A natural mutation of the NST1 gene arrests secondary cell wall biosynthesis in the seed coat of a hull-less pumpkin accession

Xiaolong Lyu , Lu Shi , Meng Zhao , Zhangping Li , Nanqiao Liao , Yiqing Meng , Yuyuan Ma , Yulan Zhou , Qin Xue , Zhongyuan Hu , Jinghua Yang , Mingfang Zhang

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac136

PDF (1552KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac136 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac136
Article
research-article
A natural mutation of the NST1 gene arrests secondary cell wall biosynthesis in the seed coat of a hull-less pumpkin accession
Author information +
History +
PDF (1552KB)

Abstract

Hull-less pumpkins (Cucurbita pepo L.) are naturally occurring novel variants known as oilseed or naked-seeded pumpkins, and are characterized by the absence of a normal lignified seed coat. Due to a specialized seed coat structure, these variants serve as a good model for studying seed coat formation and simplify the processing of pumpkin seeds. However, causal genes for this hull-less trait still remain unknown. Here, by bulked segregant analysis and fine mapping, we found that mutation of a single gene, NAC SECONDARY WALL THICKENING PROMOTING FACTOR 1 (NST1), accounts for the hull-less trait. A 14-bp sequence insertion in the CpNST1 gene causes premature termination of CpNST1 translation, leading to lack of secondary cell wall (SCW) biosynthesis in hull-less seed coats. In situ hybridization analysis provided further evidence for the role of CpNST1 in pumpkin seed coat SCW biosynthesis. Interestingly, through secondary cell wall compositional analysis, we found that the main SCW components differed among cell layers in the seed coat. RNA-seq analysis indicated an upstream role of CpNST1 in the SCW biosynthesis network. Collectively, our findings provide mechanistic insight into seed coat SCW biosynthesis, and a target gene for breeders to introduce this hull-less trait for commercial exploitation.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaolong Lyu, Lu Shi, Meng Zhao, Zhangping Li, Nanqiao Liao, Yiqing Meng, Yuyuan Ma, Yulan Zhou, Qin Xue, Zhongyuan Hu, Jinghua Yang, Mingfang Zhang. A natural mutation of the NST1 gene arrests secondary cell wall biosynthesis in the seed coat of a hull-less pumpkin accession. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac136 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac136

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Haughn G, Chaudhury A . Genetic analysis of seed coat development in Arabidopsis . Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10: 472-7.

[2]

Radchuk V, Borisjuk L . Physical, metabolic and developmental functions of the seed coat. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 510.

[3]

Coen O, Magnani E . Seed coat thickness in the evolution of angiosperms. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008; 75: 2509-18.

[4]

Griffiths JS, North HM . Sticking to cellulose: exploiting Arabidopsis seed coat mucilage to understand cellulose biosynthesis and cell wall polysaccharide interactions. New Phytol. 2017; 214: 959-66.

[5]

Zhong R, Ye ZH . SCWs: biosynthesis, patterned deposition and transcriptional regulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 195-214.

[6]

Tobimatsu Y, Chen F, Nakashima J et al. Coexistence but independent biosynthesis of catechyl and guaiacyl/syringyl lignin polymers in seed coats. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 2587-600.

[7]

Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H . ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38: e164.

[8]

Liang M, Davis E, Gardner D et al. Involvement of AtLAC15 in lignin synthesis in seeds and in root elongation of Arabidopsis . Planta. 2006; 224: 1185-96.

[9]

Stork J, Harris D, Griffiths J et al. CELLULOSE SYNTHASE9 serves a nonredundant role in SCW synthesis in Arabidopsis epidermal testa cells. Plant Physiol. 2010; 153: 580-9.

[10]

Sullivan S, Ralet MC, Berger A et al. CESA5 is required for the synthesis of cellulose with a role in structuring the adherent mucilage of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156: 1725-39.

[11]

Griffiths JS, Šola K, Kushwaha R et al. Unidirectional movement of cellulose synthase complexes in Arabidopsis seed coat epidermal cells deposit cellulose involved in mucilage extrusion, adherence, and ray formation. Plant Physiol. 2015; 168: 502-20.

[12]

Yang B, Voiniciuc C, Fu L et al. TRM4 is essential for cellulose deposition in Arabidopsis seed mucilage by maintaining cortical microtubule organization and interacting with CESA3. New Phytol. 2019; 221: 881-95.

[13]

Usadel B, Kuschinsky AM, Rosso MG et al. RHM2 is involved in mucilage pectin synthesis and is required for the development of the seed coat in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 2004; 134: 286-95.

[14]

Western TL, Young DS, Dean GH et al. MUCILAGE-MODIFIED4 encodes a putative pectin biosynthetic enzyme developmentally regulated by APETALA2, TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1, and GLABRA2 in the Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Physiol. 2004; 134: 296-306.

[15]

Walker AR, Davison PA, Bolognesi-Winfield AC et al. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell. 1999; 11: 1337-49.

[16]

Penfield S, Meissner RC, Shoue DA et al. MYB61 is required for mucilage deposition and extrusion in the Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Cell. 2001; 13: 2777-91.

[17]

Johnson CS, Kolevski B, Smyth DR . TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a trichome and seed coat development gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a WRKY transcription factor. Plant Cell. 2002; 14: 1359-75.

[18]

Taketa S, Amano S, Tsujino Y et al. Barley grain with adhering hulls is controlled by an ERF family transcription factor gene regulating a lipid biosynthesis pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 4062-7.

[19]

Dorweiler J, Stec A, Kermicle J et al. Teosinte glume architecture 1: a genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution . Science. 1993; 262: 233-5.

[20]

Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li B et al. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature. 2005; 436: 714-9.

[21]

Sun L, Miao Z, Cai C et al. GmHs1-1, encoding a calcineurin-like protein, controls hard-seededness in soybean . Nat Genet. 2015; 47: 939-43.

[22]

Singh R, Low ET, Ooi LC et al. The oil palm SHELL gene controls oil yield and encodes a homologue of SEEDSTICK . Nature. 2013; 500: 340-4.

[23]

Salamini F, Ozkan H, Brandolini A et al. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3: 429-41.

[24]

Guo C, Wang Y, Yang A et al. The Coix genome provides insights into Panicoideae evolution and papery hull domestication. Mol Plant. 2019; 13: 309-20.

[25]

Luo H, Pandey MK, Khan AW et al. Discovery of genomic regions and candidate genes controlling shelling percentage using QTL-seq approach in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) . Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1248-60.

[26]

Lelley T, Loy B, Murkovic M . In: Vollmann J, Rajcan I, eds. Hull-less oil seed pumpkin, Oil Crops . Springer: New York, 2009, 469-92.

[27]

Stuart SG, Loy JB . Comparison of testa development in normal and hull-less seeded strains of Cucurbita pepo L. Bot Gaz. 1983; 144: 491-500.

[28]

Murovec J, Draslar K, Bohanec B . Detailed analysis of Cucurbita pepo seed coat types and structures with scanning electron microscopy. Botany 2012; 90: 1161-9.

[29]

Zraidi N, Pachner M, Lelley T . On the genetics and histology of the hull-less character of Styrian oil-pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) . Cucurbit Genet Cooperative Rep. 2003; 26: 57-61.

[30]

Chahal G, Kaur A, Dhatt A . A single-gene mutation changed the architecture of pumpkin seed: a review. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022; 41: 113-8.

[31]

Teppner H. Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) - history, seed coat types, thin coated seeds, and their genetics . Phyton. 2000; 40: 1-42.

[32]

Bezold TN, Mathews D, Loy JB et al. Molecular analysis of the hull-less seed trait in pumpkin: expression profiles of genes related to seed coat development. Seed Sci Res. 2005; 15: 205-17.

[33]

Inan N, Yildiz M, Sensoy S et al. Efficacy of ISSR and SRAP techniques for molecular characterization of some Cucurbita genotypes including naked (hull-less) seed pumpkin. J Anim Plant Sciences. 2012; 22: 123-36.

[34]

Sun H, Wu S, Zhang G et al. Karyotype stability and unbiased fractionation in the paleo-allotetraploid Cucurbita genomes. Mol Plant. 2017; 10: 1293-306.

[35]

Montero-Pau J, Blanca J, Bombarely A et al. De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole-genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus . Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1161-71.

[36]

Xiao J, Chen Y, Lu Y et al. A natural variation of an SVP MADS-box transcription factor in Triticum petropavlovskyi leads to its ectopic expression and contributes to elongated glume . Mol Plant. 2021; 14: 1408-11.

[37]

Soyk S, Lemmon ZH, Oved M et al. Bypassing negative epistasis on yield in tomato imposed by a domestication gene. Cell. 2017; 169: 1142-1155.e12.

[38]

Wang Y, Tan J, Wu Z et al. STAYGREEN, STAY HEALTHY: a loss-of-susceptibility mutation in the STAYGREEN gene provides durable, broad-spectrum disease resistances for over 50 years of US cucumber production. New Phytol. 2019; 221: 415-30.

[39]

Liu S, Gao P, Zhu Q et al. Resequencing of 297 melon accessions reveals the genomic history of improvement and loci related to fruit traits in melon. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 2545-58.

[40]

Guo S, Zhao S, Sun H et al. Resequencing of 414 cultivated and wild watermelon accessions identifies selection for fruit quality traits. Nat Genet. 2019; 51: 1616-23.

[41]

Liao N, Hu Z, Li Y et al. Ethylene-responsive factor 4 is associated with the desirable rind hardness trait conferring cracking resistance in fresh fruits of watermelon . Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1066-77.

[42]

Taylor-Teeples M, Lin L, de Lucas M et al. An Arabidopsis gene regulatory network for SCW synthesis. Nature. 2015; 517: 571-5.

[43]

Zhong R, Cui D, Ye ZH . SCW biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2019; 221: 1703-23.

[44]

Ranocha P, Denancé N, Vanholme R et al. Walls are thin 1 (WAT1), an Arabidopsis homolog of Medicago truncatula NODULIN21, is a tonoplast-localized protein required for secondary wall formation in fibers . Plant J. 2010; 63: 469-83.

[45]

Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye ZH . The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2007; 19: 2776-92.

[46]

Zhou J, Lee C, Zhong R et al. MYB58 and MYB63 are transcriptional activators of the lignin biosynthetic pathway during SCW formation in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 248-66.

[47]

Wenzl T, Prettner E, Schweiger K et al. An improved method to discover adulteration of Styrian pumpkin seed oil. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2002; 53: 193-202.

[48]

Mitsuda N, Seki M, Shinozaki K et al. The NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST2 of Arabidopsis regulate secondary wall thickenings and are required for anther dehiscence . Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 2993-3006.

[49]

Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M . NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST3 regulate pod shattering in a partially redundant manner by promoting secondary wall formation after the establishment of tissue identity . Plant J. 2008; 56: 768-78.

[50]

Xu B, Ohtani M, Yamaguchi M et al. Contribution of NAC transcription factors to plant adaptation to land. Science. 2014; 343: 1505-8.

[51]

McCarthy RL, Zhong R, Ye ZH . MYB83 is a direct target of SND1 and acts redundantly with MYB46 in the regulation of SCW biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 1950-64.

[52]

Zhong R, Lee C, Zhou J et al. A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of SCW biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2008; 20: 2763-82.

[53]

Zhong R, Lee C, Ye ZH . Global analysis of direct targets of secondary wall NAC master switches in Arabidopsis . Mol Plant. 2010; 3: 1087-103.

[54]

Wang H, Zhao Q, Chen F et al. NAC domain function and transcriptional control of a secondary cell wall master switch. Plant J. 2011; 68: 1104-14.

[55]

Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA . FQC dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics. 2017; 33: 3137-9.

[56]

McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20: 1297-303.

[57]

Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013; 74: 174-83.

[58]

Lyu X, Chen S, Liao N et al. Characterization of watermelon anther and its programmed cell death-associated events during dehiscence under cold stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2019; 38: 1551-61.

[59]

Nikovics K, Blein T, Peaucelle A et al. The balance between the MIR164A and CUC2 genes controls leaf margin serration in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 2929-45.

[60]

Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 511-5.

[61]

Robinson M, McCarthy D, Smyth G . edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 139-40.

[62]

Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y . Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 368-75.

PDF (1552KB)

52

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/