VvSUN may act in the auxin pathway to regulate fruit shape in grape

Abstract

Fruit shape is an essential agronomic feature in many crops. We identified and functionally characterized an auxin pathway-related gene, VvSUN. VvSUN, which belongs to the SUN/IQ67-DOMAIN (IQD) family, localizes to the plasma membrane and chloroplast and may be involved in controlling fruit shape through auxin. It is highly expressed in the ovary, and the expression level 1 week before the anthesis stage is positively correlated with the fruit shape index. Functional analyses illustrated that VvSUN gene overexpression in tomato and tobacco plants changed fruit/pod shape. The VvSUN promoter directly bound to VvARF6 in yeast and activated ß-glucuronidase (GUS) activity by indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) treatments in grapevine leaves, indicating that VvSUN functions are in coordination with auxin. Further analysis of 35S::VvSUN transgenic tomato ovaries showed that the fruit shape changes caused by VvSUN were predominantly caused by variations in cell number in longitudinal directions by regulating endogenous auxin levels via polar transport and/or auxin signal transduction process variations. Moreover, enrichment of the 35S::VvSUN transgenic tomato differentially expressed genes was found in a variety of biological processes, including primary metabolic process, transmembrane transport, calcium ion binding, cytoskeletal protein binding, tubulin binding, and microtubule-based movement. Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), we confirmed that this plant hormone signal transduction may play a crucial role in controlling fruit shape. As a consequence, it is possible that VvSUN acts as a hub gene, altering cellular auxin levels and the plant hormone signal transduction pathway, which plays a role in cell division patterns, leading to anisotropic growth of the ovary and, ultimately, an elongated fruit shape.

References

[1] Wycislo AP, Clark JR Karcher DE . Fruit shape analysis of Vitis using digital photography. HortScience. 2008; 43: 677-80.

[2] Zhang C, Cui L Fang J . Genome-wide association study of the candidate genes for grape berry shape-related traits. BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22: 1-19.

[3] Lippman Z, Tanksley SD . Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom . Genetics. 2001; 158: 413-22.

[4] Wu S, Xiao H, Cabrera A et al. SUN regulates vegetative and reproductive organ shape by changing cell division patterns. Plant Physiol. 2011; 157: 1175-86.

[5] Blas AL, Yu Q, Veatch OJ et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit size and shape in papaya. Mol Breed. 2012; 29: 457-66.

[6] Wang Y, Bo K, Gu X et al. Molecularly tagged genes and quantitative trait loci in cucumber with recommendations for QTL nomenclature. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 3.

[7] Périn C, Hagen L, Giovinazzo N et al. Genetic control of fruit shape acts prior to anthesis in melon (Cucumis melo L.) . Mol Gen Genomics. 2002; 266: 933-41.

[8] Cirilli M, Baccichet I, Chiozzotto R et al. Genetic and phenotypic analyses reveal major quantitative loci associated to fruit size and shape traits in a non-flat peach collection (P. persica L. Batsch) . Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 232.

[9] Dou J, Zhao S, Lu X et al. Genetic mapping reveals a candidate gene (ClFS1) for fruit shape in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) . Theor Appl Genet. 2018; 131: 947-58.

[10] Jin B, Kim J, Jung J et al. Characterization of IQ domain gene homologs as common candidate genes for elongated fruit shape in cucurbits. Hortic Sci Technol. 2018; 36: 85-97.

[11] Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q et al. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 950-4.

[12] Yang BJ, Wendrich JR, De Rybel B et al. Rice microtubule-associated protein IQ67-DOMAIN14 regulates grain shape by modulating microtubule cytoskeleton dynamics. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1141-52.

[13] Wang YP, Clevenger JP, Illa-Berenguer E et al. A comparison of sun, ovate, fs8.1 and auxin application on tomato fruit shape and gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019; 60: 1067-81.

[14] Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E et al. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science. 2008; 319: 1527-30.

[15] Colle M, Weng Y, Kang Y et al. Variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit size and shape results from multiple components acting pre-anthesis and post-pollination . Planta. 2017; 246: 641-58.

[16] Pan Y, Liang X, Gao M et al. Round fruit shape in WI7239 cucumber is controlled by two interacting quantitative trait loci with one putatively encoding a tomato SUN homolog. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; 130: 573-86.

[17] Bürstenbinder K, Mitra D Quegwer J . Functions of IQD proteins as hubs in cellular calcium and auxin signaling: a toolbox for shape formation and tissue-specification in plants? Plant Signal Behav. 2017; 12: 1692-708.

[18] Vaddepalli P, de Zeeuw T, Strauss S et al. Auxin-dependent control of cytoskeleton and cell shape regulates division orientation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Curr Biol. 2021; 31: 4946-4955.e4.

[19] Wang Y, Clevenger JP, Illa-Berenguer E et al. A comparison of sun, ovate, fs8.1 and auxin application on tomato fruit shape and gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019; 60: 1067-81.

[20] Wang H, Yan A, Sun L et al. Novel stable QTLs identification for berry quality traits based on high-density genetic linkage map construction in table grape. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 1-15.

[21] Huang Z, Van Houten J, Gonzalez G et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Mol Gen Genomics. 2013; 288: 111-29.

[22] Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H et al. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 1-23.

[23] Fasoli M, Dal Santo S, Zenoni S et al. The grapevine expression atlas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a maturation program. Plant Cell. 2012; 24: 3489-505.

[24] Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Gao S et al. Cloning of VvSUN gene in grape (Vitis L.) and a preliminary study on the function of controlling fruit shape. Acta Bot Boreali-Occiden Sin. 2017; 37: 1271-7.

[25] Abel S, Savchenko T Levy M . Genome-wide comparative analysis of the IQD gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa . BMC Evol Biol. 2005; 5: 1-25.

[26] Hu J, Israeli A, Ori N et al. The interaction between DELLA and ARF/IAA mediates crosstalk between gibberellin and auxin signaling to control fruit initiation in tomato. Plant Cell. 2018; 30: 1710-28.

[27] Munsky B, Neuert G Van Oudenaarden A . Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science. 2012; 336: 183-7.

[28] Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Frary A et al. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000; 289: 85-8.

[29] Dekker J . Gene regulation in the third dimension. Science. 2008; 319: 1793-4.

[30] Nilsen TW . Mechanisms of microRNA-mediated gene regulation in animal cells. Trends Genet. 2007; 23: 243-9.

[31] Petersson SV, Johansson AI, Kowalczyk M et al. An auxin gradient and maximum in the Arabidopsis root apex shown by high-resolution cell-specific analysis of IAA distribution and synthesis. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 1659-68.

[32] Wendrich JR, Yang BJ, Mijnhout P et al. IQD proteins integrate auxin and calcium signaling to regulate microtubule dynamics during Arabidopsis development. BioRxiv. 2018; 275560.

[33] Bu H, Yu W, Yuan H et al. Endogenous auxin content contributes to larger size of apple fruit. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 592540.

[34] Petrásek J, Mravec J, Bouchard R et al. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science. 2006; 312: 914-8.

[35] Mravec J, Skůpa P, Bailly A et al. Subcellular homeostasis of phytohormone auxin is mediated by the ER-localized PIN5 transporter. Nature. 2009; 459: 1136-40.

[36] Chen X, Grandont L, Li H et al. Inhibition of cell expansion by rapid ABP1-mediated auxin effect on microtubules. Nature. 2014; 516: 90-3.

[37] Abel S, Bürstenbinder K Müller J . The emerging function of IQD proteins as scaffolds in cellular signaling and trafficking. Plant Signal Behav. 2013; 8: e24369.

[38] Vanneste S, Friml J . Calcium: the missing link in auxin action. Plants (Basel). 2013; 2: 650-75.

[39] Zheng H, Kawabata S . Identification and validation of new alleles of FALSIFLORA and COMPOUND INFLORESCENCE genes controlling the number of branches in tomato inflorescence . Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18: 1572.

[40] Godoy F, Kühn N, Muñoz M et al. The role of auxin during early berry development in grapevine as revealed by transcript profiling from pollination to fruit set. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 140.

[41] Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M et al. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24: 1596-9.

[42] Zheng H, Yu X, Yuan Y et al. The VviMYB80 gene is abnormally expressed in Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Zhong Shan Hong’ and its expression in tobacco driven by the 35S promoter causes male sterility . Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57: 540-57.

[43] De Jong M, Wolters-Arts M, Feron R et al. The Solanum lycopersicum auxin response factor 7 (SlARF7) regulates auxin signaling during tomato fruit set and development. Plant J. 2009; 57: 160-70.

[44] Kosugi S, Ohashi Y, Nakajima K et al. An improved assay for ß-glucuronidase (GUS) in transformed cells: methanol almost suppresses a putative endogenous GUS activity. Plant Sci. 1990; 70: 133-40.

[45] Wu X, Prior RL . Systematic identification and characterization of anthocyanins by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS in common foods in the United States: fruits and berries. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53: 2589-99.

[46] Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 15-21.

[47] Trapnell CRA, Goff L, Pertea G et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012; 7: 562-78.

[48] Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X et al. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 136-8.

[49] Kuang JF, Wu CJ, Guo YF et al. Deciphering transcriptional regulators of banana fruit ripening by regulatory network analysis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 477-89.

[50] Young M, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK et al. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010; 11: R14-4.

[51] Shen S, Park JW, Lu ZX et al. rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 5593-601.