Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals key regulatory networks and genes involved in the determination of seed hardness in vegetable soybean

Congcong Wang , Jianyu Lin , Yuanpeng Bu , Ruidong Sun , Yang Lu , JunYi Gai , Han Xing , Na Guo , Jinming Zhao

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) : 084

PDF (2099KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) :084 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae084
Articles
research-article
Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals key regulatory networks and genes involved in the determination of seed hardness in vegetable soybean
Author information +
History +
PDF (2099KB)

Abstract

Seed hardness is an important quality trait of vegetable soybean. To determine the factors underlying seed hardness, two landraces with contrasting seed hardness, Niumaohuang (low seed hardness) and Pixiansilicao (high seed hardness), were selected from 216 soybean accessions originating from 26 provinces in China. The contents of the main components in vegetable soybean seeds such as water, soluble sugar, starch, protein and oil were measured, and transcriptome analyses performed during five stages of seed developmental. Transcriptome analysis indicates that during the middle and late stages of seed development, a large number of genes involved in the synthesis or degradation of starch, storage protein, and fatty acids were differentially expressed, leading to differences in the accumulation of stored substances during seed maturation among Niumaohuang and Pixiansilicao. The activity of cell proliferation and the formation of cell walls in the middle and late stages of seed development may also affect the hardness of seeds to a certain extent. In addition, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was undertaken to identify co-expressed gene modules and hub genes that regulate seed hardness. Overexpression of a candidate seed hardness regulatory hub gene, GmSWEET2, resulted in increased seed hardness. In this study, the important role of GmSWEET2 in regulating the hardness of vegetable soybean seeds was verified and numerous potential key regulators controlling seed hardness and the proportion of seed components were identified, laying the groundwork for improving the texture of vegetable soybean.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Congcong Wang, Jianyu Lin, Yuanpeng Bu, Ruidong Sun, Yang Lu, JunYi Gai, Han Xing, Na Guo, Jinming Zhao. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals key regulatory networks and genes involved in the determination of seed hardness in vegetable soybean. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (5) : 084 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae084

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program (Modern Agriculture) of Jiangsu Province (BE2023348), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1201605), Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL) (BM2022008-01 and ZSBBL-KY2023-03), the ‘JBGS’ Project of Seed Industry Revitalization in Jiangsu Province (JBGS(2021)059), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-04), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471519), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XUEKEN2023022), the Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX(22)5004 and CX(20)2015), the Key R&D project of Jiangsu Province (BE2019376), Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production and Cyrus Tang Innovation Center for Seed Industry.

Author Contributions

H.X., N.G., J.Z., and C.W. conceived and designed this study. C.W., J.L., R.S., Y.L., and Y.B. conducted the experiments. C.W. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.X., N.G., and J.Z., reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

All data are available in the article and in the online supplementary data.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Wang Z, Senga E, Wang D. Vegetable soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) from production to processing. Outlook Agriculture. 2005; 34:167-172

[2]

Wang Z, Aimaili SX. Studies on vegetable soybean quality assess factors. J Chinese Cereals Oils Assoc. 2004; 3:47-50

[3]

Essèdjlo SA, Etchikinto EA, Emile CA. et al. Sensory preference criteria and willingness to adopt vegetable soybean “edamame” in Benin (West Africa). J Sens Stud. 2022; 38:e12797

[4]

Chen Z, Zhong W, Zhou Y. et al. Integrative analysis of metabolome and transcriptome reveals the improvements of seed quality in vegetable soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr). Phytochemistry. 2022; 200:113216

[5]

Hirata K, Masuda R, Tsubokura Y. et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with boiled seed hardness in soybean. Breed Sci. 2014; 64:362-70

[6]

Taira H. Quality of soybeans for processed foods in Japan. Japan Agric Res Quart. 1990; 24:224-30

[7]

Yaklich RW, Wergin WP, Vigil EL. Special secretory cells in the soybean seed coat. Protoplasma. 1986; 134:78-87

[8]

Geater CW, Fehr WR, Wilson LA. Association of soybean seed traits with physical properties of natto. Crop Sci. 2000; 40:1529-34

[9]

Zhang X, Zhao J, Bu Y. et al. Genome-wide association studies of soybean seed hardness in the Chinese mini core collection. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2018; 36:605-17

[10]

Saio K, Watanabe T. Distribution of inorganic constituents (calcium, phosphorus and magnesium) in soybean seed and their changes in food processing. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi. 2010; 19:219-22

[11]

Toda K, Kato S, Hirata K. et al. DNA marker-assisted evaluation of cooked bean hardness of three soybean progeny lines. Breed Sci. 2020; 70:487-93

[12]

Toda K, Hirata K, Yamada T. et al. Flavonoid 3-hydroxylase reduces Ca and Mg content in soybean seeds, resulting in decreased hardness of cooked beans. Crop Sci. 2022; 62:1405-14

[13]

Senda M, Yamaguchi N, Hiraoka M. et al. Accumulation of proanthocyanidins and/or lignin deposition in buff-pigmented soybean seed coats may lead to frequent defective cracking. Planta. 2017; 245:659-70

[14]

Mullin WJ, Xu W. Study of soybean seed coat components and their relationship to water absorption. J Agric Food Chem. 2001; 49:5331-5

[15]

Ritchie S, Hanway JJ, Thompson HE. How a soybean plant develops. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Cooperative Extension Service. 1982,1-20. (Special Report, 53)

[16]

Tsou SCS, Hong TL. Research on vegetable soybean quality in Taiwan. Vegetable soybean: research needs for production and quality improvement. Vegetable Soybean Research and Development Center. 1991; 29:103-7

[17]

Bu Y. Identification of QTL for vegetable soybean seed hardness and preliminary function verification of candidate gene GmMFTL. Nanjing Agricultural University; 2019:

[18]

Bu Y, Zhang X, Wang C. et al. Conditional and unconditional QTL analyses of seed hardness in vegetable soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Euphytica. 2018; 214:237

[19]

Saldivar X, Wang Y, Chen P. et al. Changes in chemical composition during soybean seed development. Food Chem. 2011; 124:1369-75

[20]

Du J, Wang S, He C. et al. Identification of regulatory networks and hub genes controlling soybean seed set and size using RNA sequencing analysis. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68:1955-72

[21]

Patil G, Valliyodan B, Deshmukh R. et al. Soybean (Glycine max) SWEET gene family: insights through comparative genomics, transcriptome profiling and whole genome re-sequence analysis. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:520

[22]

Mbuvi SW, Litchfield JB. Green soybeans as a vegetable: comparing green soybeans with green peas and lima beans; and maximized harvest time determinations using mathematical modeling. J Veg Crop Prod. 1995; 1:99-121

[23]

Fehr WR, Caviness CE, Burmood DT. et al. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 1971; 11:929-31

[24]

Saldivar X, Wang Y, Chen P. et al. Effects of blanching and storage conditions on soluble sugar contents in vegetable soybean. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2010; 43:1368-72

[25]

Chrastil J. Correlation between the physicochemical and functional properties of rice. J Agric Food Chem. 1992; 40:1683-6

[26]

Robutti J, Borras F, Ferrer M. et al. Evaluation of quality factors in Argentine maize races. Cereal Chem. 2000; 77:24-6

[27]

Wood JA, Knights EJ, Campbell GM. et al. Differences between easy- and difficult-to-mill chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Part II: protein, lipid and mineral composition. J Sci Food Agric. 2013; 94:1446-53

[28]

Stenvert NL, Kingswood K. The influence of the physical structure of the protein matrix on wheat hardness. J Sci Food Agric. 1977; 28:11-9

[29]

Garg R, Singh VK, Rajkumar MS. et al. Global transcriptome and co-expression network analyses reveal cultivar-specific molecular signatures associated with seed development and seed size/weight determination in chickpea. Plant J. 2017; 91:1088-107

[30]

Sekhon RS, Hirsch CN, Childs KL. et al. Phenotypic and transcriptomic analysis of divergently selected maize populations reveals the role of developmental timing in seed size determination. Plant Physiol. 2014; 165:658-69

[31]

Shrikaar K, Aznar-Moreno JA, Bailey SR. et al. Temporal changes in metabolism late in seed development affect biomass composition. Plant Physiol. 2021; 186:874-90

[32]

Hernández-Sebastià C, Marsolais F, Saravitz C. et al. Free amino acid profiles suggest a possible role for asparagine in the control of storage-product accumulation in developing seeds of low- and high-protein soybean lines. J Exp Bot. 2005; 56:1951-63

[33]

Allen DK, Ohlrogge JB, Shachar-Hill Y. The role of light in soybean seed filling metabolism. Plant J. 2009; 58:220-34

[34]

Song L, Meng X, Yang L. et al. Identification of key genes and enzymes contributing to nutrition conversion of Torreya grandis nuts during post-ripening process. Food Chem. 2022; 384:132454

[35]

Zhang Q, Pritchard J, Mieog J. et al. Over-expression of a wheat late maturity alpha-amylase type 1 impact on starch properties during grain development and germination. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:811728

[36]

Wood JA, Knights EJ, Campbell GM. et al. Differences between easy- and difficult-to-mill chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Part I: broad chemical composition. J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 94:1437-45

[37]

Ruan L. Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014; 65:33-67

[38]

Ayre BG. Membrane-transport systems for sucrose in relation to whole-plant carbon partitioning. Mol Plant. 2011; 4:377-94

[39]

Baker RF, Leach KA, Braun DM. SWEET as sugar: new sucrose effluxers in plants. Mol Plant. 2012; 5:766-8

[40]

Miao L, Yang S, Zhang K. et al. Natural variation and selection in GmSWEET39 affect soybean seed oil content. New Phytol. 2020; 225:1651-66

[41]

Wang S, Liu S, Wang J. et al. Simultaneous changes in seed size, oil content and protein content driven by selection of SWEET homologues during soybean domestication. Natl Sci Rev. 2020; 7:1776-86

[42]

Li M. Construction of genetic linkage map and fine mapping QTLs for agronomic and quality traits in soybean. South China Agricultural University; 2017:

[43]

Wei Y, Ren Z, Wang B. et al. A nitrate transporter encoded by ZmNPF7.9 is essential for maize seed development. Plant Sci. 2021; 308:110901

[44]

Yang X, Han W, Qi J. et al. Identification of NPF family genes in Brassica rapa reveal their potential functions in pollen development and response to low nitrate stress. Mol Sci. 2023; 24:754

[45]

Qiu D, Rui H, Ji L. et al. Peptide transporter OsNPF8.1 contributes to sustainable growth under salt and drought stresses, and grain yield under nitrogen deficiency in rice. Rice Sci. 2023; 30:18

[46]

Zeeman SC, Kossmann J, Smith AM. Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61:209-34

[47]

Rawsthorne S. Carbon flux and fatty acid synthesis in plants. Prog Lipid Res. 2002; 41:182-96

[48]

Chow C, Lee T, Hung Y. et al. PlantPAN3.0: a new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 2019; 47:D1155-63

[49]

Bolger AM, Marc L, Bjoern U. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:2114-20

[50]

Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:357-60

[51]

Roberts A, Pimentel H, Trapnell C. et al. Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:2325-9

[52]

Maness N. Extraction and analysis of soluble carbohydrates. Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 639:341-70

[53]

Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agron J. 1962; 65:109-12

[54]

Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:559

[55]

Livak KJ, Schmittgen T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-DDCt method. Methods. 2001; 25:402-8

[56]

Song S, Hou W, Godo I. et al. Soybean seeds expressing feedback-insensitive cystathionine γ-synthase exhibit a higher content of methionine. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64:1917-26

[57]

Bai M, Yuan J, Kuang H. et al. Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR-Cas 9 in soya bean. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18:721-31

[58]

Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y. et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020; 13:1194-202

PDF (2099KB)

121

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/