Metagenome-enabled models improve genomic predictive ability and identification of herbivory-limiting genes in sweetpotato

Alhagie K. Cham , Alison K. Adams , Phillip A. Wadl , Ma del Carmen Ojeda-Zacarías , William B. Rutter , D. Michael Jackson , D. Dewayne Shoemaker , G. Craig Yencho , Bode A. Olukolu

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) : 135

PDF (1580KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7) :135 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae135
Article
research-article
Metagenome-enabled models improve genomic predictive ability and identification of herbivory-limiting genes in sweetpotato
Author information +
History +
PDF (1580KB)

Abstract

Plant-insect interactions are often influenced by host- or insect-associated metagenomic community members. The relative abundance of insects and the microbes that modulate their interactions were obtained from sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) leaf-associated metagenomes using quantitative reduced representation sequencing and strain/species-level profiling with the Qmatey software. Positive correlations were found between whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and its endosymbionts (Candidatus Hamiltonella defensa, Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, and Rickettsia spp.) and negative correlations with nitrogen-fixing bacteria that implicate nitric oxide in sweetpotato-whitefly interaction. Genome-wide associations using 252 975 dosage-based markers, and metagenomes as a covariate to reduce false positive rates, implicated ethylene and cell wall modification in sweetpotato-whitefly interaction. The predictive abilities (PA) for whitefly and Ocypus olens abundance were high in both populations (68%-69% and 33.3%-35.8%, respectively) and 69.9% for Frankliniella occidentalis. The metagBLUP (gBLUP) prediction model, which fits the background metagenome-based Cao dissimilarity matrix instead of the marker-based relationship matrix (G-matrix), revealed moderate PA (35.3%-49.1%) except for O. olens (3%-10.1%). A significant gain in PA after modeling the metagenome as a covariate (gGBLUP, ≤ 11%) confirms quantification accuracy and that the metagenome modulates phenotypic expression and might account for the missing heritability problem. Significant gains in PA were also revealed after fitting allele dosage (≤ 17.4%) and dominance effects (≤ 4.6%). Pseudo-diploidized genotype data underperformed for dominance models. Including segregation-distorted loci (SDL) increased PA by 6%-17.1%, suggesting that traits associated with fitness cost might benefit from the inclusion of SDL. Our findings confirm the holobiont theory of host-metagenome co-evolution and underscore its potential for breeding within the context of G × G × E interactions.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alhagie K. Cham, Alison K. Adams, Phillip A. Wadl, Ma del Carmen Ojeda-Zacarías, William B. Rutter, D. Michael Jackson, D. Dewayne Shoemaker, G. Craig Yencho, Bode A. Olukolu. Metagenome-enabled models improve genomic predictive ability and identification of herbivory-limiting genes in sweetpotato. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (7) : 135 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae135

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We thank Ty Phillips for assistance with planting, maintenance, and tissue sampling of the diversity population. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity employer. This study was funded by the USDA-NIFA Hatch/Multistate Project W5157-TEN00539, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant ID OPP1052983 and OPP1213329), and the Illumina Agricultural Greater Good Initiative grant.

Data availability

The NGS data (Illumina short reads) used for the USDA diversity population are available on the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) SRA database (Bioproject ID: PRJNA880973), while the NGS data for the DC biparental population will be publicly available on the NCBI SRA database.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Horticulture Research Journal online.

References

[1]

Sapakhova Z, Raissova N, Daurov D. et al. Sweet potato as a key crop for food security under the conditions of global climate change: a review. Plan Theory. 2023; 12:2516

[2]

Guo C, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. et al. Invasion biology and management of sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China. J Integr Pest Manag. 2021; 12:1-2

[3]

Okada Y, Kobayashi A, Tabuchi H. et al. Review of major sweet-potato pests in Japan, with information on resistance breeding programs. Breed Sci. 2017; 67:73-82

[4]

Eyre AW, Wang OY, Dean RA. Identification and characterization of the core rice seed microbiome. Phytobiomes J. 2019; 3:148-57

[5]

Johnson AC, Gurr GM. Invertebrate pests and diseases of sweet-potato (Ipomoea batatas): a review and identification of research priorities for smallholder production. Ann Appl Biol. 2016; 168:291-320

[6]

Okonya JS, Mwanga RO, Syndikus K. et al. Insect pests of sweet-potato in Uganda: farmers’ perceptions of their importance and control practices. Springerplus. 2014; 3:303

[7]

Pagán I. Transmission through seeds: the unknown life of plant viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18

[8]

Engelmann J, Hamacher J. Plant virus diseases:ornamental plants. In: Mahy BWH, Van Regenmortel MHV, 3rd ed. Elsevier, Academic Press: Cambridge, 2008, 207-29

[9]

Wondafrash M, Van Dam NM, Tytgat TO. Plant systemic induced responses mediate interactions between root parasitic nematodes and aboveground herbivorous insects. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4:87

[10]

Balint-Kurti P. The plant hypersensitive response: concepts, control, and consequences. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019; 20:1163-78

[11]

Aerts N, Pereira Mendes M, Van Wees SCM. Multiple levels of crosstalk in hormone networks regulating plant defense. Plant J. 2021; 105:489-504

[12]

Zhou S, Jander G. Molecular ecology of plant volatiles in interactions with insect herbivores. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73:449-62

[13]

Kroschel J, Mujica N, Okonya J. et al. Insect Pests Affecting Potatoes in Tropical, Subtropical, and Temperate Regions. In: Campos H, Ortiz O,eds. The Potato Crop. Springer: Cham, 2020, 251-306

[14]

Thavamanikumar S, Arnold RJ, Luo J. et al. Genomic studies reveal substantial dominant effects and improved genomic predictions in an open-pollinated breeding population of Eucalyptus pellita. G3 (Bethesda). 2020; 10:3751-63

[15]

Tolhurst DJ, Gaynor RC, Gardunia B. et al. Genomic selection using random regressions on known and latent environmental covariates. Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135:3393-415

[16]

Venbrux M, Crauwels S, Rediers H. Current and emerging trends in techniques for plant pathogen detection. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1120-968

[17]

Adams AK, Kristy BD, Gorman M. et al. Qmatey: an automated pipeline for fast exact matching-based alignment and strain-level taxonomic binning and profiling of metagenomes. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24:bbad351

[18]

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 1987; 19:11-5

[19]

Wadl PA, Olukolu BA, Branham SE. et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of USDA sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collections using GBSpoly. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:1166

[20]

Kuster RD, Yencho GC, Olukolu BA. ngsComposer: an automated pipeline for empirically based NGS data quality filtering. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22:bbab092

[21]

Wu S, Lau KH, Cao Q. et al. Genome sequences of two diploid wild relatives of cultivated sweetpotato reveal targets for genetic improvement. Nat Commun. 2018; 9:4580

[22]

Rosyara UR, De Jong WS, Douches DS. et al. Software for genome-wide association studies in autopolyploids and its application to potatoes. Plant Genome. 2016;9

[23]

VanRaden P. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:4414-23

[24]

Amadeu RR, Cellon C, Olmstead JW. et al. AGHmatrix: R package to construct relationship matrices for autotetraploid and diploid species: a blueberry example. Plant Genome. 2016; 9:1-10

[25]

Fang H, Huang C, Zhao H. et al. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through lasso. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31:3172-80

[26]

Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 2005; 38:203-8

[27]

Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM. et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics. 2008; 178:1709-23

[28]

Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Ersoz E. et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010; 42:355-60

[29]

Slater AT, Cogan NO, Forster JW. et al. Improving genetic gain with genomic selection in autotetraploid potato. Plant Genome. 2016; 9:1-15

[30]

Vitezica ZG, Varona L, Legarra A. On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics. 2013; 195:1223-30

[31]

Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J (2022) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.6-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

[32]

Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q. et al. GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28:2397-9

[33]

Gaber W, Abou-elenien N, Shehata E. Population fluctuation of Tetranychus urticae on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) and effect of some insecticides. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, F Toxicology & Pest Control. 2023; 15:123-7

[34]

Gilbertson RL, Batuman O, Webster CG. et al. Role of the insect supervectors Bemisia tabaci and Frankliniella occidentalis in the emergence and global spread of plant viruses. Annual Review of Virology. 2015; 2:67-93

[35]

Balog A, Markó V, Imre A. Farming system and habitat structure effects on rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) assembly in Central European apple and pear orchards. Biologia. 2009; 64:343-9

[36]

Ruhe J, Agler MT, Placzek A. et al. Obligate biotroph pathogens of the genus Albugo are better adapted to active host defense compared to niche competitors. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:820

[37]

Dean JM, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM. Plant dependence on rhizobia for nitrogen influences induced plant defenses and herbivore performance. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15:1466-80

[38]

Arnaiz A, Rosa-Diaz I, Romero-Puertas MC. et al. Nitric oxide, an essential intermediate in the plant-herbivore interaction. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11:620-086

[39]

Yang X, Liu YB. Nitric oxide fumigation for postharvest pest control on lettuce. Pest Manag Sci. 2019; 75:390-5

[40]

Fan ZY, Liu Y, He ZQ. et al. Rickettsia infection benefits its whitefly hosts by manipulating their nutrition and defense. Insects. 2022; 13:1161

[41]

Zhao P, Yao X, Cai C. et al. Viruses mobilize plant immunity to deter nonvector insect herbivores. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav9801

[42]

Thaler JS, Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK. Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci. 2012; 17:260-70

[43]

Houben M, Van de Poel B. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO): the enzyme that makes the plant hormone ethylene. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:695

[44]

War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T. et al. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav. 2012; 7:1306-20

[45]

Pavlidi N, Vontas J, van Leeuwen T. The role of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in insecticide resistance in crop pests and disease vectors. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018, 2018; 27:97-102

[46]

Yoshida MW, Hakozaki M, Goshima G. Armadillo repeat-containing kinesin as a versatile plus-end-directed transporter in Physcomitrella. Nature Plants. 2023; 9:733-48

[47]

Kretschmer M, Damoo D, Djamei A. et al. Chloroplasts and plant immunity: where are the fungal effectors? Pathogens. 2020; 9:19

[48]

Ross EM, Hayes BJ. Metagenomic predictions: a review 10 years on. Front Genet. 2022; 13:865-765

PDF (1580KB)

78

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/