Genome and GWAS analysis identified genes significantly related to phenotypic state of Rhododendron bark

Qiannan Ye , Lu Zhang , Qing Li , Yaliang Ji , Yanli Zhou , Zhenzhen Wu , Yanting Hu , Yongpeng Ma , Jihua Wang , Chengjun Zhang

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 008

PDF (3216KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) :008 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae008
Articles
research-article
Genome and GWAS analysis identified genes significantly related to phenotypic state of Rhododendron bark
Author information +
History +
PDF (3216KB)

Abstract

As an important horticultural plant, Rhododendron is often used in urban greening and landscape design. However, factors such as the high rate of genetic recombination, frequent outcrossing in the wild, weak linkage disequilibrium, and the susceptibility of gene expression to environmental factors limit further exploration of functional genes related to important horticultural traits, and make the breeding of new varieties require a longer time. Therefore, we choose bark as the target trait which is not easily affected by environmental factors, but also has ornamental properties. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of Rhododendron delavayi (30 samples), R. irroratum (30 samples) and their F1 generation R. agastum (200 samples) was conducted on the roughness of bark phenotypes. Finally, we obtained 2416.31 Gbp of clean data and identified 5 328 800 high-quality SNPs. According to the P-value and the degree of linkage disequilibrium of SNPs, we further identified 4 out of 11 candidate genes that affect bark roughness. The results of gene differential expression analysis further indicated that the expression levels of Rhdel02G0243600 and Rhdel08G0220700 in different bark phenotypes were significantly different. Our study identified functional genes that influence important horticultural traits of Rhododendron, and illustrated the powerful utility and great potential of GWAS in understanding and exploiting wild germplasm genetic resources of Rhododendron.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qiannan Ye, Lu Zhang, Qing Li, Yaliang Ji, Yanli Zhou, Zhenzhen Wu, Yanting Hu, Yongpeng Ma, Jihua Wang, Chengjun Zhang. Genome and GWAS analysis identified genes significantly related to phenotypic state of Rhododendron bark. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (3) : 008 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhae008

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

We thank Hong Yang for phenotypic data collection. This research was supported by the ZIAT-Special Project (ZJKJT-2022-01) and the Science and Technology Talent and Platform Program of Yunnan Province (202105 AC160017), the Yunnan Province Agriculture joint special project (202101BD070001-010), and the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-23-G56).

Author contributions

C.Z. and J.W conceived the study and participated in revision and discussion; Q.Y., Q.L., Y.Z., and Y.J. executed formal analysis, methodology and project administration; Z.W., Y.H., and Y.J. helped in investigation, data curation and resources; L.Z. conducted experiments; Q.Y., L.Z., and C.Z. drafted the manuscript with significant participation of Y.M. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Fang MY, Fang RZ, He MY. et al.. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press, 2005, 260-455

[2]

Cheng JJ, Li M, Yuan T. et al. A dataset on wild Rhododendron and geographical distribution information in China. Biodivers Sci. 2021; 29:1175-80

[3]

Yu FY, Skidmore AK, Wang TJ. et al. Rhododendron diversity patterns and priority conservation areas in China. Divers Distrib. 2017; 23:1143-56

[4]

Feng ZB, Zhuang P, Zhang C. et al. An adaptive evaluation of wild Rhododendron under ex-situ conservation. Acta Bot Yunnanica. 2004; 5:497-506

[5]

Huang CL, Chen X, Gao GL. Physiological response of seedlings of three Azalea species of drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance. Forestry Sci. 2011; 47:48-55

[6]

Mahinder P, Vipasha V, Meenakshi T. et al. Designing of future ornamental crops: a biotechnological driven perspective. Hortic Res. 2023; 10:uhad192.

[7]

Demirjian C, Vailleau F, Berthomé R. et al. Genome-wide association studies in plant pathosystems: success or failure? Trends Plant Sci. 2022; 28:471-85

[8]

Guo S, Zhao S, Sun H. et al. Resequencing of 414 cultivated and wild watermelon accessions identifies selection for fruit quality traits. Nat Genet. 2019; 51:1616-23

[9]

Zhuo XK. Dissection of genetic variation underlying weeping traits in Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc. based on genome-wide association study and QTL mapping. Doctoral dissertation,. Beijing Forestry University; 2019:

[10]

Zhao N, Wang W, Grover CE. et al. Genomic and GWAS analyses demonstrate phylogenomic relationships of Gossypium barbadense in China and selection for fibre length, lint percentage and Fusarium wilt resistance. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:691-710

[11]

Yu Y, Guan J, Xu Y. et al. Population-scale peach genome analyses unravel selection patterns and biochemical basis underlying fruit flavor. Nat Commun. 2021; 12:3604

[12]

Liang Z, Duan S, Sheng J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing of 472 Vitis accessions for grapevine diversity and demographic history analyses. Nat Commun. 2019; 10:1190

[13]

Zhang L, Xu P, Cai Y. et al. The draft genome assembly of Rhododendron delavayi Franch. var. delavayi. GigaScience. 2017; 6:1-11

[14]

Wu XP, Zhang L, Wang X. et al. Evolutionary history of two evergreen Rhododendron species as revealed by chromosome-level genome assembly. Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1123707

[15]

Zhou XJ, Li JT, Wang HL. et al. The chromosome-scale genome assembly, annotation and evolution of Rhododendron henanense subsp. lingbaoense. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022; 22:988-1001

[16]

Yang FS, Nie S, Liu H. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of a parent species of widely cultivated azaleas. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:5269

[17]

Wang Y, Wang X, Sun S. et al. GWAS, MWAS and mGWAS provide insights into precision agriculture based on genotype-dependent microbial effects in foxtail millet. Nat Commun. 2022; 13:5913

[18]

Daniel M, Eichenberger B, Voigt F. et al. Single-molecule imaging reveals translation of mRNAs localized to stress granules. Cell. 2020; 183:1801-1812.e13

[19]

Becker A, Theissen G. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003; 29:464-89

[20]

Zhang YQ, Liang ZH, Li BX. Application of β-glucosidase to cellulose bio-degradation. J Tianjin Univ. 2007; 40:4

[21]

Eklof JM, Brumer H. The XTH gene family: an update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiol. 2010; 153:456-66

[22]

Liu C, Yu H, Rao X. et al. Abscisic acid regulates secondary cell-wall formation and lignin deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana through phosphorylation of nst1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021; 118:e2010911118

[23]

Liu CF, Yang N, Teng RM. et al. Exogenous methyl jasmonate and cytokinin antagonistically regulate lignin biosynthesis by mediating CsHCT expression in Camellia sinensis. Protoplasma. 2023; 260:869-84

[24]

Napoleão TA, Soares G, Vital CE. et al. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid are able to modify cell wall but only salicylic acid alters biomass digestibility in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Sci. 2017; 263:46-54

[25]

Shen YJ, Jiang H, Jin JP. et al. Development of genome-wide DNA polymorphism database for map-based cloning of rice genes. Plant Physiol. 2004; 135:1198-205

[26]

Pang Y, Liu C, Wang D. et al. High-resolution genome-wide association study identifies genomic regions and candidate genes for important agronomic traits in wheat. Mol Plant. 2020; 13:1311-27

[27]

Huang X, Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014; 65:531-51

[28]

Adhikari L, Raupp J, Wu S. et al. Genetic characterization and curation of diploid A-genome wheat species. Plant Physiol. 2022; 188:2101-14

[29]

Marczewski T, Ma YP, Zhang XM. et al. Why is population information crucial for taxonomy? A case study involving a hybrid swarm and related varieties. AoB Plants. 2016; 8:plw070.

[30]

Zhang JL, Zhang CQ, Gao LM. et al. Natural hybridization origin of Rhododendron agastum (Ericaceae) in Yunnan, China: inferred from morphological and molecular evidence. J Plant Res. 2007; 120:457-63

[31]

Zheng SL, Tian X, Huang C. et al. Molecular and morphological evidence for natural hybridization between Rhododendron decorum and Rhododendron delavayi.(Ericaceae). Biodivers Sci. 2017; 25:627-37

[32]

Rosell JA. Bark in woody plants: understanding the diversity of a multifunctional structure. Integr Comp Biol. 2019; 59:535-47

[33]

Bi H, Kovalchuk N, Langridge P. et al. The impact of drought on wheat leaf cuticle properties. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17:85

[34]

Somarelli JA, Lee SY, Skolnick J. et al. Structure-based classification of 45 FK506-binding proteins. Proteins. 2008; 72:197-208

[35]

Faure JD, Gingerich D, Howell SH. An Arabidopsis immunophilin, AtFKBP12, binds to AtFIP37 (FKBP interacting protein) in an interaction that is disrupted by FK506. Plant J. 1998; 15:783-9

[36]

Bai Y, Salvadore C, Chiang YC. et al. The CCR4 and CAF1 proteins of the CCR4-NOT complex are physically and functionally separated from NOT2, NOT4, and NOT5. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19:6642-51

[37]

Collart MA, Panasenko OO. The CCR4-NOT complex. Gene. 2012; 492:42-53

[38]

Albert TK, Hanzawa H, Legtenberg YIA. et al. Identification of a ubiquitin-protein ligase subunit within the CCR4-NOT transcription repressor complex. EMBO J. 2002; 21:355-64

[39]

Fang L, Zhao T, Hu Y. et al. Divergent improvement of two cultivated allotetraploid cotton species. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:1325-36

[40]

Gong W, Xu F, Sun J. et al. iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of two upland cotton genotypes differing in salt tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:2113.

[41]

Davies DR. The structure and function of the aspartic proteinases. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990; 19:189-215

[42]

Chen HJ, Huang YH, Huang GJ. et al. Sweet potato SPAP1 is a typical aspartic protease and participates in ethephon-mediated leaf senescence. J Plant Physiol. 2015; 180:1-17

[43]

Cao S, Guo M, Wang C. et al. Genome-wide characterization of aspartic protease (AP) gene family in Populus trichocarpa and identification of the potential PtAPs involved in wood formation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19:276

[44]

Updegraff EP, Zhao F, Preuss D. The extracellular lipase EXL4 is required for efficient hydration of Arabidopsis pollen. Sex Plant Reprod. 2009; 22:197-204

[45]

Agee AE, Surpin M, Sohn EJ. et al. MODIFIED VACUOLE PHENOTYPE1 is an Arabidopsis myrosinase associated protein involved in endomembrane protein trafficking. Plant Physiol. 2010; 152:120-32

[46]

Park JJ, Jin P, Yoon J. et al. Mutation in Wilted Dwarf and Lethal 1 (WDL1) causes abnormal cuticle formation and rapid water loss in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2010; 74:91-103

[47]

Girard AL, Mounet F, Lemaire-Chamley M. et al. Tomato GDSL1 is required for cutin deposition in the fruit cuticle. Plant Cell. 2012; 24:3119-34

[48]

Ursache R, de Jesus Vieira Teixeira C, Dénervaud Tendon V. et al. GDSL-domain proteins have key roles in suberin polymerization and degradation. Nature Plants. 2021; 7:353-64

PDF (3216KB)

108

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/