Leveraging a graft collection to develop metabolome-based trait prediction for the selection of tomato rootstocks with enhanced salt tolerance

Abstract

Grafting has been demonstrated to significantly enhance the salt tolerance of crops. However, breeding efforts to develop enhanced graft combinations are hindered by knowledge-gaps as to how rootstocks mediate scion-response to salt stress. We grafted the scion of cultivated M82 onto rootstocks of 254 tomato accessions and explored the morphological and metabolic responses of grafts under saline conditions (EC = 20 dS m⁻¹) as compared to self-grafted M82 (SG-M82). Correlation analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator were performed to address the association between morphological diversification and metabolic perturbation. We demonstrate that grafting the same variety onto different rootstocks resulted in scion phenotypic heterogeneity and emphasized the productivity efficiency of M82 irrespective of the rootstock. Spectrophotometric analysis to test lipid oxidation showed largest variability of malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents across the population, while the least responsive trait was the ratio of fruit fresh weight to total fresh weight (FFW/TFW). Generally, grafts showed greater values for the traits measured than SG-M82, except for branch number and wild race-originated rootstocks; the latter were associated with smaller scion growth parameters. Highly responsive and correlated metabolites were identified across the graft collection including malate, citrate, and aspartate, and their variance was partly related to rootstock origin. A group of six metabolites that consistently characterized exceptional graft response was observed, consisting of sorbose, galactose, sucrose, fructose, myo-inositol, and proline. The correlation analysis and predictive modelling, integrating phenotype- and leaf metabolite data, suggest a potential predictive relation between a set of leaf metabolites and yield-related traits.

References

[1] Shrivastava P, Kumar R . Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015; 22: 123-31.

[2] Panta S, Flowers T, Lane PA et al. Halophyte agriculture: success stories. Environ Exp Bot. 2014; 107: 71-83.

[3] Munns R, James RA, Gilliham M et al. Tissue tolerance: an essential but elusive trait for salt-tolerant crops. Funct Plant Biol. 2016; 43: 1103-13.

[4] Munns R, Tester M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59: 651-81.

[5] Kim YH, Khan AL, Waqas M et al. Silicon application to rice root zone influenced the phytohormonal and antioxidant responses under salinity stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2014; 33: 137-49.

[6] Muchate NS, Nikalje GC, Rajurkar NS et al. Plant salt stress: adaptive responses, tolerance mechanism and bioengineering for salt tolerance. Bot Rev. 2016; 82: 371-406.

[7] Park HJ, Kim WY, Yun DJ . A new insight of salt stress signaling in plant. Mol Cells. 2016; 39: 447-59.

[8] Zhang XK, Zhou QH, Cao JH, Yu BJ . Differential cl⁻/salt tolerance and NaCl⁻induced alternations of tissue and cellular ion fluxes in glycine max, glycine soja and their hybrid seedlings . J Agron Crop Sci. 2011; 197: 329-39.

[9] Himabindu Y, Chakradhar T, Reddy MC et al. Salt-tolerant genes from halophytes are potential key players of salt tolerance in glycophytes. Environ Exp Bot. 2016; 124: 39-63.

[10] Shannon M, Grieve C . Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Sci Hortic. 1998; 78: 5-38.

[11] Flowers TJ . Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2004; 55: 307-19.

[12] Aidoo MK, Sherman T, Lazarovitch N et al. Physiology and metabolism of grafted bell pepper in response to low root-zone temperature. Funct Plant Biol. 2019; 46: 339-49.

[13] Penella C, Landi M, Guidi L et al. Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength. J Plant Physiol. 2016; 193: 1-11.

[14] Colla G, Rouphael Y, Jawad R et al. The effectiveness of grafting to improve NaCl and CaCl₂ tolerance in cucumber . Sci Hortic. 2013; 164: 380-91.

[15] Huang Y, Bie Z, He S et al. Improving cucumber tolerance to major nutrients induced salinity by grafting onto Cucurbita ficifolia . Environ Exp Bot. 2010; 69: 32-8.

[16] Pina A, Errea P . A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility. Sci Hortic. 2005; 106: 1-11.

[17] Sabatino L, Iapichino G, D’Anna F et al. Hybrids and allied species as potential rootstocks for eggplant: effect of grafting on vigour, yield and overall fruit quality traits. Sci Hortic. 2018; 228: 81-90.

[18] Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Romero L, Ruiz JM . Accumulation of free polyamines enhances the antioxidant response in fruits of grafted tomato plants under water stress. J Plant Physiol. 2016; 190: 72-8.

[19] Gimeno V, Syvertsen JP, Nieves M et al. Additional nitrogen fertilization affects salt tolerance of lemon trees on different rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2009; 121: 298-305.

[20] Huang Y, Zhao L, Kong Q et al. Comprehensive mineral nutrition analysis of watermelon grafted onto two different rootstocks. Hortic Plant J. 2016; 2: 105-13.

[21] Alan O, Ozdemir N, Gunen Y . Effect of grafting on watermelon plant growth, yield and quality. J Agron. 2007; 6: 362-5.

[22] Colla G, Rouphael Y, Leonardi C, Bie ZL . Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Sci Hortic. 2010; 127: 147-55.

[23] Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Romero L . Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stress conditions. J Food Agric Environ. 2003; 1: 70-4.

[24] Dasgan HY, Akhoundnejad Y . The effectiveness of grafting to improve salt tolerance of sensitive melon when the tolerant melon is use as rootstock. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015; 29: 268-8.

[25] Etehadnia M, Waterer D, De Jong H, Tanino KK . Scion and rootstock effects on ABA-mediated plant growth regulation and salt tolerance of acclimated and unacclimated potato genotypes. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008; 27: 125-40.

[26] Camalle MD, Sikron N, Zurgil U et al. Does scion-rootstock compatibility modulate photoassimilate and hormone trafficking through the graft junction in melon-pumpkin graft combinations? Plant Sci . 2021; 306: 110852.

[27] Tietel Z, Srivastava S, Fait A et al. Impact of scion/rootstock reciprocal effects on metabolomics of fruit juice and phloem sap in grafted Citrus reticulata. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0227192.

[28] Huang WJ, Liao SH, Lv HY et al. Characterization of the growth and fruit quality of tomato grafted on a woody medicinal plant, Lycium chinense . Sci Hortic. 2015; 197: 447-53.

[29] Zombardo A, Crosatti C, Bagnaresi P et al. Transcriptomic and biochemical investigations support the role of rootstock-scion interaction in grapevine berry quality. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 468.

[30] Kumar P, Edelstein M, Cardarelli M et al. Grafting affects growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and partitioning under cadmium stress in tomato. HortScience. 2015; 50: 1654-61.

[31] Gratao PL, Monteiro CC, Tezotto T et al. Cadmium stress antioxidant responses and root-to-shoot communication in grafted tomato plants. Biometals. 2015; 28: 803-16.

[32] Faria-Silva L, Gallon CZ, Silva DM . Photosynthetic performance is determined by scion/rootstock combination in mango seedling propagation. Sci Hortic. 2020; 265: 109247.

[33] Ntatsi G, Savvas D, Ntatsi G et al. Growth, yield, and metabolic responses of temperature-stressed tomato to grafting onto rootstocks differing in cold tolerance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2014; 139: 230-43.

[34] Grieneisen ML, Aegerter BJ, Stoddard CS, Zhang MH . Yield and fruit quality of grafted tomatoes, and their potential for soil fumigant use reduction. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev. 2018; 38: 29.

[35] Singh H, Kumar P, Kumar A, Kyriacou MC . Grafting tomato as a tool to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 263.

[36] Santa-Cruz A, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F et al. The rootstock effect on the tomato salinity response depends on the shoot genotype. Plant Sci. 2002; 162: 825-31.

[37] Fernández-Garcí N, Martínez V, Cerdá A, Carvajal M . Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2004; 79: 995-1001.

[38] Albacete A, Martínez-Andújar C, Ghanem ME et al. Rootstock-mediated changes in xylem ionic and hormonal status are correlated with delayed leaf senescence, and increased leaf area and crop productivity in salinized tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2009; 32: 928-38.

[39] He Y, Zhu ZJ, Yang J et al. Grafting increases the salt tolerance of tomato by improvement of photosynthesis and enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activity. Environ Exp Bot. 2009; 66: 270-8.

[40] Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Estañ MT, Moyano E et al. The effectiveness of grafting to improve salt tolerance in tomato when an ’excluder’ genotype is used as scion. Environ Exp Bot. 2008; 63: 392-401.

[41] Fan ML, Bie ZL, Krumbein A, Schwarz D. Salinity stress in tomatoes can be alleviated by grafting and potassium depending on the rootstock and K-concentration employed. Sci Hortic. 2011;130:615-23.

[42] Fernie AR, Schauer N . Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement? Trends Genet . 2009; 25: 39-48.

[43] Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 447-54.

[44] Rosental L, Perelman A, Nevo N et al. Environmental and genetic effects on tomato seed metabolic balance and its association with germination vigor. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17: 1047.

[45] Xu S, Xu Y, Gong L, Zhang Q . Metabolomic prediction of yield in hybrid rice. Plant J. 2016; 88: 219-27.

[46] Dan Z, Hu J, Zhou W et al. Metabolic prediction of important agronomic traits in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) . Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 21732.

[47] Toubiana D, Puzis R, Wen L et al. Combined network analysis and machine learning allows the prediction of metabolic pathways from tomato metabolomics data. Commun Biol. 2019; 2: 214.

[48] Fait A, Fernie A . A role for metabolomics in marker-assisted breeding for crop compositional traits? Acta Hortic . 2008; 817: 101-12.

[49] Siddiqui MH, Alamri SA, Al-Khaishany MY et al. Exogenous application of nitric oxide and spermidine reduces the negative effects of salt stress on tomato. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2017; 58: 537-47.

[50] Cao K, Yu J, Xu D et al. Exposure to lower red to far-red light ratios improve tomato tolerance to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 92.

[51] Donald C, Hamblin J . The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv Agron. 1976; 28: 361-405.

[52] Luo X, Yue Y, Hu K et al. Unravelling the complex trait of harvest index in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) with association mapping . BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 379.

[53] Wang T, Tang L, Lin R et al. Individual variability in human urinary metabolites identifies age-related, body mass index-related, and sex-related biomarkers. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021; 9: e1738.

[54] Blanca J, Cañizares J, Cordero L et al. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48198.

[55] Blanca J, Montero-Pau J, Sauvage C et al. Genomic variation in tomato, from wild ancestors to contemporary breeding accessions. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 257.

[56] Slama I, Abdelly C, Bouchereau A et al. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Ann Bot. 2015; 115: 433-47.

[57] De la Torre-Gonzalez A, Montesinos-Pereira D, Blasco B, Ruiz JM . Influence of the proline metabolism and glycine betaine on tolerance to salt stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) commercial genotypes . J Plant Physiol. 2018; 231: 329-36.

[58] Annunziata MG, Ciarmiello LF, Woodrow P et al. Durum wheat roots adapt to salinity remodeling the cellular content of nitrogen metabolites and sucrose. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 2035.

[59] Zhang Y, Ma F, Wang Y . Forecasting crude oil prices with a large set of predictors: can LASSO select powerful predictors? J Empir Financ. 2019; 54: 97-117.

[60] Hay RKM . Harvest index - a review of its use in plant-breeding and crop physiology. Ann Appl Biol. 1995; 126: 197-216.

[61] Sinclair TR . Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci. 1998; 38: 638-43.

[62] Mauro RP, Agnello M, Distefano M et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis and growth of tomato plants as affected by long-term oxygen root zone deprivation and grafting. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 137.

[63] Papadaki AM, Bletsos FA, Eleftherohorinos IG et al. Effectiveness of seven commercial rootstocks against verticillium wilt and their effects on growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomato. Crop Prot. 2017; 102: 25-31.

[64] Albacete A, Andújar C, Dodd I et al. Rootstock-mediated variation in tomato vegetative growth under drought, salinity and soil impedance stresses. Acta Hortic. 2014; 1086: 141-6.

[65] Voutsela S, Yarsi G, Petropoulos SA, Khan EM . The effect of grafting of five different rootstocks on plant growth and yield of tomato plants cultivated outdoors and indoors under salinity stress. Afr J Agric Res. 2012; 7: 5553- 7.

[66] Mauro RP, Agnello M, Onofri A et al. Scion and rootstock differently influence growth, yield and quality characteristics of cherry tomato. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9: 1725.

[67] Conesa MA et al. Growth capacity in wild tomatoes and relatives correlates with original climate in arid and semi-arid species. Environ Exp Bot. 2017; 141: 181-90.

[68] Zhu G, Wang S, Huang Z et al. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell. 2018; 172: 249-61.

[69] Lin T, Zhu G, Zhang J et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat Genet. 2014; 46: 1220-6.

[70] Bandehagh A, Taylor NL . Can alternative metabolic pathways and shunts overcome salinity induced inhibition of central carbon metabolism in crops? Front Plant Sci . 2020; 11: 1072.

[71] Munns R, Gilliham M . Salinity tolerance of crops - what is the cost? New Phytol . 2015; 208: 668-73.

[72] Amthor JS . The McCree-de wit-penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Ann Bot. 2000; 86: 1-20.

[73] Hauben M, Haesendonckx B, Standaert E et al. Energy use efficiency is characterized by an epigenetic component that can be directed through artificial selection to increase yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 20109-14.

[74] Osorio S, Ruan YL, Fernie AR . An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 516.

[75] Zhang YJ, Fernie AR . On the role of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in plant productivity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018; 60: 1199-216.

[76] Hildebrandt TM, Nunes Nesi A, Araujo WL, Braun HP . Amino acid catabolism in plants. Mol Plant. 2015; 8: 1563-79.

[77] Carillo P. GABA shunt in durum wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 100.

[78] Fait A, Fromm H, Walter D et al. Highway or byway: the metabolic role of the GABA shunt in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2008; 13: 14-9.

[79] Munns R, Day DA, Fricke W et al. Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants. New Phytol. 2020; 225: 1072-90.

[80] van Zelm E, Zhang Y, Testerink C . Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2020; 71: 403-33.

[81] Munns R, Passioura JB, Colmer TD, Byrt CS . Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil. New Phytol. 2020; 225: 1091-6.

[82] Shen W, Wei Y, Dauk M et al. Involvement of a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in modulating the NADH/NAD⁺ ratio provides evidence of a mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 422-41.

[83] Chen X, Snyder CL, Truksa M et al. Sn-Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011; 6: 1695-9.

[84] Green MA, Fry SC . Vitamin C degradation in plant cells via enzymatic hydrolysis of 4- O-oxalyl-L-threonate . Nature. 2005; 433: 83-7.

[85] Truffault V, Fry SC, Stevens RG, Gautier H . Ascorbate degradation in tomato leads to accumulation of oxalate, threonate and oxalyl threonate. Plant J. 2017; 89: 996-1008.

[86] Barros J, Escamilla-Trevino L, Song L et al. 4-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase in the lignin biosynthesis pathway is a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 1994.

[87] Hur M, Campbell AA, Almeida-de-Macedo M et al. A global approach to analysis and interpretation of metabolic data for plant natural product discovery. Nat Prod Rep. 2013; 30: 565-83.

[88] Liu YH, Xu Y, Zhang M et al. Accurate prediction of a quantitative trait using the genes controlling the trait for gene-based breeding in cotton. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 583277.

[89] Gemmer MR, Richter C, Jiang Y et al. Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? PLoS One . 2020; 15: e0234052.

[90] Desta ZA, Ortiz R . Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 19: 592-601.

[91] Spindel JE, Begum H, Akdemir D et al. Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement . Heredity. 2016; 116: 395-408.

[92] Haghverdi A, Washington-Allen RA, Leib BG . Prediction of cotton lint yield from phenology of crop indices using artificial neural networks. Comput Electron Agric. 2018; 152: 186-97.

[93] Zhang M, Liu Y-H, Xu W et al. Analysis of the genes controlling three quantitative traits in three diverse plant species reveals the molecular basis of quantitative traits. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 10074.

[94] Crossa J, de Los Campos G, Pérez P et al. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics. 2010; 186: 713-24.

[95] Yamamoto E, Matsunaga H, Onogi A et al. Efficiency of genomic selection for breeding population design and phenotype prediction in tomato. Heredity. 2017; 118: 202-9.

[96] Cappetta E, Andolfo G, Di Matteo A et al. Accelerating tomato breeding by exploiting genomic selection approaches. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9: 1236.

[97] Islam MS, Fang DD, Jenkins JN et al. Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in upland cotton. Mol Gen Genomics. 2020; 295: 67-79.

[98] Reif JC, Zhao YS, Wurschum T et al. Genomic prediction of sunflower hybrid performance. Plant Breed. 2013; 132: 107-14.

[99] Frisch M, Thiemann A, Fu J et al. Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Theor Appl Genet. 2010; 120: 441-50.

[100] Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C et al. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 217-20.

[101] Dan Z, Chen Y, Xu Y et al. A metabolome-based core hybridisation strategy for the prediction of rice grain weight across environments. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 906-13.

[102] Chen W, Gao Y, Xie W et al. Genome-wide association analyses provide genetic and biochemical insights into natural variation in rice metabolism. Nat Genet. 2014; 46: 714-21.

[103] Toubiana D, Cabrera R, Salas E et al. Morphological and metabolic profiling of a tropical-adapted potato association panel subjected to water recovery treatment reveals new insights into plant vigor. Plant J. 2020; 103: 2193-210.

[104] Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I et al. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell. 2008; 20: 509-23.

[105] Shamshiri RR, Jones JW, Thorp KR et al. Review of optimum temperature, humidity, and vapour pressure deficit for microclimate evaluation and control in greenhouse cultivation of tomato: a review. Int Agrophys. 2018; 32: 287-302.

[106] Heath RL, Packer L . Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968; 125: 189-98.

[107] Fernie AR, Aharoni A, Willmitzer L et al. Recommendations for reporting metabolite data. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2477-82.

[108] Lisec J, Schauer N, Kopka J et al. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1: 387-96.

[109] Reshef N, Fait A, Agam N . Grape berry position affects the diurnal dynamics of its metabolic profile. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 1897-912.

[110] Fan S, Kind T, Cajka T et al. Systematic error removal using random forest for normalizing large-scale untargeted lipidomics data. Anal Chem. 2019; 91: 3590-6.

[111] Tibshirani R . Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol. 1996; 58: 267-88.

[112] Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010; 33: 1-22.

[113] North BV, Curtis D, Sham PC . A note on the calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedures. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71: 439-41.

[114] Revelle WR . Psych: procedures for personality and psychological researchR package version 2.0.12 Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. 2020.

[115] Wei T, Simko V . R package “corrplot”: visualization of a correlation matrix (version 0.84). 2017.

[116] Kassambara A, Mundt F . Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analysesR package version 1.0.7.1. 2017; 337-54.

[117] Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M . Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016; 32: 2847-9.

[118] Ginestet C . ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis . Wiley Online Library; 2011.

[119] Oliveros JV . An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams 2007-2015. 2016.

[120] Team, R.D.C. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2020.