Construction of a collection of introgression lines of “Texas” almond DNA fragments in the “Earlygold” peach genetic background

Naveen Kalluri , Octávio Serra , José Manuel Donoso , Roger Picañol , Werner Howad , Iban Eduardo , Pere Arús

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac070

PDF (1204KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac070 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac070
Article
research-article
Construction of a collection of introgression lines of “Texas” almond DNA fragments in the “Earlygold” peach genetic background
Author information +
History +
PDF (1204KB)

Abstract

Peach [ Prunus persica L. Batsch] is one of the major temperate fruit tree species, the commercial materials of which have a low level of genetic variability. Almond [ P. dulcis (Mill) DA Webb], a close relative of peach cultivated for its kernels, has a much higher level of diversity. The species are inter-compatible and often produce fertile hybrids, almond being a possible source of new genes for peach that could provide biotic and abiotic stress tolerance traits. In this paper we describe the development of a collection of peach-almond introgression lines (ILs) having a single fragment of almond (cv. Texas) in the peach background (cv. Earlygold). Lines with few introgressions were selected with markers from successive generations from a “Texas”× “Earlygold” F1 hybrid, initially using a set of SSRs and later with the 18 k peach SNP chip, allowing for the final extraction of 67 lines, 39 with almond heterozygous introgressions covering 99% of the genome, and 28 with homozygous introgressions covering 83% of the genome. As a proof of concept, four major genes and four quantitative characters were examined in the selected ILs giving results generally consistent with previous information on the genetics of these characters. This collection is the first of its kind produced in a woody perennial species and promises to be a valuable tool for genetic analyses, including dissection of quantitative traits, positional cloning, epistasis and as prebreeding material to introgress almond genes of interest into the peach commercial gene pool.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Naveen Kalluri, Octávio Serra, José Manuel Donoso, Roger Picañol, Werner Howad, Iban Eduardo, Pere Arús. Construction of a collection of introgression lines of “Texas” almond DNA fragments in the “Earlygold” peach genetic background. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac070 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac070

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2: 983-9.

[2]

Balakrishnan D, Surapaneni M, Mesapogu S et al. Development and use of chromosome segment substitution lines as a genetic resource for crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 2019; 132: 1-25.

[3]

Eshed Y, Zamir D . An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics. 1995; 141: 1147-62.

[4]

Szalma SJ, Hostert BM, LeDeaux JR et al. QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize. Zuchter. 2007; 114: 1211-28.

[5]

Szymański J, Bocobza S, Panda S et al. Analysis of wild tomato introgression lines elucidates the genetic basis of transcriptome and metabolome variation underlying fruit traits and pathogen response. Nat Genet. 2020; 52: 1111-21.

[6]

Zhang G. Target chromosome-segment substitution: a way to breeding by design in rice. Crop J. 2021; 9: 658-68.

[7]

Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S et al. fw2.2 a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000; 289: 85-8.

[8]

Fridman E, Carrari F, Liu Y-S et al. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science. 2004; 305: 1786-9.

[9]

Xu Q, Xu X, Shi Y et al. Elucidation of the molecular responses of a cucumber segment substitution line carrying Pm5.1 and its recurrent parent triggered by powdery mildew by comparative transcriptome profiling. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 21.

[10]

Balakrishnan D, Surapaneni M, Mesapogu S et al. Detecting CSSLs and yield QTLs with additive, epistatic and QTL× environment interaction effects from Oryza sativa × O. nivara IRGC81832 cross . Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 7766.

[11]

Gur A, Zamir D . Mendelizing all components of a pyramid of three yield QTL in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 1096.

[12]

Eshed Y, Abu-Abied M, Saranga Y et al. Lycopersicon esculentum lines containing small overlapping introgressions from L. pennellii . Theor Appl Genet. 1992; 83: 1027-34.

[13]

Yu Y, Fu J, Xu Y et al. Genome re-sequencing reveals the evolutionary history of peach fruit edibility. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 5404.

[14]

Alioto T, Alexiou KG, Bardil A et al. Transposons played a major role in the diversification between the closely related almond and peach genomes: results from the almond genome sequence. Plant J. 2020; 101: 455-72.

[15]

Faust M, Timon B . Horticultural Reviews Vol. 17. In: Janick J (ed.), Ch. 10. New York: Wiley, 1995.

[16]

Ladizinsky G . On the origin of almond. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1999; 46: 143-7.

[17]

Byrne DH . Isozyme variability in four diploid stone fruits compared with other woody perennial plants. J Hered. 1990; 81: 68-71.

[18]

Velasco D, Hough J, Aradhya M et al. Evolutionary genomics of peach and almond domestication. G three. 2016; 6: 3985-93.

[19]

Donoso JM, Eduardo I, Picañol R et al. High-density mapping suggests cytoplasmic male sterility with two restorer genes in almond × peach progenies. Hortic Res. 2015; 2: 15016.

[20]

Donoso JM, Picañol R, Serra O et al. Exploring almond genetic variability useful for peach improvement: mapping major genes and QTLs in two interspecific almond × peach populations. Mol Breeding. 2016; 36: 16.

[21]

Serra O, Donoso JM, Picañol R et al. Marker-assisted introgression (MAI) of almond genes into the peach background: a fast method to mine and integrate novel variation from exotic sources in long intergeneration species. Tree Genet Genomes. 2016; 12: 96.

[22]

Marimon N, Luque J, Arús P et al. Fine mapping and identification of candidate genes for the peach powdery mildew resistance gene Vr3 . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 175.

[23]

Kalluri N, Eduardo I, Arús P . Comparative QTL analysis in peach ‘Earlygold’ F2 and backcross progenies. Sci Hortic. 2022; 293: 110726.

[24]

Pirona R, Eduardo I, Pacheco I et al. Fine mapping and identification of a candidate gene for a major locus controlling maturity date in peach. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13: 166.

[25]

Tanksley SD, Nelson JC . Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet. 1996; 92: 191-203.

[26]

Aranzana MJ, Carbo J, Arús P . Microsatellite variability in peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch: cultivar identification, marker mutation, pedigree inferences and population structure. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 106: 1341-52.

[27]

Micheletti D, Dettori MT, Micali S et al. Whole-genome analysis of diversity and SNP-major Gene Association in peach Germplasm. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0136803.

[28]

Scorza R, Mehlenbacher SA, Lightner GW . Inbreeding and coancestry of freestone peach cultivars of the eastern-United-States and implications for peach germplasm improvement. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 1985; 110: 547-52.

[29]

Cirilli M, Baccichet I, Chiozzotto R et al. Genetic and phenotypic analyses reveal major quantitative loci associated to fruit size and shape traits in a non-flat peach collection (P. persica L. Batsch) . Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 232.

[30]

Hernández Mora JR, Micheletti D, Bink M et al. Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 404.

[31]

Ramming DW . The use of embryo culture in fruit breeding. HortScience. 1990; 25: 393-8.

[32]

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL . A rapid Total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus. 1990; 12: 13-5.

[33]

Verde I, Bassil N, Scalabrin S et al. Development and evaluation of a 9K SNP Array for peach by internationally coordinated SNP detection and validation in breeding Germplasm. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e35668.

[34]

Gasic K, Linge CS, Bianco L et al. Development and evaluation of a 9K SNP addition to the peach IPSC 9K SNP array v1. HortScience. 2019; 54: S188-8.

[35]

Di Guardo M, Micheletti D, Bianco L et al. ASSIsT: an automatic SNP scoring tool for in- and outbreeding species. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 3873-4.

[36]

van Berloo RGGT . 2.0: versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data. J Hered. 2008; 99: 232-6.

[37]

Verde I, Jenkins J, Dondini L et al. The peach v2.0 release: high-resolution linkage mapping and deep resequencing improve chromosome-scale assembly and contiguity. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 225.

PDF (1204KB)

59

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/