Efficient and heritable A-to-K base editing in rice and tomato

Abstract

Cytosine and adenosine base editors (CBE and ABE) have been widely used in plants, greatly accelerating gene function research and crop breeding. Current base editors can achieve efficient A-to-G and C-to-T/G/A editing. However, efficient and heritable A-to-Y (A-to-T/C) editing remains to be developed in plants. In this study, a series of A-to-K base editor (AKBE) systems were constructed for monocot and dicot plants. Furthermore, nSpCas9 was replaced with the PAM-less Cas9 variant (nSpRY) to expand the target range of the AKBEs. Analysis of 228 T₀ rice plants and 121 T₀ tomato plants edited using AKBEs at 18 endogenous loci revealed that, in addition to highly efficient A-to-G substitution (41.0% on average), the plant AKBEs can achieve A-to-T conversion with efficiencies of up to 25.9 and 10.5% in rice and tomato, respectively. Moreover, the rice-optimized AKBE generates A-to-C conversion in rice, with an average efficiency of 1.8%, revealing the significant value of plant-optimized AKBE in creating genetic diversity. Although most of the A-to-T and A-to-C edits were chimeric, desired editing types could be transmitted to the T₁ offspring, similar to the edits generated by the traditional ABE8e. Besides, using AKBEs to target tyrosine (Y, TAT) or cysteine (C, TGT) achieved the introduction of an early stop codon (TAG/TAA/TGA) of target genes, demonstrating its potential use in gene disruption.

References

[1.] Li J, Zhang C, He Y. et al. Plant base editing and prime editing: the current status and future perspectives. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65: 444-67

[2.] Tan J, Zeng D, Zhao Y. et al. PhieABEs: a PAM-less/free high-efficiency adenine base editor toolbox with wide target scope in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20:934-43

[3.] Xiong X, Li Z, Liang J. et al. A cytosine base editor toolkit with varying activity windows and target scopes for versatile gene manipulation in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:3565-80

[4.] Sretenovic S, Liu S, Li G. et al. Exploring C-to-G base editing in rice, tomato, and poplar. Front Genome Ed. 2021;3:756766.

[5.] Tian Y, Shen R, Li Z. et al. Efficient C-to-G editing in rice using an optimized base editor. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20:1238-40

[6.] Zeng D, Zheng Z, Liu Y. et al. Exploring C-to-G and A-to-Y base editing in rice by using new vector tools. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:7990

[7.] Tong H, Wang X, Liu Y. et al. Programmable A-to-Y base editing by fusing an adenine base editor with an N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:1080-4

[8.] Chen L, Hong M, Luan C. et al. Adenine transversion editors enable precise, efficient A•T-to-C•G base editing in mammalian cells and embryos. Nat Biotechnol. 2023.

[9.] Li Y, Li S, Li C. et al. Engineering a plant A-to-K base editor with improved performance by fusion with a transactivation module. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100667.

[10.] Wu X, Ren B, Liu L. et al. Adenine base editor incorporating the N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase MPGv3 enables efficient A-to-K base editing in rice. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100668.

[11.] Wei C, Wang C, Jia M. et al. Efficient generation of homozygous substitutions in rice in one generation utilizing an rABE8e base editor. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63:1595-9

[12.] Koblan LW, Doman JL, Wilson C. et al. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:843-6

[13.] Khodyreva SN, Prasad R, Ilina ES. et al. Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site recognition by the 5’-dRP/AP lyase in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:22090-5

[14.] Liu Q, Wang C, Jiao X. et al. Hi-TOM: a platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas sys-tems. Sci China Life Sci. 2019;62:1-7

[15.] Li J, Ding J, Zhu J. et al. Prime editing-mediated precise knockin of protein tag sequences in the rice genome. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100572.

[16.] Fang J, Chai C, Qian Q. et al. Mutations of genes in synthesis of the carotenoid precursors of ABA lead to pre-harvest sprouting and photo-oxidation in rice. Plant J. 2008;54:177-89

[17.] Li J, Xu R, Qin R. et al. Genome editing mediated by SpCas9 variants with broad non-canonical PAM compatibility in plants. Mol Plant. 2021;14:352-60

[18.] Wu Y, Ren Q, Zhong Z. et al. Genome-wide analyses of PAM-relaxed Cas9 genome editors reveal substantial off-target effects by ABE8e in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20:1670-82

[19.] Niu Q, Wu S, Xie H. et al. Efficient A·TtoG·C base conversions in dicots using adenine base editors expressed under the tomato EF1α promoter. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023;21:5-7

[20.] Li Q, Zhou S, Liu W. et al. A chlorophyll a oxygenase 1 gene ZmCAO1 contributes to grain yield and waterlogging tolerance in maize. JExp Bot. 2021;72:3155-67

[21.] Jung YJ, Lee HJ, Yu J. et al. Transcriptomic and physiological anal-ysis of OsCAO1 knockout lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2021;40:1013-24

[22.] Wójtowicz J, Jagielski AK, Mostowska A. et al. Compensation mechanism of the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis thaliana ch1 mutants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22:22

[23.] Lu Y, Tian Y, Shen R. et al. Precise genome modification in tomato using an improved prime editing system. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19:415-7

[24.] Vu TV, Nguyen NT, Kim J. et al. The obstacles and potential solution clues of prime editing applications in tomato. BioDesign Res. 2022;2022:0001

[25.] Chandrasekaran M, Boopathi T, Paramasivan M. A status-quo review on CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing applications in tomato. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;190:120-9

[26.] Wang S, Zong Y, Lin Q. et al. Precise, predictable multi-nucleotide deletions in rice and wheat using APOBEC-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1460-5

[27.] Jin S, Fei H, Zhu Z. et al. Rationally designed APOBEC3B cytosine base editors with improved specificity. Mol Cell. 2020;79:728-740.e6

[28.] Kuscu C, Parlak M, Tufan T. et al. CRISPR-STOP: gene silencing through base-editing-induced nonsense mutations. Nat Methods. 2017;14:710-2

[29.] Ghezraoui H, Piganeau M, Renouf B. et al. Chromosomal translo-cations in human cells are generated by canonical nonhomolo-gous end-joining. Mol Cell. 2014;55:829-42

[30.] Weaver TM, Hoitsma NM, Spencer JJ. et al. Structural basis for APE1 processing DNA damage in the nucleosome. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5390

[31.] Twayana S, Bacolla A, Barreto-Galvez A. et al. Translesion poly-merase eta both facilitates DNA replication and promotes increased human genetic variation at common fragile sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2106477118.

[32.] Ren Q, Sretenovic S, Liu G. et al. Improved plant cytosine base editors with high editing activity, purity, and specificity. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2052-68

[33.] Liu G, Yin K, Zhang Q. et al. Modulating chromatin accessibility by transactivation and targeting proximal dsgRNAs enhances Cas9 editing efficiency in vivo. Genome Biol. 2019;20:145

[34.] Wang H, He Y, Wang Y. et al. Base editing-mediated targeted evolution of ACCase for herbicide-resistant rice mutants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64:2029-32

[35.] LiuH, DingY, ZhouY. et al. CRISPR-P 2.0: an improved CRISPR-Cas 9 tool for genome editing in plants. Mol Plant. 2017;10:530-2

[36.] Tian Y, Zhong D, Li X. et al. High-throughput genome editing in rice with a virus-based surrogate system. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65:646-55

[37.] Jin S, Lin Q, Gao Q. et al. Optimized prime editing in monocot plants using PlantPegDesigner and engineered plant prime edi-tors (ePPEs). Nat Protoc. 2023;18:831-53

[38.] Clement K, Rees H, Canver MC. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accu-rate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:224-6

[39.] Nishimura A, Aichi I, Matsuoka M. A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2796-802

[40.] Lu Y, Ye X, Guo R. et al. Genome-wide targeted mutagenesis in rice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1242-5

[41.] Liu W, Xie X, Ma X. et al. DSDecode: a web-based tool for decoding of sequencing chromatograms for genotyping of targeted muta-tions. Mol Plant. 2015;8:1431-3