Apple U-box-type E3 ubiquitin ligase MdPUB23 reduces cold-stress tolerance by degrading the cold-stress regulatory protein MdICE1

Abstract

Cold stress limits plant growth, geographical distribution, and crop yield. The MYC-type bHLH transcription factor ICE1 is recognized as the core positive regulator of the cold-stress response. However, how ICE1 protein levels are regulated remains to be further studied. In this study, we observed that a U-box-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, MdPUB23, positively regulated the cold-stress response in apple. The expression of MdPUB23 increased at both the transcriptional and post-translational levels in response to cold stress. Overexpression of MdPUB23 in transgenic apple enhanced sensitivity to cold stress. Further study showed that MdPUB23 directly interacted with MdICE1, promoting the ubiquitination-mediated degradation of the MdICE1 protein through the 26S-proteasome pathway and reducing the MdICE1-improved cold-stress tolerance in apple. Our results reveal that MdPUB23 regulates the cold-stress response by directly mediating the stability of the positive regulator MdICE1. The PUB23–ICE1 ubiquitination module may play a role in maintaining ICE1 protein homeostasis and preventing overreactions from causing damage to plants. The discovery of the ubiquitination regulatory pathway of ICE1 provides insights for the further exploration of plant cold-stress-response mechanisms.

References

[1] Ahuja I, de Vos RC, Bones AM et al. Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci. 2010; 15: 664-74.

[2] Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci China Life Sci. 2020; 63: 635-74.

[3] Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z et al. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat Rev Genet. 2022; 23: 104-19.

[4] Chen WJ, Zhu T . Networks of transcription factors with roles in environmental stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9: 591-6.

[5] Zhu JK . Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016; 167: 313-24.

[6] Kidokoro S, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K . Transcriptional regulatory network of plant cold-stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2022; 27: 922-35.

[7] Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK . Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2007; 12: 444-51.

[8] Ding Y, Yang S . Surviving and thriving: how plants perceive and respond to temperature stress. Dev Cell. 2022; 57: 947-58.

[9] Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhu JK . Thriving under stress: how plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev Cell. 2020; 55: 529-43.

[10] Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK, Sunkar R . Gene regulation during cold stress acclimation in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 639: 39-55.

[11] Shi Y, Ding Y, Yang S . Molecular regulation of CBF Signaling in cold acclimation. Trends Plant Sci. 2018; 23: 623-37.

[12] Ding Y, Shi Y, Yang S . Molecular regulation of plant responses to environmental temperatures. Mol Plant. 2020; 13: 544-64.

[13] Song Y, Zhang X, Li M et al. The direct targets of CBFs: in cold stress response and beyond. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63: 1874-87.

[14] Stockinger EJ, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF . Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcriptional activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94: 1035-40.

[15] Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Stockinger EJ et al. Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression. Plant J. 1998; 16: 433-42.

[16] Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y et al. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively. Plant Cell. 1998; 10: 1391-406.

[17] Wisniewski M, Nassuth A, Teulières C et al. Genomics of cold hardiness in Woody plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2014; 33: 92-124.

[18] Chinnusamy V, Ohta M, Kanrar S et al. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 1043-54.

[19] Agarwal M, Hao Y, Kapoor A et al. A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 37636-45.

[20] Franklin KA, Whitelam GC . Light-quality regulation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 1410-3.

[21] Doherty CJ, Van Buskirk HA, Myers SJ et al. Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA transcription factors in cold-regulated gene expression and freezing tolerance. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 972-84.

[22] Fursova OV, Pogorelko GV, Tarasov VA . Identification of ICE2, a gene involved in cold acclimation which determines freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 2009; 429: 98-103.

[23] Nakamichi N, Kusano M, Fukushima A et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 447-62.

[24] Dong MA, Farré EM, Thomashow MF . Circadian clock-associated 1 and late elongated hypocotyl regulate expression of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 7241-6.

[25] Lee CM, Thomashow MF . Photoperiodic regulation of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) cold acclimation pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 15054-9.

[26] Shi Y, Tian S, Hou L et al. Ethylene signaling negatively regulates freezing tolerance by repressing expression of CBF and type-a ARR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012; 24: 2578-95.

[27] Kim Y, Park S, Gilmour SJ et al. Roles of CAMTA transcription factors and salicylic acid in configuring the low-temperature transcriptome and freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013; 75: 364-76.

[28] Ding Y, Li H, Zhang X et al. OST1 kinase modulates freezing tolerance by enhancing ICE1 stability in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2015; 32: 278-89.

[29] Eremina M, Unterholzner SJ, Rathnayake AI et al. Brassinosteroids participate in the control of basal and acquired freezing tolerance of plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: E5982-e5991.

[30] Jiang B, Shi Y, Zhang X et al. PIF3 is a negative regulator of the CBF pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017; 114: E6695-e6702.

[31] Kidokoro S, Yoneda K, Takasaki H et al. Different cold-Signaling pathways function in the responses to rapid and gradual decreases in temperature. Plant Cell. 2017; 29: 760-74.

[32] Li H, Ye K, Shi Y et al. BZR1 positively regulates freezing tolerance via CBF-dependent and CBF-independent pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2017; 10: 545-59.

[33] An JP, Yao JF, Wang XN et al. MdHY5 positively regulates cold tolerance via CBF-dependent and CBF-independent pathways in apple. J Plant Physiol. 2017; 218: 275-81.

[34] An JP, Li R, Qu FJ et al. R2R3-MYB transcription factor MdMYB23 is involved in the cold tolerance and proanthocyanidin accumulation in apple. Plant J. 2018; 96: 562-77.

[35] Xu H, Wang N, Wang Y et al. Overexpression of the transcription factor MdbHLH33 increases cold tolerance of transgenic apple callus. Plant Cell Tissue & Organ Culture. 2018; 134: 131-40.

[36] An JP, Wang XF, Zhang XW et al. An apple MYB transcription factor regulates cold tolerance and anthocyanin accumulation and undergoes MIEL1-mediated degradation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 337-53.

[37] An JP, Wang XF, Zhang XW et al. Apple B-box protein BBX37 regulates jasmonic acid mediated cold tolerance through the JAZ-BBX37-ICE1-CBF pathway and undergoes MIEL1-mediated ubiquitination and degradation. New Phytol. 2021; 229: 2707-29.

[38] Lee BH, Henderson DA, Zhu JK . The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 3155-75.

[39] Tang K, Zhao L, Ren Y et al. The transcription factor ICE1 functions in cold stress response by binding to the promoters of CBF and COR genes. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62: 258-63.

[40] Hu Y, Jiang L, Wang F et al. Jasmonate regulates the inducer of cbf expression-C-repeat binding factor/DRE binding factor1 cascade and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 2907-24.

[41] Dong CH, Agarwal M, Zhang Y et al. The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 8281-6.

[42] Li H, Ding Y, Shi Y et al. MPK3- and MPK6-mediated ICE1 phosphorylation negatively regulates ICE1 stability and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2017; 43: 630-642.e4.

[43] Zhao C, Wang P, Si T et al. MAP kinase cascades regulate the cold response by modulating ICE1 protein stability. Dev Cell. 2017; 43: 618-629.e5.

[44] Ye K, Li H, Ding Y et al. BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE2 negatively regulates the stability of transcription factor ICE1 in response to cold stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2019; 31: 2682-96.

[45] Miura K, Jin JB, Lee J et al. SIZ1-mediated sumoylation of ICE1 controls CBF3/DREB1A expression and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007; 19: 1403-14.

[46] Zhang Z, Li J, Li F et al. OsMAPK3 phosphorylates OsbHLH002/OsICE1 and inhibits its Ubiquitination to activate OsTPP1 and enhances Rice chilling tolerance. Dev Cell. 2017; 43: 731-743.e5.

[47] Zhao ML et al. Induction of jasmonate signalling regulators MaMYC2s and their physical interactions with MaICE1 in methyl jasmonate-induced chilling tolerance in banana fruit. Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 36: 30-51.

[48] Fan ZQ, Chen JY, Kuang JF et al. The Banana fruit SINA ubiquitin ligase MaSINA1 regulates the stability of MaICE1 to be negatively involved in cold stress response. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 995.

[49] An JP, Xu RR, Liu X et al. Abscisic acid insensitive 4 interacts with ICE1 and JAZ proteins to regulate ABA signaling-mediated cold tolerance in apple. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73: 980-97.

[50] Sun L, Chen ZJ . The novel functions of ubiquitination in signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004; 16: 119-26.

[51] Miura K, Jin JB, Hasegawa PM . Sumoylation, a post-translational regulatory process in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007; 10: 495-502.

[52] Ubersax JA, Ferrell JE Jr. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 530-41.

[53] Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK . Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018; 19: 489-506.

[54] Chen X, Ding Y, Yang Y et al. Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63: 53-78.

[55] Lyzenga WJ, Stone SL . Abiotic stress tolerance mediated by protein ubiquitination. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 599-616.

[56] Zhao Q, Tian M, Li Q et al. A plant-specific in vitro ubiquitination analysis system. Plant J. 2013; 74: 524-33.

[57] Mazzucotelli E, Belloni S, Marone D et al. The e3 ubiquitin ligase gene family in plants: regulation by degradation. Curr Genomics. 2006; 7: 509-22.

[58] Xu FQ, Xue HW . The ubiquitin-proteasome system in plant responses to environments. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 2931-44.

[59] Vierstra RD . The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10: 385-97.

[60] Hatakeyama S, Nakayama KI . U-box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin ligases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003; 302: 635-45.

[61] Morreale FE, Walden H . Types of ubiquitin ligases. Cell. 2016; 165: 248-248.e1.

[62] Toma-Fukai S, Shimizu T . Structural diversity of ubiquitin E3 ligase. Molecules. 2021; 26: 6682.

[63] Yee D, Goring DR . The diversity of plant U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases: from upstream activators to downstream target substrates. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 1109-21.

[64] Sharma M . Role of plant U-BOX (PUB) protein in stress and development. In Dr. Girdhar K. Pandey (ed.), Plant Stress.Global Science books 2013.

[65] Trujillo M. News from the PUB: plant U-box type E3 ubiquitin ligases. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69: 371-84.

[66] Trujillo M, Ichimura K, Casais C et al. Negative regulation of PAMP-triggered immunity by an E3 ubiquitin ligase triplet in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2008; 18: 1396-401.

[67] Lu D, Lin W, Gao X et al. Direct ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptor FLS2 attenuates plant innate immunity. Science. 2011; 332: 1439-42.

[68] Zhou J, Lu D, Xu G et al. The dominant negative ARM domain uncovers multiple functions of PUB13 in Arabidopsis immunity, flowering, and senescence. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66: 3353- 66.

[69] Ma A, Zhang D, Wang G et al. Verticillium dahliae effector VDAL protects MYB6 from degradation by interacting with PUB25 and PUB26 E3 ligases to enhance Verticillium wilt resistance. Plant Cell. 2021; 33: 3675-99.

[70] Wang Y, Wu Y, Zhong H et al. Arabidopsis PUB2 and PUB4 connect signaling components of pattern-triggered immunity. New Phytol. 2022; 233: 2249-65.

[71] Cho SK, Ryu MY, Song C et al. Arabidopsis PUB22 and PUB23 are homologous U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases that play combinatory roles in response to drought stress. Plant Cell. 2008; 20: 1899-914.

[72] Adler G, Konrad Z, Zamir L et al. The Arabidopsis paralogs, PUB46 and PUB48, encoding U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases, are essential for plant response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17: 8.

[73] Zhao J, Zhao L, Zhang M et al. Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligases PUB22 and PUB23 negatively regulate drought tolerance by targeting ABA receptor PYL9 for degradation. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 17: 1841.

[74] Chen X, Wang T, Rehman AU et al. Arabidopsis U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase PUB11 negatively regulates drought tolerance by degrading the receptor-like protein kinases LRR1 and KIN7. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021; 63: 494-509.

[75] Bergler J, Hoth S . Plant U-box armadillo repeat proteins AtPUB18 and AtPUB19 are involved in salt inhibition of germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011; 13: 725-30.

[76] Jung C, Zhao P, Seo JS et al. PLANT U-BOX PROTEIN10 regulates MYC2 stability in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015; 27: 2016-31.

[77] Kong L, Cheng J, Zhu Y et al. Degradation of the ABA co-receptor ABI1 by PUB12/13 U-box E3 ligases. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8630.

[78] Seo DH, Ahn MY, Park KY et al. The N-terminal UND motif of the Arabidopsis U-box E3 ligase PUB18 is critical for the negative regulation of ABA-mediated Stomatal movement and determines its Ubiquitination specificity for exocyst subunit Exo70B1. Plant Cell. 2016; 28: 2952-73.

[79] Zhou J, Liu D, Wang P et al. Regulation of Arabidopsis brassinosteroid receptor BRI1 endocytosis and degradation by plant U-box PUB12/PUB13-mediated ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018; 115: E1906-e1915.

[80] Kim EJ, Lee SH, Park CH et al. Plant U-Box40 mediates degradation of the Brassinosteroid-responsive transcription factor BZR1 in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell. 2019; 31: 791-808.

[81] Wang X, Ding Y, Li Z et al. PUB25 and PUB26 promote plant freezing tolerance by degrading the cold Signaling negative regulator MYB15. Dev Cell. 2019; 51: 222-235.e5.

[82] Hu DG, Yu JQ, Han PL et al. The regulatory module MdPUB29-MdbHLH3 connects ethylene biosynthesis with fruit quality in apple. New Phytol. 2019; 221: 1966-82.

[83] Wei Y, Jin J, Xu Y et al. Ethylene-activated MdPUB24 mediates ubiquitination of MdBEL7 to promote chlorophyll degradation in apple fruit. Plant J. 2021; 108: 169-82.

[84] Han PL, Dong YH, Gu KD et al. The apple U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase MdPUB29 contributes to activate plant immune response to the fungal pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea. Planta. 2019; 249: 1177-88.

[85] Azevedo C, Santos-Rosa MJ, Shirasu K . The U-box protein family in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6: 354-8.

[86] Byun MY, Cui LH, Oh TK et al. Homologous U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases OsPUB2 and OsPUB3 are involved in the positive regulation of low temperature stress response in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 16.

[87] Yao W, Wang L, Wang J et al. VpPUB24, a novel gene from Chinese grapevine, Vitis pseudoreticulata, targets VpICE1 to enhance cold tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68: 2933-49.

[88] An JP, Yao JF, Xu RR et al. Apple bZIP transcription factor MdbZIP44 regulates abscisic acid-promoted anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Cell Environ. 2018; 41: 2678-92.