There and back again; historical perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies

Patrick P. Edger , Massimo Iorizzo , Nahla V. Bassil , Juliana Benevenuto , Luis Felipe V. Ferrão , Lara Giongo , Kim Hummer , Lovely Mae F. Lawas , Courtney P. Leisner , Changying Li , Patricio R. Munoz , Hamid Ashrafi , Amaya Atucha , Ebrahiem M. Babiker , Elizabeth Canales , David Chagné , Lisa DeVetter , Mark Ehlenfeldt , Richard V. Espley , Karina Gallardo , Catrin S. Günther , Michael Hardigan , Amanda M. Hulse-Kemp , MacKenzie Jacobs , Mary Ann Lila , Claire Luby , Dorrie Main , Molla F. Mengist , Gregory L. Owens , Penelope Perkins-Veazie , James Polashock , Marti Pottorff , Lisa J. Rowland , Charles A. Sims , Guo-qing Song , Jessica Spencer , Nicholi Vorsa , Alan E. Yocca , Juan Zalapa

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac083

PDF (739KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac083 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac083
Review Article
research-article
There and back again; historical perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies
Author information +
History +
PDF (739KB)

Abstract

The genus Vaccinium L. (Ericaceae) contains a wide diversity of culturally and economically important berry crop species. Consumer demand and scientific research in blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) and cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) have increased worldwide over the crops’ relatively short domestication history (~100 years). Other species, including bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), and ohelo berry (Vaccinium reticulatum) are largely still harvested from the wild but with crop improvement efforts underway. Here, we present a review article on these Vaccinium berry crops on topics that span taxonomy to genetics and genomics to breeding. We highlight the accomplishments made thus far for each of these crops, along their journey from the wild, and propose research areas and questions that will require investments by the community over the coming decades to guide future crop improvement efforts. New tools and resources are needed to underpin the development of superior cultivars that are not only more resilient to various environmental stresses and higher yielding, but also produce fruit that continue to meet a variety of consumer preferences, including fruit quality and health related traits.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Patrick P. Edger, Massimo Iorizzo, Nahla V. Bassil, Juliana Benevenuto, Luis Felipe V. Ferrão, Lara Giongo, Kim Hummer, Lovely Mae F. Lawas, Courtney P. Leisner, Changying Li, Patricio R. Munoz, Hamid Ashrafi, Amaya Atucha, Ebrahiem M. Babiker, Elizabeth Canales, David Chagné, Lisa DeVetter, Mark Ehlenfeldt, Richard V. Espley, Karina Gallardo, Catrin S. Günther, Michael Hardigan, Amanda M. Hulse-Kemp, MacKenzie Jacobs, Mary Ann Lila, Claire Luby, Dorrie Main, Molla F. Mengist, Gregory L. Owens, Penelope Perkins-Veazie, James Polashock, Marti Pottorff, Lisa J. Rowland, Charles A. Sims, Guo-qing Song, Jessica Spencer, Nicholi Vorsa, Alan E. Yocca, Juan Zalapa. There and back again; historical perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac083 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac083

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Stevens PF . A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. Bot J Linn Soc. 1971; 64: 1-53.

[2]

Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii . Choice University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI. 1990;2828-0964-28-0964.

[3]

Von Linné C . Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas ad genera relatas, cum diferentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas . Berlin: Junk; 1908.

[4]

Linnaeus C . Species plantarum . Berolini, Impensis G. C. Nauk; 1799.

[5]

von Linné C . Linnaeus’ Philosophia Botanica . Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 2005.

[6]

von Linné, C. Caroli Linnæi ... Genera plantarum eorumque characteres naturales secundum numerum, figuram, situm, & proportionem omnium fructificationis partium . Lugduni Batavorum, apud C. Wishoff, 1737 https//:10.5962/bhl.title.70902.

[7]

von Linné C . Lachesis Lapponica: or, a tour in Lapland . London: White and Cochrane; 1811.

[8]

von Linné C . Caroli Linnaei ... Flora Svecica: exhibens plantas per regnum Sueciae crescentes, systematice cum differentiis specierum, synonymis autorum, nominibus incolarum, solo locorum, usu oeconomorum, officinalibus pharmacopaeæorum . Sumtu & Literis Laurentii Salvii; 1755.

[9]

Linnaeus C . Caroli Linnæi ... Systema vegetabilium . sumtibus Librariae Dieterichianae, Sprengel, Anton; 1828.

[10]

Linnaeus C . Flora Lapponica. apud S Schouten, Amstelaedami: Apud Salomonem Schouten. 1737.

[11]

Vander Kloet SP . On the LECTOTYPIFICATION of VACCINIUM l. Taxon. 1981; 30: 646-8.

[12]

Ann Powell E, Kron KA . Hawaiian blueberries and their relatives-a phylogenetic analysis of Vaccinium sections Macropelma. Myrtillus, and Hemimyrtillus (Ericaceae). Syst Bot. 2002; 27: 768-79.

[13]

Kron KA, Judd WS, Stevens P et al. Phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Bot Rev. 2002; 68: 335-423.

[14]

Vander Kloet SP, Others. The Genus Vaccinium in North America . Agriculture Canada; Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Ottawa, Canada. 1988.

[15]

Hummer KE, Williams KA, Bushakra JM. North American Crop Wild Relatives of Temperate Berries (Fragaria L., Ribes L., Rubus L., and Vaccinium L.). In: Greene SL, Williams KA, Khoury CK, Kantar MB, Marek LF, eds. North American Crop Wild Relatives, Volume 2: Important Species.Springer International Publishing, New York, New York USA, 2019, 283-327.

[16]

Ehlenfeldt MK, Luteyn JL . Fertile intersectional F1 hybrids of 4x Vaccinium meridionale (section Pyxothamnus) and Highbush blueberry, V. corymbosum (section Cyanococcus). HortScience. 2021; 56: 318-23.

[17]

Lyrene PM, Vorsa N, Ballington JR . Euphytica . 2003; 133: 27-36.

[18]

Bruederle LP, Vorsa N . Genetic differentiation of diploid blueberry, Vaccinium sect. Cyanococcus (Ericaceae). Syst Bot. 1994; 19: 337-49.

[19]

Hancock JF . Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding . Springer Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany. 2008.

[20]

Vorsa N, Zalapa J . Domestication, genetics, and genomics of the American cranberry. Plant Breed Rev. 2019; 279-315.

[21]

Hancock JF, Lyrene P, Finn CE et al. Blueberries and cranberries. In: Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding Springer Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany. 115-50.

[22]

Research and extension initiative for cranberry and blueberry: Current and future needs - NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV. https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1009968-research-and-extension-initiative-for-cranberry-and-blueberry-current-and-future-needs.html.

[23]

Gallardo RK, Zhang Q, Dosset M et al. Breeding trait priorities of the blueberry industry in the United States and Canada. HortScience. 2018; 53: 1021-8.

[24]

Gallardo RK, Zhang Q, Dosset M et al. Breeding trait priorities of the cranberry industry in the United States and Canada. HortScience. 2018; 53: 1467-74.

[25]

Baloga DW, Vorsa N, Lawter L . Dynamic headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of volatile flavor compounds from wild diploid blueberry species. ACS Symp Ser. 1995; 235-47.

[26]

Lyrene PM . Phenotype and fertility of intersectional hybrids between Tetraploid Highbush blueberry and colchicine-treated Vaccinium stamineum. HortScience. 2016; 51: 15-22.

[27]

Lyrene PM . First report of Vaccinium arboreum hybrids with cultivated highbush blueberry. HortScience. 2011; 46: 563-6.

[28]

Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ . Highly fertile intersectional blueberry hybrids of Vaccinium padifolium section Hemimyrtillus and V. corymbosum section Cyanococcus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2014; 139: 30-8.

[29]

Ehlenfeldt MK, Kawash J, Polashock J . Field performance of backcross (BC1) blueberry hybrids of Vaccinium padifolium (section Hemimyrtillus) with V. corymbosum/V. angustifolium. HortScience. 2020; 55: 1788-93.

[30]

Tsuda H, Kunitake H, Yamasaki M et al. Production of intersectional hybrids between colchicine-induced tetraploid shashanbo (Vaccinium bracteatum) and highbush blueberry ‘Spartan’. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2013; 138: 317-24.

[31]

Tsuda H, Kunitake H, Aoki Y et al. Efficient in vitro screening for higher soil pH adaptability of intersectional hybrids in blueberry. HortScience. 2014; 49: 141-4.

[32]

Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ, Ballington JR . Vaccinium corymbodendron Dunal as a bridge between taxonomic sections and ploidies in Vaccinium: a work in progress. North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference. 2018; 15, 1.

[33]

Gustavsson B. Lingonberry breeding and cultivation (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). in V international symposium on Vaccinium Culture. 1993; 346: 311-3.

[34]

Ritchie JC . A natural hybrid in Vaccinium. I. the structure, performance and chorology of the cross Vaccinium intermedium Ruthe. New Phytol. 1955; 54: 49-67.

[35]

Ritchie JC . A natural hybrid in Vaccinium II. Genetic studies in Vaccinium intermedium Ruthe. New Phytol. 1955; 54: 320-35.

[36]

Christ E. Crossbreedings between cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) and cowberries (Vaccinium vitis idaea L.) . Acta hortic. 1977; 61: 285-94.

[37]

Morozov OV . The prospects for using Vaccinium uliginosum L. × Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. hybrid in breeding. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2007; 6: 43-56.

[38]

Zeldin EL, McCown BH . Intersectional hybrids of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, section Vitis-idaea) and cranberry (V. macrocarpon, section Oxycoccus) to Vaccinium reticulatum (section Macropelma) . VI International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture. 1996; 446: 235-8.

[39]

Marozau A, Baranov OY . Hybridity of a plant created in a combination of crossing of (Vaccinium uliginosum L. × V. vitis-idaea L.) × Oxycoccus macrocarpus (Aiton) Pursh at the tetraploid level. Folia Forestalia Polonica. 2018; 60: 281-91.

[40]

Vorsa N, Johnson-Cicalese J, Polashock J . A blueberry by cranberry hybrid derived from a Vaccinium darrowii×(V. macrocarpon× V. oxycoccos) intersectional cross . Acta hortic. 2009; 810: 187-90.

[41]

Bian Y, Ballington J, Raja A et al. Patterns of simple sequence repeats in cultivated blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) and their use in revealing genetic diversity and population structure. Mol Breed. 2014; 34: 675-89.

[42]

Sakhanokho HF, Rinehart TA, Stringer SJ et al. Variation in nuclear DNA content and chromosome numbers in blueberry. Sci Hortic. 2018; 233: 108-13.

[43]

Costich DE, Ortiz R, Meagher TR et al. Determination of ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in blueberry by flow cytometry. Theor Appl Genet. 1993; 86: 1001-6.

[44]

Gupta V, Estrada AD, Blakley I et al. RNA-Seq analysis and annotation of a draft blueberry genome assembly identifies candidate genes involved in fruit ripening, biosynthesis of bioactive compounds, and stage-specific alternative splicing. Gigascience. 2015; 4: 5.

[45]

Die JV, Román B, Qi X et al. Genome-scale examination of NBS-encoding genes in blueberry. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 3429.

[46]

Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blueberry. Gigascience. 2019; 8, giz012.

[47]

Polashock J, Zelzion E, Fajardo D et al. The American cranberry: first insights into the whole genome of a species adapted to bog habitat. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14: 165.

[48]

Diaz-Garcia L, Garcia-Ortega LF, Gonzalez-Rodriguez M et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) and its wild relative Vaccinium microcarpum. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 633310.

[49]

Wu C, Deng C, Hilario E et al. A chromosome-scale assembly of the bilberry genome identifies a complex locus controlling berry anthocyanin composition. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2022. 22, 345-360.

[50]

Cui F, Ye X, Li X et al. Dissecting the subtropical adaptation traits and cuticle synthesis pathways via the genome of the subtropical blueberry Vaccinium darrowii . bioRxiv 2021.09.03.458838. 2021. 1 https//:10.1101/2021.09.03.458838.

[51]

Tian Y, Ma Z, Ma H et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) provides insights into genes associated with flavonoids metabolism during fruit development. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020; 34: 1252-64.

[52]

GDV. http://www.vaccinium.org.

[53]

Home. https://www.vacciniumcap.org.

[54]

Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial ‘pan-genome’. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 13950-5.

[55]

Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Bhalla PL et al. Pangenomics comes of age: from bacteria to plant and animal applications. Trends Genet. 2020; 36: 132-45.

[56]

Die JV, Rowland LJ . Advent of genomics in blueberry. Mol Breed. 2013; 32: 493-504.

[57]

Chung SW, Yu DJ, Oh HD et al. Transcriptional regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signal transduction, and anthocyanin biosynthesis in ‘Bluecrop’ highbush blueberry fruit during ripening. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0220015.

[58]

Günther CS, Dare AP, McGhie TK et al. Spatiotemporal modulation of flavonoid metabolism in blueberries. Frontiers in plant science.. 2020; 11 https//:10.3389/fpls.2020.00545.

[59]

Guo X, Wang D, Shakeel M . Transcriptome analysis reveals light-induced anthocyanin synthesis candidate genes in rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei: Reade). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2021; 35: 746-57.

[60]

Li X, Sun H, Pei J et al. De novo sequencing and comparative analysis of the blueberry transcriptome to discover putative genes related to antioxidants. Gene. 2012; 511: 54-61.

[61]

Lin Y, Wang Y, Li B et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in anthocyanin synthesis in blueberry. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 127: 561-72.

[62]

Plunkett BJ, Esplay RV, Dare AP et al. MYBA from blueberry (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus) is a subgroup 6 type R2R3MYB transcription factor that activates anthocyanin production. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 1300.

[63]

Sun H, Liu Y, Gai Y et al. De novo sequencing and analysis of the cranberry fruit transcriptome to identify putative genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, transport and regulation. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 652.

[64]

Zhao M, Li J, Zhu L et al. Identification and characterization of MYB-bHLH-WD40 regulatory complex members controlling Anthocyanidin biosynthesis in blueberry fruits development. Genes. 2019; 10, 496.

[65]

Zifkin M, Jin A, Ozga JA et al. Gene expression and metabolite profiling of developing Highbush blueberry fruit indicates transcriptional regulation of flavonoid metabolism and activation of Abscisic acid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2012; 158: 200-24.

[66]

Dhanaraj AL, Alkharouf NW, Beard HS et al. Major differences observed in transcript profiles of blueberry during cold acclimation under field and cold room conditions. Planta. 2007; 225: 735-51.

[67]

Dhanaraj AL, Slovin JP, Rowland LJ . Analysis of gene expression associated with cold acclimation in blueberry floral buds using expressed sequence tags. Plant Sci. 2004; 166: 863-72.

[68]

Die JV, Rowland LJ . Elucidating cold acclimation pathway in blueberry by transcriptome profiling. Environ Exp Bot. 2014; 106: 87-98.

[69]

Rowland LJ, Alkharouf N, Darwish O et al. Generation and analysis of blueberry transcriptome sequences from leaves, developing fruit, and flower buds from cold acclimation through deacclimation. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12: 46.

[70]

Song G-Q, Chen Q . Comparative transcriptome analysis of nonchilled, chilled, and late-pink bud reveals flowering pathway genes involved in chilling-mediated flowering in blueberry. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 98.

[71]

Walworth A, Song G-Q . The cold-regulated genes of blueberry and their response to overexpression of VcDDF1 in several tissues. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 1553.

[72]

Li L, Zhang H, Liu Z et al. Comparative transcriptome sequencing and de novo analysis of Vaccinium corymbosum during fruit and color development. BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16: 223.

[73]

Liu Y, Wang Y, Pei J et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of COMT gene family during the development of blueberry fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21.

[74]

Nguyen N, Suokas M, Karppinen K et al. Recognition of candidate transcription factors related to bilberry fruit ripening by de novo transcriptome and qRT-PCR analyses. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 9943.

[75]

Qi X, Ogden EL, Die JV et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies genes related to the waxy coating on blueberry fruit in two northern-adapted rabbiteye breeding populations. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 460.

[76]

Qi X, Ogden EL, Ehlenfeldt MK et al. Dataset of de novo assembly and functional annotation of the transcriptome of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Data Brief. 2019; 25: 104390.

[77]

Walworth AE, Chai B, Song G-Q. Transcript profile of flowering regulatory genes in VcFT-overexpressing blueberry plants. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156993.

[78]

Benevenuto RF, Seldal T, Hegland SJ et al. Transcriptional profiling of methyl jasmonate-induced defense responses in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 70.

[79]

Benevenuto RF, Seldal T, Polashock J et al. Molecular and ecological plant defense responses along an elevational gradient in a boreal ecosystem. Ecol Evol. 2020; 10: 2478-91.

[80]

Saad N, Alcala-Briseno RI, Polston JE et al. Blueberry red ringspot virus genomes from Florida inferred through analysis of blueberry root transcriptomes. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 12043.

[81]

Yang L, Li QQ, Yan Y et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals positive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on photosynthesis and high-pH tolerance in blueberry seedlings. Trees. 2020; 34: 433-44.

[82]

Yi-Lan J, Shi-Long J, Xuan-Li J . Disease-resistant identification and analysis to transcriptome differences of blueberry leaf spot induced by beta-aminobutyric acid. Arch Microbiol. 2021; 203: 3623-32.

[83]

Yuan F, Yan J, Yan X et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in volatile compound synthesis in blueberries (Vaccinium virgatum) during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2020; 170: 111327, .

[84]

Zhang F, Ji S, Wei B et al. Transcriptome analysis of postharvest blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum ‘Duke’) in response to cold stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 80.

[85]

Payá-Milans M, Nunez GH, Olmstead JW et al. Regulation of gene expression in roots of the pH-sensitive Vaccinium corymbosum and the pH-tolerant Vaccinium arboreum in response to near neutral pH stress using RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 580.

[86]

AN H, Zhang J, Xu F et al. Transcriptomic profiling and discovery of key genes involved in adventitious root formation from green cuttings of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 182.

[87]

Wang Y, Shadid MQ, Ghouri F et al. Transcriptome analysis and annotation: SNPs identified from single copy annotated unigenes of three polyploid blueberry crops. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0216299.

[88]

Wang Y, Nie F, Shahid MQ et al. Molecular footprints of selection effects and whole genome duplication (WGD) events in three blueberry species: detected by transcriptome dataset. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 250.

[89]

Yue J, Lu X, Zhang H et al. Identification of conserved and novel MicroRNAs in blueberry. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1155.

[90]

KNApSAcK. http://www.knapsackfamily.com/KNApSAcK/.

[91]

Afendi FM, Okada T, Yamazaki M et al. KNApSAcK family databases: integrated metabolite-plant species databases for multifaceted plant research. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012; 53: e1-1.

[92]

Steinbeck C, Conesa P, Haug K et al. MetaboLights: towards a new COSMOS of metabolomics data management. Metabolomics. 2012; 8: 757-60.

[93]

Wishart DS . FooDB. The Metabolomics Innovation Centre. 2016.

[94]

Food Metabolome Repository. http://metabolites.in/foods.

[95]

Sakurai N, Shibata D . Tools and databases for an integrated metabolite annotation environment for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics. Carotenoid Science. 2017; 22: 16-22.

[96]

Karppinen K, Zoratti L, Nguyenquynh N et al. On the developmental and environmental regulation of secondary metabolism in Vaccinium spp. Frontiers in plant science. 2016; 7: 655.

[97]

Qi J, Li K, Shi Y et al. Cross-species comparison of metabolomics to decipher the metabolic diversity in ten fruits. Meta. 2021; 11: 164.

[98]

Wang H, Guo X, Hu X et al. Comparison of phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and cellular antioxidant activities of different varieties of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Food Chem. 2017; 217: 773-81.

[99]

Skrovankova S, Sumczynski D, Mlcek J et al. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16: 24673-706.

[100]

Ara T, Sakurai N, Takahashi S et al. TOMATOMET: a metabolome database consists of 7118 accurate mass values detected in mature fruits of 25 tomato cultivars. Plant Direct. 2021; 5: e00318.

[101]

Pinu FR, Beale DJ, Paten AM et al. Systems biology and multi-Omics integration: viewpoints from the metabolomics research community. Meta. 2019; 9(4): 76.

[102]

Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A et al. mixOmics: an R package for’omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13: e1005752.

[103]

Chong J, Soufan O, Li C et al. MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: W486-94.

[104]

Xia T, Hemert JV, Dickerson JA . OmicsAnalyzer: a Cytoscape plug-in suite for modeling omics data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 2995-6.

[105]

Ferrão LFV, Johnson TS, Benevenuto J et al. Genome-wide association of volatiles reveals candidate loci for blueberry flavor. New Phytol. 2020; 226: 1725-37.

[106]

Schorn MA, Verhoeven S, Ridder L et al. A community resource for paired genomic and metabolomic data mining. Nat Chem Biol. 2021; 17: 363-8.

[107]

Beaudry R. Blueberry quality characteristics and how they can be optimized. Annual Report of the Michigan State Horticultural Society (122nd). 1992; 122 140-5.

[108]

Cappai F, Benevenuto J, Ferrão LFV et al. Molecular and genetic bases of fruit firmness variation in blueberry-a review. Agronomy. 2018; 8: 174.

[109]

Cellon C, Amadeu RR, Olmstead J et al. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values in an autotetraploid blueberry breeding population with extensive pedigree data. Euphytica. 2018; 214.

[110]

Ferrão LFV, Benevenuto J, de Bem Oliveira I et al. Insights into the genetic basis of blueberry fruit-related traits using diploid and Polyploid models in a GWAS context. Front Ecol Evol. 2018; 6: 107.

[111]

Qi X, Ogden EL, Bostan H et al. High-density linkage map construction and QTL identification in a diploid blueberry mapping population. Frontiers in plant science.. 2021; 12.

[112]

Cabezas D, de Bem Oliveira I, Acker M et al. Evaluating wild Germplasm Introgression into Autotetraploid blueberry. Agronomy. 2021; 11: 614.

[113]

Mengist MF, Grace MH, Xiong J et al. Diversity in metabolites and fruit quality traits in blueberry enables Ploidy and species differentiation and establishes a strategy for future genetic studies. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 370.

[114]

Rowland LJ, Ogden EL, Vinyard BT . Phenotypic evaluation of a hybrid diploid blueberry population for plant development and fruit quality traits. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 1067.

[115]

Benevenuto J, Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR et al. How can a high-quality genome assembly help plant breeders? Gigascience. 2019; 8, giz068.

[116]

Bell DJ, Rowland LJ, Stommel J et al. Yield variation among clones of lowbush blueberry as a function of genetic similarity and self-compatibility. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2010; 135: 259-70.

[117]

Gündüz K, Serçe S, Hancock JF . Variation among highbush and rabbiteye cultivars of blueberry for fruit quality and phytochemical characteristics. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2015; 38: 69-79.

[118]

Hancock JF, Olmstead J, Itle RA et al. Performance of an elite, hybrid family of a northern × southern highbush cross (‘Draper’ × ‘Jewel’). Euphytica. 2018; 214: 95- 95.

[119]

Finn CE, Luby JJ . Inheritance of fruit quality traits in blueberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1992; 117: 617-21.

[120]

Connor AM, Luby JJ, Tong CBS . Variation and heritability estimates for antioxidant activity, Total phenolic content, and anthocyanin content in blueberry progenies. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2002; 127: 82-8.

[121]

Gilbert JL, Olmstead JW, Colquhoun TA et al. Consumer-assisted selection of blueberry fruit quality traits. HortScience. 2014; 49: 864-73.

[122]

Retamales JB, Hancock JF . Blueberries . In: CABI. CABI Publishing, London, United Kingdom 2nd ed. 2018.

[123]

Rowland LJ, Bell DJ, Alkharouf N et al. Generating genomic tools for blueberry improvement. International Journal of Fruit Science. 2012; 12: 276-87.

[124]

Polashock JJ, Vorsa N . Development of SCAR markers for DNA fingerprinting and Germplasm analysis of American cranberry. jashs. 2002; 127: 677-84.

[125]

Boches P, Rowland LJ, Hummer K et al. Microsatellite markers developed from ‘Bluecrop’ reveal polymorphisms in the genus Vaccinium and are suitable for cultivar fingerprinting. HortScience. 2005; 40: 1122B-122.

[126]

Boches PS, Hummer KE, Bassil NV et al. Cross-species amplification of SSRS in the genus VACCINIUM. Acta Hortic. 2006; 119-28.

[127]

Rowland LJ, Dhanaraj AL, Polashock JJ et al. Utility of blueberry-derived EST-PCR primers in related Ericaceae species. HortScience. 2003; 38: 1428-32.

[128]

Rowland LJ, Mehra S, Dhanaraj AL et al. Development of EST-PCR markers for DNA fingerprinting and genetic relationship studies in blueberry (Vaccinium, section Cyanococcus). J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2003; 128: 682-90.

[129]

Anderson JT, Geber MA . Demographic source-SINK dynamics restrict local adaptation in ELLIOTT’S blueberry (VACCINIUM ELLIOTTII). Evolution. 2010; 64: 370-84.

[130]

Bassil N, Oda A, Hummer KE . Blueberry MICROSATELLITE markers identify cranberry cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2009 715; 181-7.

[131]

Zalapa JE, Bougie T, Schlautaman BJ et al. Clonal diversity and genetic differentiation revealed by SSR markers in wildVaccinium macrocarponandVaccinium oxycoccos. Ann Appl Biol. 2015; 166: 196-207.

[132]

Rodriguez-Bonilla L, Rohde J, Matusinec D et al. Cross-transferability analysis of SSR markers developed from the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) to other Vaccinium species of agricultural importance. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2019; 66: 1713-25.

[133]

Rodriguez-Bonilla L, Williams KA, Bonilla FR et al. The genetic diversity of cranberry crop wild relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with special emphasis on National Forests. Plan Theory. 2020; 9: 1446.

[134]

Schlautman B, Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Rodriguez-Bonilla L et al. Genetic diversity and cultivar variants in the NCGR cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton) collection. J Genet. 2018; 97: 1339-51.

[135]

Fajardo D, Senalik D, Ames M et al. Complete plastid genome sequence of Vaccinium macrocarpon: structure, gene content, and rearrangements revealed by next generation sequencing. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013; 9: 489-98.

[136]

Zhu H, Senalik D, McCown BH et al. Mining and validation of pyrosequenced simple sequence repeats (SSRs) from American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.). Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 124: 87-96.

[137]

Schlautman B, Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Diaz-Garcia L et al. Construction of a high-density American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) composite map using genotyping-by-sequencing for multi-pedigree linkage mapping . 2017 Apr; 7(4): 1177-1189. https//:10.1101/088419.

[138]

Schlautman B, Diaz-Garcia L, Covarrubias-Pazaran G et al. Comparative genetic mapping reveals synteny and collinearity between the American cranberry and diploid blueberry genomes. Mol Breed. 2018; 38: 9.

[139]

Covarrubias-Pazaran G. Genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits using the R package sommer. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156744.

[140]

Daverdin G, Johnson-Cicalese J, Zalapa J et al. Identification and mapping of fruit rot resistance QTL in American cranberry using GBS. Mol Breed. 2017; 37: 38.

[141]

Vega-Polo P, Cobo MM, Arugdo A et al. Characterizing the genetic diversity of the Andean blueberry (Vaccinium floribundum Kunth.) across the Ecuadorian highlands. PLOS ONE. 15(12): e0243420. https//:10.1101/2020.09.30.319681.

[142]

Kulkarni KP, Vorsa N, Natarajan P et al. Admixture analysis using genotyping-by-sequencing reveals genetic relatedness and parental lineage distribution in Highbush blueberry genotypes and cross derivatives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 26; 22(1): 163 https//:10.20944/preprints202011.0577.v1.

[143]

Campa A, Ferreira JJ . Genetic diversity assessed by genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and for phenological traits in blueberry cultivars. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0206361.

[144]

Cappai F, Amadeu RR, Benevenuto J et al. High-resolution linkage map and QTL analyses of fruit firmness in Autotetraploid blueberry. Frontiers in plant science.. 2020; 11.

[145]

Cappai F, Amadeu RR, Benevenuto J et al. High-Resolution Linkage Map and QTL Analyses for Machine Harvest Traits in Autotetraploid Blueberry . bioRxiv 2020.05.13.093633; doi: https//:10.1101/2020.05.13.093633.

[146]

McCallum S, Graham J, Jorgense L et al. Construction of a SNP and SSR linkage map in autotetraploid blueberry using genotyping by sequencing. Mol Breed. 2016; 36(4): 41.

[147]

Nishiyama S, Fujikawa M, Yamane H et al. Genomic insight into the developmental history of southern highbush blueberry populations. Heredity. 2021; 126: 194-205.

[148]

Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Diaz-Garcia L, Schlautman B et al. Exploiting genotyping by sequencing to characterize the genomic structure of the American cranberry through high-density linkage mapping. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17: 451.

[149]

Schlautman B, Bolivar-Medina J, Hodapp S et al. Cranberry SSR multiplexing panels for DNA horticultural fingerprinting and genetic studies. Sci Hortic. 2017; 219: 280-6.

[150]

Diaz-Garcia L, Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Schlautman B et al. Image-based phenotyping for identification of QTL determining fruit shape and size in American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarponL.). PeerJ. 2018; 6: e5461.

[151]

Diaz-Garcia L, Rodriguez-Bonilla L, Phillips M et al. Comprehensive analysis of the internal structure and firmness in American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarponAit.) fruit . PLOS ONE 14(9): e0222451. http//:10.1101/567958.

[152]

Diaz-Garcia L, Schlautman B, Covarrubias-Pazaran G et al. Massive phenotyping of multiple cranberry populations reveals novel QTLs for fruit anthocyanin content and other important chemical traits. Mol Gen Genomics. 2018; 293: 1379-92.

[153]

Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Schlautman B, Diaz-Garcia L et al. Multivariate GBLUP improves accuracy of genomic selection for yield and fruit weight in Biparental populations of Vaccinium macrocarpon ait. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9.

[154]

Diaz-Garcia L, Covarrubias-Pazaran G, Johnson-Cicalese J et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing identifies historical breeding stages of the recently domesticated American cranberry. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11.

[155]

Home - breeding insight. https://www.breedinginsight.org/ (2019).

[156]

Home. https://www.polyploids.org/.

[157]

Mollinari M, Garcia AAF . Linkage analysis and haplotype phasing in experimental autopolyploid populations with high Ploidy level using hidden Markov models. G3 2019; 9: 3297-314.

[158]

Hackett CA, Boskamp B, Vogogias A et al. TetraploidSNPMap: software for linkage analysis and QTL mapping in Autotetraploid populations using SNP dosage data. J Hered. 2017; 108: 438-42.

[159]

Bourke PM, van Geest G, Voorrips RE et al. polymapR- linkage analysis and genetic map construction from F1 populations of outcrossing polyploids. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34: 3496-502.

[160]

Rowland LJ, Levi A . RAPD-based genetic linkage map of blueberry derived from a cross between diploid species (Vaccinium darrowi and V. elliottii) . Theor Appl Genet. 1994; 87: 863-8.

[161]

Qu L, Hancock JF . Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-(RAPD-) based genetic linkage map of blueberry derived from an interspecific cross between diploid Vaccinium darrowi and tetraploid V. corymbosum. jashs. 1997; 122: 69-73.

[162]

Rowland LJ, Ogden EL, Bostan H et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map of an interspecific diploid blueberry population and identification of QTL for chilling requirement and cold hardiness. Mol Breed. 2014; 34: 2033-48.

[163]

Amadeu RR, Lara LAC, Munoz P et al. Estimation of molecular pairwise relatedness in autopolyploid crops. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 2020; 10: 4579-89.

[164]

Zheng C, Boer MP, van Eeuwijk FA . Construction of genetic linkage maps in multiparental populations. Genetics. 2019; 212: 1031-44.

[165]

Zheng C, Voorrips RE, Jansen J et al. Probabilistic multilocus haplotype reconstruction in outcrossing Tetraploids. Genetics. 2016; 203: 119-31.

[166]

Bernardo R. Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129: 2323-32.

[167]

Meuwissen THE, Goddard ME . Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes. Genet Sel Evol. 2001; 33(6): 605-34.

[168]

Ferrão LFV, Amadeu RR, Benevenuto J et al. Genomic selection in an outcrossing Autotetraploid fruit crop: lessons from blueberry breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12.

[169]

de Bem Oliveira I, Ferrao LFV, Amadeu RR et al. Genomic prediction of Autotetraploids; influence of relationship matrices. G three. 2019; 9: 1189-98.

[170]

Zingaretti LM, Gezan SA, Ferrao LFV et al. Exploring deep learning for complex trait genomic prediction in Polyploid outcrossing species. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 25.

[171]

de Bem Oliveira I, Amadeu RR, Ferrão LFV et al. Optimizing whole-genomic prediction for autotetraploid blueberry breeding. Heredity. 2020; 125: 437-48.

[172]

Ballington JR . The role of interspecific hybridization in blueberry improvement. IX International Vaccinium Symposium. 2008; 810: 49-60.

[173]

Brevis PA, Bassil NV, Ballington JR et al. Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008; 133: 427-37.

[174]

Song G-Q. 9.1 Vaccinium spp. blueberry and cranberry. Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops. 2020; No.Ed.2 pp. 191-205.

[175]

Song G-Q, Hancock JF . Vaccinium. In: Kole C, ed. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources.Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2011, 197-221.

[176]

Song G-Q, Prieto H, Orbovic V . Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tree fruit crops: methods, Progress, and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 226.

[177]

Omori M, Yamane H, Osakabe K et al. Targeted mutagenesis of CENTRORADIALIS using CRISPR/Cas9 system through the improvement of genetic transformation efficiency of tetraploid highbush blueberry. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2021; 96: 153-61.

[178]

Serres R, Stang EJ, Mccabe D et al. Gene transfer using electric discharge particle bombardment and recovery of transformed cranberry plants. jashs. 1992; 117: 174-80.

[179]

Song G-Q, Sink KC . Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2004; 23: 475-84.

[180]

Qu L, Polashock J, Vorsa N . A highly efficient in vitro cranberry regeneration system using leaf explants. HortScience. 2000; 35: 948-52.

[181]

Zeldin EL, Jury TP, Serres RA et al. Tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate in transgenic cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) and enhancement of tolerance in progeny. jashs. 2002; 127: 502-7.

[182]

Song G-Q . Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1224: 121-31.

[183]

Liu C, Callow P, Rowland LJ et al. Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of southern highbush blueberry cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010; 103: 137-44.

[184]

Song G-Q, Sink KC, Callow PW et al. Evaluation of a herbicide-resistant trait conferred by the bar gene driven by four distinct promoters in transgenic blueberry plants. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2008; 133: 605-11.

[185]

Song G-Q, Roggers RA, Sink KC et al. Production of herbicide-resistant HIGHBUSH blueberry ‘legacy’ by AGROBACTERIUM-mediated transformation of the bar gene. Acta Hortic. 2007; 738: 397-407.

[186]

Walworth AE, Rowland LJ, Polashock JJ et al. Overexpression of a blueberry-derived CBF gene enhances cold tolerance in a southern highbush blueberry cultivar. Mol Breed. 2012; 30: 1313-23.

[187]

Song G-Q, Gao X . Transcriptomic changes reveal gene networks responding to the overexpression of a blueberry DWARF AND DELAYED FLOWERING 1 gene in transgenic blueberry plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17 Article number: 106.

[188]

Polashock JJ, Arora R, Peng Y et al. Functional identification of a C-repeat binding factor transcriptional activator from blueberry associated with cold acclimation and freezing tolerance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2010; 135: 40-8.

[189]

Song G-Q, Sink KC, Walworth AE et al. Engineering cherry rootstocks with resistance to Prunus necrotic ring spot virus through RNAi-mediated silencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11: 702-8.

[190]

Gao X, Walworth AE, Mackie C et al. Overexpression of blueberry FLOWERING LOCUS T is associated with changes in the expression of phytohormone-related genes in blueberry plants. Hortic Res. 2016; 3: 16053.

[191]

Song G-Q, Chen Q . Overexpression of the MADS-box gene K-domain increases the yield potential of blueberry. Plant Sci. 2018; 276: 22-31.

[192]

Song G-Q, Han X . K-domain technology: constitutive expression of a blueberry keratin-like domain mimics expression of multiple MADS-box genes in enhancing maize grain yield. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 664983.

[193]

Song G-Q, Walworth A, Lin T et al. VcFT-induced mobile florigenic signals in transgenic and transgrafted blueberries. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 105.

[194]

Surridge C . Blueberry fooled into flowering. Nat Plants. 2019; 5: 910.

[195]

Lin T, Walworth A, Zong X et al. VcRR2 regulates chilling-mediated flowering through expression of hormone genes in a transgenic blueberry mutant. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 96.

[196]

Martin RR, Bristow PR, Wegener LA . Scorch and shock: emerging virus diseases of highbush blueberry and other Vaccinium species. VIII International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture. 2004; 715: 463-8.

[197]

Liang Z, Chen K, Gao C . Biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 with Ribonucleoprotein complex in wheat. Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1917: 327-35.

[198]

Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat Plants. 2018; 4: 766-70.

[199]

Kawash J., Colt K., Hartwick N. T. et al. Contrasting a reference cranberry genome to a crop wild relative provides insights into adaptation, domestication, and breeding. Plos one. 2022; 17(3), p. e0264966.

PDF (739KB)

52

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/