The BBX gene CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in chrysanthemum

Yanan Liu , Hua Cheng , Peilei Cheng , Chunmeng Wang , Jiayu Li , Ye Liu , Aiping Song , Sumei Chen , Fadi Chen , Likai Wang , Jiafu Jiang

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac181

PDF (2987KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac181 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac181
Article
research-article
The BBX gene CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in chrysanthemum
Author information +
History +
PDF (2987KB)

Abstract

BBX transcription factors play vital roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. Although BBX proteins have been studied in great detail in the model plant Arabidopsis, their roles in crop plants such as chrysanthemum are still largely uninvestigated. Here, we cloned CmBBX22 and further determined the function of CmBBX22 in response to drought treatment. Subcellular localization and transactivation assay analyses revealed that CmBBX22 was localized in the nucleus and possessed transactivation activity. Overexpression of CmBBX22 in chrysanthemum was found to reduce plant drought tolerance, whereas expression of the chimeric repressor CmBBX22-SRDX was found to promote a higher drought tolerance than that shown by wild-type plants, indicating that CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought tolerance in chrysanthemum. Transcriptome analysis and physiological measurements indicated the potential involvement of the CmBBX22-mediated ABA response, stomatal conductance, and antioxidant responses in the negative regulation of drought tolerance in chrysanthemum. Based on the findings of this study, we were thus able to establish the mechanisms whereby the transcriptional activator CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought tolerance in chrysanthemum via the regulation of the abscisic acid response, stomatal conductance, and antioxidant responses.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanan Liu, Hua Cheng, Peilei Cheng, Chunmeng Wang, Jiayu Li, Ye Liu, Aiping Song, Sumei Chen, Fadi Chen, Likai Wang, Jiafu Jiang. The BBX gene CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in chrysanthemum. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac181 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac181

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anzano A, Bonanomi G, Mazzoleni S et al. Plant metabolomics in biotic and abiotic stress: a critical overview. Phytochem Rev. 2021; 21: 503-24.

[2]

Rosegrant MW, Cline SA . Global food security: challenges and policies. Science. 2003; 302: 1917-9.

[3]

Zhao CX, Guo LY, Jaleel CA et al. Prospectives for applying molecular and genetic methodology to improve wheat cultivars in drought environments. C R Biol. 2008; 331: 579-86.

[4]

Kiełbowicz-Matuk A . Involvement of plant C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factors in stress responses. Plant Sci. 2012; 185-186: 78-85.

[5]

Faraji S, Rasouli SH, Kazemitabar SK . Genome-wide exploration of C2H2 zinc finger family in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum): insights into the roles in biological processes especially stress response. Biometals. 2018; 31: 1019-42.

[6]

Khanna R, Kronmiller B, Maszle DR et al. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 3416-20.

[7]

Wei H, Wang P, Chen J et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of B-BOX gene family in grapevine reveal its potential functions in berry development. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 72.

[8]

Gangappa SN, Botto JF . The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 19: 460-70.

[9]

Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W et al. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science. 2004; 303: 1003-6.

[10]

Valverde F . CONSTANS and the evolutionary origin of photoperiodic timing of flowering. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62: 2453-63.

[11]

Shalmani A, Jing XQ, Shi Y et al. Characterization of B-BOX gene family and their expression profiles under hormonal, abiotic and metal stresses in Poaceae plants. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 27.

[12]

Gomez-Ocampo G, Ploschuk EL, Mantese A et al. BBX21 reduces abscisic acid sensitivity, mesophyll conductance and chloroplast electron transport capacity to increase photosynthesis and water use efficiency in potato plants cultivated under moderated drought. Plant J. 2021; 108: 1131-44.

[13]

Nagaoka S, Takano T . Salt tolerance-related protein STO binds to a Myb transcription factor homologue and confers salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 2231-7.

[14]

Yang Y, Ma C, Xu Y et al. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2014; 26: 2038-54.

[15]

Wang Q, Tu X, Zhang J et al. Heat stress-induced BBX18 negatively regulates the thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2013; 40: 2679-88.

[16]

Xu Y, Zhao X, Aiwaili P et al. A zinc finger protein BBX19 interacts with ABF3 to affect drought tolerance negatively in chrysanthemum. Plant J. 2020; 103: 1783-95.

[17]

Chen P, Zhi F, Li X et al. Zinc-finger protein MdBBX7/MdCOL9, a target of MdMIEL1 E3 ligase, confers drought tolerance in apple. Plant Physiol. 2022; 188: 540-59.

[18]

Xu D, Li J, Gangappa SN et al. Convergence of light and ABA signaling on the ABI5 promoter. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10: e1004197.

[19]

Kang X, Xu G, Lee B et al. HRB2 and BBX21 interaction modulates Arabidopsis ABI5 locus and stomatal aperture. Plant Cell Environ. 2018; 41: 1912-25.

[20]

Liu Y, Chen H, Ping Q et al. The heterologous expression of CmBBX22 delays leaf senescence and improves drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2019; 38: 15-24.

[21]

Chang CS, Maloof JN, Wu SH . COP1-mediated degradation of BBX22/LZF1 optimizes seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156: 228-39.

[22]

Gangappa SN, Crocco CD, Johansson H et al. The Arabidopsis B-BOX protein BBX25 interacts with HY5, negatively regulating BBX22 expression to suppress seedling photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 1243-57.

[23]

Lanctot A, Taylor-Teeples M, Oki EA et al. Specificity in auxin responses is not explained by the promoter preferences of activator ARFs. Plant Physiol. 2020; 182: 1533-6.

[24]

Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J . Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 571.

[25]

Hirakawa H, Sumitomo K, Hisamatsu T et al. De novo whole-genome assembly in Chrysanthemum seticuspe, a model species of chrysanthemums, and its application to genetic and gene discovery analysis. DNA Res. 2019; 26: 195-203.

[26]

Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P et al. Erratum: near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 888.

[27]

Love MI, Huber W, Anders S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: 550.

[28]

Janiak A, Kwasniewski M, Sowa M et al. No time to waste: transcriptome study reveals that drought tolerance in barley may be attributed to stressed-like expression patterns that exist before the occurrence of stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 8: 2212.

[29]

Kim EH, Kim YS, Park SH et al. Methyl jasmonate reduces grain yield by mediating stress signals to alter spikelet development in rice. Plant Physiol. 2009; 149: 1751-60.

[30]

Tan L, Xu W, He X et al. The feasibility of Fv/Fm on judging nutrient limitation of marine algae through indoor simulation and in situ experiment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2019; 229: 106411.

[31]

Su L, Dai Z, Li S et al. A novel system for evaluating drought-cold tolerance of grapevines using chlorophyll fluorescence. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 82.

[32]

Crocco CD, Ocampo GG, Ploschuk EL et al. Heterologous expression of AtBBX21 enhances the rate of photosynthesis and alleviates photoinhibition in Solanum tuberosum. Plant Physiol. 2018; 177: 369-80.

[33]

Bertolino LT, Caine RS, Gray JE . Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 225.

[34]

Anjum SA, Xie X, Wang L et al. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res. 2011; 6: 2026-32.

[35]

Mahmood T, Khalid S, Abdullah M et al. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cell. 2020; 9: 105.

[36]

Laxa M, Liebthal M, Telman W et al. The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019; 8: 94.

[37]

You J, Chan Z . ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 1092.

[38]

Szabados L, Savoure A . Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010; 15: 89-97.

[39]

Rehman AU, Bashir F, Ayaydin F et al. Proline is a quencher of singlet oxygen and superoxide both in in vitro systems and isolated thylakoids. Physiol Plant. 2021; 172: 7-18.

[40]

Liu X, Li R, Dai Y et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the B-box gene family in the apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) genome. Mol Gen Genomics. 2018; 293: 303-15.

[41]

Huang J, Zhao X, Weng X et al. The rice B-box zinc finger gene family: genomic identification, characterization, expression profiling and diurnal analysis. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48242.

[42]

Zhang Z, Ji R, Li H et al. CONSTANS-LIKE 7 (COL7) is involved in phytochrome B (phyB)-mediated light-quality regulation of auxin homeostasis. Mol Plant. 2014; 7: 1429-40.

[43]

Heng Y, Jiang Y, Zhao X et al. BBX4, a phyB-interacting and modulated regulator, directly interacts with PIF3 to fine tune red light-mediated photomorphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019; 116: 26049-56.

[44]

Wang L, Sun J, Ren L et al. CmBBX8 accelerates flowering by targeting CmFTL1 directly in summer chrysanthemum. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1562-72.

[45]

Job N, Yadukrishnan P, Bursch K et al. Two B-box proteins regulate photomorphogenesis by oppositely modulating HY5 through their diverse C-terminal domains. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176: 2963-76.

[46]

Zhu L, Guan Y, Liu Y et al. Regulation of flowering time in chrysanthemum by the R2R3 MYB transcription factor CmMYB2 is associated with changes in gibberellin metabolism. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 96.

[47]

Cheng P, Liu Y, Yang Y et al. CmBES1 is a regulator of boundary formation in chrysanthemum ray florets. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 129.

[48]

Li X, Dhaubhadel S . Soybean 14-3-3 gene family: identification and molecular characterization. Planta. 2011; 233: 569-82.

[49]

Shan H, Chen S, Jiang J et al. Heterologous expression of the chrysanthemum R2R3-MYB transcription factor CmMYB2 enhances drought and salinity tolerance, increases hypersensitivity to ABA and delays flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biotechnol. 2012; 51: 160-73.

[50]

Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N . ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 1229-40.

[51]

Qi J, Song CP, Wang B et al. Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018; 60: 805-26.

[52]

Sharma R, Sahoo A, Devendran R et al. Over-expression of a rice tau class glutathione S-transferase gene improves tolerance to salinity and oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e92900.

[53]

Sierla M, Waszczak C, Vahisalu T et al. Reactive oxygen species in the regulation of stomatal movements. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171: 1569-80.

[54]

Plackett ARG, Emms DM, Kelly S et al. Conditional stomatal closure in a fern shares molecular features with flowering plant active stomatal responses. Curr Biol. 2021; 31: 4560-4570.e5.

[55]

Zhang TY, Li ZQ, Zhao YD et al. Ethylene-induced stomatal closure is mediated via MKK1/3-MPK3/6 cascade to EIN2 and EIN3. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63: 1324-40.

[56]

Shen J, Zhang J, Zhou M et al. Persulfidation-based modification of cysteine desulfhydrase and the NADPH oxidase RBOHD controls guard cell abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2020; 32: 1000-17.

[57]

Plessis A, Cournol R, Effroy D et al. New ABA-hypersensitive Arabidopsis mutants are affected in loci mediating responses to water deficit and Dickeya dadantii infection. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e20243.

[58]

Li GZ, Li HX, Xu MJ et al. Functional characterization and regulatory mechanism of wheat CPK34 kinase in response to drought stress. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 577.

[59]

Song A, An J, Guan Z et al. The constitutive expression of a two transgene construct enhances the abiotic stress tolerance of chrysanthemum. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80:114-20.

[60]

Gao H, Song A, Zhu X et al. The heterologous expression in Arabidopsis of a chrysanthemum Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein gene confers salinity and drought tolerance. Planta. 2012; 235: 979-93.

[61]

Yoo S-D, Cho Y-H, Sheen J . Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2: 1565-72.

[62]

Song A, You Y, Chen F et al. A multiplex RT-PCR for rapid and simultaneous detection of viruses and viroids in chrysanthemum. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013; 56: 8-13.

[63]

Oshima Y, Mitsuda N, Nakata M et al. Novel vector systems to accelerate functional analysis of transcription factors using chimeric repressor gene-silencing technology (CRES-T). Plant Biotechnol. 2011; 28: 201-10.

[64]

Li P, Song A, Gao C et al. The over-expression of a chrysanthemum WRKY transcription factor enhances aphid resistance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015; 95: 26-34.

[65]

Liu T, Longhurst AD, Talavera-Rauh F et al. The Arabidopsis transcription factor ABIG1 relays ABA signaled growth inhibition and drought induced senescence. eLife. 2016; 5: e13768.

[66]

Fan Q, Song A, Jiang J et al. CmWRKY1 enhances the dehydration tolerance of chrysanthemum through the regulation of ABA-associated genes. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0150572.

[67]

Ren X, Chen Z, Liu Y et al. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010; 63: 417-29.

[68]

Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y et al. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38: W64-70.

[69]

Xia X, Shao Y, Jiang J et al. Gene expression profiles responses to aphid feeding in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). BMC Genomics. 2014; 15: 1050.

[70]

Wang L, Cheng H, Wang Q et al. CmRCD1 represses flowering by directly interacting with CmBBX8 in summer chrysanthemum. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 79.

[71]

Gu C, Chen S, Liu Z et al. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR in chrysanthemum subjected to biotic and abiotic stress. Mol Biotechnol. 2011; 49: 192-7.

[72]

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402-8.

[73]

Bauer H, Ache P, Lautner S et al. The stomatal response to reduced relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis. Curr Biol. 2013; 23: 53-7.

PDF (2987KB)

45

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/