The fungal elicitor eutypine from Eutypa lata activates basal immunity through its phenolic side chains

Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) affect grape production and reduce vineyard longevity worldwide. Since the causative fungi also occur in asymptomatic trunks, we address disease outbreak in terms of altered chemical communication between host and endophyte. Here, we identified four chemically similar secondary metabolites secreted by the GTD-associated fungus Eutypa lata to analyse their modes of action in a grapevine cell culture of Vitis rupestris, where microtubules were tagged by GFP. Treatment with the metabolite eutypine activated defence responses, evident from extracellular alkalinisation and induction of defence genes. Eutypinol, instead, eliminated microtubules, in contrast to the other three compounds. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of four corresponding chemical analogues of these compounds, sharing the phenolic but lacking the alkyne moiety. These analogues were able to induce similar defence responses in V. rupestris cells, albeit at reduced amplitude. Since closely related moieties differing only in details of the side groups at the phenolic ring differ significantly with respect to the response of the host cell, we propose that these fungal compounds act through a specific binding site at the membrane of grapevine cells. We corroborate this specificity by combination experiments, where the eutypine and the eutypinol analogues behave competitively with respect to the elicited responses. In summary, Eutypa lata secretes compounds that elicit host defence in a specific manner by interfering with early events of immunity signalling. This supports the notion that a real understanding of GTDs has to address inter-organismic chemical communication.

References

[1] Kaplan J, Travadon R, Cooper M et al. Identifying economic hurdles to early adoption of preventative practices: the case of trunk diseases in California winegrape vineyards. Wine Econ Policy. 2016; 5: 127-41.

[2] Lorrain B, Ky I, Pasquier G et al. Effect of esca disease on the phenolic and sensory attributes of cabernet sauvignon grapes, musts and wines. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2012; 18: 64-72.

[3] The Commission of the European Communities. Commission regulation (EC) no 552/2009 of 22 June 2009, amending regulation (EC) no 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the council on the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) as regards annex XVII. Off J Eur Union. 2009; 164: 7-31.

[4] Wagschal I, Abou-Mansour E, Petit AN . 16 Wood Diseases of Grapevine: A Review on Eutypa Dieback and Esca. a. in: Ait Barka E, Cle’ment C, Eds. Plant-Microbe Interactions.Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2008: 367-91.

[5] Moller W, Kasimatis A . Further evidence that Eutypa armeniacae-not Phomopsis viticola-incites dead arm symptoms on grape. Plant Dis. 1981; 65: 429-31.

[6] Moller W, Kasimatis A . Dieback of grapevines caused by Eutypa armeniacae . Plant Dis Rep. 1978; 62: 254-8.

[7] Masi M, Cimmino A, Reveglia P et al. Advances on fungal Phytotoxins and their role in grapevine trunk diseases. J Agric Food Chem. 2018; 66: 5948-58.

[8] Rolshausen P, Greve LC, Labavitch JM et al. Pathogenesis of Eutypa lata in grapevine: identification of virulence factors and biochemical characterization of cordon dieback. Phytopathology. 2008; 98: 222-9.

[9] Schmidt C, Wolf G, Lorenz D . Production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes by the grapevine dieback fungus Eutypa lata. J Plant Dis Prot. 1999; 106: 1-11.

[10] Collemare J, O’Connell R, Lebrun MH . Nonproteinaceous effectors: the terra incognita of plant-fungal interactions. New Phytol. 2019; 223: 590-6.

[11] Spagnolo A, Magnin-Robert M, Alayi TD et al. Differential responses of three grapevine cultivars to Botryosphaeria dieback. Phytopathology. 2014; 104: 1021-35.

[12] Yadeta K, Thomma B . The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4: 97.

[13] Khattab IM, Sahi VP, Baltenweck R et al. Ancestral chemotypes of cultivated grapevine with resistance to Botryosphaeriaceae-related dieback allocate metabolism towards bioactive stilbenes. New Phytol. 2021; 229: 1133-46.

[14] Jiménez-Teja D, Hernández-Galán R, Collado IG . Metabolites from Eutypa species that are pathogens on grapes. Nat Prod Rep. 2006; 23: 108-16.

[15] Tsoupras G, Angelis P D, Zesiger T et al. Biologically-active natural acetylenes from the culture medium of Eutypa lata . Bioact. Mol. 1988; 7: 93-100.

[16] Renaud JM, Tsoupras G, Stoeckli-Evans H et al. A novel allenic epoxycyclohexane and related compounds from Eutypa lata (Pers: F.) Tul. Helv Chim Acta. 1989; 72: 1262-7.

[17] Tey-Rulh P, Philippe I, Renaud JM et al. Eutypine, a phytotoxin produced by Eutypa lata the causal agent of dying-arm disease of grapevine. Phytochemistry. 1991; 30: 471-3.

[18] Andolfi A, Mugnai L, Luque J et al. Phytotoxins produced by fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases. Toxins (Basel). 2011; 3: 1569-605.

[19] Mutawila C, Stander C, Halleen F et al. Response of Vitis vinifera cell cultures to Eutypa lata and Trichoderma atroviride culture filtrates: expression of defence-related genes and phenotypes . Protoplasma. 2017; 254: 863-79.

[20] Guan P, Terigele, Schmidt F et al. Hunting modulators of plant defence: the grapevine trunk disease fungus Eutypa lata secretes an amplifier for plant basal immunity. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71: 3710-24.

[21] Guan P, Shi W, Riemann M et al. Dissecting the membrane-microtubule sensor in grapevine defence. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 1-16.

[22] Chang X, Seo M, Takebayashi Y et al. Jasmonates are induced by the PAMP flg22 but not the cell death-inducing elicitor Harpin in Vitis rupestris . Protoplasma. 2017; 254: 271-83.

[23] Chang X, Nick P . Defence signalling triggered by Flg22 and Harpin is integrated into a different stilbene output in Vitis cells. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e40446.

[24] Chang X, Riemann M, Liu Q et al. Actin as deathly switch? How auxin can suppress cell-death related defence. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0125498.

[25] Felix G, Regenass M, Boller T . Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. Plant J. 1993; 4: 307-16.

[26] Mahoney N, Molyneux RJ, Smith LR et al. Dying-arm disease in grapevines: diagnosis of infection with Eutypa lata by metabolite analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53: 8148-55.

[27] Lardner R, Mahoney N, Zanker TP et al. Secondary metabolite production by the fungal pathogen Eutypa lata: analysis of extracts from grapevine cultures and detection of those metabolites in planta. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2006; 12: 107-14.

[28] Mahoney N, Lardner R, Molyneux RJ et al. Phenolic and heterocyclic metabolite profiles of the grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata . Phytochemistry. 2003; 64: 475-84.

[29] Li J, Staiger CJ . Understanding cytoskeletal dynamics during the plant immune response. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2018; 56: 513-33.

[30] Galarneau ERA, Lawrence DP, Travadon R et al. Drought exacerbates botryosphaeria dieback symptoms in grapevines and confounds host-based molecular markers of infection by Neofusicoccum parvum . Plant Dis. 2019; 103: 1738-45.

[31] Lima MR, Machado AF, Gubler WD . Metabolomic study of chardonnay grapevines double stressed with esca-associated fungi and drought. Phytopathology. 2017; 107: 669-80.

[32] Fontaine F, Pinto C, Vallet J et al. The effects of grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) on vine physiology. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2016; 144: 707-21.

[33] Deswarte C, Rouquier P, Roustan J et al. Ultrastructural changes produced in plantlet leaves and protoplasts of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet sauvignon by eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata . Vitis. 1994; 33: 185-8.

[34] Deswarte C, Canut H, Klaebe A et al. Transport, cytoplasmic accumulation and mechanism of action of the toxin eutypine in Vitis vinifera cells. J Plant Physiol. 1996; 149: 336-42.

[35] Afifi M, el-Kereamy A, Legrand V et al. Control of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway gene expression by eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata, in grape cell tissue cultures. J Plant Physiol. 2003; 160: 971-5.

[36] Colrat S, Deswarte C, Latché A et al. Enzymatic detoxification of eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata, by Vitis vinifera cells: partial purification of an NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase . Planta. 1999; 207: 544-50.

[37] Smith LR, Mahoney N, Molyneux RJ . Synthesis and structure−Phytotoxicity relationships of Acetylenic phenols and Chromene metabolites, and their analogues, from the grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata . J Nat Prod. 2003; 66: 169-76.

[38] Amborabé B-E, Fleurat-Lessard P, Bonmort J et al. Effects of eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata, on plant cell plasma membrane: possible subsequent implication in disease development. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001; 39: 51-8.

[39] Boller T . Chemoperception of microbial signals in plant cells. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1995; 46: 189-214.

[40] Montesano M, Brader G, Palva ET . Pathogen derived elicitors: searching for receptors in plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2003; 4: 73-9.

[41] Hu G, DeHart AKA, Li Y et al. EDS1 in tomato is required for resistance mediated by TIR-class R genes and the receptor-like R gene Ve . Plant J. 2005; 42: 376-91.

[42] Abdul Malik NA, Kumar IS, Nadarajah K . Elicitor and receptor molecules: orchestrators of plant defense and immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21: 963.

[43] Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S et al. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature. 2007; 448: 497-500.

[44] Kaku H, Nishizawa Y, Ishii-Minami N et al. Plant cells recognize chitin fragments for defense signaling through a plasma membrane receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; 103: 11086-91.

[45] Laohavisit A, Wakatake T, Ishihama N et al. Quinone perception in plants via leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases. Nature. 2020; 587: 92-7.

[46] Hardham AR . Microtubules and biotic interactions. Plant J. 2013; 75: 278-89.

[47] Fischer J, Thines E . Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine . Heidelberg: Springer; 2017: 165-85.

[48] Molyneux RJ, Mahoney N, Bayman P et al. Eutypa dieback in grapevines: differential production of acetylenic phenol metabolites by strains of Eutypa lata . J Agric Food Chem. 2002; 50: 1393-9.

[49] Defrancq E, Gordon J, Brodard A et al. The synthesis of a novel Epoxycyclohexane from the fungus Eutypa lata (Pers: F) TUL. Helv Chim Acta. 1992; 75: 276-81.