Molecular mechanisms underlying multi-level defense responses of horticultural crops to fungal pathogens

Xiaodi Xu , Yong Chen , Boqiang Li , Zhanquan Zhang , Guozheng Qin , Tong Chen , Shiping Tian

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhac066

PDF (779KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhac066 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac066
Review Article
research-article
Molecular mechanisms underlying multi-level defense responses of horticultural crops to fungal pathogens
Author information +
History +
PDF (779KB)

Abstract

The horticultural industry helps to enrich and improve the human diet while contributing to growth of the agricultural economy. However, fungal diseases of horticultural crops frequently occur during pre- and postharvest periods, reducing yields and crop quality and causing huge economic losses and wasted food. Outcomes of fungal diseases depend on both horticultural plant defense responses and fungal pathogenicity. Plant defense responses are highly sophisticated and are generally divided into preformed and induced defense responses. Preformed defense responses include both physical barriers and phytochemicals, which are the first line of protection. Induced defense responses, which include innate immunity (pattern-triggered immunity and effector-triggered immunity), local defense responses, and systemic defense signaling, are triggered to counterstrike fungal pathogens. Therefore, to develop regulatory strategies for horticultural plant resistance, a comprehensive understanding of defense responses and their underlying mechanisms is critical. Recently, integrated multi-omics analyses, CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing, high-throughput sequencing, and data mining have greatly contributed to identification and functional determination of novel phytochemicals, regulatory factors, and signaling molecules and their signaling pathways in plant resistance. In this review, research progress on defense responses of horticultural crops to fungal pathogens and novel regulatory strategies to regulate induction of plant resistance are summarized, and then the problems, challenges, and future research directions are examined.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaodi Xu, Yong Chen, Boqiang Li, Zhanquan Zhang, Guozheng Qin, Tong Chen, Shiping Tian. Molecular mechanisms underlying multi-level defense responses of horticultural crops to fungal pathogens. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhac066 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhac066

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Shipman EN, Yu J, Zhou J et al. Can gene editing reduce postharvest waste and loss of fruit, vegetables, and ornamentals? Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 1-21.

[2]

Zhang ZQ, Chen T, Li BQ et al. Molecular basis of pathogenesis of postharvest pathogenic fungi and control strategy in fruits: progress and prospect. Mol Hortic. 2021; 1: 1-10.

[3]

Tian S, Torres R, Ballester AR et al. Molecular aspects in pathogen-fruit interactions: virulence and resistance. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016; 122: 11-21.

[4]

Vilanova, Viñas I, Torres R et al. Increasing maturity reduces wound response and lignification processes against Penicillium expansum (pathogen) and Penicillium digitatum (non-host pathogen) infection in apples. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2014; 88: 54-60.

[5]

Hua L, Yong C, Zhanquan Z et al. Pathogenic mechanisms and control strategies of Botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest decay in fruits and vegetables. Food Qual Saf. 2018; 2: 111-9.

[6]

Song C, Zhao Y, Li A et al. Postharvest nitric oxide treatment induced the alternative oxidase pathway to enhance antioxidant capacity and chilling tolerance in peach fruit. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021; 167: 113-22.

[7]

Ziv C, Zhao Z, Gao YG, et al. Multifunctional roles of plant cuticle during plant-pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci 2018; 9: 1088.

[8]

Alkan N, Fortes AM . Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 1-14.

[9]

De Kesel J, Conrath U, Flors V et al. The induced resistance lexicon: do’s and don’ts. Trends Plant Sci. 2021; 26: 685-91.

[10]

Szymański J, Bocobza S, Panda S et al. Analysis of wild tomato introgression lines elucidates the genetic basis of transcriptome and metabolome variation underlying fruit traits and pathogen response. Nat Genet. 2020; 52: 1111-21.

[11]

Fu ZQ, Dong X . Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 64: 839-63.

[12]

Romanazzi G, Sanzani SM, Bi Y et al. Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016; 122: 82-94.

[13]

Pieterse CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL et al. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014; 52: 347-75.

[14]

Bacete L, Mélida H, Miedes E et al. Plant cell wall-mediated immunity: cell wall changes trigger disease resistance responses. Plant J 2018; 93: 614-36.

[15]

Berto P, Comménil P, Belingheri L et al. Occurrence of a lipase in spores of Alternaria brassicicola with a crucial role in the infection of cauliflower leaves. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999; 180: 183-9.

[16]

Gui YJ, Zhang WQ, Zhang DD et al. A Verticillium dahliae extracellular cutinase modulates plant immune responses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018; 31: 260-73.

[17]

Yeats TH, Rose JKC . The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol. 2013; 163: 5-20.

[18]

Lino LO, Quilot-Turion B, Dufour C et al. Cuticular waxes of nectarines during fruit development in relation to surface conductance and susceptibility to Monilinia laxa. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71: 5521-37.

[19]

Isaacson T, Kosma DK, Matas AJ et al. Cutin deficiency in the tomato fruit cuticle consistently affects resistance to microbial infection and biomechanical properties, but not transpirational water loss. Plant J. 2009; 60: 363-77.

[20]

Chu W, Gao H, Chen H et al. Effects of cuticular wax on the postharvest quality of blueberry fruit. Food Chem. 2018; 239: 68-74.

[21]

Zhang YL, Zhang CL, Wang GL et al. The R2R3 MYB transcription factor MdMYB30 modulates plant resistance against pathogens by regulating cuticular wax biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 362.

[22]

Wang W, Liu X, Gai X et al. Cucumis sativus L. WAX2 plays a pivotal role in WAX biosynthesis, influencing pollen fertility and plant biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 1339-54.

[23]

Saladié M, Matas AJ, Isaacson T et al. A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity. Plant Physiol. 2007; 144: 1012-28.

[24]

Yin Y, Bi Y, Chen S et al. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of cuticular wax isolated from Asian pear fruit (cv. Pingguoli). Sci Hortic. 2011; 129: 577-82.

[25]

Shanker KS, Kanjilal S, Rao BVSK et al. Isolation and antimicrobial evaluation of isomeric hydroxy ketones in leaf cuticular waxes of Annona squamosa. Phytochem Anal. 2007; 18: 7-12.

[26]

Uluisik S, Seymour GB . Pectate lyases: their role in plants and importance in fruit ripening. Food Chem. 2020; 309: 125559.

[27]

Yang L, Huang W, Xiong F et al. Silencing of SlPL, which encodes a pectate lyase in tomato, confers enhanced fruit firmness, prolonged shelf-life and reduced susceptibility to grey mould. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 1544-55.

[28]

VanEtten HD, Mansfield JW, Bailey JA et al. Two classes of plant antibiotics: phytoalexins versus ‘phytoanticipins’. Plant Cell 1994; 6: 1191-2.

[29]

Arif T, Bhosale JD, Kumar N et al. Natural products-antifungal agents derived from plants. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2009; 11: 621-38.

[30]

Zacchino SA, Butassi E, Di Liberto M et al. Plant phenolics and terpenoids as adjuvants of antibacterial and antifungal drugs. Phytomedicine. 2017; 37: 27-48.

[31]

Pacifico D, Lanzanova C, Pagnotta E et al. Sustainable use of bioactive compounds from Solanum tuberosum and Brassicaceae wastes and by-products for crop protection-a review. Molecules. 2021; 26: 2174.

[32]

Kumar SN, Nambisan B . Antifungal activity of diketopiperazines and stilbenes against plant pathogenic fungi in vitro. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014; 172: 741-54.

[33]

Zaynab M, Fatima M, Abbas S et al. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2018; 124: 198-202.

[34]

Bhattacharya A, Sood P, Citovsky V . The roles of plant phenolics in defence and communication during Agrobacterium and Rhizobium infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010; 11: 705-19.

[35]

Ma D, Cui X, Zhang Z et al. Honokiol suppresses mycelial growth and reduces virulence of Botrytis cinerea by inducing autophagic activities and apoptosis. Food Microbiol. 2020; 88: 103411.

[36]

Jiao W, Li X, Wang X et al. Chlorogenic acid induces resistance against Penicillium expansum in peach fruit by activating the salicylic acid signaling pathway. Food Chem. 2018; 260: 274-82.

[37]

Liu X, Cui X, Ji D et al. Luteolin-induced activation of the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway contributes to quality maintenance and disease resistance of sweet cherry. Food Chem. 2021; 342: 128309.

[38]

Yuan S, Li W, Li Q et al. Defense responses, induced by p-coumaric acid and methyl p-coumarate, of jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) fruit against black spot rot caused by Alternaria alternata. J Agric Food Chem. 2019; 67: 2801-10.

[39]

Li Z, Wang N, Wei Y et al. Terpinen-4-ol enhances disease resistance of postharvest strawberry fruit more effectively than tea tree oil by activating the phenylpropanoid metabolism pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2020; 68: 6739-47.

[40]

Rodríguez A, Kava V, Latorre-García L et al. Engineering d-limonene synthase down-regulation in orange fruit induces resistance against the fungus Phyllosticta citricarpa through enhanced accumulation of monoterpene alcohols and activation of defence. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018; 19: 2077-93.

[41]

He YH, Shang XF, Li HX et al. Antifungal activity and action mechanism study of coumarins from Cnidium monnieri fruit and structurally related compounds. Chem Biodivers. 2021; 18: e2100633.

[42]

Blanco-Ulate B, Vincenti E, Powell ALT et al. Tomato transcriptome and mutant analyses suggest a role for plant stress hormones in the interaction between fruit and Botrytis cinerea. Front Plant Sci 2013; 4: 142.

[43]

Yang YX, Ahammed GJ, Wu C et al. Crosstalk among jasmonate, salicylate and ethylene signaling pathways in plant disease and immune responses. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015; 16: 450-61.

[44]

Yao H, Tian S . Effects of pre- and post-harvest application of salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate on inducing disease resistance of sweet cherry fruit in storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005; 35: 253-62.

[45]

Cao S, Zheng Y, Yang Z et al. Effect of methyl jasmonate on the inhibition of Colletotrichum acutatum infection in loquat fruit and the possible mechanisms. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2008; 49: 301-7.

[46]

Zhu Z, Tian S . Resistant responses of tomato fruit treated with exogenous methyl jasmonate to Botrytis cinerea infection. Sci Hortic. 2012; 142: 38-43.

[47]

Darras AI, Terry LA, Joyce DC . Methyl jasmonate vapour treatment suppresses specking caused by Botrytis cinerea on cut Freesia hybrida L. flowers. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005; 38: 175-82.

[48]

Dong H, Ye Y, Guo Y et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed resistance differences of Cavendish bananas to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense race1 and race4. BMC Genet 2020; 21: 122.

[49]

Zhu Z, Zhang Z, Qin G et al. Effects of brassinosteroids on postharvest disease and senescence of jujube fruit in storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2010; 56: 50-5.

[50]

Buhrow LM, Liu Z, Cram D et al. Wheat transcriptome profiling reveals abscisic and gibberellic acid treatments regulate early-stage phytohormone defense signaling, cell wall fortification, and metabolic switches following Fusarium graminearum-challenge. BMC Genomics. 2021; 22: 798.

[51]

Su Y, Wang G, Huang Z et al. Silencing GhIAA43, a member of cotton AUX/IAA genes, enhances wilt resistance via activation of salicylic acid-mediated defenses. Plant Sci. 2022; 314: 111126.

[52]

Gupta R, Elkabetz D, Leibman-Markus M et al. Cytokinin-microbiome interactions regulate developmental functions. Environ Microbiome. 2022; 17: 2.

[53]

Liu C, Chen L, Zhao R et al. Melatonin induces disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit by activating jasmonic acid signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2019; 67: 6116-24.

[54]

Macho AP, Zipfel C . Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Mol Cell. 2014; 54: 263-72.

[55]

Wang X, Jiang N, Liu J et al. The role of effectors and host immunity in plant-necrotrophic fungal interactions. Virulence. 2014; 5: 722-32.

[56]

Albers P, Üstün S, Witzel K et al. A remorin from Nicotiana benthamiana interacts with the Pseudomonas type-III effector protein HopZ1a and is phosphorylated by the immune-related kinase PBS1. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2019; 32: 1229-42.

[57]

Ji D, Chen T, Zhang Z et al. Versatile roles of the receptor-like kinase feronia in plant growth, development and host-pathogen interaction. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21: 7881.

[58]

Wang Y, Ji D, Chen T et al. Production, signaling, and scavenging mechanisms of reactive oxygen species in fruit-pathogen interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20: 2994.

[59]

Xu S, Liao CJ, Jaiswal N et al. Tomato PEPR1 ORTHOLOG RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE1 regulates responses to systemin, necrotrophic fungi, and insect herbivory. Plant Cell. 2018; 30: 2214-29.

[60]

Jaiswal N, Liao CJ, Mengesha B et al. Regulation of plant immunity and growth by tomato receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase TRK1. New Phytol. 2022; 233: 458-78.

[61]

Liebrand TWH, van den Berg GCM, Zhang Z et al. Receptor-like kinase SOBIR1/EVR interacts with receptor-like proteins in plant immunity against fungal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 10010-5.

[62]

De Jonge R, van Esse HP, Maruthachalam K et al. Tomato immune receptor Ve1 recognizes effector of multiple fungal pathogens uncovered by genome and RNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 5110-5.

[63]

Rivas S, Thomas CM . Molecular interactions between tomato and the leaf mold pathogen Cladosporium fulvum. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005; 43: 395-436.

[64]

Ron M, Avni A . The receptor for the fungal elicitor ethylene-inducing xylanase is a member of a resistance-like gene family in tomato. Plant Cell. 2004; 16: 1604-15.

[65]

Die JV, Román B, Qi X et al. Genome-scale examination of NBS-encoding genes in blueberry. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 6429.

[66]

Shao ZQ, Xue JY, Wu P et al. Large-scale analyses of angiosperm nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat genes reveal three anciently diverged classes with distinct evolutionary patterns. Plant Physiol. 2016; 170: 2095-109.

[67]

Goyal N, Bhatia G, Sharma S et al. Genome-wide characterization revealed role of NBS-LRR genes during powdery mildew infection in Vitis vinifera. Genomics. 2020; 112: 312-22.

[68]

Wang T, Jia ZH, Zhang JY et al. Identification and analysis of NBS-LRR genes in Actinidia chinensis genome. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9: 1350.

[69]

Andolfo G, Sanseverino W, Aversano R et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of candidate genes for disease resistance in tomato. Mol Breed. 2014; 33: 227-33.

[70]

Lozano R, Ponce O, Ramirez M et al. Genome-wide identification and mapping of NBS-encoding resistance genes in Solanum tuberosum group phureja. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e34775.

[71]

Zhang YM, Chen M, Sun L et al. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of NBS-LRR genes from Dioscorea rotundata. Front Genet. 2020; 11: 484.

[72]

Liu Y, Li D, Yang N et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of CC-NBS-LRR family in response to downy mildew and black rot in Chinese cabbage. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 4266.

[73]

Liu Z, Xie J, Wang H et al. Identification and expression profiling analysis of NBS-LRR genes involved in Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. conglutinans resistance in cabbage. 3 Biotech. 2019; 9: 202.

[74]

Wan H, Yuan W, Bo K et al. Genome-wide analysis of NBS-encoding disease resistance genes in Cucumis sativus and phylogenetic study of NBS-encoding genes in Cucurbitaceae crops. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 109.

[75]

Kang YJ, Kim KH, Shim S et al. Genome-wide mapping of NBS-LRR genes and their association with disease resistance in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12: 139.

[76]

Xue JY, Zhao T, Liu Y et al. Genome-wide analysis of the nucleotide binding site leucine-rich repeat genes of four orchids revealed extremely low numbers of disease resistance genes. Front Genet. 2020; 10: 1286.

[77]

Gabriëls SHEJ, Vossen JH, Ekengren SK et al. An NB-LRR protein required for HR signalling mediated by both extra- and intracellular resistance proteins. Plant J. 2007; 50: 14-28.

[78]

Sueldo DJ, Shimels M, Spiridon LN et al. Random mutagenesis of the nucleotide-binding domain of NRC1 (NB-LRR Required for Hypersensitive Response-associated Cell Death-1), a downstream signalling nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) protein, identifies gain-of-function mutations in the nucleotide-binding pocket. New Phytol. 2015; 208: 210-23.

[79]

Houterman PM, Ma L, van Ooijen G et al. The effector protein Avr2 of the xylem-colonizing fungus Fusarium oxysporum activates the tomato resistance protein I-2 intracellularly. Plant J. 2009; 58: 970-8.

[80]

Wang X, Chen Q, Huang J et al. Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat genes CsRSF1 and CsRSF2 are positive modulators in the Cucumis sativus defense response to Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 3986.

[81]

Meng D, Li C, Park HJ et al. Sorbitol modulates resistance to Alternaria alternata by regulating the expression of an NLR resistance gene in apple. Plant Cell. 2018; 30: 1562-81.

[82]

Wang Y, Wei H, Fan W et al. CCR-NB-LRR proteins MdRNL2 and MdRNL6 interact physically to confer broad-spectrum fungal resistance in apple (Malus × domestica) . Plant J. 2021; 108: 1522-38.

[83]

Campos MD, Félix M d R, Patanita M et al. High throughput sequencing unravels tomato-pathogen interactions towards a sustainable plant breeding. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 171.

[84]

Yuan S, Ding X, Zhang Y et al. Characterization of defense responses in the ‘green ring’ and ‘red ring’ on jujube fruit upon postharvest infection by Alternaria alternata and the activation by the elicitor treatment. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2019; 149: 166-76.

[85]

Balint-Kurti P. The plant hypersensitive response: concepts, control and consequences. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019; 20: 1163-78.

[86]

Salguero-Linares J, Coll NS . Plant proteases in the control of the hypersensitive response. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 2087-95.

[87]

Ilyas M, Hörger AC, Bozkurt TO et al. Functional divergence of two secreted immune proteases of tomato. Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 2300-6.

[88]

Paulus JK, Kourelis J, Ramasubramanian S et al. Extracellular proteolytic cascade in tomato activates immune protease Rcr3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 17409-17.

[89]

Wang W, Cai J, Wang P et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of fruit ripening and disease resistance in tomato by the vacuolar protease SlVPE3. Genome Biol. 2017; 18: 47.

[90]

Raffaele S, Mongrand S, Gamas P et al. Genome-wide annotation of remorins, a plant-specific protein family: evolutionary and functional perspectives. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 593-600.

[91]

Malakshah SN, Rezaei MH, Heidari M et al. Proteomics reveals new salt responsive proteins associated with rice plasma membrane. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007; 71: 2144-54.

[92]

Cai J, Qin G, Chen T, Tian S . The mode of action of remorin1 in regulating fruit ripening at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. New Phytol. 2018; 219: 1406-20.

[93]

Lefebvre B, Timmers T, Mbengue M et al. A remorin protein interacts with symbiotic receptors and regulates bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 2343-8.

[94]

Cai J, Chen T, Wang Y et al. SlREM1 triggers cell death by activating an oxidative burst and other regulators. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183: 717-32.

[95]

Singh NK, Paz E, Kutsher Y et al. Tomato T2 ribonuclease LE is involved in the response to pathogens. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020; 21: 895-906.

[96]

Zhong X, Xi L, Lian Q et al. The NPR1 homolog GhNPR1 plays an important role in the defense response of Gladiolus hybridus. Plant Cell Rep. 2015; 34: 1063-74.

[97]

Ali S, Mir ZA, Tyagi A et al. Overexpression of NPR1 in Brassica juncea confers broad spectrum resistance to fungal pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1-16.

[98]

Chen XK, Zhang JY, Zhang Z et al. Overexpressing MhNPR1 in transgenic Fuji apples enhances resistance to apple powdery mildew. Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39: 8083-9.

[99]

Malnoy M, Borejsza-Wysocka EE, Jin QL et al. Over-expression of the apple gene MpNPR1 causes increased disease resistance in Malus × domestica. Acta Hortic. 2004; 663: 463-8.

[100]

Le Henanff G, Farine S, Kieffer-Mazet F et al. Vitis vinifera VvNPR1.1 is the functional ortholog of AtNPR1 and its overexpression in grapevine triggers constitutive activation of PR genes and enhanced resistance to powdery mildew. Planta. 2011; 234: 405-17.

[101]

Goyal N, Bhatia G, Garewal N et al. Identification of defense related gene families and their response against powdery and downy mildew infections in Vitis vinifera. BMC Genomics. 2021; 22: 776.

[102]

Zhou JM, Trifa Y, Silva H et al. NPR1 differentially interacts with members of the TGA/OBF family of transcription factors that bind an element of the PR-1 gene required for induction by salicylic acid. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000; 13: 191-202.

[103]

Abd El Rahman T, El Oirdi M, Gonzalez-Lamothe R et al. Necrotrophic pathogens use the salicylic acid signaling pathway to promote disease development in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012; 25: 1584-93.

[104]

Tang Y, Kuang JF, Wang FY et al. Molecular characterization of PR and WRKY genes during SA- and MeJA-induced resistance against Colletotrichum musae in banana fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013; 79: 62-8.

[105]

Deng B, Wang W, Ruan C et al. Involvement of CsWRKY70 in salicylic acid-induced citrus fruit resistance against Penicillium digitatum. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 157.

[106]

Zhao XY, Qi CH, Jiang H et al. MdHIR4 transcription and translation levels associated with disease in apple are regulated by MdWRKY31. Plant Mol Biol. 2019; 101: 149-62.

[107]

Shan W, Chen JY, Kuang JF et al. Banana fruit NAC transcription factor MaNAC5 cooperates with MaWRKYs to enhance the expression of pathogenesis-related genes against Colletotrichum musae. Mol Plant Pathol 2016; 17: 330-8.

[108]

Gu KD, Zhang QY, Yu JQ et al. R2R3-MYB transcription factor MdMYB73 confers increased resistance to the fungal pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea in apples via the salicylic acid pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2021; 69: 447-58.

[109]

Chan Z, Wang Q, Xu X et al. Functions of defense-related proteins and dehydrogenases in resistance response induced by salicylic acid in sweet cherry fruits at different maturity stages. Proteomics. 2008; 8: 4791-807.

[110]

Chan Z, Qin G, Xu X et al. Proteome approach to characterize proteins induced by antagonist yeast and salicylic acid in peach fruit. J Proteome Res. 2007; 6: 1677-88.

[111]

Yildiz I, Mantz M, Hartmann M et al. The mobile SAR signal N-hydroxypipecolic acid induces NPR1-dependent transcriptional reprogramming and immune priming. Plant Physiol. 2021; 186: 1679-705.

[112]

Huang W, Wang Y, Li X et al. Biosynthesis and regulation of salicylic acid and N-hydroxypipecolic acid in plant immunity. Mol Plant 2019; 13: 31-41.

[113]

Hartmann M, Zeier J . N-hydroxypipecolic acid and salicylic acid: a metabolic duo for systemic acquired resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019; 50: 44-57.

[114]

Schnake A, Hartmann M, Schreiber S et al. Inducible biosynthesis and immune function of the systemic acquired resistance inducer N-hydroxypipecolic acid in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71: 6444-59.

[115]

Holmes EC, Chen YC, Sattely ES et al. An engineered pathway for N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid synthesis enhances systemic acquired resistance in tomato. Sci Signal 2019; 12: eaay3066.

[116]

Chaturvedi R, Venables B, Petros RA et al. An abietane diterpenoid is a potent activator of systemic acquired resistance. Plant J. 2012; 1: 161-72.

[117]

Singh A, Lim G, Kachroo P . Transport of chemical signals in systemic acquired resistance. J Integr Plant Biol. 2017; 59: 336-44.

[118]

Isaacs M, Carella P, Faubert J et al. Orthology analysis and in vivo complementation studies to elucidate the role of DIR1 during systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Cucumis sativus. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 566.

[119]

Min D, Li F, Cui X et al. SlMYC2 are required for methyl jasmonate-induced tomato fruit resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Food Chem. 2020; 310: 125901.

[120]

Jia H, Zhang C, Pervaiz T et al. Jasmonic acid involves in grape fruit ripening and resistant against Botrytis cinerea. Funct Integr Genomics. 2016; 16: 79-94.

[121]

Du M, Zhao J, Tzeng DTW et al. MYC2 orchestrates a hierarchical transcriptional cascade that regulates jasmonate-mediated plant immunity in tomato. Plant Cell. 2017; 29: 1883-906.

[122]

Thines B, Katsir L, Melotto M et al. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling . Nature. 2007; 448: 661-5.

[123]

Xie DX, Feys BF, James S et al. COI1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science. 1998; 280: 1091-4.

[124]

Sun JQ, Jiang HL, Li CY . Systemin/jasmonate-mediated systemic defense signaling in tomato. Mol Plant. 2011; 4: 607-15.

[125]

Vasconcellos RCC, Oraguzie OB, Soler A et al. Meta-QTL for resistance to white mold in common bean. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0171685.

[126]

Zhang M, Koh J, Liu L et al. Critical role of COI1-dependent jasmonate pathway in AAL toxin induced PCD in tomato revealed by comparative proteomics. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 28451.

[127]

Liu M, Zhang Q, Wang C et al. CsWRKY10 mediates defence responses to Botrytis cinerea infection in Cucumis sativus. Plant Sci. 2020; 300: 110640.

[128]

Ren H, Bai M, Sun J et al. RcMYB84 and RcMYB123 mediate jasmonate-induced defense responses against Botrytis cinerea in rose (Rosa chinensis). Plant J. 2020; 103: 1839-49.

[129]

Ballester AR, Norelli J, Burchard E et al. Transcriptomic response of resistant (PI613981-Malus sieversii) and susceptible (‘Royal Gala’) genotypes of apple to blue mold (Penicillium expansum) infection. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1981.

[130]

Akagi A, Dandekar AM, Stotz HU . Resistance of Malus domestica fruit to Botrytis cinerea depends on endogenous ethylene biosynthesis. Phytopathology. 2011; 101: 1311-21.

[131]

Li D, Liu X, Shu L et al. Global analysis of the AP2/ERF gene family in rose (Rosa chinensis) genome unveils the role of RcERF099 in Botrytis resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 533.

[132]

Li X, Zhu X, Mao J et al. Isolation and characterization of ethylene response factor family genes during development, ethylene regulation and stress treatments in papaya fruit. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013; 70: 81-92.

[133]

Wang JH, Gu KD, Han PL et al. Apple ethylene response factor MdERF11 confers resistance to fungal pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Sci. 2020; 291: 110351.

[134]

Steinberg G, Gurr SJ . Fungi, fungicide discovery and global food security. Fungal Genet Biol. 2020; 144: 103476.

[135]

Weiberg A, Wang M, Lin FM et al. Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways. Science. 2013; 342: 118-23.

[136]

Cai Q, Qiao L, Wang M et al. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes. Science. 2018; 360: 1126-9.

[137]

Wang M, Weiberg A, Lin FM et al. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat Plants. 2016; 2: 16151.

[138]

Qiao L, Lan C, Capriotti L et al. Spray-induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 1756-68.

[139]

Zaynab M, Fatima M, Abbas S et al. Long non-coding RNAs as molecular players in plant defense against pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2018; 121: 277-82.

[140]

Cui J, Luan Y, Jiang N et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis between resistant and susceptible tomato allows the identification of lncRNA16397 conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans by co-expressing glutaredoxin. Plant J. 2017; 89: 577-89.

[141]

Cui J, Jiang N, Meng J et al. LncRNA33732-respiratory burst oxidase module associated with WRKY1 in tomato-Phytophthora infestans interactions. Plant J. 2019; 97: 933-46.

[142]

Bhatia G, Upadhyay SK, Upadhyay A et al. Investigation of long non-coding RNAs as regulatory players of grapevine response to powdery and downy mildew infection. BMC Plant Biol 2021; 21: 265.

[143]

Zhang H, Wang Y, Wu X et al. Determinants of genome-wide distribution and evolution of uORFs in eukaryotes. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 1076.

[144]

Zhang H, Si X, Ji X et al. Genome editing of upstream open reading frames enables translational control in plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36: 894-900.

[145]

Xu G, Yuan M, Ai C et al. uORF-mediated translation allows engineered plant disease resistance without fitness costs. Nature. 2017; 545: 491-4.

[146]

Zhang H, Wang Y, Lu J . Function and evolution of upstream ORFs in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2019; 44: 782-94.

[147]

Nowack MK, Holmes DR, Lahaye T . TALE-induced cell death executors: an origin outside immunity? Trends Plant Sci. 2021;S1360-1385(21)00309-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.003.

[148]

Schornack S, Ballvora A, Gürlebeck D et al. The tomato resistance protein Bs4 is a predicted non-nuclear TIR-NB-LRR protein that mediates defense responses to severely truncated derivatives of AvrBs4 and overexpressed AvrBs3. Plant J. 2004; 37: 46-60.

[149]

Xue J, Lu Z, Liu W et al. The genetic arms race between plant and Xanthomonas: lessons learned from TALE biology. Sci China Life Sci. 2021; 64: 51-65.

[150]

Pixley KV, Falck-Zepeda JB, Giller KE et al. Genome editing, gene drives, and synthetic biology: will they contribute to disease-resistant crops, and who will benefit? Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019; 57: 165-88.

[151]

Schreiber T, Prange A, Hoppe T et al. Split-TALE: a TALE-based two-component system for synthetic biology applications in planta. Plant Physiol 2019; 179: 1001-12.

PDF (779KB)

69

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/