CsMLO8/11 are required for full susceptibility of cucumber stem to powdery mildew and interact with CsCRK2 and CsRbohD

Shaoyun Dong , Xin Liu , Jianan Han , Han Miao , Diane M. Beckles , Yuling Bai , Xiaoping Liu , Jiantao Guan , Ruizhen Yang , Xingfang Gu , Jiaqiang Sun , Xueyong Yang , Shengping Zhang

Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 295

PDF (2252KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) :295 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad295
Articles
research-article
CsMLO8/11 are required for full susceptibility of cucumber stem to powdery mildew and interact with CsCRK2 and CsRbohD
Author information +
History +
PDF (2252KB)

Abstract

Powdery mildew (PM) is one of the most destructive diseases that threaten cucumber production globally. Efficient breeding of novel PM-resistant cultivars will require a robust understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cucumber resistance against PM. Using a genome-wide association study, we detected a locus significantly correlated with PM resistance in cucumber stem, pm-s5.1. A 1449-bp insertion in the CsMLO8 coding region at the pm-s5.1 locus resulted in enhanced stem PM resistance. Knockout mutants of CsMLO8 and CsMLO11 generated by CRISPR/Cas9 both showed improved PM resistance in the stem, hypocotyl, and leaves, and the double mutant mlo8mlo11 displayed even stronger resistance. We found that reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation was higher in the stem of these mutants. Protein interaction assays suggested that CsMLO8 and CsMLO11 could physically interact with CsRbohD and CsCRK2, respectively. Further, we showed that CsMLO8 and CsCRK2 competitively interact with the C-terminus of CsRbohD to affect CsCRK2-CsRbohD module-mediated ROS production during PM defense. These findings provide new insights into the understanding of CsMLO proteins during PM defense responses.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shaoyun Dong, Xin Liu, Jianan Han, Han Miao, Diane M. Beckles, Yuling Bai, Xiaoping Liu, Jiantao Guan, Ruizhen Yang, Xingfang Gu, Jiaqiang Sun, Xueyong Yang, Shengping Zhang. CsMLO8/11 are required for full susceptibility of cucumber stem to powdery mildew and interact with CsCRK2 and CsRbohD. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (2) : 295 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhad295

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202487), the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Program (Z231100003723005), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B020220001), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2021LZGC016), the Beijing Joint Research Program for Germplasm Innovation and New Variety Breeding (G20220628003-03), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-23), and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (CAAS-ASTIP-IVFCAAS).

Author contributions

S.D. drafted the manuscript; S.D., X.L., J.H., and H.M. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data; D.M.B., Y.B., J.G., X.P.L., R.Y., and X.G. helped collect the data; J.S., X.Y., and S.Z. conceived and designed the study.

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are available in the article and in the supplementary materials published online.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Perez-Garcia A, Romero D, Fernandez-Ortuno D. et al. The powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera fusca (synonym Podosphaera xanthii ), a constant threat to cucurbits. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009; 10 : 153-60

[2]

Zitter TA, Hopkins DL, Thomas CE. Compendium of Cucurbit Diseases. Saint Paul: APS Press; 1996:

[3]

Xu XW, Liu XL, Yan YL. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of cucumber powdery mildew resistance between a single-segment substitution line and its recurrent parent. Hortic Res. 2019; 6 :115

[4]

Kooistra E. Powdery mildew resistance in cucumber. Euphytic. 1968; 17 :236-44

[5]

Barnes W, Epps W. Powdery mildew resistance in South Carolina cucumbers. Plant Dis Rep. 1956; 40 :1093

[6]

Fugieda KAR. Genetic study of powdery mildew resistance and spine color on fruit in cucumber. Jpn Soc Hortic Sci. 1962; 31 :30-2

[7]

Sakata Y, Kubo N, Morishita M. et al. QTL analysis of powdery mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus l.). Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 112 :986-6

[8]

Liu LZ, Yuan XJ, Cai R. et al. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to powdery mildew in cucumber under seedling spray inoculation and leaf disc infection. J Phytopathol. 2008; 156 :691-7

[9]

Zhang SP, Liu MM, Miao H. et al. QTL mapping of resistance genes to powdery mildew in cucumber. Sci Agr Sin. 2011; 44 :3584-93

[10]

He XM, Li YH, Pandey S. et al. QTL mapping of powdery mildew resistance in WI 2757 cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 126 :2149-61

[11]

Nie JT, He HL, Peng JL. et al. Identification and fine mapping of pm5.1: a recessive gene for powdery mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Mol Breeding. 2015; 35 :7

[12]

Zhang P, Zhu YQ, Wang LL. et al. Mining candidate genes associated with powdery mildew resistance in cucumber via super-BSA by specific length amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16 :1058

[13]

Wang YH, VandenLangenberg K, Wen CL. et al. QTL mapping of downy and powdery mildew resistances in PI 197088 cucumber with genotyping-by-sequencing in RIL population. Theor Appl Genet. 2018; 131 :597-611

[14]

Liu XP, Gu XF, Lu HW. et al. Identification of novel loci and candidate genes for resistance to powdery mildew in a resequenced cucumber germplasm. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12 :584

[15]

Xu X, Yu T, Xu R. et al. Fine mapping of a dominantly inherited powdery mildew resistance major-effect QTL, Pm1.1, in cucumber identifies a 41.1 kb region containing two tandemly arrayed cysteine-rich receptor-like protein kinase genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129 :507-16

[16]

Zhang KJ, Wang X, Zhu WW. et al. Complete resistance to powdery mildew and partial resistance to downy mildew in a Cucumis hystrix introgression line of cucumber were controlled by a co-localized locus. Theor Appl Genet. 2018; 131 :2229-43

[17]

Zhang CY, Anarjan MB, Win KT. et al. QTL-seq analysis of powdery mildew resistance in a Korean cucumber inbred line. Theor Appl Genet. 2021; 134 :435-51

[18]

Liu PN, Miao H, Lu HW. et al. Molecular mapping and candidate gene analysis for resistance to powdery mildew in Cucumis sativus stem. Genet Mol Res. 2017; 16 :gmr16039680

[19]

Van Schie CCN, Takken FLW. Susceptibility genes 101: how to be a good host. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014; 52 :551-81

[20]

Engler JD, Favery B, Engler G. et al. Loss of susceptibility as an alternative for nematode resistance. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16 :112-7

[21]

Devoto A, Piffanelli P, Nilsson I. et al. Topology, subcellular localization, and sequence diversity of the Mlo family in plants. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274 :34993-5004

[22]

Jørgensen IH. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica. 1992; 63 :141-52

[23]

Consonni C, Humphry ME, Hartmann HA. et al. Conserved requirement for a plant host cell protein in powdery mildew pathogenesis. Nat Genet. 2006; 38 :716-20

[24]

Bai YL, Pavan S, Zheng Z. et al. Naturally occurring broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a central American tomato accession is caused by loss of Mlo function. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008; 21 :30-9

[25]

Varallyay E, Giczey G, Burgyan J. Virus-induced gene silencing of Mlo genes induces powdery mildew resistance in Triticum aestivum. Arch Virol. 2012; 157 :1345-50

[26]

Zheng Z, Nonomura T, Appiano M. et al. Loss of function in Mlo orthologs reduces susceptibility of pepper and tomato to powdery mildew disease caused by Leveillula taurica. PLoS One. 2013; 8 :e70723

[27]

Pessina S, Lenzi L, Perazzolli M. et al. Knockdown of MLO genes reduces susceptibility to powdery mildew in grapevine. Hortic Res. 2016; 3 :16016

[28]

Wan DY, Guo Y, Cheng Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of vvmlo3 results in enhanced resistance to powdery mildew in grapevine ( Vitis vinifera ). Hortic Res. 2020; 7 :116

[29]

Qiu W, Feechan A, Dry I. Current understanding of grapevine defense mechanisms against the biotrophic fungus ( Erysiphe necator ), the causal agent of powdery mildew disease. Hortic Res. 2015; 2 :15020

[30]

Tapia RR, Barbey CR, Chandra S. et al. Evolution of the MLO gene families in octoploid strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa ) and progenitor diploid species identified potential genes for strawberry powdery mildew resistance. Hortic Res. 2021; 8 :153

[31]

Santo T, Rashkova M, Alabaca C. et al. The ENU-induced powdery mildew resistant mutant pea ( Pisum sativum l.) lines S(er1mut1) and F(er1mut2) harbour early stop codons in the PsMLo1 gene. Mol Breeding. 2013; 32 :723-7

[32]

Humphry M, Reinstadler A, Ivanov S. et al. Durable broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in pea er1 plants is conferred by natural loss-of-function mutations in PsMLo1. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011; 12 :866-78

[33]

Berg JA, Appiano M, Bijsterbosch G. et al. Functional characterization of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Clade V MLO genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17 :80

[34]

Berg JA, Appiano M, Martinez MS. et al. A transposable element insertion in the susceptibility gene CsaMLO8 results in hypocotyl resistance to powdery mildew in cucumber. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15 :243

[35]

Fukino N, Yoshioka Y, Sugiyama M. et al. Identification and validation of powdery mildew ( Podosphaera xanthii )-resistant loci in recombinant inbred lines of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Mol Breeding. 2013; 32 :267-77

[36]

Skou JP. Callose formation responsible for the powdery mildew resistance in barley with genes in the ml-o locus. J Phytopathol. 1982; 104 :90-5

[37]

Piffanelli P, Zhou FS, Casais C. et al. The barley MLO modulator of defense and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli. Plant Physiol. 2002; 129 :1076-85

[38]

Bienert GP, Chaumont F. Aquaporin-facilitated transmembrane diffusion of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1840 : 1596-604

[39]

Castro B, Citterico M, Kimura S. et al. Stress-induced reactive oxygen species compartmentalization, perception and signalling. Nat Plants. 2021; 7 :403-12

[40]

Kimura S, Hunter K, Vaahtera L. et al. CRK2 and C-terminal phosphorylation of NADPH oxidase RBOHD regulate reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020; 32 : 1063-80

[41]

Tek MI, Calis O, Fidan H. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 based mlo-mediated resistance against Podosphaera xanthii in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022, 13 :1081506

[42]

Jha Y, Mohamed HI. Plant secondary metabolites as a tool to investigate biotic stress tolerance in plants: a review. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2022; 74 :771-90

[43]

Liu W, Yan C, Li R. et al. VQMAPK3/VQMAPK6, VQWRKY33, and VQNSTS3 constitute a regulatory node in enhancing resistance to powdery mildew in grapevine. Hortic Res. 2023; 10 :uhad116

[44]

Oliva M, Guy A, Galili G. et al. Enhanced production of aromatic amino acids in tobacco plants leads to increased phenylpropanoid metabolites and tolerance to stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 11 :604349

[45]

Yoo H, Widhalm JR, Qian YC. et al. An alternative pathway contributes to phenylalanine biosynthesis in plants via a cytosolic tyrosine:phenylpyruvate aminotransferase. Nat Commun. 2013; 4 :2833

[46]

Maeda H, Dudareva N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012; 63 : 73-105

[47]

Dixon RA, Achnine L, Kota P. et al. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence - a genomics perspective. Mol Plant Pathol. 2002; 3 :371-90

[48]

Zhang Y, Li X. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis, perception, and contributions to plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019; 50 :29-36

[49]

Sun YH, Li X, Zhang QZ. et al. The reverse mutation of CsMLO8 results in susceptibility to powdery mildew via inhibiting cell wall apposition formation and cell death in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Sci Hortic. 2023; 313 :111894

[50]

El-Shetehy M, Wang CX, Shine MB. et al. Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species are required for systemic acquired resistance in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2015; 10 :e998544

[51]

Tuteja N, Sopory SK. Plant signaling in stress G-protein coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins and signal coupling via phospholipases. Plant Signal Behav. 2008; 3 :79-86

[52]

Yin W, Wang X, Liu H. et al. Overexpression of VqWRKY31 enhances powdery mildew resistance in grapevine by promoting salicylic acid signaling and specific metabolite synthesis. Hortic Res. 2022; 9 :uhab064

[53]

Wang Y, Wang X, Fang J. et al. Vqwrky56 interacts with vqbzipc22 in grapevine to promote proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and increase resistance to powdery mildew. New Phytol. 2023; 237 : 1856-75

[54]

Zhang D, Wu S, Li N. et al. Chemical induction of leaf senescence and powdery mildew resistance involves ethylene-mediated chlorophyll degradation and ROS metabolism in cucumber. Hortic Res. 2022; 9 :uhac101

[55]

Cheval C, Samwald S, Johnston MG. et al. Chitin perception in plasmodesmata characterizes submembrane immune-signaling specificity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117 : 9621-9

[56]

Huang HL, Ullah F, Zhou DX. et al. Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019; 10 :800

[57]

Daudi A, Cheng ZY, O’Brien JA. et al. The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in Arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity. Plant Cell. 2012; 24 :275-87

[58]

Kadota Y, Shirasu K, Zipfel C. Regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD during plant immunity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56 : 1472-80

[59]

O’Brien JA, Daudi A, Finch P. et al. A peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in cultured Arabidopsis cells functions in MAMP-elicited defense. Plant Physiol. 2012; 158 : 2013-27

[60]

Waszczak C, Carmody M, Kangasjarvi J. Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018; 69 :209-36

[61]

Wang CX, Liu RY, Lim GH. et al. Pipecolic acid confers systemic immunity by regulating free radicals. Sci Adv. 2018; 4. 10.1126/sciadv.aar4509

[62]

Chen Z, Noir S, Kwaaitaal M. et al. Two seven-transmembrane domain MILDEW RESISTANCE LOCUS O proteins cofunction in Arabidopsis root thigmomorphogenesis. Plant Cell. 2009; 21 : 1972-91

[63]

Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Keinath NF. et al. Conserved molecular components for pollen tube reception and fungal invasion. Science. 2010; 330 :968-71

[64]

Jacott CN, Charpentier M, Murray JD. et al. Mildew Locus O facilitates colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in angiosperms. New Phytol. 2020; 227 :343-51

[65]

Hilbert M, Novero M, Rovenich H. et al. MLO differentially regulates barley root colonization by beneficial endophytic and mycorrhizal fungi. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 10 :1678

[66]

Jacott CN, Ridout CJ, Murray JD. Unmasking Mildew Resistance Locus O. Trends Plant Sc. 2021; 26 :1006-13

[67]

Aist JR, Gold RE, Bayles CJ. et al. Evidence for the involvement of molecular components of papillae in ml-o resistance to barley powdery mildew. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1988; 33 :17-32

[68]

Frietsch S, Wang YF, Sladek C. et al. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel is essential for polarized tip growth of pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104 :14531-6

[69]

Chen J, Lalonde S, Obrdlik P. et al. Uncovering Arabidopsis membrane protein interactome enriched in transporters using mating-based split ubiquitin assays and classification models. Front. Plant Sci. 2012; 3 :124

[70]

Kim MC, Panstruga R, Elliott C. et al. Calmodulin interacts with MLO protein to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature. 2002; 416 :447-51

[71]

Zhang Q, Hou CC, Tian YD. et al. Interaction between AtCML9 and AtMLO10 regulates pollen tube development and seed setting. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 11 :1119

[72]

Morandini P, Costa A. et al. cROStalk for life: uncovering ROS signaling in plants and animal systems, from gametogenesis to early embryonic development. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12 :525

[73]

Cui FQ, Wu HP, Safronov O. et al. Arabidopsis MLO 2 is a negative regulator of sensitivity to extracellular reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Environ. 2018; 41 :782-96

[74]

Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE. et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23 :2633-5

[75]

Turner SD. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. J Open Source Softw. 2014; 3 :731

[76]

Hu BW, Li DW, Liu X. et al. Engineering non-transgenic gynoecious cucumber using an improved transformation protocol and optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant. 2017; 10 :1575-8

[77]

Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR. et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34 :i884-90

[78]

Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29 :15-21

[79]

Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15 :550

[80]

Yu GC, Wang LG, Han YY. et al. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16 :284-7

[81]

Xie Q, Liu P, Shi L. et al. Combined fine mapping, genetic diversity, and transcriptome profiling reveals that the auxin transporter gene ns plays an important role in cucumber fruit spine development. Theor Appl Genet. 2018; 131 :1239-52

[82]

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-△△Ct method. Methods. 2001; 25 :402-8

[83]

Dong S, Li C, Tian H. et al. Natural variation in STAYGREEN contributes to low temperature tolerance in cucumber. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023; 65 :2552-68

[84]

He GH, Liu J, Dong HX. et al. The blue-light receptor CRY1 interacts with BZR1 and BIN2 to modulate the phosphorylation and nuclear function of BZR1 in repressing BR signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2019; 12 :689-703

PDF (2252KB)

112

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/