Transcriptomic and genetic approaches reveal that low-light-induced disease susceptibility is related to cellular oxidative stress in tomato

Qian Luo , Jiao Wang , Ping Wang , Xiao Liang , Jianxin Li , Changqi Wu , Hanmo Fang , Shuting Ding , Shujun Shao , Kai Shi

Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10) : 173

PDF (1469KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10) :173 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhad173
Article
research-article
Transcriptomic and genetic approaches reveal that low-light-induced disease susceptibility is related to cellular oxidative stress in tomato
Author information +
History +
PDF (1469KB)

Abstract

The impact of low light intensities on plant disease outbreaks represents a major challenge for global crop security, as it frequently results in significant yield losses. However, the underlying mechanisms of the effect of low light on plant defense are still poorly understood. Here, using an RNA-seq approach, we found that the susceptibility of tomato to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) under low light was associated with the oxidation–reduction process. Low light conditions exacerbated Pst DC3000-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and protein oxidation. Analysis of gene expression and enzyme activity of ascorbate peroxidase 2 (APX2) and other antioxidant enzymes revealed that these defense responses were significantly induced by Pst DC3000 inoculation under normal light, whereas these genes and their associated enzyme activities were not responsive to pathogen inoculation under low light. Additionally, the reduced ascorbate to dehydroascorbate (AsA/DHA) ratio was lower under low light compared with normal light conditions upon Pst DC3000 inoculation. Furthermore, the apx2 mutants generated by a CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing approach were more susceptible to Pst DC3000 under low light conditions. Notably, this increased susceptibility could be significantly reduced by exogenous AsA treatment. Collectively, our findings suggest that low-light-induced disease susceptibility is associated with increased cellular oxidative stress in tomato plants. This study sheds light on the intricate relationship between light conditions, oxidative stress, and plant defense responses, and may pave the way for improved crop protection strategies in low light environments.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qian Luo, Jiao Wang, Ping Wang, Xiao Liang, Jianxin Li, Changqi Wu, Hanmo Fang, Shuting Ding, Shujun Shao, Kai Shi. Transcriptomic and genetic approaches reveal that low-light-induced disease susceptibility is related to cellular oxidative stress in tomato. Horticulture Research, 2023, 10 (10) : 173 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhad173

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172650) and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2021C02040).

Author contributions

K.S. conceived the research; Q.L., J.W., and K.S. designed the experiments; Q.L., P.W., X.L., J.L., C.W., H.F., S.D., and S.S. performed the research and analyzed the data; and Q.L., J.W., and K.S. wrote the article with contributions from other authors.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and the supporting information file. RNA-seq datasets can be accessed in the SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA990324) under record number PRJNA990324. Sequence data from this article can be found in the Sol Genomics Network (http://solgenomics.net/) under the following accession numbers: APX2, Solyc06g005150, APX6, Solyc11g018550, SOD2, Solyc02g021140, SOD5, Solyc06g048410, POD8, Solyc07g042440, POD107, Solyc04g071900, CAT5, Solyc12g094620, CAT4, Solyc04g082460, SlACTIN, Solyc03g078400.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

References

[1]

Asada K . The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999; 50: 601-39

[2]

Karpinski S, Gabrys H, Mateo A et al. Light perception in plant disease defence signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003; 6: 390-6

[3]

Zeier J, Pink B, Mueller MJ et al. Light conditions influence specific defence responses in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions: uncoupling systemic resistance from salicylic acid and PR-1 accumulation. Planta. 2004; 219: 673-83

[4]

Griebel T, Zeier J . Light regulation and daytime dependency of inducible plant defenses in Arabidopsis: phytochrome signaling controls systemic acquired resistance rather than local defense . Plant Physiol. 2008; 147: 790-801

[5]

Zeier J, Delledonne M, Mishina T et al. Genetic elucidation of nitric oxide signaling in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol. 2004; 136: 2875-86

[6]

Meng ZJ, Lu T, Zhang G et al. Photosystem inhibition and protection in tomato leaves under low light. Sci Hortic. 2017; 217: 145-55

[7]

Ballaré CL, Austin AT . Recalculating growth and defense strategies under competition: key roles of photoreceptors and jasmonates. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 3425-34

[8]

Pierik R, Ballare CL . Control of plant growth and defense by photoreceptors: from mechanisms to opportunities in agriculture. Mol Plant. 2021; 14: 61-76

[9]

Kangasjarvi S, Neukermans J, Li S et al. Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and light signalling in defence responses. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 1619-36

[10]

Ballare CL . Light regulation of plant defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014; 65: 335-63

[11]

Dismukes GC, Klimov VV, Baranov SV et al. The origin of atmospheric oxygen on earth: the innovation of oxygenic photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 2170-5

[12]

Torres MA, Jones JD, Dangl JL . Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2006; 141: 373-8

[13]

Waszczak C, Carmody M, Kangasjarvi J . Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018; 69: 209-36

[14]

Locato V, Cimini S, De Gara L . ROS and redox balance as multifaceted players of cross-tolerance: epigenetic and retrograde control of gene expression. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69: 3373-91

[15]

Foyer CH, Noctor G . Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 1866-75

[16]

Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS et al. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot. 2012; 2012: 1-26

[17]

Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N . ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 1229-40

[18]

Bechtold U, Karpinski S, Mullineaux PM . The influence of the light environment and photosynthesis on oxidative signalling responses in plant-biotrophic pathogen interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2005; 28: 1046-55

[19]

Mühlenbock P, Szechynska-Hebda M, Plaszczyca M et al. Chloroplast signaling and LESION SIMULATING DISEASE1 regulate crosstalk between light acclimation and immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008; 20: 2339-56

[20]

Liu M, Zhang S, Hu J et al. Phosphorylation-guarded light-harvesting complex II contributes to broad-spectrum blast resistance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019; 116: 17572-7

[21]

Qiu S, Chen X, Zhai Y et al. Downregulation of light-harvesting complex II induces ROS-mediated defense against turnip mosaic virus infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 690988

[22]

Fryer MJ, Ball L, Oxborough K et al. Control of ascorbate peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves . Plant J. 2003; 33: 691-705

[23]

Davletova S, Rizhsky L, Liang H et al. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 268-81

[24]

Choudhury FK, Rivero RM, Blumwald E et al. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017; 90: 856-67

[25]

Miller G, Shulaev V, Mittler R . Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol Plant. 2008; 133: 481-9

[26]

Xu PL, Guo YK, Bai JG et al. Effects of long-term chilling on ultrastructure and antioxidant activity in leaves of two cucumber cultivars under low light. Physiol Plant. 2008; 132: 467-78

[27]

Feng Y, Cui X, Shan H et al. Effects of solar radiation on photosynthetic physiology of barren stalk differentiation in maize. Plant Sci. 2021; 312: 111046

[28]

Ren YF, Gao P, Zhu F . Meteorological grade prediction of occurrence degree of rice blast in Jiangsu. Jiangsu Agric Sci. 2016; 44: 151-4

[29]

Apel K, Hirt H . Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55: 373-99

[30]

Foyer CH, Noctor G . Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155: 2-18

[31]

Genoud T, Buchala AJ, Chua NH et al. Phytochrome signalling modulates the SA-perceptive pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002; 31: 87-95

[32]

Chojak-Koźniewska J, Linkiewicz A, Sowa S et al. Interactive effects of salt stress and Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans infection in cucumber: involvement of antioxidant enzymes, abscisic acid and salicylic acid . Environ Exp Bot. 2017; 136: 9-20

[33]

Qi J, Wang J, Gong Z et al. Apoplastic ROS signaling in plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017; 38: 92-100

[34]

Raja V, Majeed U, Kang H et al. Abiotic stress: interplay between ROS, hormones and MAPKs. Environ Exp Bot. 2017; 137: 142-57

[35]

Foyer CH, Shigeoka S . Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155: 93-100

[36]

Noctor G, Foyer CH . Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998; 49: 249-79

[37]

Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA et al. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010; 30: 161-75

[38]

Xu Y, Sun X, Jin J et al. Protective effect of nitric oxide on light-induced oxidative damage in leaves of tall fescue. J Plant Physiol. 2010; 167: 512-8

[39]

Chaouch S, Noctor G . Myo-inositol abolishes salicylic acid-dependent cell death and pathogen defence responses triggered by peroxisomal hydrogen peroxide. New Phytol. 2010; 188: 711-8

[40]

Queval G, Issakidis-Bourguet E, Hoeberichts FA et al. Conditional oxidative stress responses in the Arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength-dependent gene expression, and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of H2O2-induced cell death . Plant J. 2007; 52: 640-57

[41]

Athar H-u-R, Khan A, Ashraf M . Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environ Exp Bot. 2008; 63: 224-31

[42]

Jung HI, Kong MS, Lee BR et al. Exogenous glutathione increases arsenic translocation into shoots and alleviates arsenic-induced oxidative stress by sustaining ascorbate-glutathione homeostasis in rice seedlings. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 1089

[43]

Elkelish A, Qari SH, Mazrou YSA et al. Exogenous ascorbic acid induced chilling tolerance in tomato plants through modulating metabolism, osmolytes, antioxidants, and transcriptional regulation of catalase and heat shock proteins. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9: 431

[44]

Maddison J, Lyons T, Plöchl M et al. Hydroponically cultivated radish fed L-galactono-1,4-lactone exhibit increased tolerance to ozone. Planta. 2002; 214: 383-91

[45]

Agrawal GK, Jwa NS, Iwahashi H et al. Importance of ascorbate peroxidases OsAPX1 and OsAPX2 in the rice pathogen response pathways and growth and reproduction revealed by their transcriptional profiling . Gene. 2003; 322: 93-103

[46]

Bonifacio A, Martins MO, Ribeiro CW et al. Role of peroxidases in the compensation of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase knockdown in rice plants under abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2011; 34: 1705-22

[47]

Hu Z, Li J, Ding S et al. The protein kinase CPK28 phosphorylates ascorbate peroxidase and enhances thermotolerance in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2021; 186: 1302-17

[48]

Yabuta Y, Motoki T, Yoshimura K et al. Thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase is a limiting factor of antioxidative systems under photo-oxidative stress. Plant J. 2002; 32: 915-25

[49]

Wang J, Wang A, Luo Q et al. Glucose sensing by regulator of G protein signaling 1 (RGS1) plays a crucial role in coordinating defense in response to environmental variation in tomato. New Phytol. 2022; 236: 561-75

[50]

Zhang N, Pombo MA, Rosli HG et al. Tomato wall-associated kinase SlWak1 depends on Fls2/Fls3 to promote apoplastic immune responses to Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183: 1869-82

[51]

Noctor G, Mhamdi A, Foyer CH . Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems: recipes for successful data collection and interpretation. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39: 1140-60

[52]

Cheng F, Yin LL, Zhou J et al. Interactions between 2-cys peroxiredoxins and ascorbate in autophagosome formation during the heat stress response in Solanum lycopersicum. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 1919-33

PDF (1469KB)

82

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/