Breeding an underutilized fruit crop: a long-term program for Hylocereus

Noemi Tel-Zur

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac078

PDF (731KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac078 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac078
Review Article
research-article
Breeding an underutilized fruit crop: a long-term program for Hylocereus
Author information +
History +
PDF (731KB)

Abstract

This review describes three decades of introduction, agro-technology development, breeding and selection of Hylocereus species, known as pitaya or dragon fruit, as an example of a holistic program aimed to develop the horticultural potential of a perennial underutilized fruit crop. Interspecific homoploid and interploid crosses and embryo rescue procedures produced improved hybrids, some of which have been released to farmers. Molecular tools and morphological and phenological comparisons between the parental species and the resulting hybrids provided valuable information on dominant/recessive traits and on genetic relationships that could be exploited for further hybridizations. In addition, Hylocereus were crossed with species of the closely related genus Selenicereus, producing valuable intergeneric hybrids. In situ chromosome doubling resulted in the production of autopolyploid lines, from which an understanding of the effect of increased ploidy on fruit traits and metabolomic profiles was obtained. Gamete-derived lines were produced, adding to our biobank homozygote lines that were subsequently used for further hybridization. Spontaneous chromosome doubling occurred in haploid gamete-derived Hylocereus monacanthus lines and in interspecific interploid Hylocereus megalanthus × H. undatus hybrids obtained from an embryo rescue procedure, resulting in plants with double the expected ploidy. Challenging technical problems were addressed by the development of protocols for DNA isolation, flow cytometry, in situ chromosome doubling, androgenesis, gynogenesis and embryo rescue following interspecific and interploidy crosses. Current research leading to the development of genomics and molecular tools, including a draft genome of H. undatus, is also presented. Perspectives for further development of Hylocereus species and hybrids are discussed.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Noemi Tel-Zur. Breeding an underutilized fruit crop: a long-term program for Hylocereus. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac078 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac078

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mizrahi Y . Vine-cacti pitayas: the new crops of the world. Rev Bras Frutic. 2014; 36: 124-38.

[2]

Mizrahi Y, Nerd A . New crops as a possible solution for the troubled Israeli export market. In: Janick J, ed. vol. 20 WANATCA Yearbook. 1996; 20: 41-51.

[3]

Gibson AC, Nobel PS . The Cactus Primer . Harvard University Press; 1986.

[4]

Barthlott W, Hunt DR . Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons. In: Kubitzi K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, eds. Flowering Plants·Dicotyledons.Berlin, New York: Springer, 1993, 161.

[5]

Mizrahi Y, Nerd A, Nobel PS . Cacti as Crops. In: Horticultural Reviews: Janick/Horticultural Reviews, Volume 18 . John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010, 291-319.

[6]

Britton NL, Rose JN . Hylocereanae the Cactaceae Vol II. 1963. Dover, New York, 183-212.

[7]

Bauer R. A synopsis of the tribe Hylocereeae. Cactaceae Syst Initiat. 2003; 17: 3-63.

[8]

Merten S . A review of Hylocereus production in the United States. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev. 2003; 5: 98-105.

[9]

Nerd A, Mizrahi Y . Reproductive biology of cactus fruit crops. Horticultural Reviews: Janick/Horticultural Reviews, Volume 18. 1997; 321-46.

[10]

Hunt D, Taylor N, Charles G . The new cactus lexicon. Cactus and Succulent Journal. 2006; 78.

[11]

Tel-Zur N, Mizrahi Y, Cisneros A et al. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of vine cactus collection (Cactaceae). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2011; 58: 1075-85.

[12]

Pagliaccia D, Vidalakis G, Douhan GW et al. Genetic characterization of pitahaya accessions based on amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. HortScience. 2015; 50: 332-6.

[13]

Trivellini A, Lucchesini M, Ferrante A et al. Pitaya, an attractive alternative crop for mediterranean region. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 1-19.

[14]

Tel-Zur N. Vine cacti (Hylocereus species): an emerging fruit crop . Italus Hortus. 2017; 24: 19-24.

[15]

Tel-Zur N, Abbo S, Bar-Zvi D et al. Genetic relationships among Hylocereus and Selenicereus vine cacti (Cactaceae): evidence from hybridization and cytological studies . Ann Bot. 2004; 94: 527-34.

[16]

Weiss J, Nerd A, Mizrahi Y . Flowering behavior and pollination requirements in climbing cacti with fruit crop potential. HortScience. 1994; 29: 1487-92.

[17]

Ben-Asher J, Nobel PS, Yossov E et al. Net CO2 uptake rates for Hylocereus undatus and Selenicereus megalanthus under field conditions: drought influence and a novel method for analyzing temperature dependence . Photosynthetica. 2006; 44: 181-6.

[18]

Lichtenzveig J, Abbo S, Nerd A et al. Cytology and mating systems in the climbing cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus . Am J Bot. 2000; 87: 1058-65.

[19]

Cohen H, Tel-Zur N . Morphological changes and self-incompatibility breakdown associated with autopolyploidization in Hylocereus species (Cactaceae) . Euphytica. 2012; 184: 345-54.

[20]

Tel-Zur N, Abbo S, Bar-Zvi D et al. Clone identification and genetic relationship among vine cacti from the genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus based on RAPD analysis . Scientia Horticulturae. 2004; 100: 279-89.

[21]

Dag A, Mizrahi Y . Effect of pollination method on fruit set and fruit characteristics in the vine cactus Selenicereus megalanthus (“yellow pitaya”) . J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2005; 80: 618-22.

[22]

Tel-Zur N, Abbo S, Bar-Zvi D et al. Chromosome doubling in vine cacti hybrids. J Hered. 2003; 94: 329-33.

[23]

Mizrahi Y, Mouyal J, Nerd A et al. Metaxenia in the vine cacti Hylocereus polyrhizus and Selenicereus spp. Ann Bot. 2004; 93: 469-72.

[24]

Metz C, Nerd A, Mizrahi Y . Viability of pollen of two fruit crop cacti of the genus Hylocereus is affected by temperature and duration of storage. HortScience. 2000; 35: 22-4.

[25]

Moran RV . Selenicereus megalanthus (Schumann) Moran . Gentes Herbarum. 1953; 8: 325.

[26]

Plume O, Straub SCK, Tel-Zur N et al. Testing a hypothesis of intergeneric allopolyploidy in vine cacti (Cactaceae: Hylocereeae). Syst Bot. 2013; 38: 737-51.

[27]

Tel-Zur N, Abbo S, Myslabodski D et al. Modified CTAB procedure for DNA isolation from epiphytic cacti of the genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus (Cactaceae) . Plant Mol Biol Report. 1999; 17: 249-54.

[28]

Li D, Cisneros A, Tel-Zur N . An improved protocol for flow cytometry analysis of dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.)-species with a high polysaccharide content . Sci Hortic. 2017; 220: 130-3.

[29]

Thudi M, Palakurthi R, Schanble JC et al. Genomic resources in plant breeding for sustainable agriculture. J Plant Physiol. 2021; 257: 153351.

[30]

Tel-Zur N. Pitahayas: introduction, agrotechniques, and breeding. Acta Hortic. 2013; 995: 109-15.

[31]

Nerd A, Tel-Zur N, Mizrahi Y . Fruits of vine and columnar cacti. In: Cacti Biology and Uses.University of California Press, 2002, 184-97.

[32]

Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ . Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon. 1971; 20: 509-17.

[33]

Tel-Zur N, Abbo S, Mizrahi Y . Cytogenetics of semi-fertile triploid and aneuploid intergeneric vine cacti hybrids. J Hered. 2005; 96: 124-31.

[34]

Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD . Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol. 1995; 129: 1-22.

[35]

Tel-Zur N, Mouyal J, Zurgil U et al. In support of Winge’s theory of “hybridization followed by chromosome doubling”. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11.

[36]

Tel-Zur N, Dudai M, Raveh E et al. Selection of interspecific vine cacti hybrids (Hylocereus spp.) for self-compatibility . Plant Breed. 2012; 131: 681-5.

[37]

Tel-Zur N, Mouyal J, Cisneros A et al. Intergeneric hybridization within the tribe Hylocereeae, subfamily Cactoideae (Cactaceae). Isr J Plant Sci. 2012; 60: 325-34.

[38]

Korotkova N, Borsch T, Arias S . A phylogenetic framework for the Hylocereeae (Cactaceae) and implications for the circumscription of the genera. Phytotaxa. 2017; 327: 1.

[39]

Boyle TH, Idnurm A . Intergenic hybridization between Schlumbergera Lem. And Hatiora Britt. & Rose (Cactaceae) . jashs. 2003; 128: 724-30.

[40]

Cruz-Zamora Y, Cruz-Garcia F, Orozco-Arroyo G et al. Polascontria (Cactaceae), a nothogenus that represents the gene flow between Escontria and Polaskia . Phytotaxa. 2017; 295: 141.

[41]

Lavania UC, Srivastava S, Lavania S et al. Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitates enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation. Plant J. 2012; 71: 539-49.

[42]

Dhooghe E, Laere K, Eeckhaut T et al. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011; 104: 359-73.

[43]

Tel-Zur N, Dudai M, Raveh E et al. In situ induction of chromosome doubling in vine cacti (Cactaceae). Scientia Horticulturae. 2011; 129: 570-6.

[44]

Cohen H, Fait A, Tel-Zur N . Morphological, cytological and metabolic consequences of autopolyploidization in Hylocereus (Cactaceae) species. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13: 173.

[45]

Zhang Y, Zhong C, Liu Y et al. Agronomic trait variations and ploidy differentiation of kiwiberries in Northwest China: implication for breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1-12.

[46]

Zheng J, Sun C, Yan L et al. Development of cucumber autotetraploids and their phenotypic characterization. Cytologia (Tokyo). 2019; 84: 359-65.

[47]

Robledo-Torres V, Ramirez Godina F, Foroughbakhch R et al. Development of tomatillo (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) autotetraploids and their chromosome and phenotypic characterization . Breed Sci. 2011; 61: 288-93.

[48]

Hu Y, Sun D, Hu H et al. A comparative study on morphological and fruit quality traits of diploid and polyploid carambola (Averrhoa carambola L.) genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae. 2021; 277: 109843.

[49]

Mable BK . Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association? New Phytol. 2004; 162: 803-11.

[50]

Zenil-Ferguson R, Burleigh JG, Freyman WA et al. Interaction among ploidy, breeding system and lineage diversification. New Phytol. 2019; 224: 1252-65.

[51]

Adachi Y, Komori S, Hoshikawa Y et al. Characteristics of fruiting and pollen tube growth of apple autotetraploid cultivars showing self-compatibility. J Japan Soc Hort Sci. 2009; 78: 402-9.

[52]

Entani T, Takayama S, Iwano M et al. Relationship between polyploid and pollen self-incompatibility in Petunia hybrida Vilm. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999; 63: 1882-8.

[53]

Dunwell JM . Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010; 8: 377-424.

[54]

Hooghvorst I, Nogués S . Chromosome doubling methods in doubled haploid and haploid inducer-mediated genome-editing systems in major crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 40: 255-70.

[55]

Germanà MA . Doubled haploid production in fruit crops. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006; 86: 131-46.

[56]

Germanà MA . Gametic embryogenesis and haploid technology as valuable support to plant breeding. Plant Cell Rep. 2011; 30: 839-57.

[57]

Jia Y, Zhang QX, Pan HT et al. Callus induction and haploid plant regeneration from baby primrose (Primula forbesii Franch.) anther culture . Scientia Horticulturae. 2014; 176: 273-81.

[58]

Cisneros A, Garcia RB, Tel-Zur N . Ovule morphology, embryogenesis and seed development in three Hylocereus species (Cactaceae) . Flora - Morphol. Flora. 2011; 206: 1076-84.

[59]

Benega Garcia R, Cisneros A, Schneider B et al. Gynogenesis in the vine cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus (Cactaceae) . Plant Cell Rep. 2009; 28: 719-26.

[60]

Benega Garcia R, Schneider B, Tel-Zur N . Androgenesis in the vine cacti Selenicereus and Hylocereus (Cactaceae) . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009; 96: 191-9.

[61]

Li D, Arroyave Martinez MF, Shaked R et al. Homozygote depression in gamete-derived dragon-fruit (Hylocereus) lines . Front Plant Sci. 2018; 8: 1-13.

[62]

M’Ribu HK, Veilleux RE . Fertility of doubled monoploids of Solanum phureja . American Potato Journal. 1992; 69: 447-59.

[63]

Cisneros A, Tel-Zur N . Embryo rescue and plant regeneration following interspecific crosses in the genus Hylocereus (Cactaceae) . Euphytica. 2010; 174: 73-82.

[64]

Cisneros A, Garcia RB, Tel-Zur N . Creation of novel interspecific-interploid Hylocereus hybrids (Cactaceae) via embryo rescue. Euphytica. 2013; 189: 433-43.

[65]

Nerd A, Sitrit Y, Kaushik RA et al. High summer temperatures inhibit flowering in vine pitaya crops (Hylocereus spp.) . Scientia Horticulturae. 2002; 96: 343-50.

[66]

Nobel PS, La Barrera E . CO2 uptake by the cultivated hemiepiphytic cactus . Ann Appl Biol. 2004; 144: 1-8.

[67]

Tomaz de Oliveira MM, Shuhua L, Kumbha DS et al. Performance of Hylocereus (Cactaceae) species and interspecific hybrids under high-temperature stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 153: 30-9.

[68]

Tomaz de Oliveira MM, Lu S, Zurgil U et al. Grafting in Hylocereus (Cactaceae) as a tool for strengthening tolerance to high temperature stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021; 160: 94-105.

[69]

Wybraniec S, Platzner I, Geresh S et al. Betacyanins from vine cactus Hylocereus polyrhizus . Phytochemistry. 2001; 58: 1209-12.

[70]

Wybraniec S, Nowak-Wydra B, Mitka K et al. Minor betalains in fruits of Hylocereus species. Phytochemistry. 2007; 68: 251-9.

[71]

Hua Q, Chen C, Tel Zur N et al. Metabolomic characterization of pitaya fruit from three red-skinned cultivars with different pulp colors. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 126: 117-25.

[72]

Chen C, Wu J, Hua Q et al. Identification of reliable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in pitaya. Plant Methods. 2019; 15: 1-12.

[73]

Chen J, Xie FF, Cui YZ et al. A chromosome-scale genome sequence of pitaya (Hylocereus undatus) provides novel insights into the genome evolution and regulation of betalain biosynthesis . Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 164.

[74]

Zheng J, Meinhardt LW, Goenaga R et al. The chromosome-level genome of dragon fruit reveals whole-genome duplication and chromosomal co-localization of betacyanin biosynthetic genes. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 63.

[75]

Hua Q, Zhou Q, Gan S et al. Proteomic analysis of Hylocereus polyrhizus reveals metabolic pathway changes. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17: 1-13.

[76]

Xi X, Zong Y, Li S et al. Transcriptome analysis clarified genes involved in betalain biosynthesis in the fruit of red pitayas (Hylocereus costaricensis) . Molecules. 2019; 24: 1-12.

[77]

Qingzhu H, Chengjie C, Zhe C et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals key genes related to betalain biosynthesis in pulp coloration of Hylocereus polyrhizus . Front Plant Sci. 2016; 6: 1-13.

[78]

Cheng MN, Huang ZJ, Hua QZ et al. The WRKY transcription factor HpWRKY44 regulates CytP450-like1 expression in red pitaya fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) . Hortic. Res. 2017; 4: 17039.

[79]

Chen C, Xie F, Hua Q et al. Integrated sRNAome and RNA-Seq analysis reveals miRNA effects on betalain biosynthesis in pitaya. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 437.

[80]

Xie F, Hua Q, Chen C et al. Genome-wide characterization of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in pitaya reveals a R2R3-MYB repressor HuMYb1 involved in fruit ripening through regulation of betalain biosynthesis by repressing betalain biosynthesis-related genes. Cell. 2021; 10: 1949.

[81]

Zhou J, Wang Z, Mao Y et al. Proteogenomic analysis of pitaya reveals cold stress-related molecular signature. PeerJ. 2020; 8: e8540-20.

[82]

Jiao Z, Xu W, Nong Q et al. An integrative transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) seedlings in response to heat stress . Genes (Basel). 2021; 12: 1714.

[83]

Xiong R, Liu C, Xu M et al. Transcriptomic analysis of flower induction for long-day pitaya by supplementary lighting in short-day winter season. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 1-17.

[84]

Ye X, Gao Y, Chen C et al. Genome-wide identification of aquaporin gene family in pitaya reveals an HuNIP6;1 involved in flowering process. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 7689.

[85]

Mizrahi Y . Do we need new crops for arid eegions? A review of fruit species domestication in Israel. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 1995.

PDF (731KB)

49

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/