The transcriptional coactivator CmMBF1c is required for waterlogging tolerance in Chrysanthemum morifolium

Abstract

Waterlogging is one of the most serious abiotic stressors affecting Chrysanthemum morifolium during its lifespan. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the waterlogging tolerance of chrysanthemum remain unclear. In this study, we discovered that the transcriptional coactivator MULTIPROTEIN BRIDGING FACTOR 1c (CmMBF1c) was significantly induced by waterlogging stress in chrysanthemums. Promoter sequence analysis and transient dual-luciferase assay using chrysanthemum protoplasts showed that the waterlogging-tolerant cultivar ‘Nannongxuefeng’ carried more response elements involved in waterlogging and hypoxia stress compared with the waterlogging-sensitive cultivar ‘Qinglu’, conferring on ‘Nannongxuefeng’ a stronger hypoxia responsive activity and higher CmMBF1c expression under waterlogging conditions. Subcellular localization and transcriptional activity assays showed that CmMBF1c protein was localized to the nucleus and had no transcriptional activation activity. Overexpression of CmMBF1c in ‘Qinglu’ enhanced its waterlogging tolerance by promoting its reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging ability and maintaining low ROS levels. However, RNAi-mediated knockdown of CmMBF1c in cultivar ‘Nannongxuefeng’ resulted in the opposite tendency. Yeast two-hybrid screening and tobacco bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays revealed that CmHRE2, a pivotal regulator of hypoxia response, could interact with CmMBF1c. In summary, this study demonstrates that CmMBF1c improves chrysanthemum waterlogging tolerance by regulating its ROS signaling pathway and interacting with CmHRE2. These findings together offer, to our knowledge, new mechanistic insights into chrysanthemum waterlogging tolerance and provide a rational foundation for future research on the genetic improvement of horticultural crops for waterlogging stress tolerance.

References

[1] Jackson MB, Colmer TD . Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann Bot. 2005; 96: 501-5.

[2] Huang H, Ullah F, Zhou DX et al. Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 800.

[3] Das K, Roychoudhury A . Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. 2014; 2: 53.

[4] Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV . Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Bot. 2003; 91: 179-94.

[5] Herzog M, Striker GG, Colmer TD et al. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat - a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39: 1068-86.

[6] Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R et al. ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012; 35: 259-70.

[7] Pan J, Sharif R, Xu X et al. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in plants: research progress and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11: 627331.

[8] Phukan UJ, Mishra S, Shukla RK . Waterlogging and submergence stress: affects and acclimation. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016; 36: 956-66.

[9] Teixeira da Silva J, Shinoyama H, Aida R et al. Chrysanthemum biotechnology: quo vadis?_ Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2013; 32: 21-52.

[10] Su J, Zhang F, Li P et al. Genetic variation and association mapping of waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemum. Planta. 2016; 244: 1241-52.

[11] Yin D, Chen S, Chen F et al. Morphological and physiological responses of two chrysanthemum cultivars differing in their tolerance to waterlogging. Environ Exp Bot. 2009; 67: 87-93.

[12] Wang L, Gao J, Zhang Z et al. Overexpression of CmSOS1 confers waterlogging tolerance in Chrysanthemum. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62: 1059-64.

[13] Su J, Zhang F, Chong X et al. Genome-wide association study identifies favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes for waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemums. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 21.

[14] Zhang Z, Luan D, Chen G et al. Isolation and characterization of a waterlogging-responsive gene involved in ethylene biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018; 40: 100.

[15] Weake VM, Workman JL . Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11: 426-37.

[16] Wang J, Zhou J, Yang Q et al. Multi-protein bridging factor 1 (Mbf1), Rps3 and Asc1 prevent stalled ribosomes from frameshifting. eLife. 2018; 7: e39637.

[17] Takemaru K, Li FQ, Ueda H et al. Multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) is an evolutionarily conserved transcriptional coactivator that connects a regulatory factor and TATA element-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94: 7251-6.

[18] Jaimes-Miranda F, Chavez Montes RA . The plant MBF1 protein family: a bridge between stress and transcription. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71: 1782-91.

[19] Tsuda K, Yamazaki K . Structure and expression analysis of three subtypes of Arabidopsis MBF1 genes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004; 1680: 1-10.

[20] Tsuda K, Tsuji T, Hirose S et al. Three Arabidopsis MBF1 homologs with distinct expression profiles play roles as transcriptional co-activators. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004; 45: 225-31.

[21] Yu R, Suo YY, Yang R et al. StMBF1c positively regulates disease resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum via it’s primary and secondary upregulation combining expression of StTPS5 and resistance marker genes in potato. Plant Sci. 2021; 307: 110877.

[22] Suzuki N, Bajad S, Shuman J et al. The transcriptional co-activator MBF1c is a key regulator of thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283: 9269-75.

[23] Qin D, Wang F, Geng X et al. Overexpression of heat stress-responsive TaMBF1c, a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) multiprotein bridging factor, confers heat tolerance in both yeast and rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2015; 87: 31-45.

[24] Zhao N, Li C, Yan Y et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of waterlogging-sensitive and waterlogging-tolerant Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars under waterlogging stress and reoxygenation conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 1455.

[25] Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 325-7.

[26] Sasidharan R, Schippers JHM, Schmidt RR . Redox and low-oxygen stress: signal integration and interplay. Plant Physiol. 2021; 186: 66-78.

[27] Patel M, Pandey S, Burritt D et al. Plant responses to low-oxygen stress: interplay between ROS and NO signaling pathways. Environ Exp Bot. 2019; 161: 134-42.

[28] Robyr D, Wolffe AP, Wahli W . Nuclear hormone receptor coregulators in action: diversity for shared tasks. Mol Endocrinol. 2000; 14: 329-47.

[29] Liu QX, Ueda H, Hirose S . MBF2 is a tissue- and stage-specific coactivator that is regulated at the step of nuclear transport in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Dev Biol. 2000; 225: 437-46.

[30] Sugikawa Y, Ebihara S, Tsuda K et al. Transcriptional coactivator MBF1s from Arabidopsis predominantly localize in nucleolus. J Plant Res. 2005; 118: 431-7.

[31] Zou C, Sun K, Mackaluso JD et al. Cis-regulatory code of stress-responsive transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 14992-7.

[32] Springer N, de Leon N, Grotewold E . Challenges of translating gene regulatory information into agronomic improvements. Trends Plant Sci. 2019; 24: 1075-82.

[33] Suzuki N, Rizhsky L, Liang H et al. Enhanced tolerance to environmental stress in transgenic plants expressing the transcriptional coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1c. Plant Physiol. 2005; 139: 1313-22.

[34] Arce DP, Godoy AV, Tsuda K et al. The analysis of an Arabidopsis triple knock-down mutant reveals functions for MBF1 genes under oxidative stress conditions. J Plant Physiol. 2010; 167: 194-200.

[35] Ohama N, Sato H, Shinozaki K et al. Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22: 53-65.

[36] Ozaki J, Takemaru KI, Ikegami T et al. Identification of the core domain and the secondary structure of the transcriptional coactivator MBF1. Genes Cells. 1999; 4: 415-24.

[37] Mishima M, Ozaki J, Ikegami T et al. Resonance assignments, secondary structure and¹⁵N relaxation data of the human transcriptional coactivator hMBF1 (57-148) . J Biomol NMR. 1999; 14: 373-6.

[38] Wang X, Du Y, Yu D . Trehalose phosphate synthase 5-dependent trehalose metabolism modulates basal defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Integr Plant Biol. 2019; 61: 509-27.

[39] Kim GD, Cho YH, Yoo SD . Regulatory functions of evolutionarily conserved AN1/A20-like zinc finger family proteins in Arabidopsis stress responses under high temperature. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 457: 213-20.

[40] Gibbs DJ, Lee SC, Isa NM et al. Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants. Nature. 2011; 479: 415-8.

[41] Giuntoli B, Perata P . Group VII ethylene response factors in Arabidopsis: regulation and physiological roles. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176: 1143-55.

[42] Eysholdt-Derzso E, Sauter M . Hypoxia and the group VII ethylene response transcription factor HRE2 promote adventitious root elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 2019; 21 Suppl 1: 103-8.

[43] Licausi F, van Dongen JT, Giuntoli B et al. HRE1 and HRE2, two hypoxia-inducible ethylene response factors, affect anaerobic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010; 62: 302-15.

[44] Hess N, Klode M, Anders M et al. The hypoxia responsive transcription factor genes ERF71/HRE2 and ERF73/HRE1 of Arabidopsis are differentially regulated by ethylene. Physiol Plant. 2011; 143: 41-9.

[45] Park HY, Seok HY, Woo DH et al. AtERF71/HRE2 transcription factor mediates osmotic stress response as well as hypoxia response in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 414: 135-41.

[46] Jukes TH, Cantor CR . Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, ed. Mammalian Protein Metabolism.Academic Press: New York, 1969, 21-132.

[47] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K . MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33: 1870-4.

[48] Guan Y, Ding L, Jiang J et al. Overexpression of the CmJAZ1-like gene delays flowering in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 87.

[49] Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR . Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1997; 15: 8-15.

[50] Hellens RP, Allan AC, Friel EN et al. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods. 2005; 1: 13.

[51] Zhu L, Guan Y, Liu Y et al. Regulation of flowering time in chrysanthemum by the R2R3 MYB transcription factor CmMYB2 is associated with changes in gibberellin metabolism. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 96.

[52] Baena-González E, Rolland F, Thevelein JM et al. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature. 2007; 448: 938-42.

[53] Li F, Zhang H, Zhao H et al. Chrysanthemum CmHSFA4 gene positively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1311-21.

[54] Korasick DA, McMichael C, Walker KA et al. Novel functions of stomatal cytokinesis-defective 1 (SCD1) in innate immune responses against bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 23342-50.

[55] Schutze K, Harter K, Chaban C . Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to study protein-protein interactions in living plant cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 479: 189-202.

[56] Xin J, Liu Y, Li H et al. CmMLO17 and its partner CmKIC potentially support Alternaria alternata growth in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 101.

[57] Lai H, Chiang C . Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay for direct visualization of protein-protein interaction in vivo. Bio Protoc. 2013; 3: e935.