The role of DNA methylation in the maintenance of phenotypic variation induced by grafting chimerism in Brassica

Abstract

Grafting facilitates the interaction between heterologous cells with different genomes, resulting in abundant phenotypic variation, which provides opportunities for crop improvement. However, how grafting-induced variation occurs and is transmitted to progeny remains elusive. A graft chimera, especially a periclinal chimera, which has genetically distinct cell layers throughout the plant, is an excellent model to probe the molecular mechanisms of grafting-induced variation maintenance. Here we regenerated a plant from the T-cell layer of a periclinal chimera, TCC (where the apical meristem was artificially divided into three cell layers – from outside to inside, L1, L2, and L3; T = Tuber mustard, C = red Cabbage), named rTTT0 (r = regenerated). Compared with the control (rsTTT, s = self-grafted), rTTT0 had multiple phenotypic variations, especially leaf shape variation, which could be maintained in sexual progeny. Transcriptomes were analyzed and 58 phenotypic variation-associated genes were identified. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing analyses revealed that the methylome of rTTT0 was changed, and the CG methylation level was significantly increased by 8.74%. In rTTT0, the coding gene bodies are hypermethylated in the CG context, while their promoter regions are hypomethylated in the non-CG context. DNA methylation changes in the leaf shape variation-associated coding genes, ARF10, IAA20, ROF1, and TPR2, were maintained for five generations of rTTT0. Interestingly, grafting chimerism also affected transcription of the microRNA gene (MIR), among which the DNA methylation levels of the promoters of three MIRs associated with leaf shape variation were changed in rTTT0, and the DNA methylation modification of MIR319 was maintained to the fifth generation of selfed progeny of rTTT0 (rTTT5). These findings demonstrate that DNA methylation of coding and non-coding genes plays an important role in heterologous cell interaction-induced variation formation and its transgenerational inheritance.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32172561) and Zhejiang Provincial Basic Public Welfare Research Project (Grant No. LGN19C150012).

Author contributions

L.P.C. and L.Y. conceived and designed the research. K.L., T.J.W., D.H.X., B.L., Y.Y., K.X.X., Z.Y.Q., Y.W., J.X.L., and X.X. performed the experiments. K.L. analyzed the data. K.L. wrote the manuscript. L.P.C. and L.Y. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Data availability

All data are publicly available in NCBI under the accession number PRJNA878553.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

[1] Gaut BS, Miller AJ, Seymour DK . Living with two genomes: grafting and its implications for plant genome-to-genome interactions, phenotypic variation, and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 2019; 53: 195-215.

[2] Gautier AT, Chambaud C, Brocard L et al. Merging genotypes: graft union formation and scion-rootstock interactions. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 747-55.

[3] Williams B, Ahsan MU, Frank MH . Getting to the root of grafting-induced traits. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021; 59: 101988.

[4] Zhang X, Lai T, Zhang P et al. Mini review: revisiting mobile RNA silencing in plants. Plant Sci. 2019; 278: 113-7.

[5] Lewsey MG, Hardcastle TJ, Melnyk CW et al. Mobile small RNAs regulate genome-wide DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: E801-10.

[6] Li Z, Wang L, He J et al. A chromosome-scale reference genome provides insights into the genetic origin and grafting-mediated stress tolerance of Malus prunifolia . Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20: 1015-7.

[7] Huang Y, Xu Y, Jiang X et al. Genome of a citrus rootstock and global DNA demethylation caused by heterografting. Hortic Res 2021; 8: 69.

[8] Cerruti E, Gisbert C, Drost HG et al. Grafting vigour is associated with DNA de-methylation in eggplant. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 241.

[9] Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK . Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018; 19: 489-506.

[10] Song Y, Tian M, Ci D et al. Methylation of microRNA genes regulates gene expression in bisexual flower development in andromonoecious poplar. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66: 1891-905.

[11] Piya S, Lopes-Caitar VS, Kim WS et al. Title: Hypermethylation of miRNA genes during nodule development. Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8: 616623.

[12] He L, Huang H, Bradai M et al. DNA methylation-free Arabidopsis reveals crucial roles of DNA methylation in regulating gene expression and development . Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 1335.

[13] Taller J, Hirata Y, Yagishita N et al. Graft-induced genetic changes and the inheritance of several characteristics in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 1998; 97: 705-13.

[14] Cao L, Yu N, Li J et al. Heritability and reversibility of DNA methylation induced by in vitro grafting between Brassica juncea and B. oleracea . Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 27233.

[15] Yu N, Cao L, Yuan L et al. Maintenance of grafting-induced epigenetic variations in the asexual progeny of Brassica oleracea and B. juncea chimera . Plant J. 2018; 96: 22-38.

[16] Burge GK, Morgan ER, Seelye JF . Opportunities for synthetic plant chimeral breeding: past and future. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2002; 70: 13-21.

[17] Li J, Wang Y, Zhang L et al. Heritable variation and small RNAs in the progeny of chimeras of Brassica juncea and Brassica oleracea . J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 4851-62.

[18] Yu Y, Zhang Y, Chen X et al. Plant noncoding RNAs: hidden players in development and stress responses. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 35: 407-31.

[19] Tang Y, Zhao CY, Tan ST et al. Arabidopsis type II phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase PI4Kgamma5 regulates auxin biosynthesis and leaf margin development through interacting with membrane-bound transcription factor ANAC078. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12: e1006252.

[20] Bartusch K, Melnyk CW . Insights into plant surgery: an overview of the multiple grafting techniques for Arabidopsis thaliana . Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 613442.

[21] Avramidou E, Kapazoglou A, Aravanopoulos FA et al. Global DNA methylation changes in Cucurbitaceae inter-species grafting. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2015; 15: 112-6.

[22] Chang YN, Zhu C, Jiang J et al. Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol 2020; 62: 563-80.

[23] Thomas HR, Frank MH . Connecting the pieces: uncovering the molecular basis for long-distance communication through plant grafting. New Phytol. 2019; 223: 582-9.

[24] Chen X, Rechavi O . Plant and animal small RNA communications between cells and organisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022; 23: 185-203.

[25] Melnyk CW, Gabel A, Hardcastle TJ et al. Transcriptome dynamics at Arabidopsis graft junctions reveal an intertissue recognition mechanism that activates vascular regeneration . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018; 115: E2447-56.

[26] Tirnaz S, Batley J . DNA methylation: toward crop disease resistance improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2019; 24: 1137-50.

[27] Seymour DK, Becker C . The causes and consequences of DNA methylome variation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017; 36: 56-63.

[28] Mallory AC, Bartel DP, Bartel B . MicroRNA-directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for proper development and modulates expression of early auxin response genes . Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 1360-75.

[29] Tao Q, Guo D, Wei B et al. The TIE1 transcriptional repressor links TCP transcription factors with TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED corepressors and modulates leaf development in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 421-37.

[30] Boskovic A, Rando OJ . Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Annu Rev Genet 2018; 52: 21-41.

[31] Kundariya H, Yang X, Morton K et al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 5343.

[32] Kawakatsu T, Nery JR, Castanon R et al. Dynamic DNA methylation reconfiguration during seed development and germination. Genome Biol. 2017; 18: 171.

[33] Bouyer D, Kramdi A, Kassam M et al. DNA methylation dynamics during early plant life. Genome Biol. 2017; 18: 179.

[34] Walker J, Gao H, Zhang J et al. Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis . Nat Genet. 2018; 50: 130-7.

[35] Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MTA et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell. 2012; 151: 194-205.

[36] Hsieh PH, He S, Buttress T et al. Arabidopsis male sexual lineage exhibits more robust maintenance of CG methylation than somatic tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 15132-7.

[37] Chen LP, Ge YM, Zhu XY . Artificial synthesis of interspecific chimeras between tuber mustard (Brassica juncea) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea) and cytological analysis . Plant Cell Rep 2006; 25: 907-13.

[38] Murashige T, Skoog F . A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962; 15: 473-97.

[39] Cantalapiedra CP, Hernandez-Plaza A, Letunic I et al. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38: 5825-9.

[40] Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020; 13: 1194-202.

[41] Rowland LJ, Nguyen B . Use of polyethylene-glycol for purification of DNA from LEAF tissue of woody plants. BioTechniques. 1993; 14: 734-6.

[42] Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y et al. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34: i884-90.

[43] Krueger F, Andrews SR . Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 1571-2.

[44] Langmead B, Salzberg SL . Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9: 357-9.

[45] Friedlander MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N et al. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: 37-52.

[46] Gruntman E, Qi Y, Slotkin RK et al. Kismeth: analyzer of plant methylation states through bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9: 371.