Heterografted chrysanthemums enhance salt stress tolerance by integrating reactive oxygen species, soluble sugar, and proline

Abstract

Chrysanthemum, one of the most important commercial ornamental crops, is susceptible to salinity, which limits its cultivation and application in coastal and inland saline areas. Grafting is widely used to improve the salt tolerance of horticultural crops, but the mechanisms of grafted chrysanthemum responses to salt stress remain unclear. In this study, we showed that heterografted chrysanthemums with Artemisia annua as rootstock exhibited increased salt tolerance compared with self-grafted and self-rooted chrysanthemums. Under high salt stress, the roots of heterografted chrysanthemums enrich Na⁺, resulting in a reduction of Na⁺ toxicity in the scion, with only a small amount of Na⁺ being transported to the leaves. On the other hand, the roots of heterografted chrysanthemums alleviated high Na⁺ stress via enhanced catalase enzyme activity, downregulation of the expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation-related genes, massive accumulation of soluble sugars and proline, and upregulation of the expression of heat shock protein-related genes to enhance salt tolerance. In addition, the leaves of heterografted chrysanthemums respond to low Na⁺ stress by increasing peroxidase enzyme activity and soluble sugar and proline contents, to maintain a healthy state. However, self-grafted and self-rooted plants could not integrate ROS, soluble sugars, and proline in response to salt stress, and thus exhibited a salt-sensitive phenotype. Our research reveals the mechanisms underlying the increased salt tolerance of heterografted chrysanthemums and makes it possible to have large-scale cultivation of chrysanthemums in saline areas.

References

[1] Munns R, Tester M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59: 651-81.

[2] Parida AK, Das AB . Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005; 60: 324-49.

[3] Anuradha U, Gaonkar T, Upadhyay AK et al. Global transcriptome analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves under salt stress reveals differential response at early and late stages of stress in table grape cv. Thompson Seedless . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 129: 168.

[4] Ahmed I, Shin T, Peter N . Life and death under salt stress: same players, different timing? J Exp Bot . 2014; 65: 2963-79.

[5] Zhu JK . Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002; 53: 247-73.

[6] Wang Q, Guan C, Wang S . Coordination of AtHKT1;1 and AtSOS1 facilitates Na⁺ and K⁺ homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana under salt stress . J Plant Biol. 2014; 57: 282-90.

[7] Rahman A, Hossain MS, Nahar K et al. Manganese-induced salt stress tolerance in rice seedlings: regulation of ion homeostasis, antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2016; 22: 291-306.

[8] Mittler KV, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N et al. ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci . 2011; 16: 300-9.

[9] Fu L, Ding Z, Han B et al. Physiological investigation and transcriptome analysis of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced dehydration stress in cassava. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17: 283.

[10] Hewage KAH, Yang JF, Wang D et al. Chemical manipulation of abscisic acid signaling: a new approach to abiotic and biotic stress management in agriculture. Adv Sci. 2020; 7: 2001265.

[11] Javid MG, Sorooshzadeh A, Moradi F et al. The role of phytohormones in alleviating salt stress in crop plants. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011; 5: 726-34.

[12] Mhadhbi H, Fotopoulos V, Mylona PV et al. Antioxidant gene-enzyme responses in Medicago truncatula genotypes with different degree of sensitivity to salinity . Physiol Plant. 2011; 141: 201-14.

[13] Sandhu D, Cornacchioene MV, Ferreira JFS et al. Variable salinity responses of 12 alfalfa genotypes and comparative expression analyses of salt-response genes. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 42958.

[14] Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H et al. Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol. 2003; 133: 1755-67.

[15] Galston AW, Sawhney RK . Polyamines in plant physiology. Plant Physiol. 1990; 94: 406-10.

[16] Yang Z, Wang Y, Wei X et al. Transcription profiles of genes related to hormonal regulations under salt stress in sweet sorghum. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2017; 35: 586-99.

[17] Liu Y, Liu L, Zhao W et al. A transcriptional response atlas of Chrysanthemum morifolium to dodder invasion . Environ Exp Bot. 2021; 181: 104272.

[18] Zhang W, Gao T, Li P et al. Chrysanthemum CmWRKY53 negatively regulates the resistance of chrysanthemum to the aphid Macrosiphoniella sanborni . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 109.

[19] Anderson NO . Breeding flower seed crops. In: McDonald MB, Kwong FY (eds), Flower Seeds: Biology and Technology . Wallingford: CABI Publishing, 2005, 53.

[20] Silva JATD, Shinoyama H, Aida R et al. Chrysanthemum biotechnology: quo vadis? Crit Rev Plant Sci . 2013; 32: 21-52.

[21] Suvija NV, Suresh J . Evaluation of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) genotypes for loose flower, cut flower and pot mums . Int J Innov Res Adv Stud. 2016; 3: 100-4.

[22] Liu Y . Historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv Genet. 2006; 56: 101-29.

[23] Melnyk CW, Meyerowitz EM . Plant grafting. Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 183-8.

[24] Goldschmidt EE . Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 727.

[25] Thomas HR, Frank MH . Connecting the pieces: uncovering the molecular basis for long-distance communication through plant grafting. New Phytol. 2019; 223: 582-9.

[26] Kumpers BMC, Bishopp A . Plant grafting: making the right connections. Curr Biol. 2015; 10: 411-3.

[27] Warschefsky EJ, Klein LL, Frank MH et al. Rootstocks: diversity, domestication, and impacts on shoot phenotypes. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 418-37.

[28] Zhang X, Sun XZ, Zhang S et al. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of grafting onto Artemisia scoparia W. to affect the aphid resistance of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium T.) . BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 776.

[29] Deng Y, Chen S, Lu A et al. Production and characterisation of the intergeneric hybrids between Dendranthema morifolium and Artemisia vulgaris exhibiting enhanced resistance to chrysanthemum aphid (Macrosiphoniella sanbourni) . Planta. 2010; 231: 693-703.

[30] Wang X, Zhang YM, Wang CY . Response of protective enzymes activities in grafted chrysanthemum to heat stress. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2014; 42: 125-31.

[31] Chen Y, Xianzhi S, Chengsu Z et al. Grafting onto Artemisia annua improves drought tolerance in chrysanthemum by enhancing photosynthetic capacity . Hortic Plant J. 2018; 3: 117-25.

[32] Halliwell B. Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol. 2006; 141: 312-22.

[33] Asano T, Hayashi N, Kikuchi S et al. CDPK-mediated abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2012; 7: 817-21.

[34] Timperio AM, Egidi MG, Zolla L et al. Proteomics applied on plant abiotic stresses: role of heat shock proteins (HSP). J Proteomics. 2008; 71: 391-411.

[35] Lehmann S, Funck D, Szabados L et al. Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino Acids. 2010; 39: 949-62.

[36] Moukhtari AE, Cabassa-Hourton C, Farissi M et al. How does proline treatment promote salt stress tolerance during crop plant development? Front Plant Sci . 2020; 11: 1127.

[37] Kiyosue T. A nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial proline dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in proline metabolism, is upregulated by proline but downregulated by dehydration in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 1996; 8: 1323-35.

[38] Everts KL, Himmelstein JC . Fusarium wilt of watermelon: towards sustainable management of a re-emerging plant disease. Crop Prot. 2015; 73: 93-9.

[39] Sharma A, Wang J, Xu D et al. Melatonin regulates the functional components of photosynthesis, antioxidant system, gene expression, and metabolic pathways to induce drought resistance in grafted Carya cathayensis plants. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 713: 136675.

[40] Zhang Z, Cao B, Li N et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the regulation of ABA signaling genes in different rootstock grafted tomato seedlings under drought stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2019; 166: 103814.

[41] Li H, Guo Y, Lan Z et al. Methyl jasmonate mediates melatonin-induced cold tolerance of grafted watermelon plants. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 57.

[42] Feng Y, Liu J, Zhai L et al. Natural variation in cytokinin maintenance improves salt tolerance in apple rootstocks. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 424-36.

[43] Zhang H, Sheng LD, Guo ZZ et al. Soil water and salt affect cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) photosynthesis, yield and fiber quality in coastal saline soil . Agric Water Manag. 2017; 187: 112-21.

[44] Liang W, Ma X, Wan P et al. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: a review. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018; 495: 286-91.

[45] Li F, Zhang H, Zhao H et al. Chrysanthemum CmHSFA4 gene positively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1311-21.

[46] Zhou Y, Wen Z, Zhang J et al. Exogenous glutathione alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in tomato seedlings by regulating glutathione metabolism, redox status, and the antioxidant system. Sci Hortic. 2017; 220: 90-101.

[47] Akter S, Huang J, Waszczak C et al. Cysteines under ROS attack in plants: a proteomics view. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66: 2935-44.

[48] Sewelam N, Kazan K, Schenk PM et al. Global plant stress signaling: reactive oxygen species at the cross-road. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 187.

[49] Wang N, Qiao W, Liu X et al. Relative contribution of Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis, photochemical efficiency and antioxidant defense system to differential salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017; 119: 121-31.

[50] Wei T, Wang Y, Liu JH et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals synergistic and disparate defense pathways in the leaves and roots of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) autotetraploids with enhanced salt tolerance . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 88.

[51] Choudhury FK, Rivero RM, Blumwald E et al. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017; 90: 856-67.

[52] Miller G, Shulaev V, Mittler R et al. Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol Plant. 2008; 133: 481-9.

[53] Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M et al. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9: 490-8.

[54] Jain G, Gould KS . Are betalain pigments the functional homologues of anthocyanins in plants? Environ Exp Bot . 2015; 119: 48-53.

[55] Kobayashi M, Ohura I, Kawakita K et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. Plant Cell. 2007; 19: 1065-80.

[56] Xing T, Wang XJ, Malik K et al. Ectopic expression of an Arabidopsis calmodulin-like domain protein kinase-enhanced NADPH oxidase activity and oxidative burst in tomato protoplasts . Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001; 14: 1261-4.

[57] Perez-Salamo I, Papdi C, Rigo G et al. The heat shock factor A4A confers salt tolerance and is regulated by oxidative stress and the mitogen-activated protein kinases MPK3 and MPK6. Plant Physiol. 2014; 165: 319-34.

[58] Rutherford SL, Lindquist S . Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998; 396: 336-42.

[59] Xu J, Xue C, Xue D et al. Overexpression of GmHsp90s, a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) gene family cloning from soybean, decrease damage of abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana . PLoS One. 2013; 8: e69810.

[60] Zhu JK . Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016; 167: 313-24.

[61] Wei T, Wang Y, Xie Z et al. Enhanced ROS scavenging and sugar accumulation contribute to drought tolerance of naturally occurring autotetraploids in Poncirus trifoliata . Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 7: 1394-407.

[62] Szabados L, Savouré A . Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010; 15: 89-97.

[63] Martina Z, Borghi GL, Pirone C et al. β-Amylase 1 (BAM1) degrades transitory starch to sustain proline biosynthesis during drought stress . J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 1819-26.

[64] Alban L, Cabassa-Hourton C, Eubel H et al. Proline oxidation fuels mitochondrial respiration during dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana . J Exp Bot. 2019; 21: 6203-14.

[65] Ashraf M . Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1994; 13: 17.

[66] Srinivas V, Balasubramanian D . Proline is a protein-compatible hydrotrope. Langmuir. 1995; 11: 2830-3.

[67] Pérez-Arellano I, Carmona-Alvarez F, Martinez AI et al. Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase and proline biosynthesis: from osmotolerance to rare metabolic disease. Protein Sci. 2010; 19: 372-82.

[68] Kishor P, Sreenivasulu N . Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? Plant Cell Environ . 2014; 37: 300-11.

[69] Franceschetti M, Hanfrey C, Scaramagli S et al. Characterization of monocot and dicot plant S-adenosyl-l-methionine decarboxylase gene families including identification in the mRNA of a highly conserved pair of upstream overlapping open reading frames. Biochem J. 2001; 353: 403-9.

[70] Alcázar R, Marco F, Cuevas JC et al. Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett. 2006; 28: 1867-76.

[71] Kusano T, Berbrich T, Tateda C et al. Polyamines: essential factors for growth and survival. Planta. 2008; 228: 367-81.

[72] Waie B, Rajam MV . Effect of increased polyamine biosynthesis on stress responses in transgenic tobacco by introduction of human S-adenosylmethionine gene. Plant Sci. 2003; 164: 727-34.

[73] Wu J, Shu S, Li C et al. Spermidine-mediated hydrogen peroxide signaling enhances the antioxidant capacity of salt-stressed cucumber roots. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018; 128: 152-62.

[74] Liu J, Yu BJ, Liu YL et al. Effects of spermidine and spermine levels on salt tolerance associated with tonoplast H⁺-ATPase and H⁺-PPase activities in barley roots . Plant Growth Regul. 2006; 49: 119-26.

[75] Hong SW, Lee U, Vierling E . Arabidopsis hot mutants define multiple functions required for acclimation to high temperatures. Plant Physiol. 2003; 132: 757-67.

[76] Zhao N, Liu H, Wang Q et al. Root elemental composition in Chinese forests: implications for biogeochemical niche differentiation. Funct Ecol. 2018; 32: 40-9.

[77] Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 644-52.

[78] Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 511-5.

[79] Anders S, Huber W . Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11: R106.

[80] Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X et al. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 136-8.

[81] Storey JD, Tibshirani R . Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 9440-5.

[82] Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 36: 480-4.

[83] Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG et al. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21: 3787-93.

[84] Ye L, Liu N, Yin Y et al. Histone H3K4 methylation regulates hyphal growth, secondary metabolism and multiple stress responses in Fusarium graminearum . Environ Microbiol. 2016; 17: 4615-30.

[85] Livak AKJ, Schmittgen BTD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402-8.