SlMYB1 regulates the accumulation of lycopene, fruit shape, and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato

Ziyi Yin , Jiazong Liu , Haipeng Zhao , Xiaomeng Chu , Haoqi Liu , Xiangyu Ding , Chongchong Lu , Xinyu Wang , Xiangyu Zhao , Yang Li , Xinhua Ding

Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 282

PDF (1908KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) :282 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac282
Article
research-article
SlMYB1 regulates the accumulation of lycopene, fruit shape, and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato
Author information +
History +
PDF (1908KB)

Abstract

Fruit lycopene, shape, and resistance are essential traits in vegetables whose final product is fruit, and they are also closely related to and strictly regulated by multiple transcription factors. Lycopene, which cannot be synthesized by the human body and can only be ingested from the outside, was important in maintaining human health. During fruit ripening and post-harvest, tomato plants face a variety of biotic or abiotic stresses, which might inflict great damage to fruit quality due to its flat shape and pointed tip during storage and transportation. Therefore, there is an urgent need for key molecular switches to simultaneously improve fruit lycopene and resistance to biotic stress during ripening. Here, we identified the MYB transcription factor SlMYB1 in tomato plants which could bind to the promoters of lycopene synthesis-related genes, SlLCY1, SlPSY2, and the pathogen-related gene SlPR5 directly, to regulate the fruit lycopene and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. In addition to regulating lycopene synthesis, SlMYB1 also regulates the content of soluble sugar, soluble protein and flavonoid in tomato. What’s more, SlMYB1 could regulate the tomato fruit shape, making it smoother or flatter to prevent skin damage caused by vibration on fruits. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) further showed that SlMYB1 fruit-specific expression lines had multiple differentially expressed genes compared with those from wild-type plants, suggesting that SlMYB1 might have multiple roles in fruit nutritional quality control and resistance to stresses, which is a rare occurrence in previous studies. In summary, our results revealed that SlMYB1 was an essential multi-functional transcription factor that could regulate the lycopene and resistance to Botrytis cinerea, and change the shape of fruit in tomato plants.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ziyi Yin, Jiazong Liu, Haipeng Zhao, Xiaomeng Chu, Haoqi Liu, Xiangyu Ding, Chongchong Lu, Xinyu Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Yang Li, Xinhua Ding. SlMYB1 regulates the accumulation of lycopene, fruit shape, and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Horticulture Research, 2023, 10 (2) : 282 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac282

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (32072500, 31872925, 32272557), Shandong Province Key Research and Development Plan (2022TZXD0025, 2021TZXD007-04-4), Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, Major Basic Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022ZD23) and Shandong Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (SDAIT-04-08).

Author contributions

Ziyi Yin, Haipeng Zhao, and Jiazong Liu: conceptualization, methodology, software; Xiaomeng Chu, Haoqi Liu, and Xiangyu Ding: data curation, writing – original draft preparation. Xiangyu Ding, Chongchong Lu, Haipeng Zhao, and Xinyu Wang: visualization, investigation; Yang Li and Xinhua Ding: supervision; Xiangyu Zhao and Xiangyu Ding: software, validation; Ziyi Yin, Jiazong Liu, and Yang Li: writing – reviewing and editing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

All data generated and analysed during this study are included in this article (and supplementary file).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]

Collins EJ, Bowyer C, Tsouza A et al. Tomatoes: an extensive review of the associated health impacts of tomatoes and factors that can affect their cultivation. Biology (Basel). 2022; 11: 239.

[2]

Li Y, Chen M, Wang SL et al. AtMYB11 regulates caffeoylquinic acid and flavonol synthesis in tomato and tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2015; 122: 309-19.

[3]

Toor RK, Lister CE, Savage GP . Antioxidant activities of New Zealand-grown tomatoes. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005; 56: 597-605.

[4]

Wang S, Chu Z, Jia R et al. SlMYB12 regulates Flavonol synthesis in three different cherry tomato varieties. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1582.

[5]

Fedoroff NV, Battisti DS, Beachy RN et al. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science. 2010; 327: 833-4.

[6]

Xia Y, Huang G, Zhu Y . Sustainable plant disease control: biotic information flow and behavior manipulation. Sci China Life Sci. 2019; 62: 1710-3.

[7]

Zhu JK . Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016; 167: 313-24.

[8]

Zhang X, Xu Z, Chen L et al. Comprehensive analysis of multiprotein bridging factor 1 family genes and SlMBF1c negatively regulate the resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 437.

[9]

Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R et al. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019; 70: 667-97.

[10]

Kourelis J, van der Hoorn RAL, Sueldo DJ . Decoy engineering: the next step in resistance breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 371-3.

[11]

Marks RA, Hotaling S, Frandsen PB et al. Representation and participation across 20 years of plant genome sequencing. Nat Plants. 2021; 7: 1571-8.

[12]

Michael TP, Alba R . The tomato genome fleshed out. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30: 765-7.

[13]

Sato S, Tabata S, Hirakawa H et al. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012; 485: 635-41.

[14]

Eriksson O . Evolution of angiosperm seed disperser mutualisms: the timing of origins and their consequences for coevolutionary interactions between angiosperms and frugivores. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 91: 168-86.

[15]

Rambla JL, Tikunov YM, Monforte AJ et al. The expanded tomato fruit volatile landscape. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 4613-23.

[16]

Goff SA, Klee HJ . Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science. 2006; 311: 815-9.

[17]

Soulie MC, Koka SM, Floch K et al. Plant nitrogen supply affects the Botrytis cinerea infection process and modulates known and novel virulence factors. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020; 21: 1436-50.

[18]

AbuQamar S, Moustafa K, Tran LS . Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against Botrytis cinerea. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017; 37: 262-74.

[19]

Zhang H, Yin L, Song F et al. SKIP silencing decreased disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000 in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 593267.

[20]

Wu F, Qi J, Meng X et al. miR319c acts as a positive regulator of tomato against Botrytis cinerea infection by targeting TCP29. Plant Sci. 2020; 300: 110610.

[21]

Min D, Li F, Cui X et al. SlMYC2 are required for methyl jasmonate-induced tomato fruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Food Chem. 2020; 310: 125901.

[22]

Min D, Ai W, Zhou J et al. SlARG2 contributes to MeJA-induced defense responses to Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit. Pest Manag Sci. 2020; 76: 3292-301.

[23]

Yu W, Zhao R, Sheng J et al. SlERF2 is associated with methyl Jasmonate-mediated defense response against Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit. J Agric Food Chem. 2018; 66: 9923-32.

[24]

Martin C, Paz-Ares J . MYB transcription factors in plants. Trends Genet. 1997; 13: 67-73.

[25]

Ramsay RG, Gonda TJ . MYB function in normal and cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8: 523-34.

[26]

Dubos C, Stracke R, Grotewold E et al. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010; 15: 573-81.

[27]

Wu M, Xu X, Hu X et al. SlMYB72 regulates the metabolism of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and flavonoids in tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183: 854-68.

[28]

Zhang X, Chen L, Shi Q et al. SlMYB102, an R2R3-type MYB gene, confers salt tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Sci. 2020; 291: 110356.

[29]

Gu M, Zhang J, Li H et al. Maintenance of phosphate homeostasis and root development are coordinately regulated by MYB1, an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor in rice. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68: 3603-15.

[30]

Li X, Guo C, Ahmad S et al. Systematic analysis of MYB family genes in potato and their multiple roles in development and stress responses. Biomol Ther. 2019; 9: 317.

[31]

Zhao P, Li Q, Li J et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of R2R3MYB family in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol Gen Genomics. 2014; 289: 1183-207.

[32]

Wang T, Tohge T, Ivakov A et al. Salt-related MYB1 coordinates abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling during salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 1027-41.

[33]

Li N, Wei S, Chen J et al. OsASR2 regulates the expression of a defence-related gene, Os2H16, by targeting the GT-1 cis-element. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 771-83.

[34]

Ding X, Yin Z, Wang S et al. Different fruit-specific promoters drive AtMYB12 expression to improve Phenylpropanoid accumulation in tomato . Molecules. 2022; 27: 317.

[35]

Adaskaveg JA, Silva CJ, Huang P et al. Single and double mutations in tomato ripening transcription factors have distinct effects on fruit development and quality traits. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 647035.

[36]

Zhu F, Wen W, Cheng Y et al. The metabolic changes that effect fruit quality during tomato fruit ripening. Molecular Horticulture. 2022; 2: 2.

[37]

Adato A, Mandel T, Mintz-Oron S et al. Fruit-surface flavonoid accumulation in tomato is controlled by a SlMYB12-regulated transcriptional network. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5: e1000777-7.

[38]

Zhang C, Liu J, Zhang Y et al. Overexpression of SlGMEs leads to ascorbate accumulation with enhanced oxidative stress, cold, and salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2011; 30: 389-98.

[39]

Zhao P, Wang F, Deng Y et al. Sly-miR159 regulates fruit morphology by modulating GA biosynthesis in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20: 833-45.

[40]

Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Rodrigues A et al. In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signalling pathway. Nature. 2009; 462: 660-4.

[41]

Bai Y, Kissoudis C, Yan Z et al. Plant behaviour under combined stress: tomato responses to combined salinity and pathogen stress. Plant J. 2018; 93: 781-93.

[42]

Deng GM, Zhang S, Yang QS et al. MaMYB4, an R2R3-MYB repressor transcription factor, negatively regulates the biosynthesis of anthocyanin in Banana. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11: 600704.

[43]

Li P, Wen J, Chen P et al. MYB superfamily in Brassica napus: evidence for hormone-mediated expression profiles, large expansion, and functions in root hair development. Biomol Ther. 2020; 10: 875.

[44]

Millard PS, Weber K, Kragelund BB et al. Specificity of MYB interactions relies on motifs in ordered and disordered contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: 9592-608.

[45]

Meng XL, Zhao XC, Ding XY et al. Integrated functional omics analysis of flavonoid-related metabolism in AtMYB12 transcript factor overexpressed tomato. J Agric Food Chem. 2020; 68: 6776-87.

[46]

Chen W, Xiao Z, Wang Y et al. Competition between anthocyanin and kaempferol glycosides biosynthesis affects pollen tube growth and seed set of malus. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 173.

[47]

Li S, Xu H, Ju Z et al. The RIN-MC fusion of MADS-box transcription factors has transcriptional activity and modulates expression of many ripening genes. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176: 891-909.

[48]

Tang H, Zhang X, Gong B et al. Proteomics and metabolomics analysis of tomato fruit at different maturity stages and under salt treatment. Food Chem. 2020; 311: 126009.

[49]

Böhm V, Lietz G, Olmedilla-Alonso B et al. From carotenoid intake to carotenoid blood and tissue concentrations - implications for dietary intake recommendations. Nutr Rev 2021; 79: 544-73.

[50]

Xiao J. Dietary flavonoid aglycones and their glycosides: which show better biological significance? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017; 57: 1874-905.

[51]

Flatt T . The evolutionary genetics of canalization. Q Rev Biol. 2005; 80: 287-316.

[52]

Yan J, Luo Z, Ban Z et al. The effect of the layer-by-layer (LBL) edible coating on strawberry quality and metabolites during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2019; 147: 29-38.

[53]

van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CM . Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006; 44: 135-62.

[54]

Gao Y, Jia S, Wang C et al. BjMYB1, a transcription factor implicated in plant defence through activating BjCHI1 chitinase expression by binding to a W-box-like element. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 4647-58.

[55]

Chen S, Wang XJ, Tan GF et al. Gibberellin and the plant growth retardant Paclobutrazol altered fruit shape and ripening in tomato. Protoplasma. 2020; 257: 853-61.

[56]

Dong Y, Østergaard L . Fruit development and diversification. Curr Biol. 2019; 29: R781-r785.

[57]

Hasan MM, Skalicky M, Jahan MS et al. Spermine: its emerging role in regulating drought stress responses in plants. Cell. 2021; 10: 261.

[58]

Te’o VSJ, Bergquist PL, Nevalainen KMH . Biolistic transformation of Trichoderma reesei using the bio-rad seven barrels Hepta adaptor system. J Microbiol Methods. 2002; 51: 393-9.

[59]

Liu S, Yuan X, Wang Y et al. Tomato stress-associated protein 4 contributes positively to immunity against necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019; 32: 566-82.

[60]

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402-8.

[61]

Yin Z, Feng W, Chen C et al. Shedding light on autophagy coordinating with cell wall integrity signaling to govern pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy. 2020; 16: 900-16.

[62]

Chetty VJ, Ceballos N, Garcia D et al. Evaluation of four agrobacterium tumefaciens strains for the genetic transformation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar micro-tom . Plant Cell Rep. 2013; 32: 239-47.

[63]

Zhou Z, Bi G, Zhou JM . Luciferase complementation assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Curr Protoc Plant Biol. 2018; 3: 42-50.

[64]

Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020; 13: 1194-202.

[65]

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30: 2725-9.

PDF (1908KB)

94

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/