Functional analysis of the eTM-miR171-SCL6 module regulating somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is of great significance in Lilium bulb production, germplasm preservation, and genetic improvement. miRNAs are important regulators of plant growth and development at the transcriptional level. Previous research by our group has shown that lpu-miR171 and its target gene SCARECROW-LIKE 6 (SCL6) play an important regulatory role in lily SE, and we predicted and identified that endogenous target mimics (eTMs) can regulate lpu-miR171. However, the associated mechanism and internal regulatory network are not yet clear. In the present study, lpu-miR171 was used as an entry point to explore the regulatory network between its upstream eTMs and its downstream target gene LpSCL6, as well as to identify the mechanism of this regulatory network in Lilium SE. Tobacco transient transformation confirmed that miRNA171 significantly inhibited the expression of LpSCL6. On this basis, the Lilium stable genetic transformation system was used to demonstrate that silencing lpu-miR171a and lpu-miR171b and overexpressing LpSCL6-II and LpSCL6-I promoted starch accumulation in calli and the expression of key cell cycle genes, thus providing energy to meet preconditions for SE and accelerate the formation and development of Lilium somatic embryos. LpSCL6-II and LpSCL6-I are nuclear proteins with self-activation activity in yeast cells. In addition, we confirmed in Lilium that lpu-eTM171 is the eTM of lpu-miR171 that binds lpu-miR171 to prevent cleavage of the target gene LpSCL6, thereby promoting SE. Therefore, the present study established a new mechanism whereby the eTM-miR171- SCL6 module regulates SE in Lilium pumilum and provides new insights clarifying the mechanism of SE.

References

[1] Bakhshaie M, Babalar M, Mirmasoumi M et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss., an endangered species . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010; 102: 229-35.

[2] Bartel DP . MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009; 136: 215-33.

[3] Luo Y, Zhou H, Li Y et al. Rice embryogenic calli express a unique set of microRNAs, suggesting regulatory roles of microRNAs in plant post-embryogenic development. FEBS Lett. 2006; 580: 5111-6.

[4] Wu X, Kou SJ, Liu YL et al. Genomewide analysis of small RNAs in nonembryogenic and embryogenic tissues of citrus: microRNA- and siRNA-mediated transcript cleavage involved in somatic embryogenesis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 13: 383-94.

[5] Long JM, Liu C-Y, Feng M-Q et al. miR156- SPL modules regulate induction of somatic embryogenesis in citrus callus . J Exp Bot. 2018; 69: 2979-93.

[6] Zhang J, Zhang S, Han S et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in larch and stage-specific modulation of 11 conserved microRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis. Planta. 2012; 236: 647-57.

[7] Li W, Zhang S-G, Han S-Y et al. Regulation of LaMYB33 by miR159 during maintenance of embryogenic potential and somatic embryo maturation in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013; 113: 131-6.

[8] Li W, Zhang S-G, Han S-Y et al. The post-transcriptional regulation of LaSCL6 by miR171 during maintenance of embryogenic potential in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014; 10: 223-9.

[9] Yang X, Wang L, Yuan D et al. Small RNA and degradome sequencing reveal complex miRNA regulation during cotton somatic embryogenesis. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 1521-36.

[10] Chavez-Hernandez EC, Alejandri-Ramirez ND, Juarez-Gonzalez VT et al. Maize miRNA and target regulation in response to hormone depletion and light exposure during somatic embryogenesis. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 555-5.

[11] Lin Y, Lai Z-X, Lin L et al. Endogenous target mimics, microRNA167, and its targets ARF6 and ARF8 during somatic embryo development in Dimocarpus longan Lour. Mol Breed. 2015; 35: 1-15.

[12] Lin Y, Lai Z . Comparative analysis reveals dynamic changes in miRNAs and their targets and expression during somatic embryogenesis in longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) . PLoS One. 2013; 8: e60337.

[13] Li H, Zhang J, Yang Y et al. miR171 and its target gene SCL6 contribute to embryogenic callus induction and torpedo-shaped embryo formation during somatic embryogenesis in two lily species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017; 130: 591-600.

[14] Zhu X, Leng X, Sun X et al. Discovery of conservation and diversification of miR171 genes by phylogenetic analysis based on global genomes. Plant Genome. 2015; 8.

[15] Fan T, Li X, Yang W et al. Rice Osa-miR171c mediates phase change from vegetative to reproductive development and shoot apical meristem maintenance by repressing four OsHAM transcription factors. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0125833.

[16] Zhai L, Xu L, Wang Y et al. Genome-wide identification of embryogenesis-associated microRNAs in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) by high-throughput sequencing . Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014; 32: 900-15.

[17] Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M et al. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 1033-7.

[18] Wu HJ, Wang ZM, Wang M et al. Widespread long noncoding RNAs as endogenous target mimics for microRNAs in plants. Plant Physiol. 2013; 161: 1875-84.

[19] Meng Y, Shao C, Wang H et al. Target mimics: an embedded layer of microRNA-involved gene regulatory networks in plants. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 197-7.

[20] Kravchik M, Stav R, Belausov E et al. Functional characterization of microRNA171 family in tomato. Plants. 2019; 8: 10.

[21] Ye C, Xu H, Shen E et al. Genome-wide identification of non-coding RNAs interacted with microRNAs in soybean. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 743.

[22] Wang J, Yu W, Yang Y et al. Genome-wide analysis of tomato long non-coding RNAs and identification as endogenous target mimic for microRNA in response to TYLCV infection. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 16946.

[23] Li F, Wang W, Zhao N et al. Regulation of nicotine biosynthesis by an endogenous target mimicry of microRNA in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 1062-71.

[24] Lin Y, Lai Z, Tian Q et al. Endogenous target mimics down-regulate miR160 mediation of ARF10, -16, and -17 cleavage during somatic embryogenesis in Dimocarpus longan Lour. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 956.

[25] Zhang J, Xue B, Gai M et al. Small RNA and transcriptome sequencing reveal a potential miRNA-mediated interaction network that functions during somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 566.

[26] Li H, Wang J, Yan R et al. Functional characterization of the MiR171a promoter and endogenous target mimics identification in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020; 144: 345-57.

[27] Zhang J, Gai M, Li X et al. Somatic embryogenesis and direct as well as indirect organogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch., an endangered ornamental and medicinal plant. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2016; 80: 1898-906.

[28] Tang G, Yan J, Gu Y et al. Construction of short tandem target mimic (STTM) to block the functions of plant and animal microRNAs. Methods. 2012; 58: 118-25.

[29] Yan R, Wang Z, Ren Y et al. Establishment of efficient genetic transformation systems and application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. and Lilium longiflorum White Heaven . Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20: 2920.

[30] Jiang N, Cui J, Shi Y et al. Tomato lncRNA23468 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to modulate NBS-LRR genes by decoying miR482b in the tomato- Phytophthora infestans interaction . Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 28.

[31] Zhang J, Gai MZ, Xue BY et al. The use of miRNAs as reference genes for miRNA expression normalization during Lilium somatic embryogenesis by real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017; 129: 105-18.

[32] Fu L, Zhu Y, Li M et al. Autopolyploid induction via somatic embryogenesis in Lilium distichum Nakai and Lilium cernuum Komar. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019; 139: 237-48.

[33] Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD et al. Cleavage of Scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science. 2002; 297: 2053-6.

[34] Yin J, Wong W, Jang I et al. Co-expression of peppermint geranyl diphosphate synthase small subunit enhances monoterpene production in transgenic tobacco plants. New Phytol. 2017; 213: 1133-44.

[35] Feng H, Zhang Q, Wang Q et al. Target of tae-miR408, a chemocyanin-like protein gene (TaCLP1), plays positive roles in wheat response to high-salinity, heavy cupric stress and stripe rust . Plant Mol Biol. 2013; 83: 433-43.

[36] Han L, Weng K, Ma H et al. Identification and characterization of Erysiphe necator-responsive microRNAs in Chinese wild Vitis pseudoreticulata by high-throughput sequencing . Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 621.

[37] Nikovics K, Blein T, Peaucelle A et al. The balance between the MIR164A and CUC2 genes controls leaf margin serration in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 2929-45.

[38] Adam H, Marguerettaz M, Qadri R et al. Divergent expression patterns of miR164 and CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON genes in palms and other monocots: implication for the evolution of meristem function in angiosperms . Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 1439-54.

[39] Wang L, Mai Y, Zhang Y et al. MicroRNA171c-targeted SCL6-II, SCL6-III, and SCL6-IV genes regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis . Mol Plant. 2010; 3: 794-806.

[40] Hai BZ, Qiu Z, He Y et al. Characterization and primary functional analysis of Pinus densata miR171. Biol Plant. 2018; 62: 318-24.

[41] Engstrom EM, Andersen CM, Gumulak-Smith J et al. Arabidopsis homologs of the petunia hairy meristem gene are required for maintenance of shoot and root indeterminacy . Plant Physiol. 2011; 155: 735-50.

[42] Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW et al. MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev. 2002; 16: 1616-26.

[43] Schulze S, Schafer BN, Parizotto EA et al. Lost meristems genes regulate cell differentiation of central zone descendants in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Plant J. 2010; 64: 668-78.

[44] Parizotto EA, Dunoyer P, Rahm N et al. In vivo investigation of the transcription, processing, endonucleolytic activity, and functional relevance of the spatial distribution of a plant miRNA. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2237-42.

[45] Yang W, Fan T, Hu X et al. Overexpressing Osa-miR171c decreases salt stress tolerance in rice. J Plant Biol. 2017; 60: 485-92.

[46] Wang Y, Feng C, Zhai Z et al. The apple microR171i- SCARECROW-LIKE PROTEINS26.1 module enhances drought stress tolerance by integrating ascorbic acid metabolism . Plant Physiol. 2020; 184: 194-211.

[47] Zhang S, Zhou J, Han S et al. Four abiotic stress-induced miRNA families differentially regulated in the embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus tissues of Larix leptolepis . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010; 398: 355-60.

[48] Scofield S, Jones A, Murray JAH . The plant cell cycle in context. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 2557-62.

[49] Jun SE, Okushima Y, Nam J et al. Kip-related protein 3 is required for control of endoreduplication in the shoot apical meristem and leaves of Arabidopsis . Mol Cells. 2013; 35: 47-53.

[50] Vale EM, Reis RS, Passamani LZ et al. Morphological analyses and variation in carbohydrate content during the maturation of somatic embryos of Carica papaya . Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018; 24: 295-305.

[51] Yang Y, Gao T, Xu M et al. Functional analysis of a wheat AGPase plastidial small subunit with a truncated transit peptide. Molecules. 2017; 22: 386.

[52] Zhang H, Jang S-G, Lar SM et al. Genome-wide identification and genetic variations of the starch synthase gene family in rice. Plants. 2021; 10: 1154.

[53] Fulton DC, Stettler M, Mettler T et al. Beta-AMYLASE4, a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown, acts upstream of three active beta-amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell. 2008; 20: 1040-58.

[54] Jia X, Ding N, Fan W et al. Functional plasticity of miR165/166 in plant development revealed by small tandem target mimic. Plant Sci. 2015; 233: 11-21.

[55] Jiao J, Wang Y, Selvaraj JN et al. Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) induced microRNA silencing in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) . PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0126621.