Subgenome dominance and its evolutionary implications in crop domestication and breeding

Abstract

Polyploidization or whole-genome duplication (WGD) is a well-known speciation and adaptation mechanism in angiosperms, while subgenome dominance is a crucial phenomenon in allopolyploids, established following polyploidization. The dominant subgenomes contribute more to genome evolution and homoeolog expression bias, both of which confer advantages for short-term phenotypic adaptation and long-term domestication. In this review, we firstly summarize the probable mechanistic basis for subgenome dominance, including the effects of genetic [transposon, genetic incompatibility, and homoeologous exchange (HE)], epigenetic (DNA methylation and histone modification), and developmental and environmental factors on this evolutionary process. We then move to Brassica rapa, a typical allopolyploid with subgenome dominance. Polyploidization provides the B. rapa genome not only with the genomic plasticity for adapting to changeable environments, but also an abundant genetic basis for morphological variation, making it a representative species for subgenome dominance studies. According to the ‘two-step theory’, B. rapa experienced genome fractionation twice during WGD, in which most of the genes responding to the environmental cues and phytohormones were over-retained, enhancing subgenome dominance and consequent adaption. More than this, the pangenome of 18 B. rapa accessions with different morphotypes recently constructed provides further evidence to reveal the impacts of polyploidization and subgenome dominance on intraspecific diversification in B. rapa. Above and beyond the fundamental understanding of WGD and subgenome dominance in B. rapa and other plants, however, it remains elusive why subgenome dominance has tissue- and spatiotemporal-specific features and could shuffle between homoeologous regions of different subgenomes by environments in allopolyploids. We lastly propose acceleration of the combined application of resynthesized allopolyploids, omics technology, and genome editing tools to deepen mechanistic investigations of subgenome dominance, both genetic and epigenetic, in a variety of species and environments. We believe that the implications of genomic and genetic basis of a variety of ecologically, evolutionarily, and agriculturally interesting traits coupled with subgenome dominance will be uncovered and aid in making new discoveries and crop breeding.

References

[1] Swift H . The constancy of desoxyribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1950; 36: 643-54.

[2] Choi I-Y, Kwon E-C, Kim N-S . The C-and G-value paradox with polyploidy, repeatomes, introns, phenomes and cell economy. Genes Genomics. 2020; 42: 699-714.

[3] Greilhuber J, Borsch T, Muller K et al. Smallest angiosperm genomes found in Lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size. Plant Biol. 2006; 8: 770-7.

[4] Pellicer J, Fay MF, Leitch IJ . The largest eukaryotic genome of them all? Bot J Linn Soc. 2010; 164: 10-5.

[5] Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S et al. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes. 2018; 9: 88.

[6] Barrett CF, McKain MR, Sinn BT et al. Ancient polyploidy and genome evolution in palms. Genome Biol Evol. 2019; 11: 1501-11.

[7] Levin DA, Soltis DE . Factors promoting polyploid persistence and diversification and limiting diploid speciation during the K-Pg interlude. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018; 42: 1-7.

[8] Soltis DE, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Jordan-Thaden I et al. Are polyploids really evolutionary dead-ends (again)? A critical reappraisal of Mayrose et al. (2011). New Phytol. 2014; 202: 1105-17.

[9] Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 2006; 16: 738-49.

[10] Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011; 473: 97-100.

[11] Leitch A, Leitch I . Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science. 2008; 320: 481-3.

[12] Jackson S, Chen ZJ . Genomic and expression plasticity of polyploidy. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010; 13: 153-9.

[13] Lee SI, Kim NS . Transposable elements and genome size variations in plants. Genomics Inform. 2014; 12: 87-97.

[14] Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H et al. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 1-23.

[15] Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van De Peer Y . Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 5737-42.

[16] Vanneste K, Baele G, Maere S et al. Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Res. 2014; 24: 1334-47.

[17] Freeling M. Picking up the ball at the K/Pg boundary: the distribution of ancient polyploidies in the plant phylogenetic tree as a spandrel of asexuality with occasional sex. Plant Cell. 2017; 29: 202-6.

[18] Renny-Byfield S, Wendel JF . Doubling down on genomes: polyploidy and crop plants. Am J Bot. 2014; 101: 1711-25.

[19] Otto SP, Whitton J . Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 2000; 34: 401-37.

[20] Hancock JF . Contributions of domesticated plant studies to our understanding of plant evolution. Ann Bot. 2005; 96: 953-63.

[21] Renny-Byfield S, Rodgers-Melnick E, Ross-Ibarra J . Gene fractionation and function in the ancient subgenomes of maize. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34: 1825-32.

[22] Zhang K, Wang X, Cheng F . Plant polyploidy: origin, evolution, and its influence on crop domestication. Hortic Plant J. 2019; 5: 231-9.

[23] Salman-Minkov A, Sabath N, Mayrose I . Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication. Nature Plants. 2016; 2: 16115.

[24] Dilcher D. Toward a new synthesis: major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 7030-6.

[25] Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM . The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 1991; 353: 31-7.

[26] Theissen G, Saedler H . Floral quartets. Nature. 2001; 409: 469-71.

[27] De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y . Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005; 20: 591-7.

[28] Kramer EM, Jaramillo MA, Di Stilio VS . Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004; 166: 1011-23.

[29] Barker MS, Kane NC, Matvienko M et al. Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years. Mol Biol Evol. 2008; 25: 2445-55.

[30] Huang C-H, Zhang C, Liu M et al. Multiple polyploidization events across Asteraceae with two nested events in the early history revealed by nuclear phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33: 2820-35.

[31] Howe HF, Smallwood J . Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1982; 13: 201-28.

[32] Seymour GB, Chapman NH, Chew BL et al. Regulation of ripening and opportunities for control in tomato and other fruits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11: 269-78.

[33] Tomato Genome Consortium . The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012; 485: 635-41.

[34] Young ND, Debelle F, Guerts R et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature. 2011; 480: 520-4.

[35] Edger PP, Heidel-Fischer HM, Bakaert M et al. The butterfly plant arms-race escalated by gene and genome duplications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 8362-6.

[36] Soltis PS, Soltis DE . Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016; 30: 159-65.

[37] Woodhouse MR, Schnable JC, Pedersen BS et al. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8: e1000409.

[38] Kacser H, Burns JA . The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981; 97: 639-66.

[39] Cheng F et al. Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e36442.

[40] Senchina DS, Alvarez I, Cronn RC et al. Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in Gossypium. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20: 633-43.

[41] Wang J, Tian L, Lee HS et al. Genomewide nonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics. 2006; 172: 507-17.

[42] Buggs RJ, Chamala S, Wu W et al. Characterization of duplicate gene evolution in the recent natural allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus by next-generation sequencing and Sequenom iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19: 132-46.

[43] Murat F, Zhang R, Guizard S et al. Shared subgenome dominance following polyploidization explains grass genome evolutionary plasticity from a seven protochromosome ancestor with 16K protogenes. Genome Biol Evol. 2014; 6: 12-33.

[44] Pont C, Murat F, Guizard S et al. Wheat syntenome unveils new evidences of contrasted evolutionary plasticity between paleo- and neoduplicated subgenomes. Plant J. 2013; 76: 1030-44.

[45] Akama S, Shimizu-Inatsugi R, Shimizu KK et al. Genome-wide quantification of homeolog expression ratio revealed non-stochastic gene regulation in synthetic allopolyploid Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: e46-6.

[46] Renny-Byfield S, Gong L, Gallagher JP et al. Persistence of subgenomes in paleopolyploid cotton after 60 my of evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32: 1063-71.

[47] Alger EI, Edger PP . One subgenome to rule them all: underlying mechanisms of subgenome dominance. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020; 54: 108-13.

[48] Schnable JC, Springer NM, Freeling M . Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 4069-74.

[49] Osborn TC, Pires JC, Birchler J et al. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 2003; 19: 141-7.

[50] Birchler JA, Veitia RA . Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 14746-53.

[51] Bird KA, Van Buren R, Puzey JR et al. The causes and consequences of subgenome dominance in hybrids and recent polyploids. New Phytol. 2018; 220: 87-93.

[52] Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blueberry. GigaScience. 2019; 8: giz012.

[53] Flagel L, Udall J, Nettleton D et al. Duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid Gossypium reveals two temporally distinct phases of expression evolution. BMC Biol. 2008; 6: 16.

[54] Wang M, Wang PC, Lin M et al. Evolutionary dynamics of 3D genome architecture following polyploidization in cotton. Nature Plants. 2018; 4: 90-7.

[55] Chester M, Gallagher JP, Symonds VV et al. Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 1176-81.

[56] Hurgobin B, Golicz AA, Bayer PE et al. Homoeologous exchange is a major cause of gene presence/absence variation in the amphidiploid Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1265-74.

[57] Tennessen JA, Govindarajulu R, Ashman T-L et al. Evolutionary origins and dynamics of octoploid strawberry subgenomes revealed by dense targeted capture linkage maps. Genome Biol Evol. 2014; 6: 3295-313.

[58] Guo H, Wang X, Gundlach H et al. Extensive and biased intergenomic nonreciprocal DNA exchanges shaped a nascent polyploid genome, Gossypium (cotton). Genetics. 2014; 197: 1153-63.

[59] Lloyd A, Blary A, Chariff D et al. Homoeologous exchanges cause extensive dosage-dependent gene expression changes in an allopolyploid crop. New Phytol. 2018; 217: 367-77.

[60] Kagale S, Koh C, Nixon J et al. The emerging biofuel crop Camelina sativa retains a highly undifferentiated hexaploid genome structure. Nat Commun. 2014; 5: 3706.

[61] Cheng F, Mandakova T, Wu J et al. Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 1541-54.

[62] Wang X, Wang H, Wang J et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 2011; 43: 1035-9.

[63] Cheng F, Sun C, Wu J et al. Epigenetic regulation of subgenome dominance following whole genome triplication in Brassica rapa. New Phytol. 2016; 211: 288-99.

[64] Zhao J, Paulo MJ, Jamar D et al. Association mapping of leaf traits, flowering time, and phytate content in Brassica rapa. Genome. 2007; 50: 963-73.

[65] Belser C, Istace B, Denis E et al. Chromosome-scale assemblies of plant genomes using nanopore long reads and optical maps. Nature Plants. 2018; 4: 879-87.

[66] Li P, Su T, Zhao X et al. Assembly of the non-heading pak choi genome and comparison with the genomes of heading Chinese cabbage and the oilseed yellow sarson. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 966-76.

[67] Li Y, Liu GF, Ma LM et al. A chromosome-level reference genome of non-heading Chinese cabbage [Brassica campestris (syn. Brassica rapa) ssp. chinensis]. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 212.

[68] Su T, Wang W, Li P et al. A genomic variation map provides insights into the genetic basis of spring Chinese cabbage Brassica rapa ssp. Mol Plant. 2018; 11: 1360-76.

[69] Cai X, Chang L, Zhang T et al. Impacts of allopolyploidization and structural variation on intraspecific diversification in Brassica rapa. Genome Biol. 2021; 22: 1-24.

[70] Cheng F, Wu J, Wang X . Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Hortic Res. 2014; 1: 14024.

[71] Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014; 345: 950-3.

[72] Yoo M, Szadkowski E, Wendel JJH . Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploid cotton. Mol Plant. 2013; 110: 171-80.

[73] Dong S, Adams KL . Differential contributions to the transcriptome of duplicated genes in response to abiotic stresses in natural and synthetic polyploids. New Phytol. 2011; 190: 1045-57.

[74] Buggs RJ, Wendel JF, Doyle JJ et al. The legacy of diploid progenitors in allopolyploid gene expression patterns. Phil Trans Royal Soc B. 2014; 369: 20130354.

[75] Kryvokhyzha D, Milesi P, Duan T et al. Towards the new normal: transcriptomic convergence and genomic legacy of the two subgenomes of an allopolyploid weed (Capsella bursa-pastoris). PLoS Genet. 2019; 15: e1008131.

[76] Han J, Zhou B, Shan W et al. A and D genomes spatial separation at somatic metaphase in tetraploid cotton: evidence for genomic disposition in a polyploid plant. Plant J. 2015; 84: 1167-77.

[77] Jordan KW, Wang S, Lun Y et al. A haplotype map of allohexaploid wheat reveals distinct patterns of selection on homoeologous genomes. Genome Biol. 2015; 16: 1-18.

[78] Yang JH, Liu D, Wang X et al. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat Genet. 2016; 48: 1225-32.

[79] Ge Y, Ramchiary N, Wang T et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for leaf and heading-related traits in Chinese cabbage Brassica rapa L. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2011; 52: 494-501.

[80] Wang Y, Liu X, Ji X et al. Identification and validation of a major QTL controlling the presence/absence of leaf lobes in Brassica rapa L. Euphytica. 2015; 205: 761-71.

[81] Sun X, Basnet RK, Yan Z et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals molecular pathways involved in leafy head formation of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 130.

[82] Gao Y, Lu Y, Li X et al. Development and application of SSR markers related to genes involved in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity establishment in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Front Genet. 2020; 11: 773.

[83] Su T, Wang W, Li P et al. Natural variations of BrHISN2 provide a genetic basis for growth-flavour trade-off in different Brassica rapa subspecies. New Phytol. 2021; 231: 2186-99.

[84] Wu Y, Zhang S, Zhang H et al. QTL mapping and candidate gene identification of swollen root formation in turnip. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 653.

[85] Powell JJ, Fitzgerald TL, Stiller J et al. The defence-associated transcriptome of hexaploid wheat displays homoeolog expression and induction bias. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 533-43.

[86] Lu SJ, Dong L, Fang C et al. Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication. Nat Genet. 2020; 52: 428.

[87] Yu H, Lin T, Meng X et al. A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell. 2021; 184: 1156-1170.e14.

[88] Xie Y, Zhang T, Huang X et al. A two-in-one breeding strategy boosts rapid utilization of wild species and elite cultivars, Plant Biotechnol J. 2022; 20: 800-2.