Engineering drought-tolerant apple by knocking down six GH3 genes and potential application of transgenic apple as a rootstock

Abstract

Drought poses a major threat to apple fruit production and quality. Because of the apple’s long juvenile phase, developing varieties with improved drought tolerance using biotechnology approaches is needed. Here, we used the RNAi approach to knock down six GH3 genes in the apple. Under prolonged drought stress, the MdGH3 RNAi plants performed better than wild-type plants and had stronger root systems, higher root-to-shoot ratio, greater hydraulic conductivity, increased photosynthetic capacity, and increased water use efficiency. Moreover, MdGH3 RNAi plants promoted the drought tolerance of the scion when they were used as rootstock, compared with wild-type and M9-T337 rootstocks. Scions grafted onto MdGH3 RNAi plants showed increased plant height, stem diameter, photosynthetic capacity, specific leaf weight, and water use efficiency. The use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can also increase the C/N ratio of the scion and achieve the same effect as the M9-T337 rootstock in promoting the flowering and fruiting of the scion. Notably, using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks did not reduce fruit weight and scion quality compared with using M9-T337 rootstock. Our research provides candidate genes and demonstrates a general approach that could be used to improve the drought tolerance of fruit trees without sacrificing the yield and quality of scion fruits.

References

[1] Terns RM, Terns MP . CRISPR-based technologies: prokaryotic defense weapons repurposed. Trends Genet. 2014; 30: 111-8.

[2] Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang X et al. CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends Plant Sci. 2019; 24: 1102-25.

[3] Tzfira T, Li J, Lacroix B et al. Agrobacterium T-DNA integration: molecules and models. Trends Genet. 2004; 20: 375-83.

[4] Khawar KM, Onarci S, Ozel CA et al. Plant biotechnology. Sci World J. 2013; 2013: 736731.

[5] Herman EM . Genetically modified soybeans and food allergies. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 1317-9.

[6] Wu S, Liang D, Ma F . Leaf micromorphology and sugar may contribute to differences in drought tolerance for two apple cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014; 80: 249-58.

[7] Zhou S, Li M, Guan Q et al. Physiological and proteome analysis suggest critical roles for the photosynthetic system for high water-use efficiency under drought stress in Malus. Plant Sci. 2015; 236: 44-60.

[8] Huang L, Li M, Zhou K et al. Uptake and metabolism of ammonium and nitrate in response to drought stress in Malus prunifolia. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 127: 185-93.

[9] Fujii H, Zhu JK . Arabidopsis mutant deficient in 3 abscisic acid-activated protein kinases reveals critical roles in growth, reproduction, and stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 8380-5.

[10] Fujita Y, Nakashima K, Yoshida T et al. Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 2123-32.

[11] Yang W, Liu XD, Chi XJ et al. Dwarf apple MbDREB1 enhances plant tolerance to low temperature, drought, and salt stress via both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Planta. 2011; 233: 219-29.

[12] Monneveux P, Ramírez DA, Pino MT . Drought tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum L.): can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals? Plant Sci. 2013; 205-206: 76-86.

[13] Jia X, Mao K, Wang P et al. Overexpression of MdATG8i improves water use efficiency in transgenic apple by modulating photosynthesis, osmotic balance, and autophagic activity under moderate water deficit. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 81.

[14] Singh VK, Jain M, Garg R . Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling suggest diverse roles of GH3 genes during development and abiotic stress responses in legumes. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 5: 789.

[15] Dinneny JR . Developmental responses to water and salinity in root systems. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 35: 239-57.

[16] Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado A . The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020; 368: 266-9.

[17] Rellan-Alvarez R, Lobet G, Dinneny JR . Environmental control of root system biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016; 67: 619-42.

[18] Geng D, Chen P, Shen X et al. MdMYB88 and MdMYB124 enhance drought tolerance by modulating root vessels and cell walls in apple. Plant Physiol. 2018; 178: 1296-309.

[19] Atkinson CJ, Else MA, Taylor L et al. Root and stem hydraulic conductivity as determinants of growth potential in grafted trees of apple (Malus pumila Mill.). J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 1221-9.

[20] Wang H, Zhao S, Mao K et al. Mapping QTLs for water-use efficiency reveals the potential candidate genes involved in regulating the trait in apple under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 136.

[21] Kenney AM, McKay JK, Richards JH et al. Direct and indirect selection on flowering time, water-use efficiency (WUE, delta C-13), and WUE plasticity to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol Evol. 2014; 4: 4505-21.

[22] Roussel M, Dreyer E, Montpied P et al. The diversity of (13)C isotope discrimination in a Quercus robur full-sib family is associated with differences in intrinsic water use efficiency, transpiration efficiency, and stomatal conductance. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 2419-31.

[23] Bazzer SK, Kaler AS, Ray JD et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for carbon isotope ratio (δ(13)C) in a recombinant inbred population of soybean. Theor Appl Genet. 2020; 133: 2141-55.

[24] Goldschmidt EE . Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 727.

[25] Greenwood MS, Day ME, Schatz J . Separating the effects of tree size and meristem maturation on shoot development of grafted scions of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 459-68.

[26] Vanderklein D, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lee S et al. Plant size, not age, regulates growth and gas exchange in grafted Scots pine trees. Tree Physiol. 2007; 27: 71-9.

[27] Foster TM, McAtee PA, Waite CN et al. Apple dwarfing rootstocks exhibit an imbalance in carbohydrate allocation and reduced cell growth and metabolism. Hortic Res. 2017; 4: 17009.

[28] Tombesi S, Johnson RS, Day KR et al. Relationships between xylem vessel characteristics, calculated axial hydraulic conductance and size-controlling capacity of peach rootstocks. Ann Bot. 2010; 105: 327-31.

[29] Penella C, Landi M, Guidi L et al. Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength. J Plant Physiol. 2016; 193: 1-11.

[30] Cantero-Navarro E, Romero-Aranda R, Fernandez-Munoz R et al. Improving agronomic water use efficiency in tomato by rootstock-mediated hormonal regulation of leaf biomass. Plant Sci. 2016; 251: 90-100.

[31] Guo T, Wang N, Xue Y et al. Overexpression of the RNA binding protein MhYTP1 in transgenic apple enhances drought tolerance and WUE by improving ABA level under drought condition. Plant Sci. 2019; 280: 397-407.

[32] Li H, Wang Y, Wang Z et al. Microarray and genetic analysis reveals that csa-miR159b plays a critical role in abscisic acid-mediated heat tolerance in grafted cucumber plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39: 1790-804.

[33] Cuartero J, Bolarín MC, Asíns MJ et al. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J Exp Bot. 2006; 57: 1045-58.

[34] Penella C, Nebauer SG, Quinones A et al. Some rootstocks improve pepper tolerance to mild salinity through ionic regulation. Plant Sci. 2015; 230: 12-22.

[35] Alsina MM, Smart DR, Bauerle T et al. Seasonal changes of whole root system conductance by a drought-tolerant grape root system. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62: 99-109.

[36] Bauerle TL, Centinari M, Bauerle WL . Shifts in xylem vessel diameter and embolisms in grafted apple trees of differing rootstock growth potential in response to drought. Planta. 2011; 234: 1045-54.

[37] Han Q, Guo Q, Korpelainen H et al. Rootstock determines the drought resistance of poplar grafting combinations. Tree Physiol. 2019; 39: 1855-66.

[38] Liu JJ, Li JQ, Su XH et al. Grafting improves drought tolerance by regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and stress-responsive gene expression in tobacco. Environ Exp Bot. 2014; 107: 173-9.

[39] Turnbull C . Long-distance regulation of flowering time. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62: 4399-413.

[40] Serrano G, Herrera-Palau R, Romero JM et al. Chlamydomonas CONSTANS and the evolution of plant photoperiodic signaling. Curr Biol. 2009; 19: 359-68.

[41] Shalom L, Samuelas S, Zur N et al. Fruit load induces changes in global gene expression and in abscisic acid (ABA) and indole acetic acid (IAA) homeostasis in citrus buds. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 3029-44.

[42] Xing LB, Zhang D, Li YM et al. Transcription profiles reveal sugar and hormone signaling pathways mediating flower induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 2052-68.

[43] Mellor N, Band LR, Pencik A et al. Dynamic regulation of auxin oxidase and conjugating enzymes AtDAO1 and GH3 modulates auxin homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 11022-7.

[44] Staswick PE, Serban B, Rowe M et al. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 616-27.

[45] Brunoni F, Collani S, Casanova-Saez R et al. Conifers exhibit a characteristic inactivation of auxin to maintain tissue homeostasis. New Phytol. 2020; 226: 1753-65.

[46] Kowalczyk M, Sandberg G . Quantitative analysis of indole-3-acetic acid metabolites in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001; 127: 1845-53.

[47] LeClere S, Tellez R, Rampey RA et al. Characterization of a family of IAA-amino acid conjugate hydrolases from Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 20446-52.

[48] Hayashi KI, Arai K, Aoi Y et al. The main oxidative inactivation pathway of the plant hormone auxin. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 6752.

[49] Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Liu X et al. A role for a dioxygenase in auxin metabolism and reproductive development in rice. Dev Cell. 2013; 27: 113-22.

[50] Porco S, Pencik A, Rashed A et al. Dioxygenase-encoding AtDAO1 gene controls IAA oxidation and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 11016-21.

[51] Nakazawa M, Yabe N, Ichikawa T et al. DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the light response of hypocotyl length. Plant J. 2001; 25: 213-21.

[52] Du H, Wu N, Fu J et al. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 6467-80.

[53] Zhang SW, Chen-Hui L, Cao J et al. Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3.13 activation. Plant Physiol. 2009; 151: 1889-901.

[54] Kirungu JN, Magwanga RO, Lu P et al. Functional characterization of Gh_A08G1120 (GH3.5) gene reveal their significant role in enhancing drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. BMC Genet. 2019; 20: 62.

[55] Jiang L, Zhang D, Liu C et al. MdGH36 is targeted by MdMYB94 and plays a negative role in apple water-deficit stress tolerance. Plant J. 2022; 109: 1271-89.

[56] Li K, Liu Z, Xing L et al. miRNAs associated with auxin signaling, stress response, and cellular activities mediate adventitious root formation in apple rootstocks. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019; 139: 66-81.

[57] Yao JL, Xu J, Corille A et al. A microRNA allele that emerged prior to apple domestication may underlie fruit size evolution. Plant J. 2015; 84: 417-27.

[58] Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM . The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994; 78: 203-9.

[59] Devoghalaere F, Douen T, Guitton B et al. A genomics approach to understanding the role of auxin in apple (Malus × domestica) fruit size control. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12: 7.

[60] Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W . Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell. 1993; 5: 1439-51.

[61] Liu X, Li J, Huang M et al. Mechanisms for the influence of citrus rootstocks on fruit size. J Agric Food Chem. 2015; 63: 2618-27.

[62] Ripoll JJ, Zhu M, Brocke S et al. Growth dynamics of the Arabidopsis fruit is mediated by cell expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019; 116: 25333-42.

[63] Vadez V, Kholova J, Medina S et al. Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 6141-53.

[64] Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG et al. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. Eur J Plant Physiol. 2004; 55: 2343-51.

[65] Yamaguchi M, Sharp RE . Complexity and coordination of root growth at low water potentials: recent advances from transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010; 33: 590-603.

[66] Zhao D, Wang Y, Feng C et al. Overexpression of MsGH3.5 inhibits shoot and root development through the auxin and cytokinin pathways in apple plants. Plant J. 2020; 103: 166-83.

[67] Dharmappa PM, Doddaraju P, Malagondanahalli MV et al. Introgression of root and water use efficiency traits enhances water productivity: an evidence for physiological breeding in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2019; 12: 14.

[68] Zhang Z, Cao B, Gao S et al. Grafting improves tomato drought tolerance through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and reducing ROS accumulation. Protoplasma. 2019; 256: 1013-24.

[69] Kundariya H, Yang X, Morton K et al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 5343.

[70] Yu N, Cao L, Yuan L et al. Maintenance of grafting-induced epigenetic variations in the asexual progeny of Brassica oleracea and B. juncea chimera. Plant J 2018; 96: 22-38.

[71] Zhang P, Duo T, Wang F et al. De novo transcriptome in roots of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) reveals gene expression dynamic and act network under alkaline salt stress. BMC Genomics. 2021; 22: 82.

[72] Zhang D, Yang K, Kan Z et al. The regulatory module MdBT2-MdMYB88/MdMYB124-MdNRTs regulates nitrogen usage in apple. Plant Physiol. 2021; 185: 1924-42.

[73] Tyree M, Yang S, Cruiziat P et al. Novel methods of measuring hydraulic conductivity of tree root systems and interpretation using AMAIZED. Plant Physiol. 1994; 104: 189-99.

[74] Wei C, Tyree M, Steudle E . Direct measurement of xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants. A test of the cohesion-tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiol. 1999; 121: 1191-205.