspecific hybridization of blueberry. We focused on the two major blueberry subgroups, the northern highbush blueberry (NHB) and southern highbush blueberry (SHB) and identified candidate genes that contribute to their distinct traits in climate adaptability and fruit quality. Our analysis unveiled the role of gene introgression from Vaccinium darrowii and V. ashei into SHB in driving the differentiation between SHB and NHB, potentially facilitating SHB’s adaptation to subtropical environments. Assisted by genome-wide association studies, our analysis suggested VcTBL44 as a pivotal gene regulator governing fruit firmness in SHB. Additionally, we conducted whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on nine NHB and 12 SHB cultivars, and characterized regions that are differentially methylated between the two subgroups. In particular, we discovered that the β -alanine metabolic pathway genes were enriched for DNA methylation changes. Our study provides high-quality genetic and epigenetic variation maps for blueberry, which offer valuable insights and resources for future blueberry breeding.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zejia Wang, Wanchen Zhang, Yangyan Zhou, Qiyan Zhang, Krishnanand P. Kulkarni, Kalpalatha Melmaiee, Youwen Tian, Mei Dong, Zhaoxu Gao, Yanning Su, Hong Yu, Guohui Xu, Yadong Li, Hang He, Qikun Liu, Haiyue Sun. Genetic and epigenetic signatures for improved breeding of cultivated blueberry. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (7) : 138 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae138

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds from the State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, the Project of Science and Technology Development of Jilin Province, China (20220508099RC), the Project of Development and Reform Commission of Jilin Province, China (2023C035-4) and startup funds from the School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences at Peking University. We express our gratitude for the computational resources provided by the High-performance Computing Platform of Peking University. We are grateful to Dr Massimo Iorizzo at North Carolina State University for his generous help with curating the classification of blueberry accessions. Additionally, we extend our thanks to Xiaowen Wang, Yilin Zhang, Han Zhou, Yi Liu, and Minghan Huang for their valuable discussion and input on data analysis. We are also thankful to Xinyue Lu, Xuanzhi Cheng, and Cuimei Zhang for their technical support.

Author Contributions

Q.L., H.S., and H.H. designed the research. H.S., W.Z., Y.L., H.Y., and G.X. collected the samples. Z.W., Z.G., and Y.S. analysed the high-throughput sequencing data. Y.Z., Q.Z., Y.T., and M.D. coordinated the genome resequencing and bisulfite sequencing. W.Z. measured the fruit traits. Z.W. and Q.L. wrote the manuscript. Q.L., H.S., H.H., and Z.W. revised the manuscript. K.P.K. and K.M. curated the classification of blueberry accessions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

Data availability

Whole-genome resequencing data of 220 blueberry accessions has been deposited into the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under accession number PRJNA948809. The whole-genome methylation data of 21 cultivars (including 11SHB and 10 NHB), as well as the whole-genome methylation and transcriptome data of ‘Draper’, ‘sharpblue’, and V. darrowii, have been deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under SuperSeries GSE228041 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE228041). RNA-seq data of five developmental stages of blueberry have been deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under SuperSeries GSE229139. SNPs and indels in Variant Call Format (VCF) have been deposited into the Figshare database (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22699810).

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1]

Retamales JB, Hancock JF. Blueberries. Vol. 48. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2012:4

[2]

Faria A, Pestana D, Teixeira D. et al. Blueberry anthocyanins and pyruvic acid adducts: anticancer properties in breast cancer cell lines. Phytother Res. 2010; 24 :1862-9

[3]

Kalt W, Cassidy A, Howard LR. et al. Recent research on the health benefits of blueberries and their anthocyanins. Adv Nutr. 2020; 11 :224-36

[4]

Ballington JR. Collection, utilization, and preservation of genetic resources in Vaccinium. HortSci. 2001; 36 :206-13

[5]

Nishiyama S, Fujikawa M, Yamane H. et al. Genomic insight into the developmental history of southern highbush blueberry populations. Heredity (Edinb). 2021; 126 :194-205

[6]

Lobos GA, Hancock JF. Breeding blueberries for a changing global environment: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6 :782

[7]

Blaker KM, Plotto A, Baldwin EA. et al. Correlation between sensory and instrumental measurements of standard and crisp-texture southern highbush blueberries ( Vaccinium corymbosum L. interspecific hybrids). J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 94 :2785-93

[8]

Li N, Zhang X, Sun X. et al. Genomic insights into the evolutionary history and diversification of bulb traits in garlic. Genome Biol. 2022; 23 :188

[9]

Liang Z, Duan S, Sheng J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing of 472 Vitis accessions for grapevine diversity and demographic history analyses. Nat Commun. 2019; 10 :1190

[10]

Ma Z, He S, Wang X. et al. Resequencing a core collection of upland cotton identifies genomic variation and loci influencing fiber quality and yield. Nat Genet. 2018; 50 :803-13

[11]

Zhao G, Lian Q, Zhang Z. et al. A comprehensive genome variation map of melon identifies multiple domestication events and loci influencing agronomic traits. Nat Genet. 2019; 51 :1607-15

[12]

Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM. et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blueberry. Gigascience. 2019; 8 :giz012

[13]

Cui F, Ye X, Li X. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the diploid blueberry Vaccinium darrowii provides insights into its subtropical adaptation and cuticle synthesis. Plant Commun. 2022; 3 :100307

[14]

Yu J, Hulse-Kemp AM, Babiker E. et al. High-quality reference genome and annotation aids understanding of berry development for evergreen blueberry ( Vaccinium darrowii ). Hortic Res. 2021; 8 :228

[15]

Manzanero BR, Kulkarni KP, Vorsa N. et al. Genomic and evolutionary relationships among wild and cultivated blueberry species. BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23 :126

[16]

Kulkarni KP, Vorsa N, Natarajan P. et al. Admixture analysis using genotyping-by-sequencing reveals genetic relatedness and parental lineage distribution in highbush blueberry genotypes and cross derivatives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 22 :163

[17]

Yocca AE, Platts A, Alger E. et al. Blueberry and cranberry pangenomes as a resource for future genetic studies and breeding efforts. Hortic Res. 2023; 10 :uhad202

[18]

Shen Y, Zhang J, Liu Y. et al. DNA methylation footprints during soybean domestication and improvement. Genome Biol. 2018; 19 :128

[19]

Lang Z, Wang Y, Tang K. et al. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017; 114 :E4511-9

[20]

Tian T, Wang S, Yang S. et al. Genome assembly and genetic dissection of a prominent drought-resistant maize germplasm. Nat Genet. 2023; 55 :496-506

[21]

Wang L, Zheng K, Zeng L. et al. Reinforcement of CHH methylation through RNA-directed DNA methylation ensures sexual reproduction in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022; 188 :1189-209

[22]

Song Q, Zhang T, Stelly DM. et al. Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genome Biol. 2017; 18 :99

[23]

Weiss CL, Pais M, Cano LM. et al. nQuire: a statistical framework for ploidy estimation using next generation sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018; 19 :122

[24]

Campa A, Ferreira JJ. Genetic diversity assessed by genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and for phenological traits in blueberry cultivars. PLoS One. 2018; 13 :e0206361

[25]

Forney CF, Qiu S, Jordan MA. et al. Comparison of volatile compounds contributing to flavor of wild lowbush ( Vaccinium augustifolium ) and cultivated highbush ( Vaccinium corymbosum ) blueberry fruit using gas chromatography-olfactometry. Foods. 2022; 11 :2516

[26]

Ballington J.R. The role of interspecific hybridization in blueberry improvement. Acta Hortic. 2009: 810 :49-60

[27]

Ferrão LFV, Benevenuto J, Oliveira IDB. et al. Insights into the genetic basis of blueberry fruit-related traits using diploid and polyploid models in a GWAS context. Front Ecol Evol. 2018; 6

[28]

Shen C, Du H, Chen Z. et al. The chromosome-level genome sequence of the autotetraploid alfalfa and resequencing of core germplasms provide genomic resources for alfalfa research. Mol Plant. 2020; 13 :1250-61

[29]

Martin SH, Davey JW, Jiggins CD. Evaluating the use of ABBA-BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32 :244-57

[30]

Basak I, Pal R, Patil KS. et al. Arabidopsis AtPARK13, which confers thermotolerance, targets misfolded proteins. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289 :14458-69

[31]

Berka M, Kopecka R, Berkova V. et al. Regulation of heat shock proteins 70 and their role in plant immunity. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73 :1894-909

[32]

Planas-Riverola A, Gupta A, Betegon-Putze I. et al. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development. 2019; 146 :dev151894

[33]

Krishna P. Brassinosteroid-mediated stress responses. J Plant Growth Regul. 2003; 22 :289-97

[34]

Cappai F, Benevenuto J, Ferrão LFV. et al. Molecular and genetic bases of fruit firmness variation in blueberry—a review. Agronomy. 2018; 8 :174

[35]

Shi Y, Li BJ, Su G. et al. Transcriptional regulation of fleshy fruit texture. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022; 64 :1649-72

[36]

Huang B, Hu G, Wang K. et al. Interaction of two MADS-box genes leads to growth phenotype divergence of all-flesh type of tomatoes. Nat Commun. 2021; 12 :6892

[37]

Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4 :1073-81

[38]

Law JA, Jacobsen SE. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11 :204-20

[39]

Fouad WM, Altpeter F. Transplastomic expression of bacterial L-aspartate-alpha-decarboxylase enhances photosynthesis and biomass production in response to high temperature stress. Transgenic Res. 2009; 18 :707-18

[40]

Kaplan F, Kopka J, Haskell DW. et al. Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004; 136 :4159-68

[41]

Yang L, Li M, Shen M. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the native Chinese wild blueberry Vaccinium bracteatum. Fruit Res. 2022; 2 :1-14

[42]

Ferrao L, Johnson TS, Benevenuto J. et al. Genome-wide association of volatiles reveals candidate loci for blueberry flavor. New Phytol. 2020; 226 :1725-37

[43]

Zhang J, Zhang X, Tang H. et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat Genet. 2018; 50 :1565-73

[44]

Guo H, Cao P, Wang C. et al. Population analysis reveals the roles of DNA methylation in tomato domestication and metabolic diversity. Sci China Life Sci. 2023; 66 :1888-902

[45]

Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980; 8 :4321-6

[46]

Rivera S, Kerckhoffs H, Sofkova-Bobcheva S. et al. Data of texture profile analysis performed by different input settings on stored ’Nui’ and ’Rahi’ blueberries. Data Brief. 2021; 38 :107313

[47]

Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y. et al. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34 :i884-90

[48]

Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25 :1754-60

[49]

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25 :2078-9

[50]

Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021; 10 :giab008

[51]

Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27 :2156-8

[52]

Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012; 6 :80-92

[53]

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81 :559-75

[54]

Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010; 5 :e9490

[55]

Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49 :W293-6

[56]

Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009; 19 :1655-64

[57]

Koboldt DC, Chen K, Wylie T. et al. VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25 :2283-5

[58]

Stacklies W, Redestig H, Scholz M. et al. pcaMethods-a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23 :1164-7

[59]

Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26 :841-2

[60]

Guo W, Fiziev P, Yan W. et al. BS-Seeker2: a versatile aligning pipeline for bisulfite sequencing data. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14 :774

[61]

Guo W, Zhu P, Pellegrini M. et al. CGmapTools improves the precision of heterozygous SNV calls and supports allele-specific methylation detection and visualization in bisulfite-sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34 :381-7

[62]

Juhling F, Kretzmer H, Bernhart SH. et al. Metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res. 2016; 26 :256-62

[63]

Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C. et al. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37 :907-15

[64]

Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47 :e47

[65]

Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15 :550

[66]

Wu T, Hu E, Xu S. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021; 2 :100141

[67]

Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y. et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020; 13 :1194-202

[68]

Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK. et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010; 42 :348-54

[69]

Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W. et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215 :403-10

[70]

Krzhizhanovskaya VV, Závodszky G, Lees MH. et al. Easing multiscale model design and coupling with MUSCLE 3 2020-1-1. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020:

[71]

Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25 :1972-3

[72]

Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020; 37 :1530-4

[73]

Ou S, Su W, Liao Y. et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol. 2019; 20 :275

[74]

Yan H, Bombarely A, Li S. DeepTE: a computational method for de novo classification of transposons with convolutional neural network. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36 :4269-75

[75]

Stuart T, Eichten SR, Cahn J. et al. Population scale mapping of transposable element diversity reveals links to gene regulation and epigenomic variation. elife. 2016; 5 :e20777

[76]

Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9 :357-9

[77]

Faust GG, Hall IM. YAHA: fast and flexible long-read alignment with optimal breakpoint detection. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28 :2417-24

PDF (3809KB)

91

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/