An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system for simultaneous editing two target sites in Fortunella hindsii

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a revolutionary genome editing technique and has been widely used in numerous plants. For plants (e.g. citrus) with very low transformation efficiency, how to optimize gene editing efficiency and induce large-fragment deletion has been the focus of research. Here, we report that CRISPR/Cas9 induces efficient deletion of 16–673 bp fragments in the genome of Fortunella hindsii. The ability of two binary vectors, pK7WG2D and pMDC32, to introduce specific mutations into the genome of F. hindsii was evaluated. Double single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to achieve precise editing of two sites of a gene and deletion of fragments between the two sites. The construction of vectors based on Golden Gate assembly and Gateway recombination cloning is simple and efficient. pK7WG2D is more suitable for F. hindsii genome editing than the pMDC32 vector. Editing efficiency using the pK7WG2D vector reached 66.7%. Allele mutation frequency was 7.14–100%. Plants with 100% allele mutations accounted for 39.4% (13 100% allele mutation plants/33 mutants). The proportion of mutant plants with fragment deletion induced by this editing system was as high as 52.6% (10 fragment-deletion mutants/19 FhNZZ mutants). Altogether, these data suggest that our CRISPR/Cas9 platform is capable of targeted genome editing in citrus and has broad application in research on the citrus functional genome and citrus molecular breeding.

References

[1] Pinheiro TT, Figueira A, Latado RR . Early-flowering sweet orange mutant ’x11’ as a model for functional genomic studies of citrus. BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7: 511.

[2] Tan B, Li DL, Xu SX et al. Highly efficient transformation of the GFP and MAC12.2 genes into precocious trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata [L.] Raf), a potential model genotype for functional genomics studies in citrus . Tree Genet Genomes. 2009; 5: 529-37.

[3] Zhou J, Yuan M, Zhao Y et al. Efficient deletion of multiple circle RNA loci by CRISPR-Cas9 reveals Os06circ02797 as a putative sponge for OsMIR408 in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 1240-52.

[4] Chandrasekaran J, Brumin M, Wolf D et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016; 17: 1140-53.

[5] Zhi J, Liu X, Li D et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlAN2 mutants reveal various regulatory models of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato plant. Plant Cell Rep. 2020; 39: 799-809.

[6] Miki D, Zhang W, Zeng W et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 1967.

[7] Zhang S, Zhang R, Gao J et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing for wheat grain quality improvement. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 1684-6.

[8] Xu R, Li H, Qin R et al. Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice. Rice. 2014; 7: 5.

[9] Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant. 2015; 8: 1274-84.

[10] Liu X, Yang J, Song Y et al. Effects of sgRNA length and number on gene editing efficiency and predicted mutations generated in rice. Crop J. 2022; 10: 577-81.

[11] Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 279-84.

[12] Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 2014; 24: 132-41.

[13] Hu N, Xian Z, Li N et al. Rapid and user-friendly open-source CRISPR/Cas9 system for single- or multi-site editing of tomato genome. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 7.

[14] Hendel A, Bak RO, Clark JT et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 985-9.

[15] LeBlanc C, Zhang F, Mendez J et al. Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress. Plant J. 2018; 93: 377-86.

[16] Xie K, Minkenberg B, Yang Y . Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 3570-5.

[17] Xu Q, Chen LL, Ruan X et al. The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) . Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 59-66.

[18] Zhu C, Zheng X, Huang Y et al. Genome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of an early flowering mini-citrus (Fortunella hindsii) . Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 2199-210.

[19] Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang S et al. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat Genet. 2017; 49: 765-72.

[20] Jia H, Orbovic V, Jones JB et al. Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccpthA4:dCsLOB1.3 infection. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016; 14: 1291-301.

[21] Peng A, Chen S, Lei T et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 1509-19.

[22] Zhang F, LeBlanc C, Irish VF et al. Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus using the YAO promoter. Plant Cell Rep. 2017; 36: 1883-7.

[23] Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin CY et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013; 154: 1380-9.

[24] Zhou X, Jacobs TB, Xue LJ et al. Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytol. 2015; 208: 298-301.

[25] Wan DY, Guo Y, Cheng Y et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of VvMLO3 results in enhanced resistance to powdery mildew in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 116.

[26] Palatnik JF, Wollmann H, Schommer C et al. Sequence and expression differences underlie functional specialization of Arabidopsis microRNAs miR159 and miR319. Dev Cell. 2007; 13: 115-25.

[27] Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020; 13: 1194-202.

[28] Engler C, Gruetzner R, Kandzia R et al. Golden gate shuffling: a one-pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes. PLoS One. 2009; 4: e5553.

[29] Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA . DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 2000; 10: 1788-95.

[30] Engler C, Youles M, Gruetzner R et al. A Golden Gate modular cloning toolbox for plants. ACS Synth Biol. 2014; 3: 839-43.

[31] Jia H, Wang N . Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93806.

[32] Jia H, Zhang Y, Orbović V et al. Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 817-23.

[33] Jia H, Wang N . Generation of homozygous canker-resistant citrus in the T0 generation using CRISPR-SpCas9p. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1990-2.

[34] Ren F, Ren C, Zhang Z et al. Efficiency optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 612.

[35] Prihatna C, Chen RL, Barbetti MJ et al. Optimisation of regeneration parameters improves transformation efficiency of recalcitrant tomato. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2019; 137: 473-83.

[36] Karmakar S, Molla KA, Gayen D et al. Development of a rapid and highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for pigeon pea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] . GM Crops Food. 2019; 10: 115-38.

[37] Lowder LG, Zhang D, Baltes NJ et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 971-85.

[38] Yu Y, Wang X, Sun H et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas-mediated RNA targeting and gene editing using SPLCV replicon-based expression vectors in Nicotiana benthamiana . Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 1993-5.

[39] Xing HL, Dong L, Wang ZP et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14: 327.

[40] Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant. 2013; 6: 2008-11.

[41] Chen C, Fenk LA, de Bono M . Efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans by CRISPR-targeted homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: e193.

[42] Chen LL . The biogenesis and emerging roles of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17: 205-11.

[43] Brendolise C, Espley RV, Lin-Wang K et al. Multiple copies of a simple MYB-binding site confers trans-regulation by specific flavonoid-related R2R3 MYBs in diverse species. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1864.

[44] Ishizaki T . CRISPR/Cas9 in rice can induce new mutations in later generations, leading to chimerism and unpredicted segregation of the targeted mutation. Mol Breed. 2016; 36: 165.

[45] Biswas S, Tian J, Li R et al. Investigation of CRISPR/Cas9-induced SD1 rice mutants highlights the importance of molecular characterization in plant molecular breeding . J Genet Genomics. 2020; 47: 273-80.

[46] Pena L, Perez RM, Cervera M et al. Early events in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of citrus explants. Ann Bot. 2004; 94: 67-74.

[47] Decottignies A. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics. 2007; 176: 1403-15.

[48] Wu J, Xu Z, Zhang Y et al. An integrative analysis of the transcriptome and proteome of the pulp of a spontaneous late-ripening sweet orange mutant and its wild type improves our understanding of fruit ripening in citrus. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 1651-71.

[49] Wu JX, Su S, Fu Ll et al. Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression studies using quantitative real-time PCR in navel orange fruit development and pummelo floral organs. Sci Hortic. 2014; 176: 180-8.